Demyelinating Plaques in Relapsing-remitting and Secondary-progressive Multiple Sclerosis: Assessment with Diffusion MR Imaging

Alessandro Castriota Scanderbeg; Francesco Tomaiuolo; Umberto Sabatini; Ugo Nocentini; Maria G. Grasso; Carlo Caltagirone

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Conventional MR imaging does not provide specific information that can be reliably associated with the pathologic substrate and clinical status of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Our goals were 1) to determine whether the orientationally averaged water diffusion coefficient (<D>) can be used to distinguish between plaques of different severity in these patients and 2) to assess possible correlations between <D> values and disease duration, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, and signal intensity on T1-weighted MR images.

METHODS: Twenty patients (10 with relapsing-remitting MS and 10 with secondary-progressive MS) and 11 healthy volunteers underwent a combined conventional and diffusion-weighted MR study of the brain. <D>, a parameter that is proportional to the trace of the diffusion tensor, was computed by averaging the apparent diffusion coefficients measured in the x, y, and z directions. <D> measurements were obtained for selected areas of white matter plaques. Differences in <D> among the three groups were tested using analysis of variance.

RESULTS: <D> was significantly higher (1.445 ± 0.129 × 10⁻³ mm²/s) in secondary-progressive lesions than in relapsing-remitting lesions (0.951 ± 0.08), and both values were higher than <D> in normal white matter (0.732 ± 0.02). There was a significant negative correlation between <D> and the degree of hypointensity on T1-weighted images, and a positive correlation between <D> and both EDSS score and disease duration.

CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that <D> is useful for distinguishing MS lesions of different severities, which are associated with different degrees of clinical disability.

In most patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), the early clinical course is characterized by episodes of acute worsening with recovery and a stable course between relapses. In more than 50% of patients, this relapsing-remitting phase, after a variable interval, is followed by a secondary-progressive phase, characterized by gradual neurologic deterioration with or without superimposed acute relapses. Disease progression from the first to the second phase is associated with a poorer prognosis, as patients with secondary-progressive disease become less responsive to treatment (1).

Conventional T2-weighted MR images, although sensitive for depicting focal lesions in MS patients, lack histopathologic specificity, because inflammation, edema, demyelination, gliosis, and axonal loss are all represented as areas of high signal intensity on these sequences. These different pathologic conditions are associated with different prognoses. For example, persistent demyelination and axonal loss most likely cause disability, whereas other pathologic conditions, such as edema and inflammation, do not (2). Because of its lack of specificity, T2-weighted MR imaging does not provide information that can be reliably associated with the pathologic substrate and clinical status of patients (3). T1-weighted MR imaging seems to be more specific than T2-weighted imaging for identifying clinically relevant lesions (4). Patients in the secondary-progressive phase have been found to have a larger proportion of brain lesions that appear hypointense on T1-weighted images than do patients in the relapsing-remitting phase (5). Recent studies suggest that other imaging techniques, such as MR spectroscopy and MR measurements of brain and spinal cord atrophy, may provide information more closely related to neurologic impairment in patients with MS (6, 7).

Measurement of diffusion characteristics of tissue water is another potential technique that can provide data relating to the structural properties of the human brain (8). Pathologic processes that modify the integrity of CNS structures lead to changes in the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Preliminary work has indicated that ADC is increased within MS plaques as compared with normal white matter (9).

The aims of our study were 1) to test the hypothesis that more destructive, long-standing plaques are more likely to display higher diffusivity than are less destructive lesions and 2) to correlate the diffusion parameter within a plaque with the corresponding value of signal intensity (SI) on T1-weighted images.

Methods

Subjects

Thirty-two patients with clinically definitive MS (10) were sequentially enrolled in the study. Of these, 20 patients (10 with relapsing-remitting disease, 10 with secondary-progressive disease) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. To be included in the study, patients could not have received immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory drugs for at least 1 year before the study. They also could not have had a relapse or received steroid therapy during the 3 months preceding the start of the study. Patients with relapsing-remitting disease (two men and eight women; mean age, 27 years; SD, 7 years; range, 18–38 years) had had clinically definite MS for at least 2 years with a relapsing-remitting course, and had an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) (11) score between 1.0 and 3.5 (mean, 2.6; SD, 0.9). The mean age at onset of disease was 25 years (SD, 5.8 years; range, 16–33 years). Patients with secondary-progressive MS (three men and seven women; mean age, 47 years; SD, 8 years; range, 34–59 years) had had a slowly progressive increase in disability for at least 6 months, with or without superimposed relapses, after an initial relapsing-remitting phase (12). The mean age of disease onset was 27 years (SD, 4.6 years; range, 19–35 years). There was wide variation in the duration of the initial relapsing-remitting phase (mean, 8 years; SD, 3.6 years; range, 2–27 years). The EDSS score ranged from 4.5 to 8.5 (mean, 6.3; SD, 1.5). Eleven healthy volunteers (four men and seven women; mean age, 35 years; SD, 8 years) with no history of neurologic disease served as control subjects. Approval from our hospital's ethics committee and written informed consent from all the patients were obtained before study initiation.

