1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 1:Classification of each spinal level as normal versus stenosed on the evaluation cohort (n = 130) using each quantitative metrica
Metrics Compared AUROC: Group 1 AUROC: Group 2 Z-Statistic Significance DSCA vs DSDIA 96.5 (95.0–97.7) 96.6 (95.1–97.8) 0.19 P = .85 DSCA vs DDRDIA 96.5 (95.0–97.7) 98.0 (96.7–98.9)b 2.24b P = .02b DSCA vs DDRCA 96.5 (95.0–97.7) 98.6 (97.4–99.3)b 3.54b P = .004b DSDIA vs DDRDIA 96.6 (95.1–97.8) 98.0 (96.7–98.9)b 2.56b P = .01b DSDIA vs DDRCA 96.6 (95.1–97.8) 98.6 (97.4–99.3)b 2.89b P = .004b DDRDIA vs DDRCA 98.0 (96.7–98.9) 98.6 (97.4–99.3) 1.57 P = .12