1naresh2naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) [37859563-7dcb-47f3-b0f6-139f38acb0c1] => Array ( [runtime-id] => 37859563-7dcb-47f3-b0f6-139f38acb0c1 [type] => toll-free-key [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [9f759644-9166-4989-91cf-b95b0f631683] => Array ( [runtime-id] => 9f759644-9166-4989-91cf-b95b0f631683 [type] => toll-free-key ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => toll-free-key [value] => tf_ipsecsha;2b16f67e7a789904a0bc072b7b4733ce0276908d ) ) ) 1naresh2nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) [37859563-7dcb-47f3-b0f6-139f38acb0c1] => Array ( [runtime-id] => 37859563-7dcb-47f3-b0f6-139f38acb0c1 [type] => toll-free-key [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [9f759644-9166-4989-91cf-b95b0f631683] => Array ( [runtime-id] => 9f759644-9166-4989-91cf-b95b0f631683 [type] => toll-free-key ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => toll-free-key [value] => tf_ipsecsha;2b16f67e7a789904a0bc072b7b4733ce0276908d ) ) )Table 4:Spearman rank correlation coefficients of the lesion variation in size compared with baseline MR imagesa
Measurement Method Spearman Correlation Coefficient (95% CI) Longest 1D vs axial 1D 0.890 Longest 1D vs RECIST 0.898 Longest 1D vs 2D 0.962 Longest 1D vs 3D 0.918 Axial 1D vs RECIST 0.796 Axial 1D vs 2D 0.872 Axial 1D vs 3D 0.831 RECIST vs 2D 0.847 RECIST vs 3D 0.794 2D vs 3D 0.980
↵a Cubic roots and square roots were applied for 3D and 2D measurements, respectively.