Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: New Concepts on Etiology and Diagnosis

William G. Bradley

Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is remarkable for two reasons: 1) it is one of the few treatable causes of dementia, and 2) neuroradiologists are usually involved in making the diagnosis. Hakim and Adams (1) are generally credited with the initial description of NPH, although it may actually have been described under a different name earlier by McHugh (2). It consists of the clinical triad of gait disturbance, dementia, and incontinence in a patient who radiographically has communicating hydrocephalus, ie, ventricles dilated out of proportion to any sulcal enlargement (which distinguishes it from atrophy) (3).

Over the 35 years since it was first described, the definition of NPH has been expanded. Initially it was considered to be idiopathic (4, 5); at present, common usage includes any form of chronic, communicating hydrocephalus (6, 7), and even a few noncommunicating forms such as aqueductal stenosis (8). Because all these patients may present with a similar clinical triad, and they may all be treated with a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt, this expansion of the definition is probably appropriate, although certain secondary features distinguish the idiopathic form from communicating hydrocephalus with known causes. For example, the idiopathic form of NPH tends to present in the elderly (9), whereas patients with chronic communicating hydrocephalus from prior subarachnoid hemorrhage, meningitis, neurosurgery, or head trauma tend to present at an earlier age. Also, response to shunting seems to be worse (30–50%) for patients with the idiopathic form than for patients with a known cause of communicating hydrocephalus (50–70%) (10–12). Depending on the specific diagnostic criteria used, one half of the cases of NPH are considered to be idiopathic and one half result from a known insult; thus, NPH probably represents the final common pathway for a number of different disease processes (13–15).

The symptom complex of NPH has been explained on the basis of both mechanical (16) and ischemic factors (17–21). It has been suggested that the ventricular enlargement leads to vascular stretching (22), and the decreased compliance (23) and high pulse pressure leads to local “barotrauma” (20) or “tangential shear stress” (16). It has been postulated that the purpose of the shunt is to add additional capacitance to the system (24), increasing perfusion (22), not to decrease the pressure (which is already normal).

The gait disturbance is a gait “apraxia” and represents a combination of motor deficits, failure of postural righting reflexes, abnormal smooth pursuit, and failed suppression of vestibuloocular reflexes (13, 25). The gait has been described as “magnetic” because of the wide stance and slow, small steps with reduced floor clearance (13, 26). There is increased tone and brisk tendon reflexes in the lower limbs, and absence of weakness or incoordination (26). Impaired input from the sensorimotor cortex, the superior frontal cortex, and the anterior cingulate gyrus to the reticular formation in the tegmentum of the brain stem may also contribute to the gait and stance disorder (26, 27). Since the fibers of the corticospinal tract that supply motor function to the legs pass closest to the lateral ventricles in the corona radiata, it is not surprising that the gait disturbance is usually the first symptom to appear and the first one to resolve following successful VP shunting (28).

Problems with urinary functions begin with feelings of urgency, and in the later stages, develop into frank disinhibition (13). This may initially be due to involvement of the sacral fibers of the corticospinal tract (29), and later may be a feature of the dementia (13).

The dementia is subcortical (30, 31) and is characterized by inertia, forgetfulness, and poor executive function (13). The lack of cortical features helps to distinguish the dementia of NPH clinically from that of Alzheimer's disease. A number of groups have noticed an increased incidence of subcortical, deep white matter hyperintensities on T2-weighted MR images (20, 32–34). That these represent small vessel ischemia is further substantiated by the finding of decreased cerebral blood flow (CBF) (35–43), which generally improves after shunting (38).

The acetazolamide challenge test, which normally increases CBF, fails to do so in NPH patients, particularly in the periventricular white matter (44). This lack of the usual vasomotor response to carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (or to inhaled CO₂) probably indicates that the arterioles are already maximally dilated as a result of local ischemia (40). After CSF diversion, CBF in white matter generally improves, as does the response to acetazolamide (40). In addition to shedding some light on the role of autoregulation on the pathogenesis of the dementia of NPH, the acetazolamide challenge test has also been used to select patients for shunting (40, 44, 45). In this setting, the patients that have the best response to VP shunting have preoperative CBF above 20 mL/100 g/min (40).

The etiology of idiopathic NPH has been considered by many over almost 4 decades; however, no single theory has gained widespread acceptance. Ventricular enlargement can occur when the transmantle pressure (5), ie, the difference in pressure between the ventricles and the subarachnoid space, is increased (46), even temporarily (16, 47–51). Decreased CSF resorption increases transmantle pressure (16). CSF resorption in NPH is definitely abnormal, as shown by the saline infusion test (52). While many consider that CSF resorption occurs at the level of the arachnoidal villi (microscopic) or arachnoid granulations (macroscopic), other authorities feel that a substantial amount of CSF resorption occurs at the brain parenchymal level, ie, the transcapillary or transvenular level (53–56). (This is the reason that patients with obstructive hydrocephalus can resorb at least some CSF [53].) The fact that histologic analysis of the leptomeninges in idiopathic NPH fails to show fibrosis suggests upstream obstruction (57, 58) and lends credence to the increased venous resistance theory.

