1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 2:Comparison of transradial (n = 20) and transfemoral (n = 20) cohorts
Transradial Neuroangiography (n = 20) Transfemoral Neuroangiography (n = 20) P Value Conversion rate to another site (%) 0 0 1.0 Fluoroscopy time (mean) (min) 33.7 (SD, 40.2) 23.3 (SD, 26.2) .34 Total radiation dose (mean) (Gy × cm2) 150.9 (SD, 133.7) 122.9 (SD, 79.7) .43 Complications, grade I (No.) 2 0 .15 Complications, grades I–V (No.) 0 0 Readmissions (No.) 0 0 1.0