1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 3:Influence of angioarchitectural features on the treatment success—summary and univariate models
Angioarchitectural Feature, Treatment Success Rate P Value (Univariate Analysis) Location Transverse/Sigmoid Sinus, 80.4% Tentorial/Petrosal, 72.0% Superior Sagittal Sinus, 95.0% Torcular, 100% Anterior Cranial Fossa, 83.3% Sphenoparietal Sinus, 75.0% .084 Cognard type I, 60.0% IIa, 75.0% IIb, 100% IIa+b 70.0% III, 96.4% IV, 80.4% .047a Borden type I, 66.7% II, 76.9% III, 86.1% .144 Venous drainage Into dural venous sinus, 71.4% Directly into cortical veins, 85.4% .099 Presence of cortical venous reflux Yes, 85.9% No, 61.1% .013 No. of feeding arteries <10, 92.6% ≥10, 71.4% .004a Bilateral feeders Yes, 83.3% No, 80.4% .686 Pial artery supply Yes, 77.8% No, 83.1% .531 Involvement of the middle meningeal artery Yes, 80.2% No, 92.9% .252 Involvement of the occipital artery Yes, 80.7% No, 85.2% .602 Involvement of the internal carotid arteryb Yes, 70.7% No, 88.4% .020a Involvement of the vertebral arteryb Yes, 75.6% No, 85.5% .193 Involvement of the superficial temporal artery Yes, 81.3% No, 82.1% .921 Involvement of the ascending pharyngeal artery Yes, 61.5% No, 88.1% .002a