The theory proposed by Bateman in this issue of the AJNR (page 1574) suggests that increased transvenular resistance in the territory of the superior sagittal sinus is the initiating event in NPH. Since this could lead to ventricular enlargement and decreased blood supply in the same territory, it is an enticing theory—it encompasses the two major abnormalities in NPH. Dr. Bateman goes on to propose a test for diagnosing NPH based on quantitative measurements of the inflowing carotid or basilar arteries and the outflowing superior sagittal or straight sinus. Specifically, he suggests that the net systolic pulse volume and the temporal difference in the arterial and venous peaks are diagnostic of NPH. I have several problems with his methodology, particularly the use of prospective cardiac gating (which fails to sample the end of the cardiac cycle) (59) and scaling of arterial flow (either carotid or basilar) to match venous outflow (either in the superior sagittal sinus or straight sinus). I am also concerned about the small number of patients, the lack of blinding, and the use of normal controls almost 20 years younger than the NPH group. Regardless, if the same results could be reproduced with retrospective cardiac gating, if all blood flowing in and out of the brain were measured, and if this new test were performed on a larger number of both shunt-responsive and nonshunt-responsive NPH patients, then perhaps Dr. Bateman may be proven correct.

Over the years, a number of diverse tests have been used to select symptomatic NPH patients for VP shunting. Some tests are performed by radiologists, and some by neurologists or neurosurgeons. Nuclear or CT cisternography shows ventricular reflux with slow cortical uptake (60). Although this test reveals disordered CSF resorption at the level of the arachnoid villi, it is insensitive to increased upstream resistance at the level of the veins. Thus, while cisternography may have a role in diagnosing known causes of communicating hydrocephalus, it is less useful for diagnosing idiopathic NPH. In addition, it cannot predict shunt response because the patients may already have developed atrophy (20). Thus, a positive cisternogram coupled to a nuclear or Xenon CT study that shows normal CBF is much more successful than cisternography alone in predicting which patients will respond positively to shunting (61).

Lumbar puncture and removal of 50 mL of CSF (“tap test”) has been used extensively (62–65), although some (66) have doubted its accuracy for predicting the outcome from shunting. Recently, a ventricular tap test has shown much greater sensitivity and specificity in selecting which patients will respond to shunting, not surprising given that the test comes closest to simulating the actual VP shunt (9). Pressure monitoring via an intracranial transducer should show normal mean baseline pressure (hence the name) with transient elevations of mean and pulse pressure known as “plateau” or “B” waves. B waves occurring during more than 50% of the monitoring period (47, 48, 67–69) are associated with a greater likelihood of successful response to shunting. B waves may also be the cause of ventricular enlargement (54). Unfortunately, B waves may not be present during the monitoring period, decreasing their sensitivity as a test to diagnose NPH. Saline infusion with pressure monitoring has been used to reveal decreased CSF resorptive capacity (51, 52). Obviously, such tests are invasive and run the risk of infection.

Fifteen years ago, a number of investigators noted an increased aqueductal CSF flow void on the MR images of patients with communicating hydrocephalus (33, 70–72). In patients with clinical NPH, the extent of the flow void on proton density–weighted, non-flow-compensated, conventional spin-echo images has been highly correlated with a favorable response to CSF diversion (73, 74). Subsequent attempts to evaluate the CSF flow void on fast spin-echo images have failed (75, 76) (as might be expected due to the rephasing effects of the multiple 180° pulses). More recently, the volume of CSF pulsating back and forth through the aqueduct during systole or diastole (the “aqueductal CSF stroke volume”) has been measured using phase-contrast MR imaging (77). Increased flow has been shown to correlate with a favorable response to shunting (77–80). In one report of shunt-responsive NPH patients with elevated aqueductal CSF stroke volumes, the CSF flow void was increased in only 50% of the conventional proton density–weighted images that had been performed with flow compensation. Thus, the important finding was that of hyperdynamic CSF flow, not of a prominent flow void per se. Hyperdynamic CSF flow is thus an indirect, but easily measured, sign of normal CBF and shunt-responsive NPH. Normal or reduced aqueductal CSF flow indicates that CBF is reduced, atrophy is present, and there is a decreased likelihood of shunt response.

In my institution, if the patient has symptoms of NPH, a routine MR scan using conventional (not fast) spin echo is performed. If a prominent aqueductal CSF flow void is present, the patient is considered for shunting. (We have not seen a false-positive result on flow-compensated proton density–weighted conventional spin-echo images.) If the CSF flow void is normal, the patient undergoes a quantitative MR phase-contrast CSF flow study and, if positive, is considered for shunting. In my experience it is exceedingly unusual for a patient with hyperdynamic CSF flow not to respond positively to shunting (77). Using this algorithm, we have performed 100 quantitative CSF flow studies each year for the last 8 years for institutions throughout southern California.

The hypothesis that NPH is primarily a disease of increased venous resistance is interesting, but one might now ask, “What causes the previously normal venous resistance to become elevated in elderly patients?” I believe one could make a case for deep white matter ischemia being the initiating event. It is well known that NPH patients have a higher incidence of periventricular hyperintensities, ie, small vessel ischemic changes, than age-matched control subjects (17–21, 32, 34). Furthermore, it is known that the damage is more diffuse than that seen on T2-weighted MR images because the magnetization transfer ratio is decreased (81) (indicating loss of myelin protein) and the apparent diffusion coefficient is increased (82) (indicating increased interstial edema) in patients with normal-appearing white matter. Because the white matter is ischemic, the arteries are already maximally dilated, explaining the loss of autoregulation and lack of response to acetazolamide.

When the arterioles occlude, the draining venules close as well. Whereas this maintains the inflow-outflow balance for blood, the CSF normally drained by these parenchymal veins begins to back up until a new pathway can be found. According to the Monroe-Kellie doctrine, such a process might be expected to cause a transient elevation of intracranial pressure, ie, B waves. Because CSF is made by the choroid plexus within the ventricles, occluded venous drainage will lead to a transient increase in intraventricular pressure, resulting in ventricular enlargement.

