1naresh

Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1nareshArray
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)

Table 1: Angiographic findings in carotid near-occlusion
Findings n (%)
Near-occlusion with collapse 11 (18.6)
Delayed arrival of contrast medium in the distal ICA 53 (89.8)
Evidence of intracranial collateral 47 (79.7)
Reduced ICA diameter compared with the contralateral ICA diameter^{^a} 56 (100)
Reduced ICA diameter compared with the ipsilateral ECA diameter 53 (89.8)
↵a Not applicable in 3 patients because of contralateral total occlusion or near-occlusion with collapse.

Findings	n (%)
Near-occlusion with collapse	11 (18.6)
Delayed arrival of contrast medium in the distal ICA	53 (89.8)
Evidence of intracranial collateral	47 (79.7)
Reduced ICA diameter compared with the contralateral ICA diameter^{^a}	56 (100)
Reduced ICA diameter compared with the ipsilateral ECA diameter	53 (89.8)