The subjects underwent a combined conventional and diffusion-weighted MR study of the brain. All MR examinations were performed with a 1.5-T whole-body scanner with echo-planar capability. The system was equipped with actively shielded magnetic field gradient coils giving gradient pulses up to 25 mT/m with a rise time of 250 μs. A circularly polarized head coil with a diameter of 270 mm was used both for RF transmission and for reception of MR signal. The MR imaging protocol included axial and coronal T2-weighted fast spin-echo (SE) sequences with parameters of 2800/90/2 (TR/TE/excitations), axial fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery sequences with parameters of 9000/119 and an inversion time of 2470, and axial T1-weighted SE sequences (500/12/2) before and after IV administration of 0.1 mmol/kg body weight gadopentetate dimeglumine. Fifteen to 21 5-mm-thick sections with no gap, a 23- to 24-cm field of view, and a 256 × 256 matrix were obtained with all MR imaging techniques. The axial and coronal sections ran respectively parallel and perpendicular to a line that joins the anterior and posterior commissure (AC-PC line). A middle section, in the axial and coronal planes, was placed on the AC-PC line in all patients.

The diffusion studies were carried out by using a single-shot diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging sequence (6500/120). The field of view was 23 cm and the acquisition matrix was 128 × 128. Twenty-one 5-mm-thick sections with no gap were acquired parallel to the AC-PC line to cover a brain volume of 10.5 cm. The diffusion gradients were sequentially applied in the x-, y-, and z-axis directions with four different b values (0, 50, 500, and 1000 s/mm²). In each region of interest (ROI), the ADCs in the x, y, and z directions (ADC_x, ADC_y, and ADC_z) were calculated using the Stejskal and Taner equation (13) by linear fitting of the logarithm of the SI (ln SI) versus b values. Trace (D) is equal to the sum of the diagonal elements of the diffusion tensor (D_xx, D_yy, D_zz) (14). If there is no diffusion sensitization produced by the imaging gradients, ADC_x, ADC_y, and ADC_z are equal to the diagonal elements of the diffusion tensor (15). We assumed that the diffusion sensitization produced by the imaging gradients in our sequence was negligible and we computed trace (D) by summing ADC_x, ADC_y, and ADC_z on a pixel-by-pixel basis. This assumption is usually valid for well-designed diffusion sequences on clinical scanners (16). We then divided trace (D) by three to obtain the orientationally averaged ADC, <D>. We measured the orientationally averaged water diffusion coefficient <D> in plaques of patients with relapsing-remitting and secondary-progressive MS. <D> is equal to one third of the trace of the diffusion tensor, trace (D) (14). Both <D> and trace (D) are rotationally invariant quantities that reflect an intrinsic property of the diffusion process and do not depend on the orientation of the subject in the magnet (17). Measurements of <D> were made in ROIs within the lesions.

Selection of the Region of Interest (Fig 1)

fig 1.

A–D, Axial SE T1-weighted (A), fast SE T2-weighted (B), and echo-planar T2-weighted (C) MR images, and the orientationally averaged ADC map (D), show the presence of multiple periventricular demyelinating lesions in a patient with secondary-progressive MS. Circle indicates the ROI