The VP shunt may be effective for a number of reasons. For one, it may take up a greater proportion of CSF, taking the pressure off the parenchymal absorption route at the point of production within the ventricles. For another, it provides additional capacitance. If the VP shunt modulates the pulse pressure, there will be decreased interstitial edema, decreased interstitial pressure, improved perfusion, and decreased ischemia. (This may be the reason that third ventriculostomy has been effective in some patients with NPH [83].) The fact that patients with idiopathic NPH respond less frequently and more transiently to shunting than patients with known causes of communicating hydrocephalus (84) may be because small vessel arteriosclerosis is a steadily progressive disease. At some point, the shunt is no longer able to make up for the lack of parenchymal CSF drainage. Patients with the most severe white matter disease (85), or those with the lowest CBF (41, 43), probably do not respond to shunting because irreversible atrophy has already occurred.

A better understanding of the pathophysiology of NPH will undoubtedly lead to better patient selection and treatment. Bateman's article gives us new insights into the possible etiology of this complicated disease. I hope this will stimulate larger studies comparing MR-based tests of vascular compliance and aqueductal CSF stroke volume to the more invasive tap tests and intracranial pressure monitoring to best determine which patients will respond positively to shunting for NPH.

Footnotes

1 Address reprint requests to William G. Bradley, MD, PhD, Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, Magnetic Resonance Center, 403 E. Columbia St, Long Beach, CA 90806.

