1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 3:Radiologic outcomes
Aneurysm Occlusion Classification Values Immediate postprocedural (No.) (%) RR I 38 (57.6) RR II 13 (19.7) RR III 15 (22.7) Follow-up occlusion (median, 12.1 mo) (No.) (%) RR I 51 (87.9) RR II 4 (6.9) RR III 3 (5.2) Recurrence (No.) (%) 2 (3.4%)a In-stent stenosis (No.) (%) 0 (0%)
↵a Neither of these patients required retreatment.