Lesions were localized on transverse T2-weighted fast SE images and classified on corresponding contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images as enhancing or nonenhancing. Given their small number (four lesions), the enhancing lesions were not considered further. The nonenhancing lesions were classified as T1 isointense or hypointense. T1 hypointensity was defined as reduced lesion SI with respect to the surrounding normal-appearing white matter. After localizing the lesions on the T2-weighted sequences, circular ROIs were drawn within the lesions on the diffusion-weighted T2-weighted axial images (b value = 0) and subsequently projected onto the orientationally averaged ADC map to obtain the mean ± SD of <D>. To avoid inhomogeneities of SI within the ROIs, the selected ROIs were small enough to avoid partial volume artifacts and large enough to average signal from several pixels. Each ROI had approximately 25 pixels, corresponding to 45 mm² (pixel size = 1.8 × 1.8 mm). Lesions smaller than 30 mm² were not considered for diffusivity evaluation. ROIs drawn on the diffusion-weighted T2-weighted axial images were also copied on the corresponding T1-weighted images. Given the lack of spatial correspondence between diffusion- and T1-weighted images, ROIs were manually adjusted to fit centrally only in the visible lesions; that is, the hypointense lesions. Isointense lesions, which were not distinguishable from the surrounding normal-appearing white matter, were not considered. The SI value of T1 hypointense lesions was recorded and normalized to the SI of the CSF (SI_lesion/SI_CSF) to correct for random variation in overall SI between examinations. Hypointense lesions located in sections that did not contain CSF were not evaluated. In total, 41 T1 hypointense lesions were considered, 11 from the relapsing-remitting group and 30 from the secondary-progressive group. Those ROIs, which were in the vicinity of sources of susceptibility artifacts, like the frontal and temporal sinuses, were not evaluated. The sections above and below the selected section were reviewed to ensure that the final voxel of interest did not include CSF or normal-appearing white matter in which a lesion was being studied. ROIs of uniform size (approximately 45 mm²) were also manually positioned in four white matter areas (frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital) in control subjects to calculate <D> in the normal white matter. All ROIs were chosen by one investigator and reviewed retrospectively by another. Both investigators were blinded as to whether the patients were from the relapsing-remitting or secondary-progressive group.

Statistical Analysis

One-way analysis of variance among groups (relapsing-remitting vs. secondary-progressive vs. normal white matter) was performed on the values of <D>, followed by Student-Newman-Keul post hoc comparisons. Figure 2 shows the scatter plot of the actual <D> data points for the three groups studied. Each point corresponds to one subject and represents the mean value of <D> as obtained in each subject from all the ROIs that were drawn on the T2-weighted (b = 0) images.

fig 2.

Scatter plot of the coefficient <D> data points for the relapsing-remitting (RR, 10 points), secondary-progressive (SP, 10 points), and control group (NWM, normal white matter, 11 points). Each point corresponds to one subject and represents the mean value of <D> as obtained in each subject from all the ROIs that were drawn on the T2-weighted (b = 0) images. Graph shows there is no overlap between the relapsing-remitting and secondary-progressive groups

A multiple correlation between <D>, EDSS score, disease duration, and SI_lesion/SI_CSF on T1-weighted images was also carried out. The level for statistical significance was set at P < .016, according to the Bonferroni correction. A linear regression analysis was performed between age group (by years) and <D> in the healthy control subjects. A t-test was used to compare the duration of the disease between the two groups of patients (relapsing-remitting vs. secondary-progressive).

Results

The mean value ± SD of <D> was 0.732 ± 0.02 × 10⁻³ mm²/s in the white matter of healthy volunteers, 0.951 ± 0.08 in the plaques of patients with relapsing-remitting MS, and 1.445 ± 0.129 in the plaques of patients with secondary-progressive MS. Statistically significant differences in <D> were found between all groups: relapsing-remitting vs. secondary-progressive (P < .0001), normal white matter vs. relapsing-remitting (P < .0001), and normal white matter vs. secondary-progressive (P < .0001) (Fig 2). Each point in Figures 3 and 4 corresponds to one patient and represents the mean value of <D> as obtained from all the ROIs that were drawn on the T2-weighted (b = 0) images vs. EDSS score and disease duration, respectively.

fig 3.

Scatter plot of the coefficient <D> vs. EDSS score shows a significant correlation. Each point corresponds to one patient and represents the mean value of <D> as obtained from all the ROIs that were drawn on the T2-weighted (b = 0) images. Closed circles represent the subjects with relapsing-remitting MS; open circles, the subjects with secondary-progressive MS

In MS patients, there was an inverse correlation between <D> and the T1-weighted SI_lesion/SI_CSF ratio (r = −.67; P < .0001) (Fig 5). Furthermore, there was a positive correlation between <D> and both EDSS score (r = .781; P < .0001) (Fig 3) and disease duration (r = .833; P < .0001) (Fig 4). We found no correlation between age and <D> in healthy control subjects (r = .02; not significant).

fig 4.

Scatter plot of coefficient <D> vs. disease duration shows a significant correlation. Each point corresponds to one patient and represents the mean value of <D> as obtained from all the ROIs that were drawn on the T2-weighted (b = 0) images. Closed circles represent the patients with relapsing-remitting MS; open circles, the patients with secondary-progressive MS

fig 5.

Scatter plot of coefficient <D> vs. SI_lesion/SI_CSF ratio on SE T1-weighted images for the 41 T1 hypointense lesions studied. There is a significant inverse correlation between <D> and SI_lesion/SI_CSF ratio. Each point corresponds to one lesion. Closed circles represent lesions from the relapsing-remitting group (11 lesions); open circles, lesions from the secondary-progressive group (30 lesions)

Disease duration was significantly longer in the secondary-progressive group (mean, 19 years; SD, 9 years) than in the relapsing-remitting group (mean, 3 years; SD, 2 years). This is not surprising, since most of the patients with MS progress from an initial relapsing-remitting to a secondary-progressive form.

