1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 2:Performance of HR-VWI versus DSA in assessing tandem occlusion and suitability for recanalization of ICAa
DSA HR-VWI Present Absent Suitable Unsuitable HR-VWI present 18 (40.0%) 0 (0.0%) 4 (8.9%) 14 (31.1%) HR-VWI absent 16 (35.6%) 11 (24.4%) 27 (60.0%) 0 (0.0%) DSA (suitability for recanalization) Suitable 9 (20.0%) 11 (24.4%) 20 (44.4%) 0 (0.0%) Unsuitable 25 (55.6%) 0 (0.0%) 11 (24.4%) 14 (31.1%)
↵a “Present” means tandem occlusion–positive; “Absent” means tandem occlusion–negative. The table shows the proportional relationship between the presence of tandem occlusion and the suitablity for recanalization. The percentage was calculated on the basis of a total number of patients of 45.