The Effect of Corticosteroid Medication on Quantitative MR Parameters of the Brain

Stefan C.A. Steens; Gerda M. Steup-Beekman; Gerlof P.Th. Bosma; Faiza Admiraal-Behloul; Hans Olofsen; Joost Doornbos; Tom W.J. Huizinga; Mark A. van Buchem

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Quantitative MR imaging techniques such as magnetization transfer imaging (MTI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and MR spectroscopy are promising diagnostic tools for use with patients with diffuse brain diseases such as neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE). Such patients are often on corticosteroid (CS) treatment. Presently, it is unknown whether CSs per se influence quantitative MR imaging measurements. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of low-dose oral CSs on MTI, DWI, and MR spectroscopy parameters of the brain.

METHODS: Twenty-seven rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with and without CS medication and 15 healthy controls were subjected to conventional MR imaging, whole-brain MTI and DWI, and single-voxel MR spectroscopy. Oral CSs were used by 13 of the RA patients. Univariate analyses with age as a covariate were performed on MTI, DWI, and MR spectroscopy parameters between RA patients with and without CSs and healthy controls. Pearson correlations were calculated between all imaging parameters and duration of disease, duration of CS use, and CS dosage.

RESULTS: No significant differences between the groups of subjects or significant correlations with clinical parameters were found for MTI, DWI and MR spectroscopy parameters.

CONCLUSION: In this study, we found no evidence for an effect of low-dose oral CSs on whole-brain MTI and DWI histogram parameters and single-voxel MR spectroscopy measurements of the brain. The results of this study demonstrate that it is unlikely that MTI, DWI, and MR spectroscopy parameters reported in NPSLE studies are confounded by low-dose oral CS.

Conventional MR imaging is the imaging technique of choice in the diagnostic work-up of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with neuropsychiatric (NP) symptoms (1, 2). The abnormalities that are observed in such patients on conventional MR imaging, however, are neither specific nor sensitive for primary diffuse neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE). Recently, by using the quantitative MR imaging techniques of magnetization transfer imaging (MTI) (3), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) (4), and MR spectroscopy (5), diffuse abnormalities have been observed in patients with NPSLE, which are invisible on conventional MR images (6–13). Quantitative MR imaging techniques are not only promising diagnostic tools, but have also increased knowledge on the pathogenesis of NPSLE. A clinical issue that remains to be evaluated is the question whether low-dose oral corticosteroid (CS) medication by itself leads to abnormalities in the whole-brain MTI and DWI parameters and single-voxel MR spectroscopy measurements, because many (NP-) SLE patients use low-dose oral CS.

Patients with severe SLE organ involvement or NPSLE manifestations often require high-dose (intravenous) CS (14, 15). Patients with milder disease activity, however, may benefit from oral prednisolone at daily doses of only 7–15 mg (14). Apart from the beneficial anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects of CS, there are also a number of well-documented adverse effects, including some symptomatic effects on the central nervous system (CNS) such as psychosis, seizures, or memory deficits (14, 16, 17). Furthermore, in both SLE and multiple sclerosis (MS) patients receiving CSs, some neuroimaging studies have reported cerebral atrophy, which was at least partially attributed to CS (18, 19). If CS use is associated with cerebral atrophy, the changes in neuronal density and axonal packing are likely to affect MTI, DWI, and MR spectroscopy results, which are indicative of the structural integrity and chemical composition of the brain parenchyma (2).

Before quantitative MR imaging techniques can be used as diagnostic tools and surrogate markers for therapy in NPSLE, it is imperative to know whether brain abnormalities observed can truly be attributed to the underlying disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of low-dose oral CS on whole-brain MTI and DWI parameters and single-voxel MR spectroscopy measurements. For this purpose, we selected a group of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a disease that is not known to affect brain tissue, who were receiving CS medication and compared quantitative MR imaging parameters of their brains to those of a group of RA patients without CS medication and a group of healthy controls.

Methods

Subjects

Twenty-seven patients diagnosed with RA (20) were selected from the patient files of the Department of Rheumatology at our institution (Table 1). At the time of scanning, 13 patients were receiving daily oral prednisone (CS+), whereas the others had not used oral CSs for at least 25 years (CS−). Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) consisting of oral low-dose methotrexate, sulfasalazine, leflunomide, or intramuscular gold injections were used by all patients but one. Both daily CS dosage at the time of scanning and lifetime cumulative CS dosage are listed in Table 1. The effect of CS on the study parameters was evaluated comparing CS+ and CS− patients. Also, 15 healthy controls were recruited by an advertisement in a local newspaper and included in the study. None of the subjects had a diagnosis of current or past neurologic or psychiatric disease. This study was approved by the medical ethics committee of our institution and written informed consent was acquired from all subjects.

