1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 3:Kinetic permeability metrics of jugular foramen tumorsa
Ve SER Kep Vp Ktrans Paraganglioma 0.06 (SD, 0.17) 148.1 (SD, 23.1) 0.46 (SD, 0.78) 0.47 (SD, 0.19) 0.08 (SD, 0.22) Schwannoma 0.53 (SD, 0.25) 61.5 (SD, 19.6) 0.55 (SD, 0.32) 0.087 (SD, 0.81) 0.29 (SD, 0.28) P value <.001 <.001 .77 <.001 .10
↵a There is a statistically significant difference between paragangliomas and schwannomas when comparing their values for VE, SER, and VP. Data are means unless otherwise indicated.