1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 1:Comparison of clinical and imaging characteristics between recurrent and matched primary plaquesa
Recurrent Plaques Primary Plaques P Value Patient characteristicsb Age 75.8 (SD, 9.5) 74.3 (SD, 11.4) .736 Male 6 (60.0%) 25 (68.8%) .727 Hypertension 9 (90.0%) 29 (76.3%) .664 Hyperlipidemia 8 (80.0%) 23 (60.5%) .459 Diabetes 0 (0.0%) 7 (18.4%) .318 Plaque characteristicsc Plaque components Lipid core 12 (92.3%) 32 (82.1%) .662 Fibrous cap 12 (92.3%) 32 (82.1%) .662 Calcification 9 (69.2%) 31 (79.5%) .466 IPH 8 (61.5%) 12 (30.8%) .048d Ulceration 8 (61.5%) 20 (51.3%) .521 Maximum wall thickness (mm) 4.12 (SD, 1.74) 4.41 (SD, 1.50) .562 Remodeling ratio 1.57 (SD, 0.57) 1.49 (SD, 0.50) .662 Lesion length (cm) 2.26 (SD, 1.12) 1.47 (SD, 0.54) .001d Adventitial enhancement .358 Category 0 5 (38.5%) 7 (17.9%) Category 1 3 (23.1%) 14 (35.9%) Category 2 5 (38.5%) 18 (46.2%) Plaque position .002d Opposite flow divider 4 (30.8%) 31 (79.5%) Along flow divider/sidewalls 9 (69.2%) 8 (20.5%)