View this table:

TABLE 1:

Patient characteristics

Image Acquisition

Scanning was performed on a 1.5T MR system (Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands), equipped with hardware for echo-planar imaging (EPI), shielded gradients, and a standard quadrature headcoil. Scanning was performed in the axial plane, with alignment parallel to the plane through the anterior and posterior commissure.

Conventional MR Imaging Sequences.

Conventional T1-weighted spin-echo, fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) and dual-echo (proton density and T2-weighted) images covering the whole brain consisted of 3–6-mm sections with 0–0.6-mm section gap. Echo time and repetition times (TE/TR) were 20/600 msec for T1-weighted images, 120/8000 msec or 100/8000 msec for FLAIR images with an inversion time (TI) of 2000 msec and TE₁/TE₂/TR of 30/120/2500 msec or 27/120/3000 msec for dual images. The field of view (FOV) was 220 mm with a 256 × 256 matrix. Total scanning time for conventional MR imaging was maximal 18 minutes.

MTI.

For MTI a 3D gradient-echo pulse sequence with a TE/TR of 6/106 msec and a flip angle of 12° were used, minimizing T1 and T2 weighting. A FOV of 220 mm, 256 × 128 matrix, and scan time of 11:27 minutes were used for 28 contiguous 5-mm sections. Two sets of axial images were acquired, with (Ms) and without (Mo) a sinc-shaped MT saturation pulse 1100 Hz upfield of H₂O resonance (12).

DWI.

Multisection, single-shot DW-EPI of the whole brain was performed in 3 orthogonal directions with a b value of 800 s/mm². For each diffusion direction a combination of x, y, and z gradients was used to apply strenghts of 30 mT/m and a slew rate of 150 mT/m/s. A TE/TR of 70/2642 msec, FOV of 230 mm, matrix of 256 × 128, 60% acquisition, EPI factor of 77, and scan time of 19 seconds were used for 18 6-mm sections with 1-mm section gap. From the DWI in 3 directions, an isotropic diffusion image was calculated (12).

MR Spectroscopy.

¹H-MR spectra were acquired with a TE/TR of 136/2000 msec. The number of signals averaged was 128; the spectral bandwidth was 1000 Hz, using 512 data points. A volume of interest (VOI) of 23 mL (±4.6 mL) was placed in the white matter adjacent to the left lateral cerebral ventricle. Scan time was approximately 4.5 minutes, including shimming of the VOI and optimization of parameters for water suppression (12).

Postprocessing of MR Spectra and Images

All data were transferred to an off-line workstation. The Magnetic Resonance User Interface (MRUI) software package (21) was used for MR spectroscopy data processing; all other postprocessing procedures were performed by using SNIPER (Software for Neuro-Image Processing in Experimental Research, Division of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands) by using registration algorithms described by Woods et al (22, 23).

Conventional MR Imaging Sequences.

The conventional MR images were registered to the whole-brain Ms images, providing whole-brain datasets of these sequences for each patient. Then, the intracranial, brain parenchyma, and CSF compartments were segmented automatically, providing the fraction of CSF to intracranial volume (CSF%) as an indicator of cerebral atrophy. Abnormalities as identified on hard copies of T2-weighted and FLAIR images by an experienced neuroradiologist were manually outlined on the coregistered conventional MR images, and the fraction of lesion volume to parenchymal volume was calculated (Lesion%).

MTI.

After registration of the Mo to the Ms images, the magnetization transfer ratio (MTR, in percent unit [pu]) was calculated from signal intensities of every voxel with the equation [(Mo − Ms)/Mo] × 100% (3). On the basis of the coregistered conventional MR images, the intracranial compartment was segmented automatically and manually edited when necessary. After automatic segmentation of brain parenchyma and CSF based on an MTR threshold of 20 pu as described elsewhere, MTR maps were generated from the brain parenchyma. From these maps, whole-brain MTR histograms were generated and the corresponding mean (pu) and peak height corrected for volume differences (arbitrary units) were calculated (6, 7, 12).

DWI.

After calculation of apparent diffusion coefficient ([ADC] 10⁻⁶ mm²/s) maps from the isotropic b = 800 s/mm² and b = 0 s/mm² images, the intracranial compartment was segmented automatically based on b = 0 s/mm² (≈T2-weighted) images and manually edited when necessary. After automatic segmentation of brain parenchyma and CSF, ADC maps were generated for the brain parenchyma. From these maps, whole-brain ADC histograms were generated and the corresponding mean (10⁻⁶ mm²/s) and peak height corrected for volume differences (arbitrary units) were calculated (24).