Discussion

Several lines of evidence indicate that the pathologic substrate of MS lesions is different among MS subgroups and that disease progression from the initial relapsing-remitting to the secondary-progressive form is associated with neuronal and axonal loss (18–20). Axonal loss, in turn, is likely to play a major role in determining permanent neurologic dysfunction in patients with MS (21, 22).

Quantitative clinical assessments of disease progression in MS are not very sensitive. Therefore, there has been great interest in developing markers of disease progression based on measurements of MR lesion volume or lesion frequency. Unfortunately, these potential markers have shown only a rather weak correlation with clinical disability (23, 24). Standard MR imaging can be used to detect some types of abnormalities among the clinical subtypes of MS, such as the large number of contrast-enhancing lesions in the absence of brain atrophy in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (25) and brain and spinal cord atrophy as well as a larger proportion of hypointense lesions on T1-weighted images in patients with secondary-progressive disease (26). Nevertheless, conventional MR imaging parameters permit only a rough estimation of the progression of disability and therefore are of limited use in following affected patients (24).

Other MR parameters have been used to characterize structural changes occurring during the course of MS. Magnetization transfer–based contrast has been found to be associated with edematous lesions in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis, with microscopic abnormalities in normal-appearing white matter, and with hypointense T1-weighted lesions in MS (27–29). Proton MR spectroscopy has demonstrated decreased levels of N-acetylaspartate (NAA), a neuronal marker of the adult CNS (30), in the brains of patients with secondary-progressive MS, suggesting extensive axonal damage in these patients, unlike those with relapsing-remitting MS (6, 22).

Excellent agreement was found between <D> values in the white matter of healthy subjects in our study and previously published data (16). We found an increased water diffusivity in all MS lesions as compared with normal white matter in control subjects. Moreover, we found a larger increase in <D> values in secondary-progressive than in relapsing-remitting plaques. It could be argued that this difference in diffusivity may be related to the differences in age between the patients in the relapsing-remitting and secondary-progressive groups; however, since in our sample of healthy subjects we did not find a significant correlation between age and <D> values, it is unlikely that the large difference in <D> between these two groups can be attributed to age differences. This study therefore suggests that differences in the <D> values are related to a different pathologic substrate in the two subgroups of MS. The increase in diffusivity possibly reflects expanded free water content within the lesion, although the relative contribution from edema, demyelination, and axonal loss is difficult to determine. One can speculate that in the acute phase of the disease, the expanded extracellular volume is due to astrocyte proliferation, perivascular inflammation, and demyelination, all representing pathologic stigmata of the initial step in plaque formation, whereas in its chronic stage, the more pronounced increase in diffusivity represents axonal loss and tissue destruction. More recently, it has been shown that axonal injury is associated with demyelination from the beginning of the disease, suggesting that axons are a disease target even in the early phases of plaque formation (21). Most likely, these processes are combined, with a predominance of the inflammatory process in relapsing-remitting MS and of the destructive processes in secondary-progressive MS.

A second result of this study was the significant inverse correlation between <D> and the SI_lesion/SI_CSF ratio on T1-weighted images within the corresponding brain lesion. Hypointense T1 lesions, so-called black holes, have been related to the degree of matrix destruction and loss of axons in MS (31). A change in the T1-weighted lesion load has been found to correlate with a change in EDSS score over a 3-year period in secondary-progressive MS (26), and the degree of hypointensity on T1-weighted images with a lower magnetization transfer ratio (29, 32, 33). More recently, using proton MR spectroscopy, investigators have found a strong correlation between NAA concentration and both the degree of lesion hypointensity and T1-relaxation time measurements, providing in vivo evidence of axonal damage in severely hypointense T1 lesions in MS patients (34). Our results indicate that lesions that are very hypointense on T1-weighted SE images have higher <D> values than do lesions that are less hypointense. Given this close correlation, we speculate that <D> measurements and T1 hypointensities provide highly associated information and may reflect the same differences in lesion composition, with the advantage for <D> of being an inherently quantitative parameter. More precisely, our findings are consistent with the concept that high diffusion <D> values are associated with tissue destruction in MS. Hypointensities on T1-weighted images do not solely represent tissue destruction of the late stages of the disease but may also be associated with acute lesions. The hypointensity in this case may be the result of enlargement of the extracellular space because of edema and inflammation, a process that is potentially reversible at follow-up (35). Indeed, most of these acute hypointensities will resolve over time, whereas a portion of them, after a variable interval, will reappear as true black holes, representing a more permanent and irreversible stage of tissue damage. Although the precise histopathologic basis for increased diffusivity is not known at this moment, the chronological window between the acute and chronic stage of lesion development, during which lesions are not visible on T1-weighted images, might become a possible domain of diffusion-weighted imaging in MS patients.

