1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 3:Number of samples of each WHO gradea
Sample Grade No. of Samples Cell Density (Mean) (SD) Normalb 3 1777 [SD, 371] II 39 5790 [SD, 2667] II/III 3 6085 [SD, 2022] IIIc 2 2584, 14,634 IV 5 11,547 [SD, 4252]
↵a The grade of a sample is not necessarily the same as the patient’s clinical grade. As expected, the cell density of the samples increases with increasing sample grade.
↵b These samples appeared histologically tumor-free but showed Ki-67-positive endothelial cells.
↵c Because only 2 samples were grade III, the values are listed.