References

↵
Adams RD, Fisher CM, Hakim S, et al. Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with “normal” cerebrospinal pressures: a treatable syndrome. N Engl J Med 1965;273:117
↵
McHugh PR. Occult hydrocephalus. Q J Med 1964;33:297-308
FREE Full Text
↵
Bradley WG, Quencer RM. Hydrocephalus and cerebrospinal fluid flow. In: Stark DD, Bradley WG, eds. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 3rd ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby 1999;1483-1508
↵
Hakim S, Adams RD. The special clinical problem of symptomatic hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure. J Neurosci 1965;2:307-327
↵
Conner ES, Black PML, Foley L. Experimental normal pressure hydrocephalus is accompanied by increased transmantle pressure. J Neurosurg 1984;61:322-328
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Fisher CM. The clinical picture in occult hydrocephalus. Clin Neurosurg 1977;24:270-284
PubMed
Vassilouthis J. The syndrome of normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 1984;61:501-509
PubMed
↵
Vanneste JAL, Hyman R. Nontumoural aqueduct stenosis and normal pressure hydrocephalus in the elderly. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1986;49:529-535
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
Krauss JK, Regel JP. The predictive value of ventricular CSF removal in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol Res 1997;19:357-360
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Vanneste JAL, Augustijn P, Dirven C, Tan WF, Goedhart ZD. Shunting normal pressure hydrocephalus: do the benefits outweigh the risks? A multicenter study and literature review. Neurology 1992;42:54-59
Abstract/FREE Full Text
Vanneste JAL. Three decades of normal pressure hydrocephalus: are we wiser now? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:1021-1025
FREE Full Text
Black PM, Ojemann RG, Tzouras A. CSF shunts for dementia, incontinence, and gait disturbance. Clin Neurosurg 1985;32:632-651
PubMed
↵
Corkill RG, Cadoux-Hudson TAD. Normal pressure hydrocephalus: developments in determining surgical prognosis. Curr Opin Neurol 1999;12:671-677
CrossRef PubMed
Ojemann RG, Fisher CM, Adams RD, New PF. Further experience with the syndrome of “normal” pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 1969;31:279-294
CrossRef PubMed
Huckman MS. Normal pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation of diagnostic and prognostic tests. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1981;2:385-395
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
Hakim S, Vengas JG, Burton JD. The physics of the cranial cavity, hydrocephalus and normal pressure hydrocephalus: mechanical interpretation and mathematical model. Surg Neurol 1970;5:187
↵
Koto A, Rosenberg G, Zingesser LH, Horoupian D, Katzman R. Syndrome of normal pressure hydrocephalus: possible relation to hypertensive and arteriosclerotic vasculopathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1977;40:73-79
Abstract/FREE Full Text
Graff-Radford NR, Godersky JC. Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and systemic hypertension. Neurology 1987;37:868-871
Abstract/FREE Full Text
Casmiro M, D'Alessandro R, Cacciatore FM, et al. Risk factors for the syndrome of ventricular enlargement with gait apraxia (idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus): a case-control study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1989;52:847-852
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
Bradley WG, Whittemore AR, Watanabe AS, et al. Association of deep white matter infarction with chronic communicating hydrocephalus: implications regarding the possible origin of normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1991;12:31-39
Abstract/FREE Full Text
Krauss JK, Regel JP, Vach W, Droste DW, Borremans JJ, Mergner T. Vascular risk factors and arteriosclerotic disease in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus of the elderly. Stroke 1996;27:24-29
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
Greitz TV, Grepe AO, Kalmer MS, Lopez J. Pre- and postoperative evaluation of cerebral blood flow in low pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 1969;31:644-651
PubMed
↵
Ekstedt J, Friden H. CSF hydrodynamics for the study of the adult hydrocephalus syndrome. In: Shapiro K, Mamarou A, Portnoy H, eds. Hydrocephalus. New York: Raven Press 1984;
↵
Sklar FH, Lindler ML. The role of the pressure-volume relationship of brain elasticity in the mechanics and treatment of hydrocephalus. In: Shapiro K, Mamarou A, Portnoy H, eds. Hydrocephalus. New York: Raven Press 1984;
Estanol BV. Gait apraxia in communicating hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1981;44:305-308
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
Nutt JG, Marsden CD, Thompson PD. Human walking and higher-level gait disorders particularly in the elderly. Neurology 1993;43:268-279
FREE Full Text
Denny-Brown D. The Basal Ganglia and Their Relation to Disorders of Movement. London: Oxford University Press 1962;
↵
Graff-Radford NR, Godersky JC. Normal pressure hydrocephalus. Onset of gait abnormality before dementia predicts good surgical outcome. Arch Neurol 1986;43:940-942
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Gleason PL, Black PM, Matsumae M. The neurobiology of normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1993;4:667-675
PubMed
↵
Gustafson L, Hagberg B. Recovery in hydrocephalic dementia after shunt operation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1978;41:940-947
Abstract/FREE Full Text
Thomsen AM, Borgesen SE, Bruhn P, Gjerris F. Prognosis of dementia in normal pressure hydrocephalus after a shunt operation. Ann Neurol 1986;20:304-310
CrossRef PubMed
Krauss JK, Regel JP, Vach W, et al. White matter lesions in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and in an age-matched control group: a comparative study. Neurosurgery 1997;40:491-495
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Jack CR Jr, Mokri B, Laws ER Jr, Houser OW, Baker HL Jr, Petersen RC. MR findings in normal-pressure hydrocephalus: significance and comparison with other forms of dementia. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987;11:923-931
CrossRef PubMed
Krauss JK, Droste DW, Vach W, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid shunting in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus of the elderly: effect of periventricular and deep white matter lesions. Neurosurgery 1996;39:292-300
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Mathew NT, Meyer JS, Hartmann A, Ott EC. Abnormal cerebrospinal fluid blood flow dynamics. Implications in diagnosis, treatment and prognosis in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Arch Neurol 1975;32:657-664
CrossRef PubMed
Vorstrup S, Chistensen J, Gjerris F, et al. Cerebral blood flow in patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus before and after shunting. J Neurosurg 1987;66:379-387
PubMed
Mamo HL, Meric PC, Ponsin JC, Rey AC, Luft AG, Seylaz JA. Cerebral blood flow in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Stroke 1987;18:1074-1080
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
Waldemar G, Schmidt JF, Delecluse F, Andersen AR, Gjerris S, Paulson OB. High resolution SPECT with [99mTc]-d, l-HMPAO in normal pressure hydrocephalus before and after shunt operation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993;56:655-664
Abstract/FREE Full Text
Kristensen B, Malm J, Fagerland M, et al. Regional cerebral blood flow, white matter abnormalities, and cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics in patients with idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1996;60:282-288
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
Tanaka A, Kimura M, Nakayama Y, Yoshinaga S, Tomonaga M. Cerebral blood flow and autoregulation in normal pressure hydrocephalus syndrome. Neurosurgery 1997;40:1161-1168
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Kimura M, Tanaka A, Yoshinaga S. Significance of periventricular hemodynamics in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 1992;30:701-704
PubMed
