1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 1:Assessment of methodologic quality of the 11 included studies using criteria described by Murad et al7
Study Selection Ascertainment Causality Reporting Do the patients represent the whole experience of the investigator?a Was the exposure adequately ascertained? Was the outcome adequately ascertained?b Were other alternative causes that may explain the observation ruled out? Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur?b Are the cases described with sufficient detail? Weinberg et al8 2020 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Pons et al6 2020 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Saito et al9 2020 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Kuhn et al10 2020 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Goland et al11 2019 NR NR Yes No No No Patel et al12 2019 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Brunet et al13 2019 Yes Yes Yes Yes No No
Note:—NR indicates not reported.
↵a This criterion was met if authors reported consecutive series of patients.
↵b Follow-up was considered sufficient if authors reported any delayed follow-up after the procedure in the form of telephone interviews, clinical examinations, or sonography evaluations of the distal radial artery.