1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 2:Counts of cases excluded due to technical failures and the presence of ipsilateral extracranial carotid artery stenosis, derived from DSA dataa
No. of Cases Total CTP before CTA CTA before CTP CTP with Flank Effect Total 2074 393 1628 53 Excluded due to technical issues 94 (4.5%) 25 (6.3%) 65 (4.0%) 4 (7.5%) Finally used in evaluation 1980 368 1563 49 With subsequent DSA 387 (20%) 76 (21%) 300 (19%) 11 (22%) With ICA stenosis identified in DSA 86 (22%) 21 (28%) 62 (21%) 3 (27%)
↵a Data are the number of cases (percentage). Relative counts of technical failures and the presence of higher-grade carotid stenosis are similar in all groups