Graff-Radford NR, Rezai K, Godersky JC, Eslinger P, Damasio H, Kirchner PT. Regional cerebral blood flow in normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987;50:1589-1596
Abstract/FREE Full Text
Chang CC, Kuwana N, Noji M, Tanabe Y, Koike Y, Ikegami T. Cerebral blood flow in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Nucl Med Commun 1999;20:167-169
PubMed
↵
Miyake H, Ohta T, Kajimoto Y, Deguchi J. Diamox® challenge test to decide indications for cerebrospinal fluid shunting in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1999;141:1187-1193
CrossRef PubMed
Meyer JS, Tachibana H, Hardenberg JP, et al. Normal pressure hydrocephalus. Influences on cerebral hemodynamic and cerebrospinal fluid pressure: chemical autoregulation. Surg Neurol 1984;21:195-203
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Fishman RA. Occult hydrocephalus [letter]. N Engl J Med 1966;274:466-467
↵
Pickard JD, Teasdale G, Matheson M, et al. Intraventricular pressure waves: the best predictive test for shunting in normal pressure hydrocephalus. In: Shulman K, Marmarou A, Miller JD, et al, eds. Intracranial Pressure IV. Berlin: Springer 1980;498-500
DiRocco C. Hydrocephalus and cerebrospinal fluid pulses. In: Shapiro K, Mamarou A, Portnoy H, eds. Hydrocephalus. New York: Raven Press 1984:231-250
Foltz EL. Hydrocephalus and CSF pulsatility: clinical and laboratory studies. In: Shapiro K, Mamarou A, Portnoy H, eds. Hydrocephalus. New York: Raven Press 1984:337-362
Geschwind N. The mechanism of normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Sci 1968;7:481-493
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Borgesen SE, Gjerris F. The predictive value of conductance to outflow of cerebrospinal fluid in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Brain 1982;105:65-86
FREE Full Text
↵
Boon AJ, Tans JT, Delwel EJ, et al. Does CSF outflow resistance predict the response to shunting in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus? Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1998;71:331-333
PubMed
↵
Castro ME, Portnoy HD, Maesaka J. Elevated cortical venous pressure in hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 1991;29:232-238
PubMed
↵
Penar PL, Lakin WD, Yu J. Normal pressure hydrocephalus: an analysis of aetiology and response to shunting based on mathematical modeling. Neurol Res 1995;17:83-88
PubMed
Greitz D, Greitz T, Hindmarsh T. A new view on the CSF-circulation with the potential for pharmacological treatment of childhood hydrocephalus. Acta Paediatr 1997;86:125-132
PubMed
Portnoy HD, Branch C, Castro ME. The relationship of intracranial venous pressure to hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 1994;10:29-35
CrossRef PubMed
↵
De Land FH, James AE Jr, Ladd DJ, Koninsmark BW. Normal pressure hydrocephalus: a histologic study. Am J Clin Pathol 1972;58:58-63
PubMed
Vessal K, Sperber EE, James AE Jr. Chronic communicating hydrocephalus with normal CSF pressures: a cisternographic-pathologic correlation. Ann Radiol (Paris) 1974;17:785-793
PubMed
↵
Nitz WR, Bradley WG, Watanabe AS, et al. Flow dynamics of cerebrospinal fluid: assessment with phase-contrast velocity MR imaging performed with retrospective cardiac gating. Radiology 1992;183:395-405
PubMed
↵
Tator CH, Fleming JF, Sheppard RH, Turner VM. A radioscopic test for communicating hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 1968;28:327-340
PubMed
↵
Chang C-C, Kuwana N, Ito S, Ikegami T. Prediction of effectiveness of shunting in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus by cerebral blood flow measurement and computed tomography cisternography. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1999;39:841-846
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Fisher CM. Communicating hydrocephalus. Lancet 1978;1:37-
Wood JH, Bartlet D, James AE, Udvarhelyi GB. Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: diagnosis and patient selection for shunt surgery. Neurology 1974;24:517-525
Abstract/FREE Full Text
Wikkelso C, Andersson H, Blomstrand C, Lindqvist G. The clinical effect of lumbar puncture in normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1982;45:64-69
Abstract/FREE Full Text
Wikkelso C, Andersson H, Blomstrand C, Lindqvist G, Svendsen P. Normal pressure hydrocephalus: predictive value of the cerebrospinal fluid tap-test. Acta Neurol Scand 1986;3:566-573
↵
Malm J, Kristensen B, Karlsson T, Fagerlund M, Eifverson J, Ekstedt J. The predictive value of cerebrospinal fluid dynamic tests in patients with the idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome. Arch Neurol 1995;52:783-789
CrossRef PubMed
Vanneste JAL. Diagnosis and management of normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol 2000;247:5-14
CrossRef PubMed
Symon L, Dorsch NWC. Use of long-term intracranial pressure measurement to assess hydrocephalic patients prior to shunt surgery. J Neurosurg 1975;42:258-273
PubMed
Crockard HA, Hanlon K, Duda EE, Mullan JF. Hydrocephalus as a cause of dementia: evaluation of computerized tomography and intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1977;40:736-740
Abstract/FREE Full Text
Bradley WG, Kortman KE, Burgoyne B. Flowing cerebrospinal fluid in normal and hydrocephalic states: appearance on MR images. Radiology 1986;159:611-616
PubMed
Sherman JL, Citrin CM, Gangarosa RE, Bowen BJ. The MR appearance of CSF flow in patients with ventriculomegaly. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1986;7:1025-1031
Abstract/FREE Full Text
Quencer RM, Post MJD, Hinks RS. Cine MR in the evaluation of normal and abnormal CSF flow: intracranial and intraspinal studies. Neuroradiology 1990;32:371-391
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Bradley WG, Whittemore AR, Kortman KE, et al. Marked cerebrospinal fluid void: indicator of successful shunt in patients with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus. Radiology 1991;78:459-466
Schroth G, Klose U. MRI of CSF flow in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Psychiatry Res 1989;29:289-290
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Hakim R, Black PM. Correlation between lumbo-ventricular perfusion and MRI-CSF flow studies in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Surg Neurol 1998;49:14-20
CrossRef PubMed
Krauss JK, Regel JP, Vach W, Jungling FD, Droste DW, Wakloo AK. Flow void of cerebrospinal fluid in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus of the elderly: can it predict outcome after shunting? Neurosurgery 1997;40:67-73
PubMed
↵
Bradley WG, Scalzo D, Queralt J, Nitz WN, Atkinson DJ, Wong P. Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements at MR imaging. Radiology 1996;198:523-529
PubMed
Egeler-Peerdeman SM, Barkhof F, Walchenbach R, Valk J. Cine phase-contrast MR imaging in normal pressure hydrocephalus patients: relation to surgical outcome. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1998;71:340-342
PubMed
Mase M, Yamada K, Banno T, Miyachi T, Ohara S, Matsumoto T. Quantitative analysis of CSF flow dynamics using MRI in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1998;71:350-353
PubMed
Kim D-DS, Choi J-U, Huh R, Yun P-H, Kim D-I. Quantitative assessment of cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics using a phase-contrast cine MR image in hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 1999;15:461-467
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Hahnel S, Freund M, Munkel K, Heiland S, et al. Magnetization transfer ratio is low in normal-appearing cerebral white matter in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neuroradiology 2000;42:174-179
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Gideon P, Thomsen C, Gjerris F, Sorensen, Henriksen O. Increased self-diffusion of brain water in hydrocephalus measured by MR imaging. Acta Radiol 1994;6:514-519
Mitchell P, Mathew B. Third ventriculostomy in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Brit J Neurosurg 1999;13:382-385
↵
Friedman WA, Sypert GW. Normal pressure hydrocephalus. Contemp Neurosurg 1983;5:1-6
↵
Boon AJ, Tans JT, Delwel EJ, et al. The Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study. How to select patients for shunting? An analysis of four diagnostic criteria. Surg Neurol 2000;53:201-207
CrossRef PubMed

