1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 3:Rate of correctly classified diagnoses for each disease condition comparing the conventional reading and the reading with automated coregistration
Conventional Reading Reading with Automated Coregistration P Value Follow-up pairs with disease progression 81.7% (49/60) 93.3% (56/60) .07 Follow-up pairs with disease regression 81.7% (49/60) 100.0% (60/60) .003 Follow-up pairs with mixed changes 50.0% (31/62) 88.7% (55/62) <.001 Follow-up pairs with stable disease 83.3% (50/60) 83.3% (50/60) .77 All disease conditions 74.0% (179/242) 91.3% (221/242) <.001