1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 2:Likelihood ratio analysis of the radiologic flow chart to discriminate different types of cerebellar tumors
Diagnosis Flow Chart Sequence LR+ (95% CI) LR– (95% CI) AT/RT 411/311 34 (10.6–109)a 0.26 (0.1–0.7) Ependymoma 323/423 16.5 (7.9–35) 0.11 (0.03–0.4)a Medulloblastoma SHH 111/112/313 10.6 (5.2–21.7) 0.3 (0.1–0.7) Medulloblastoma group 3 or 4 312 10.07 (5.3–19.3) 0.23 (0.12–0.45)a Pilocytic astrocytoma 123 20 (7.7–52.8) 0.13 (0.13–0.26)a
↵a Clinically applicable confidence intervals.