Reports on diffusion changes in MS lesions have differed among laboratories. Previous publications have reported increased ADC values in MS plaques, with acute lesions displaying higher ADC values than chronic lesions (36, 37). Because these previous investigators used diffusion-weighted imaging, their results are not directly comparable with our findings. Diffusion-weighted imaging results are generally difficult to interpret because the SI in diffusion-weighted images is affected by a number of factors, such as the orientation of the subject in the magnet and the degree of T2-weighted hyperintensity, both of which are unrelated to the diffusion process. The orientationally averaged water diffusion coefficient <D> that we measured in this study is a quantitative parameter that reflects a specific feature of the diffusion process and is unaffected by the orientation of the subject in the magnet or the degree of hyperintensity on the T2-weighted images (17). In a study by Horsfield et al (9), in which the diffusion gradients were also applied sequentially in the x, y, and z directions, the orientationally averaged ADC was found to be increased in all the lesions, without significant differences between benign and secondary-progressive MS. The latter finding differs from the result of our investigation, in which patients with secondary-progressive MS had significantly higher <D> values than did patients with relapsing-remitting MS. One possible explanation for this discrepancy is that patients with benign MS in the series by Horsfield et al had a long disease duration (mean, 21 years). It is reasonable to assume that individual plaques in these patients were old enough to show a high degree of matrix destruction, and thus high diffusivity, but were too few, or were not located at critical sites, to cause significant disability. Recently, full diffusion tensor imaging has been used to characterize the structural changes in plaques of different pathologic severity in six patients with MS (38). The findings of that study, showing the highest diffusion values in destructive (T1 hypointense) lesions, are in keeping with our results, and suggest that water diffusivity within the lesion is related to the severity of the pathologic substrate.

In addition to the orientationally averaged diffusion coefficient, other diffusion parameters, such as diffusion anisotropy (39), may be helpful in characterizing the anatomic-pathologic features of MS plaques (38). Measuring diffusion anisotropy, however, requires the entire diffusion tensor to be computed from a set of diffusion-weighted images acquired with diffusion-sensitizing gradients applied in at least six non-collinear directions (39). Limitations of our pulse sequence did not allow us to acquire the complete imaging data set necessary to calculate the entire diffusion tensor in this study; however, our data were sufficient to reliably assess the orientationally averaged diffusion coefficient.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that the orientationally averaged coefficient <D> is able to show the distinction between relapsing-remitting and secondary-progressive MS plaques. In addition, this parameter correlates with the degree of lesion hypointensity on T1-weighted MR images as well as with the clinical status in individual patients. This latter finding supports the hypothesis that differences in disability can be explained by structural differences among lesions as seen by <D> measurements. Serial studies in larger clinical cohorts are necessary to determine the reliability of <D> in assessing disease progression in MS. It is likely that the orientationally averaged water diffusion coefficient <D> will qualify as a new MR parameter able to increase our understanding of pathogenetic mechanisms of reversible and persistent disability.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Carlo Pierpaoli, Section of Tissue Biophysics & Biomimetics, NIH, Bethesda, MD, for the useful discussion and insightful suggestions.

Footnotes

1 Address reprint requests to Alessandro Castriota-Scanderbeg, MD, Department of Radiology, I.R.C.C.S., S. Lucia, via Ardeatina 306, 00179 Rome, Italy.