In this issue

Download PDF

Email Article

Citation Tools

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Show more BRAIN

[1] ↵
Adams RD, Fisher CM, Hakim S, et al. Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with “normal” cerebrospinal pressures: a treatable syndrome. N Engl J Med 1965;273:117

[2] ↵
McHugh PR. Occult hydrocephalus. Q J Med 1964;33:297-308
FREE Full Text

[3] ↵
Bradley WG, Quencer RM. Hydrocephalus and cerebrospinal fluid flow. In: Stark DD, Bradley WG, eds. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 3rd ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby 1999;1483-1508

[4] ↵
Hakim S, Adams RD. The special clinical problem of symptomatic hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure. J Neurosci 1965;2:307-327

[5] ↵
Conner ES, Black PML, Foley L. Experimental normal pressure hydrocephalus is accompanied by increased transmantle pressure. J Neurosurg 1984;61:322-328
CrossRef PubMed

[6] ↵
Fisher CM. The clinical picture in occult hydrocephalus. Clin Neurosurg 1977;24:270-284
PubMed

[7] Vassilouthis J. The syndrome of normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 1984;61:501-509
PubMed

[8] ↵
Vanneste JAL, Hyman R. Nontumoural aqueduct stenosis and normal pressure hydrocephalus in the elderly. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1986;49:529-535
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[9] ↵
Krauss JK, Regel JP. The predictive value of ventricular CSF removal in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol Res 1997;19:357-360
CrossRef PubMed

[10] ↵
Vanneste JAL, Augustijn P, Dirven C, Tan WF, Goedhart ZD. Shunting normal pressure hydrocephalus: do the benefits outweigh the risks? A multicenter study and literature review. Neurology 1992;42:54-59
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[11] Vanneste JAL. Three decades of normal pressure hydrocephalus: are we wiser now? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:1021-1025
FREE Full Text

[12] Black PM, Ojemann RG, Tzouras A. CSF shunts for dementia, incontinence, and gait disturbance. Clin Neurosurg 1985;32:632-651
PubMed

[13] ↵
Corkill RG, Cadoux-Hudson TAD. Normal pressure hydrocephalus: developments in determining surgical prognosis. Curr Opin Neurol 1999;12:671-677
CrossRef PubMed

[14] Ojemann RG, Fisher CM, Adams RD, New PF. Further experience with the syndrome of “normal” pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 1969;31:279-294
CrossRef PubMed

[15] Huckman MS. Normal pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation of diagnostic and prognostic tests. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1981;2:385-395
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[16] ↵
Hakim S, Vengas JG, Burton JD. The physics of the cranial cavity, hydrocephalus and normal pressure hydrocephalus: mechanical interpretation and mathematical model. Surg Neurol 1970;5:187

[17] ↵
Koto A, Rosenberg G, Zingesser LH, Horoupian D, Katzman R. Syndrome of normal pressure hydrocephalus: possible relation to hypertensive and arteriosclerotic vasculopathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1977;40:73-79
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[18] Graff-Radford NR, Godersky JC. Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and systemic hypertension. Neurology 1987;37:868-871
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[19] Casmiro M, D'Alessandro R, Cacciatore FM, et al. Risk factors for the syndrome of ventricular enlargement with gait apraxia (idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus): a case-control study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1989;52:847-852
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[20] ↵
Bradley WG, Whittemore AR, Watanabe AS, et al. Association of deep white matter infarction with chronic communicating hydrocephalus: implications regarding the possible origin of normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1991;12:31-39
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[21] Krauss JK, Regel JP, Vach W, Droste DW, Borremans JJ, Mergner T. Vascular risk factors and arteriosclerotic disease in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus of the elderly. Stroke 1996;27:24-29
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[22] ↵
Greitz TV, Grepe AO, Kalmer MS, Lopez J. Pre- and postoperative evaluation of cerebral blood flow in low pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 1969;31:644-651
PubMed

[23] ↵
Ekstedt J, Friden H. CSF hydrodynamics for the study of the adult hydrocephalus syndrome. In: Shapiro K, Mamarou A, Portnoy H, eds. Hydrocephalus. New York: Raven Press 1984;

[24] ↵
Sklar FH, Lindler ML. The role of the pressure-volume relationship of brain elasticity in the mechanics and treatment of hydrocephalus. In: Shapiro K, Mamarou A, Portnoy H, eds. Hydrocephalus. New York: Raven Press 1984;

[25] Estanol BV. Gait apraxia in communicating hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1981;44:305-308
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[26] ↵
Nutt JG, Marsden CD, Thompson PD. Human walking and higher-level gait disorders particularly in the elderly. Neurology 1993;43:268-279
FREE Full Text

[27] Denny-Brown D. The Basal Ganglia and Their Relation to Disorders of Movement. London: Oxford University Press 1962;

[28] ↵
Graff-Radford NR, Godersky JC. Normal pressure hydrocephalus. Onset of gait abnormality before dementia predicts good surgical outcome. Arch Neurol 1986;43:940-942
CrossRef PubMed

[29] ↵
Gleason PL, Black PM, Matsumae M. The neurobiology of normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1993;4:667-675
PubMed

[30] ↵
Gustafson L, Hagberg B. Recovery in hydrocephalic dementia after shunt operation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1978;41:940-947
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[31] Thomsen AM, Borgesen SE, Bruhn P, Gjerris F. Prognosis of dementia in normal pressure hydrocephalus after a shunt operation. Ann Neurol 1986;20:304-310
CrossRef PubMed