MR Spectroscopy.

The residual water signal intensity was removed by means of singular value decomposition (HSVD; 25). Metabolites detected by ¹H-MR spectroscopy include N-acetylaspartate (NAA), creatine (Cre), choline-containing substances (Cho), inositol, lactate, glutamate and glutamine, and lipids (5). In this study, we focused on the commonly used metabolites NAA, Cre, and Cho (12). These were quantified by model fitting in the time domain (AMARES method of MRUI, constrained peak fitting—ie, the linewidths of NAA, Cre, and Cho were kept identical) (26) and expressed as NAA/Cre and Cho/Cre ratios.

Statistics

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc Bonferroni test was performed to test for a significant difference in age between the groups, and independent samples t test to test for a significant difference in disease duration between CS+ and CS− patients. Univariate analyses with age as a covariate were performed on whole-brain MTI and DWI parameters and single-voxel MR spectroscopy measurements between healthy controls and CS+ and CS− patients (SPSS for Windows, release 11 2002; SPSS, Inc., Chicago). Within the RA patient group, Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between imaging parameters and disease duration. Moreover, Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between duration of CS use, daily CS dosage and cumulative CS dosage at the time of MR imaging, and all imaging parameters in the CS+ patients. Significance thresholds for Pearson correlations were set at P < .01; all other results were considered significant at P < .05.

Results

One-way ANOVA revealed a significant difference in age between the groups (overall P = .026; post hoc P = .025 between healthy controls and CS+; others not significant). No significant difference was observed for disease duration between CS+ and CS− patients (P = .181). In 17 subjects, aspecific white matter hyperintensities were observed (5 healthy controls, 6 CS−, and 6 CS+ patients), while small, old lacunar infarctions were observed in 2 patients (one CS− and one CS+). Total lesion volumes were very small and not significantly different between the groups (Table 2), so MTR and ADC histograms were generated for the whole brain parenchyma including the small lesions. For both DWI and MR spectroscopy, one dataset was excluded because of a scanner-related artifact; lipid contaminations prohibited calculation of MR spectroscopy spectra in 2 additional cases.

View this table:

TABLE 2:

Parameter values and results of univariate analyses with age as a covariate

Univariate analyses with age as a covariate revealed no significant differences between the CS+ and CS− patients and healthy controls for the quantitative MR parameters (Table 2). No significant Pearson correlations were observed between any of the clinical and imaging parameters (Table 3).

View this table:

TABLE 3:

Pearson correlation coefficients between imaging and clinical parameters

Discussion

In this study, we evaluated the effect of low-dose oral CS on cerebral atrophy and whole-brain MTI and DWI parameters and single-voxel MR spectroscopy measurements in subjects without CNS disease. Our results indicate that oral CS in a relatively low dose as is frequently prescribed to NPSLE patients does not significantly affect brain parenchyma volume and MTI, DWI, and MR spectroscopy parameters.

Prednisolone is a glucocorticoid with anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive features. (Badsha and Edwards [14] provide a detailed description on the actions of glucocorticoids.) In a low oral dose of 7–15 mg daily, CSs have a beneficial effect on mild to moderate SLE manifestations (14). Intravenous methylprednisolone (IV-MP) at levels as high as 1000 mg for several days (14, 15) or even intrathecal administration (27), however, may be required to treat severe symptoms. Most studies examining CNS side effects of CS have focused on patients on such a high-dose intravenous CS regimen; however, lower dose oral prednisolone given for a longer period of time may also result in a cumulative CS dose of several grams (Table 1) and susceptibility to side effects (16).

The mechanism by which CSs could affect brain parenchyma is not fully understood; however, 2 possible explanations are steroid-induced protein catabolism mediating a loss in cerebral tissue and induction of water loss due to decreased vascular permeability with secondary brain volume loss (28, 29). It is conceivable that the resulting changes in neuronal density and axonal packing could affect parenchymal volume and quantitative MR imaging parameters, because these are indicators of the structural integrity and chemical composition of the brain parenchyma (2). Apart from myelin integrity, MTR values are determined by inflammation and edema (3). Therefore, it could be expected that anti-inflammatory drugs such as CSs would affect MTR parameters. ADC values reflect the diffusivity of protons and are mainly determined by their distribution over the intracellular and extracellular compartment and by the integrity of biologic barriers, factors that could be influenced by CSs (4). The NAA/Cre ratio is mainly determined by neuronal and axonal integrity, whereas an increase in Cho/Cre in the absence of a neoplasma is observed in inflammation (5). With a potential change in neuronal density and axonal packing and anti-inflammatory action, CSs could have an effect on both these ratios.

