1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 2:Differences in prevalence of a TRFC between proximal and distal regions
Longitudinal Distance from Section with Narrowest Lumen (mm) No. of Slices Where Proximal and Distal Sections Are Available TRFC (No.) (%) Proximal Region TRFC (No.) (%) Distal Region P Value 2 63 28 (33.7) 15 (18.1) .007 4 56 30 (36.1) 6 (7.2) <.001 6 43 28 (33.7) 2 (2.4) .001 8 38 25 (30.1) 3 (3.6) .022 10 33 16 (19.3) 0 (0) 1.0