[32] Krauss JK, Regel JP, Vach W, et al. White matter lesions in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and in an age-matched control group: a comparative study. Neurosurgery 1997;40:491-495
CrossRef PubMed

[33] ↵
Jack CR Jr, Mokri B, Laws ER Jr, Houser OW, Baker HL Jr, Petersen RC. MR findings in normal-pressure hydrocephalus: significance and comparison with other forms of dementia. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987;11:923-931
CrossRef PubMed

[34] Krauss JK, Droste DW, Vach W, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid shunting in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus of the elderly: effect of periventricular and deep white matter lesions. Neurosurgery 1996;39:292-300
CrossRef PubMed

[35] ↵
Mathew NT, Meyer JS, Hartmann A, Ott EC. Abnormal cerebrospinal fluid blood flow dynamics. Implications in diagnosis, treatment and prognosis in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Arch Neurol 1975;32:657-664
CrossRef PubMed

[36] Vorstrup S, Chistensen J, Gjerris F, et al. Cerebral blood flow in patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus before and after shunting. J Neurosurg 1987;66:379-387
PubMed

[37] Mamo HL, Meric PC, Ponsin JC, Rey AC, Luft AG, Seylaz JA. Cerebral blood flow in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Stroke 1987;18:1074-1080
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[38] ↵
Waldemar G, Schmidt JF, Delecluse F, Andersen AR, Gjerris S, Paulson OB. High resolution SPECT with [99mTc]-d, l-HMPAO in normal pressure hydrocephalus before and after shunt operation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993;56:655-664
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[39] Kristensen B, Malm J, Fagerland M, et al. Regional cerebral blood flow, white matter abnormalities, and cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics in patients with idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1996;60:282-288
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[40] ↵
Tanaka A, Kimura M, Nakayama Y, Yoshinaga S, Tomonaga M. Cerebral blood flow and autoregulation in normal pressure hydrocephalus syndrome. Neurosurgery 1997;40:1161-1168
CrossRef PubMed

[41] ↵
Kimura M, Tanaka A, Yoshinaga S. Significance of periventricular hemodynamics in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 1992;30:701-704
PubMed

[42] Graff-Radford NR, Rezai K, Godersky JC, Eslinger P, Damasio H, Kirchner PT. Regional cerebral blood flow in normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987;50:1589-1596
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[43] Chang CC, Kuwana N, Noji M, Tanabe Y, Koike Y, Ikegami T. Cerebral blood flow in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Nucl Med Commun 1999;20:167-169
PubMed

[44] ↵
Miyake H, Ohta T, Kajimoto Y, Deguchi J. Diamox® challenge test to decide indications for cerebrospinal fluid shunting in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1999;141:1187-1193
CrossRef PubMed

[45] Meyer JS, Tachibana H, Hardenberg JP, et al. Normal pressure hydrocephalus. Influences on cerebral hemodynamic and cerebrospinal fluid pressure: chemical autoregulation. Surg Neurol 1984;21:195-203
CrossRef PubMed

[46] ↵
Fishman RA. Occult hydrocephalus [letter]. N Engl J Med 1966;274:466-467

[47] ↵
Pickard JD, Teasdale G, Matheson M, et al. Intraventricular pressure waves: the best predictive test for shunting in normal pressure hydrocephalus. In: Shulman K, Marmarou A, Miller JD, et al, eds. Intracranial Pressure IV. Berlin: Springer 1980;498-500

[48] DiRocco C. Hydrocephalus and cerebrospinal fluid pulses. In: Shapiro K, Mamarou A, Portnoy H, eds. Hydrocephalus. New York: Raven Press 1984:231-250

[49] Foltz EL. Hydrocephalus and CSF pulsatility: clinical and laboratory studies. In: Shapiro K, Mamarou A, Portnoy H, eds. Hydrocephalus. New York: Raven Press 1984:337-362

[50] Geschwind N. The mechanism of normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Sci 1968;7:481-493
CrossRef PubMed

[51] ↵
Borgesen SE, Gjerris F. The predictive value of conductance to outflow of cerebrospinal fluid in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Brain 1982;105:65-86
FREE Full Text

[52] ↵
Boon AJ, Tans JT, Delwel EJ, et al. Does CSF outflow resistance predict the response to shunting in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus? Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1998;71:331-333
PubMed

[53] ↵
Castro ME, Portnoy HD, Maesaka J. Elevated cortical venous pressure in hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 1991;29:232-238
PubMed

[54] ↵
Penar PL, Lakin WD, Yu J. Normal pressure hydrocephalus: an analysis of aetiology and response to shunting based on mathematical modeling. Neurol Res 1995;17:83-88
PubMed

[55] Greitz D, Greitz T, Hindmarsh T. A new view on the CSF-circulation with the potential for pharmacological treatment of childhood hydrocephalus. Acta Paediatr 1997;86:125-132
PubMed

[56] Portnoy HD, Branch C, Castro ME. The relationship of intracranial venous pressure to hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 1994;10:29-35
CrossRef PubMed

[57] ↵
De Land FH, James AE Jr, Ladd DJ, Koninsmark BW. Normal pressure hydrocephalus: a histologic study. Am J Clin Pathol 1972;58:58-63
PubMed

[58] Vessal K, Sperber EE, James AE Jr. Chronic communicating hydrocephalus with normal CSF pressures: a cisternographic-pathologic correlation. Ann Radiol (Paris) 1974;17:785-793
PubMed