In the present study, we did not find more atrophy in patients on low-dose oral CS medication compared with patients and controls without CSs. As far back as the late 1970s, CT studies were performed in SLE patients to evaluate whether cerebral atrophy was caused by CSs or the underlying disease process (30); however, results from such CT studies, as well as from MR imaging studies that were more recently performed in SLE patients, are equivocal (18, 31, 32). Some studies indicated that cerebral atrophy was at least partially caused by the SLE disease process itself (9, 31, 32). Others suggested that cerebral atrophy resulted mainly from CS medication or from a potential synergistic potentation of SLE and CS (18). Similarly, MR imaging studies in MS patients have yielded conflicting results regarding the cause of cerebral atrophy. In MS patients, brain volume as measured by MR imaging was significantly decreased for 1 month following IV-MP (19). Another study reported oral CS tapering after IV-MP to influence brain volume without an effect of the IV-MP itself (28). Intriguingly, yet another study attributed prevention or delay of whole-brain atrophy to IV-MP (29).

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the effects of low-dose oral CSs on whole-brain MTR and ADC histogram characteristics and to report that no such effect was observed. Previously, MR spectroscopy studies have been performed by others to evaluate the effect of CSs on brain metabolites in comparable doses to the doses used by the patients in our study. Results of these studies are equivocal (33, 34). Khiat et al (33) observed no significant differences in NAA/H₂O and Cre/H₂O metabolites between patients receiving CSs and healthy controls, which suggests that CSs had no effect on neuronal or glial metabolism. Although in the thalamic gray matter reduced Cho/H₂O was observed in patients treated for more than 5 years, such effects were not found for white matter in frontal and temporal regions (33). Brown et al (34), by contrast, observed a significant difference between NAA/Cho and NAA/(Cre+Cho) ratios between patients with and without CS use and attributed the different observations in their study and the study by Khiat et al to the difference of calculating metabolite ratios relative to Cre instead of H₂O. In the same study, the authors confirmed the absence of significant differences in NAA/Cre and Cho/Cre ratios between patients with and without CSs, which is concordant with the findings in our study (34).

Theoretically, we could have compared SLE patients with and without CS medication. Apart from systemic manifestations, however, a large number of SLE patients have CNS involvement at some time during the course of their disease (1). CSs will only be given during disease activity. Because it is not possible to ascertain that the CNS is not (subclinically) involved during times of systemic disease activity, it is impossible to set up a case-control study in which the effect of CS and disease activity can be distinguished. RA, by contrast, is a rheumatologic disorder that in general has no CNS involvement, because cerebral events occurring in RA patients are most likely a reflection of these occurring in the general population (15). By comparing RA patients with and without CSs, we aimed to evaluate the effect of CSs on the outcome measures. Methotrexate has a potential neurotoxic effect when administered intrathecally or intravenously in high doses (35, 36), though in this study only low oral doses were used. To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports on quantitative MR imaging studies and low-dose oral methotrexate or the other DMARDs. Twenty-six of 27 RA patients used DMARDs. The lack of a significant difference between RA patients with and without CSs and with the group of healthy controls makes a potential confounding effect of DMARDs very unlikely.

Subjects were not fully matched for age, though age was corrected for in the statistical model. Lesion volumes were very small and not significantly different between the groups, so we decided to generate MTR and ADC histograms of the whole brain, excluding CSF. In 4 subjects (one CS+ patient, 2 CS− patients, and one healthy control), a small lactate peak was observed; however, repeating the univariate analysis for NAA/Cre and Cho/Cre ratios without these subjects did not reveal any significant differences between the groups. Short T2 metabolites such as glutamate-glutamine and myoinositol could not reliably be detected in this study because of the relatively long TE (136 msec) used for MR spectroscopy. Metabolite concentrations were expressed as ratios to creatine because of the absence of an internal reference scan in our MR spectroscopy scanning protocol.

Although the daily CS dose used by patients included in this study was relatively low, this is a dose frequently encountered in (NP-) SLE patients. By use of whole-brain MTI and DWI and single-voxel MR spectroscopy, the current view on the abnormalities found in NPSLE patients points to a loss of cerebral tissue homogeneity due to neuronal and/or axonal damage, demyelination and cerebral atrophy (6–11, 13). Although diffuse NPSLE manifestations may be diverse, a recent multimodality study combining these techniques in one NPSLE patient group has suggested one pathogenetic pathway or several pathways with a common neuropathologic outcome with neuronal-axonal damage, demyelination, and cerebral atrophy often coexisting in NPSLE patients (12). In light of the results of the present study, we suggest that it is very unlikely that previously reported whole-brain MTR and ADC histogram parameters and single-voxel MR spectroscopy abnormalities in NPSLE patients are confounded by the use of low-dose oral CS medication.

