1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 2:Comparison of imaging metrics in patients with relapsing-remitting and progressive multiple sclerosis
RRMS Lesions PMS Lesions RRMS NAWM PMS NAWM RRMS vs PMS Lesions (P Value) RRMS vs PMS NAWM (P Value) AVF 0.18 ± 0.04 0.14 ± 0.02 0.24 ± 0.02 0.22 ± 0.02 .006a .06 MVF 0.18 ± 0.03 0.13 ± 0.03 0.26 ± 0.02 0.22 ± 0.03 .001a .01a G-ratio 0.72 ± 0.05 0.78 ± 0.07 0.67 ± 0.02 0.68 ± 0.04 .13 .39
↵a Significance following Bonferroni correction.