References

↵
Rudik RA, Cohen JA, Weinstock-Guttman B, Kinkel RP, Ransohoff RM. Management of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 1997;337:1604-1611
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Van Waesberghe JHTM, Castelijns JA, Scheltens P, et al. Comparison of four potential MR parameters for severe tissue destruction in multiple sclerosis lesions. Magn Reson Imaging 1997;15:155-162
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Miller DH, Grossman RI, Reingold SC, McFarland HF. The role of magnetic resonance techniques in understanding and managing multiple sclerosis. Brain 1998;121:3-24
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
van Walderveen MA, Barkhof F, Hommes OR, et al. Correlating MRI and clinical disease activity in multiple sclerosis: relevance of hypointense lesions on short-TR/short-TE (T1-weighted) spin-echo images. Neurology 1995;45:1684-1690
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
Lycklama à, Nijeholt GJ, van Walderveen MAA, Castelijns JA, et al. Brain and spinal cord abnormalities in multiple sclerosis: correlation between MRI parameters, clinical subtypes and symptoms. Brain 1998;121:687-697
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
Arnold DL, Riess GT, Matthews PM, et al. Use of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy for monitoring disease progression in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 1994;36:76-82
CrossRef PubMed
Losseff NA, Webb SL, O'Riordan JI, et al. Spinal cord atrophy and disability in multiple sclerosis: a new reproducible and sensitive MRI method with potential to monitor disease progression. Brain 1996a;;119:701-708
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
Le Bihan D. Molecular diffusion nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Q 1991;7:1-30
PubMed
↵
Horsfield MA, Lai M, Webb SL, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient in benign and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis by nuclear magnetic resonance. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:393-400
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 1983;13:227-231
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983;33:1444-1452
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
Lublin FD, Reigned SC. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology 1996;46:907-911
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
Stejskal EO, Tanner JE. Spin diffusion measurements: spin-echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. J Chem Phys 1965;42:288-292
CrossRef
↵
Basser PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D. MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys J 1994;66:259-267
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Mattiello J, Basser PJ, Le Bihan D. The b matrix in diffusion tensor echo-planar imaging. Magn Reson Med 1997;37:292-300
PubMed
↵
Pierpaoli C, Jezzard P, Basser PJ, Barnett A, Di Chiro G. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. Radiology 1996;201:637-648
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Basser PJ. Inferring microstructural features and the physiological state of tissues from diffusion-weighted images. NMR Biomed 1995;8:333-344
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Minderhoud JM. On the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis: a revised model of the cause(s) of multiple sclerosis, especially based on epidemiological data. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 1994;96:135-142
CrossRef PubMed
Barnes D, Munro PM, Youl BD, Prineas JW, McDonald WI. The longstanding multiple sclerosis lesion: a quantitative MRI and electron microscopic study. Brain 1991;114:1271-1280
Abstract/FREE Full Text
Sinnige LG, Teeuwissen E, Hew JM, Minderhoud JM. Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and clinical parameters in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 1995;91:188-191
PubMed
↵
Trapp BD, Peterson J, Ransohoff RM, Rudick R, Mörk S, Bö L. Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 1998;338:278-285
CrossRef PubMed
De Stefano N, Matthews PM, Antel JP, Preul M, Francis G, Arnold DL. Chemical pathology of acute demyelinating lesions and its correlation with disability. Ann Neurol 1995;38:901-909
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Paty DW, Li DK. Interferon beta-1b is effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, II: MRI analysis results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. UBC Multiple Sclerosis/MRI Study Group and the IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. Neurology 1993;43:662-667
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
Filippi M, Paty DW, Kappos L, et al. Correlations between changes in disability and T2-weighted brain MRI activity in multiple sclerosis: a follow-up study. Neurology 1995;45:255-260
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
Thorpe JW, Kidd D, Moseley IF, et al. Serial gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the brain and spinal cord in early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1996;46:373-378
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
Truyen L, van Waesberghe JH, van Walderveen MA, et al. Accumulation of hypointense lesions (“black holes”) on T1 spin-echo MRI correlates with disease progression in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1996;47:1469-1476
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
Dousset V, Grossman RI, Ramer KN, et al. Experimental allergic encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis: lesion characterization with magnetization transfer imaging. Radiology 1992;182:483-491
CrossRef PubMed
Loevner LA, Grossman RI, Cohen JA, Lexa FJ, Kessler D, Kolson DL. Microscopic disease in normal-appearing white matter on conventional MR images in patients with multiple sclerosis: assessment with magnetization-transfer measurements. Radiology 1995b;;196:511-515
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Loevner LA, Grossman RI, McGowan JC, Ramer KN, Cohen JA. Characterization of multiple sclerosis plaques with T1-weighted MR and quantitative magnetization transfer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995a;;16:1473-1479
Abstract
↵
Simmons ML, Frondoza CG, Coyle JT. Immunocytochemical localization of N-acetyl-aspartate with monoclonal antibodies. Neuroscience 1991;45:37-45
CrossRef PubMed
↵
van Walderveen MA, Scheltens P, Barkhof F, et al. Histopathologic correlates of hypointense lesions on T1-weighted SE MR images in multiple sclerosis [abstract]. J Neurol 1996;243(Suppl 2):S18
CrossRef
Hiehle JF Jr, Lenkinski RE, Grossman RI, et al. Correlation of spectroscopy and magnetization transfer imaging in the evaluation of demyelinating lesions and normal appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis. Magn Reson Med 1994;32:285-293
CrossRef PubMed
Pike GB, de Stefano N, Narayanan S, Francis GS, Antel JP, Arnold DL. Combined magnetization transfer and proton spectroscopy imaging in the assessment of pathologic brain lesions in multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:829-837
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
Van Walderveen MAA, Barkhof F, Pouwels PJ, van Schijndel RA, Polman CH, Castelijns JA. Neuronal damage in T1-hypointense multiple sclerosis lesions demonstrated in vivo using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Ann Neurol 1999;46:79-87
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Van Waesberghe JHTM, van Walderveen MAA, Castelijns JA, et al. Patterns of lesion development in multiple sclerosis: longitudinal observations with T1-weighted spin-echo and magnetization transfer MR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:675-683
Abstract
↵
Larsson HBW, Thomsen C, Frederiksen J, Stubgaard M, Henriksen O. In vivo magnetic resonance diffusion measurement in the brain of patients with multiple sclerosis. Magn Reson Imaging 1992;10:7-12
CrossRef PubMed
Christiansen P, Gideon P, Thomsen C, et al. Increased water self-diffusion in chronic plaques and in apparently normal white matter in patients with multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 1993;87:195-199
PubMed
↵
Werring DJ, Clark CA, Barker GJ, Thompson AJ, Miller DH. Diffusion tensor imaging of lesions and normal-appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1999;52:1626-1632
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
Pierpaoli C, Basser PJ. Toward a quantitative assessment of diffusion anisotropy. [published erratum appears in Magn Reson Med 1997;37:972] Magn Reson Med 1996;36:893-906
CrossRef PubMed

