1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 2:Key features involved in thalamus L-sign injury compared with other thalamic injuries (nil and atypical)
Lobe/Structure Features Thalamus L-Sign (n = 85) Other (n = 14) Overall (n = 99) P Value Thalamus score (No.) (%) Not/less involved 77 (90.6) 14 (100.0) 91 (91.9) <.001 Markedly destroyed 8 (9.4) Parietal (No.) (%) Not involved 3 (3.5) 7 (50.0) 10 (10.1) <.001 Involved 82 (96.5) 7 (50.0) 89 (89.9) Occipital (No.) (%) Not involved 1 (1.2) 7 (50.0) 8 (8.1) <.001 Involved 84 (98.8) 7 (50.0) 91 (91.9) Frontal (No.) (%) Not involved 10 (11.8) 1 (7.1) 11 (11.1) 1.000 Involved 75 (88.2) 13 (92.9) 88 (88.9) Temporal (No.) (%) Not involved 9 (10.6) 6 (42.9) 15 (15.2) .007 Involved 76 (89.4) 8 (57.1) 84 (84.8) Cerebellum (No.) (%) Not involved 57 (67.1) 10 (71.4) 67 (67.7) 1.000 Involved 28 (32.9) 4 (28.6) 32 (32.3) Brainstem (No.) (%) Not involved 74 (87.1) 14 (100.0) 88 (88.9) .355 Involved 11 (12.9) 11 (11.1)