[59] ↵
Nitz WR, Bradley WG, Watanabe AS, et al. Flow dynamics of cerebrospinal fluid: assessment with phase-contrast velocity MR imaging performed with retrospective cardiac gating. Radiology 1992;183:395-405
PubMed

[60] ↵
Tator CH, Fleming JF, Sheppard RH, Turner VM. A radioscopic test for communicating hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 1968;28:327-340
PubMed

[61] ↵
Chang C-C, Kuwana N, Ito S, Ikegami T. Prediction of effectiveness of shunting in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus by cerebral blood flow measurement and computed tomography cisternography. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1999;39:841-846
CrossRef PubMed

[62] ↵
Fisher CM. Communicating hydrocephalus. Lancet 1978;1:37-

[63] Wood JH, Bartlet D, James AE, Udvarhelyi GB. Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: diagnosis and patient selection for shunt surgery. Neurology 1974;24:517-525
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[64] Wikkelso C, Andersson H, Blomstrand C, Lindqvist G. The clinical effect of lumbar puncture in normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1982;45:64-69
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[65] Wikkelso C, Andersson H, Blomstrand C, Lindqvist G, Svendsen P. Normal pressure hydrocephalus: predictive value of the cerebrospinal fluid tap-test. Acta Neurol Scand 1986;3:566-573

[66] ↵
Malm J, Kristensen B, Karlsson T, Fagerlund M, Eifverson J, Ekstedt J. The predictive value of cerebrospinal fluid dynamic tests in patients with the idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome. Arch Neurol 1995;52:783-789
CrossRef PubMed

[67] Vanneste JAL. Diagnosis and management of normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol 2000;247:5-14
CrossRef PubMed

[68] Symon L, Dorsch NWC. Use of long-term intracranial pressure measurement to assess hydrocephalic patients prior to shunt surgery. J Neurosurg 1975;42:258-273
PubMed

[69] Crockard HA, Hanlon K, Duda EE, Mullan JF. Hydrocephalus as a cause of dementia: evaluation of computerized tomography and intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1977;40:736-740
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[70] Bradley WG, Kortman KE, Burgoyne B. Flowing cerebrospinal fluid in normal and hydrocephalic states: appearance on MR images. Radiology 1986;159:611-616
PubMed

[71] Sherman JL, Citrin CM, Gangarosa RE, Bowen BJ. The MR appearance of CSF flow in patients with ventriculomegaly. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1986;7:1025-1031
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[72] Quencer RM, Post MJD, Hinks RS. Cine MR in the evaluation of normal and abnormal CSF flow: intracranial and intraspinal studies. Neuroradiology 1990;32:371-391
CrossRef PubMed

[73] ↵
Bradley WG, Whittemore AR, Kortman KE, et al. Marked cerebrospinal fluid void: indicator of successful shunt in patients with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus. Radiology 1991;78:459-466

[74] Schroth G, Klose U. MRI of CSF flow in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Psychiatry Res 1989;29:289-290
CrossRef PubMed

[75] ↵
Hakim R, Black PM. Correlation between lumbo-ventricular perfusion and MRI-CSF flow studies in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Surg Neurol 1998;49:14-20
CrossRef PubMed

[76] Krauss JK, Regel JP, Vach W, Jungling FD, Droste DW, Wakloo AK. Flow void of cerebrospinal fluid in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus of the elderly: can it predict outcome after shunting? Neurosurgery 1997;40:67-73
PubMed

[77] ↵
Bradley WG, Scalzo D, Queralt J, Nitz WN, Atkinson DJ, Wong P. Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements at MR imaging. Radiology 1996;198:523-529
PubMed

[78] Egeler-Peerdeman SM, Barkhof F, Walchenbach R, Valk J. Cine phase-contrast MR imaging in normal pressure hydrocephalus patients: relation to surgical outcome. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1998;71:340-342
PubMed

[79] Mase M, Yamada K, Banno T, Miyachi T, Ohara S, Matsumoto T. Quantitative analysis of CSF flow dynamics using MRI in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1998;71:350-353
PubMed

[80] Kim D-DS, Choi J-U, Huh R, Yun P-H, Kim D-I. Quantitative assessment of cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics using a phase-contrast cine MR image in hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 1999;15:461-467
CrossRef PubMed

[81] ↵
Hahnel S, Freund M, Munkel K, Heiland S, et al. Magnetization transfer ratio is low in normal-appearing cerebral white matter in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neuroradiology 2000;42:174-179
CrossRef PubMed

[82] ↵
Gideon P, Thomsen C, Gjerris F, Sorensen, Henriksen O. Increased self-diffusion of brain water in hydrocephalus measured by MR imaging. Acta Radiol 1994;6:514-519

[83] Mitchell P, Mathew B. Third ventriculostomy in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Brit J Neurosurg 1999;13:382-385

[84] ↵
Friedman WA, Sypert GW. Normal pressure hydrocephalus. Contemp Neurosurg 1983;5:1-6

[85] ↵
Boon AJ, Tans JT, Delwel EJ, et al. The Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study. How to select patients for shunting? An analysis of four diagnostic criteria. Surg Neurol 2000;53:201-207
CrossRef PubMed

Main menu

User menu

Search

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: New Concepts on Etiology and Diagnosis

Footnotes

References

In this issue

Citation Manager Formats

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Similar Articles

News and Updates

Resources

Opportunities

American Society of Neuroradiology

Main menu

User menu

Search

Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: New Concepts on Etiology and Diagnosis

Footnotes

References

In this issue

Citation Manager Formats

Jump to section

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Similar Articles

News and Updates

Resources

Opportunities

American Society of Neuroradiology