1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 1:Characteristics of the 53 patients with fornix-fimbria DWI signal changes
Characteristics No. (%) Age Median 10 months Range 12 days to 22 months Sex Female 37 70 Male 16 30 MR imaging magnet 1.5T 9 17 3T 44 83 Follow-up studies Patients with a follow-up MR imaging 4 7.5 Common findings on MR imaginga Normal scan findings 20 47 Parenchymal volume loss 8 15
↵a Additional imaging findings were variable and included old infarcts, subdural collections, hydrocephalus, tuberous-sclerosis stigmata, and heterotopia.