1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 2:Comparison of lesion detectability according to the types of MR images and enhancing lesion size
Wave-T1-SPACE Standard SPACE Pa No. of enhancing lesions (<5 mm) (mean) Observer 1 1.61 (SD, 0.29) 2.84 (SD, 0.47) <.001 Observer 2 1.41 (SD, 0.19) 2.68 (SD, 0.43) <.001 Interobserver agreementb 0.72 (0.59–0.84) 0.81 (0.74–0.88) <.001 No. of enhancing lesions (>5 mm) (mean) Observer 1 1.34 (SD, 0.28) 1.32 (SD, 0.27) .66 Observer 2 1.29 (SD, 0.27) 1.29 (SD, 0.27) .26 Interobserver agreementb 0.95 (0.91–1.00) 1.00 (0.99–1.00) <.001