Received August 30, 1999.

View Abstract

In this issue

Download PDF

Email Article

Citation Tools

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Show more BRAIN

[1] ↵
Rudik RA, Cohen JA, Weinstock-Guttman B, Kinkel RP, Ransohoff RM. Management of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 1997;337:1604-1611
CrossRef PubMed

[2] ↵
Van Waesberghe JHTM, Castelijns JA, Scheltens P, et al. Comparison of four potential MR parameters for severe tissue destruction in multiple sclerosis lesions. Magn Reson Imaging 1997;15:155-162
CrossRef PubMed

[3] ↵
Miller DH, Grossman RI, Reingold SC, McFarland HF. The role of magnetic resonance techniques in understanding and managing multiple sclerosis. Brain 1998;121:3-24
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[4] ↵
van Walderveen MA, Barkhof F, Hommes OR, et al. Correlating MRI and clinical disease activity in multiple sclerosis: relevance of hypointense lesions on short-TR/short-TE (T1-weighted) spin-echo images. Neurology 1995;45:1684-1690
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[5] ↵
Lycklama à, Nijeholt GJ, van Walderveen MAA, Castelijns JA, et al. Brain and spinal cord abnormalities in multiple sclerosis: correlation between MRI parameters, clinical subtypes and symptoms. Brain 1998;121:687-697
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[6] ↵
Arnold DL, Riess GT, Matthews PM, et al. Use of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy for monitoring disease progression in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 1994;36:76-82
CrossRef PubMed

[7] Losseff NA, Webb SL, O'Riordan JI, et al. Spinal cord atrophy and disability in multiple sclerosis: a new reproducible and sensitive MRI method with potential to monitor disease progression. Brain 1996a;;119:701-708
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[8] ↵
Le Bihan D. Molecular diffusion nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Q 1991;7:1-30
PubMed

[9] ↵
Horsfield MA, Lai M, Webb SL, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient in benign and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis by nuclear magnetic resonance. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:393-400
CrossRef PubMed

[10] ↵
Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 1983;13:227-231
CrossRef PubMed

[11] ↵
Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983;33:1444-1452
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[12] ↵
Lublin FD, Reigned SC. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology 1996;46:907-911
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[13] ↵
Stejskal EO, Tanner JE. Spin diffusion measurements: spin-echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. J Chem Phys 1965;42:288-292
CrossRef

[14] ↵
Basser PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D. MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys J 1994;66:259-267
CrossRef PubMed

[15] ↵
Mattiello J, Basser PJ, Le Bihan D. The b matrix in diffusion tensor echo-planar imaging. Magn Reson Med 1997;37:292-300
PubMed

[16] ↵
Pierpaoli C, Jezzard P, Basser PJ, Barnett A, Di Chiro G. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. Radiology 1996;201:637-648
CrossRef PubMed

[17] ↵
Basser PJ. Inferring microstructural features and the physiological state of tissues from diffusion-weighted images. NMR Biomed 1995;8:333-344
CrossRef PubMed

[18] ↵
Minderhoud JM. On the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis: a revised model of the cause(s) of multiple sclerosis, especially based on epidemiological data. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 1994;96:135-142
CrossRef PubMed

[19] Barnes D, Munro PM, Youl BD, Prineas JW, McDonald WI. The longstanding multiple sclerosis lesion: a quantitative MRI and electron microscopic study. Brain 1991;114:1271-1280
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[20] Sinnige LG, Teeuwissen E, Hew JM, Minderhoud JM. Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and clinical parameters in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 1995;91:188-191
PubMed

