1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 4:Comparison of PC-MR imaging of STA between participants with improved mRS and those with poor response
Patients with MMD, Mean (SD) or No. (%) P Improved mRS (n = 24) Poor Response mRS (n = 21) PC-MR imaging of ipsilateral STA Vmean (cm/s) 6.43 (SD, 1.91) 5.53 (SD, 1.73) .106 Vpeak (cm/s) 22.13 (SD, 6.59) 17.30 (SD, 6.13) .015 BVF (mL/s) 0.65 (SD, 0.30) 0.55 (SD, 0.24) .268 PC-MR imaging of contralateral STA Vmean (cm/s) 6.92 (SD, 2.37) 6.15 (SD, 2.50) .295 Vpeak (cm/s) 21.97 (SD, 6.60) 19.79 (SD, 6.22) .263 BVF (mL/s) 0.71 (SD, 0.28) 0.64 (SD, 0.34) .453