1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)


Table 2: 
Contingency table of residual/recurrent DAVF grading according to technique (4D-MRA and DSA)a
DSA4D-MRA
No ShuntType IbType IIabType IIbcType IIa+bcType IIIcType IVcType Vc
No shunt280001000
Type Ib13000000
Type IIab10300000
Type IIbc00100000
Type IIa + bc00000000
Type IIIc40000430
Type IVc10000000
Type Vc10000000
  • ↵a Consensus grading according to Cognard et al.5
  • ↵b Low bleeding risk.
  • ↵c High bleeding risk.