1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 1:Summary of included studies for aims 1 and 2
Study Imaging Technique Intervention vs Comparator Study Inclusion Aim 1 Intervention Characteristics Aim 2 Intervention Effectiveness 1) Ash et al, 200819 MR imaging Patients and physicians were blinded to imaging results vs standard care Yes Yes 2) Karran et al, 201822 CT or MR imaging Educational intervention vs standard spinal clinic consultation Yes Yes 3) Jarvik et al, 202021 Marcum et al, 202125Suri et al, 202126 X-ray, CT, or MR imaging Prevalence information in imaging report vs standard report Yes Yes 4) Rajasekaran et al, 202127 MR imaging Patients reassured imaging findings were normal vs factual explanation of imaging findings Yes Yes 5) Weeks et al, 202024 MR imaging Prevalence information in imaging report vs standard report Yes Yes 6) Fried et al, 201820 MR imaging Prevalence information in imaging report vs standard report Yes No 7) McCullough et al, 201223 MR imaging Prevalence information in imaging report vs standard report Yes No