[21] ↵
Trapp BD, Peterson J, Ransohoff RM, Rudick R, Mörk S, Bö L. Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 1998;338:278-285
CrossRef PubMed

[22] De Stefano N, Matthews PM, Antel JP, Preul M, Francis G, Arnold DL. Chemical pathology of acute demyelinating lesions and its correlation with disability. Ann Neurol 1995;38:901-909
CrossRef PubMed

[23] ↵
Paty DW, Li DK. Interferon beta-1b is effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, II: MRI analysis results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. UBC Multiple Sclerosis/MRI Study Group and the IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. Neurology 1993;43:662-667
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[24] ↵
Filippi M, Paty DW, Kappos L, et al. Correlations between changes in disability and T2-weighted brain MRI activity in multiple sclerosis: a follow-up study. Neurology 1995;45:255-260
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[25] ↵
Thorpe JW, Kidd D, Moseley IF, et al. Serial gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the brain and spinal cord in early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1996;46:373-378
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[26] ↵
Truyen L, van Waesberghe JH, van Walderveen MA, et al. Accumulation of hypointense lesions (“black holes”) on T1 spin-echo MRI correlates with disease progression in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1996;47:1469-1476
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[27] ↵
Dousset V, Grossman RI, Ramer KN, et al. Experimental allergic encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis: lesion characterization with magnetization transfer imaging. Radiology 1992;182:483-491
CrossRef PubMed

[28] Loevner LA, Grossman RI, Cohen JA, Lexa FJ, Kessler D, Kolson DL. Microscopic disease in normal-appearing white matter on conventional MR images in patients with multiple sclerosis: assessment with magnetization-transfer measurements. Radiology 1995b;;196:511-515
CrossRef PubMed

[29] ↵
Loevner LA, Grossman RI, McGowan JC, Ramer KN, Cohen JA. Characterization of multiple sclerosis plaques with T1-weighted MR and quantitative magnetization transfer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995a;;16:1473-1479
Abstract

[30] ↵
Simmons ML, Frondoza CG, Coyle JT. Immunocytochemical localization of N-acetyl-aspartate with monoclonal antibodies. Neuroscience 1991;45:37-45
CrossRef PubMed

[31] ↵
van Walderveen MA, Scheltens P, Barkhof F, et al. Histopathologic correlates of hypointense lesions on T1-weighted SE MR images in multiple sclerosis [abstract]. J Neurol 1996;243(Suppl 2):S18
CrossRef

[32] Hiehle JF Jr, Lenkinski RE, Grossman RI, et al. Correlation of spectroscopy and magnetization transfer imaging in the evaluation of demyelinating lesions and normal appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis. Magn Reson Med 1994;32:285-293
CrossRef PubMed

[33] Pike GB, de Stefano N, Narayanan S, Francis GS, Antel JP, Arnold DL. Combined magnetization transfer and proton spectroscopy imaging in the assessment of pathologic brain lesions in multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:829-837
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[34] ↵
Van Walderveen MAA, Barkhof F, Pouwels PJ, van Schijndel RA, Polman CH, Castelijns JA. Neuronal damage in T1-hypointense multiple sclerosis lesions demonstrated in vivo using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Ann Neurol 1999;46:79-87
CrossRef PubMed

[35] ↵
Van Waesberghe JHTM, van Walderveen MAA, Castelijns JA, et al. Patterns of lesion development in multiple sclerosis: longitudinal observations with T1-weighted spin-echo and magnetization transfer MR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:675-683
Abstract

[36] ↵
Larsson HBW, Thomsen C, Frederiksen J, Stubgaard M, Henriksen O. In vivo magnetic resonance diffusion measurement in the brain of patients with multiple sclerosis. Magn Reson Imaging 1992;10:7-12
CrossRef PubMed

[37] Christiansen P, Gideon P, Thomsen C, et al. Increased water self-diffusion in chronic plaques and in apparently normal white matter in patients with multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 1993;87:195-199
PubMed

[38] ↵
Werring DJ, Clark CA, Barker GJ, Thompson AJ, Miller DH. Diffusion tensor imaging of lesions and normal-appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1999;52:1626-1632
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[39] ↵
Pierpaoli C, Basser PJ. Toward a quantitative assessment of diffusion anisotropy. [published erratum appears in Magn Reson Med 1997;37:972] Magn Reson Med 1996;36:893-906
CrossRef PubMed

Main menu

User menu

Search

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Demyelinating Plaques in Relapsing-remitting and Secondary-progressive Multiple Sclerosis: Assessment with Diffusion MR Imaging

Abstract