1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 4:Preprocedural hemodynamic qualitative inflow zone at the aneurysm neck
Response 6-Month Follow-Up 12-Month Follow-Up Remnant (n = 19) Occlusion (n = 21) Remnant (n = 10) Occlusion (n = 30) Proximal neck 11 3 6 8 Lateral side + distal neck 7 + 1 12 + 6 4 + 0 15 + 7 χ2 analysis (P value) Significant difference (.004) No significant difference (.13)