1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 4:Interrater reliability between 2 raters
MR Imaging Finding κ Pituitary height 0.8326 Stalk thickness 0.9136 Homogeneity of enhancement 1 Hypoenhancing lesion 0.6429a Shape 0.8535 Signal intensity in T2WI 0.8077 Location (AP) 1 Location (RL) 0.8462 Pattern of enhancement 1
Note:—AP indicates anterior-posterior; RL, right-left.
↵a The difference in judgment between the 2 raters was observed only in 1 case (rater 1, 19/20 versus rater 2, 18/20); this was subsequently arbitrated by a third radiologist as positive for a hypoenhancing lesion.