Conclusion

In this study, we found no significant effect of low-dose oral CSs on whole-brain MTI and DWI histogram parameters or single-voxel MR spectroscopy measurements. The results of this study demonstrate that it is unlikely that MTI, DWI, and MR spectroscopy parameters reported in NPSLE studies are confounded by low-dose oral CSs.

Footnotes

Presented in part at the Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, May 15–21, 2004, Kyoto, Japan.
S.C.A.S. and G.M.S.B. contributed equally to this article.

References

↵
Sibbitt WL, Sibbitt RR, Brooks WM. Neuroimaging in neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1999;42:2026–2038
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Huizinga TW, Steens SC, van Buchem MA. Imaging modalities in central nervous system systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2001;13:383–388
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Tofts PS, Steens SC, van Buchem MA. MT: magnetization transfer. In: Tofts PS, ed. Quantitative MRI of the brain: measuring changes caused by disease. 1st ed. Chichester: Wiley;2003 :257–298
↵
Wheeler-Kingshott CA, Barker GJ, Steens SC, et al. D: the diffusion of water. In: Tofts PS, ed. Quantitative MRI of the brain: measuring changes caused by disease. 1st ed. Chichester: Wiley;2003 :203–256
↵
Tofts PS, Waldman AD. Spectroscopy: 1H metabolite concentrations. In: Tofts PS, ed. Quantitative MRI of the brain: measuring changes caused by disease. 1st ed. Chichester: Wiley;2003 :299–339
↵
Bosma GP, Rood MJ, Zwinderman AH, et al. Evidence of central nervous system damage in patients with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus, demonstrated by magnetization transfer imaging. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:48–54
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Bosma GP, Rood MJ, Huizinga TW, et al. Detection of cerebral involvement in patients with active neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus by the use of volumetric magnetization transfer imaging. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:2428–2436
CrossRef PubMed
Bosma GP, Huizinga TW, Mooijaart SP, van Buchem MA. Abnormal brain diffusivity in patients with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:850–854
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
Sibbitt WL, Haseler LJ, Griffey RH, et al. Analysis of cerebral structural changes in systemic lupus erythematosus by proton MR spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:923–928
Abstract/FREE Full Text
Brooks WM, Sabet A, Sibbitt WL, et al. Neurochemistry of brain lesions determined by spectroscopic imaging in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 1997;24:2323–2329
PubMed
↵
Sibbitt WL, Haseler LJ, Griffey RR, et al. Neurometabolism of active neuropsychiatric lupus determined with proton MR spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1271–1277
Abstract
↵
Bosma GP, Steens SC, Petropoulos H, et al. Multisequence magnetic resonance imaging study of neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:3195–3202
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Steens SC, Admiraal-Behloul F, Bosma GP, et al. Selective gray matter damage in neuropsychiatric lupus. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:2877–2881
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Badsha H, Edwards CJ. Intravenous pulses of methylprednisolone for systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2003;32:370–377
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Nadeau SE. Neurologic manifestations of connective tissue disease. Neurol Clin 2002;20:151–178, vi
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Lundberg IE, Grundtman C, Larsson E, Klareskog L. Corticosteroids: from an idea to clinical use. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2004;18:7–19
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Keenan PA, Jacobson MW, Soleymani RM, et al. The effect on memory of chronic prednisone treatment in patients with systemic disease. Neurology 1996;47:1396–1402
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
Zanardi VA, Magna LA, Costallat LT. Cerebral atrophy related to corticotherapy in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Clin Rheumatol 2001;20:245–250
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Rao AB, Richert N, Howard T, et al. Methylprednisolone effect on brain volume and enhancing lesions in MS before and during IFNbeta-1b. Neurology 2002;59:688–694
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988;31:315–324
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Naressi A, Couturier C, Castang I, et al. Java-based graphical user interface for MRUI, a software package for quantitation of in vivo/medical magnetic resonance spectroscopy signals. Comput Biol Med 2001;31:269–286
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Woods RP, Grafton ST, Holmes CJ, et al. Automated image registration. I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998;22:139–152
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Woods RP, Grafton ST, Watson JD, et al. Automated image registration. II. Intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear models. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998;22:153–165
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Steens SC, Admiraal-Behloul F, Schaap JA, et al. Reproducibility of brain ADC histograms. Eur Radiol 2004;14:425–430
CrossRef PubMed
↵
van den Boogaart A, van Ormondt D, Pijnappel WWF, de Beer R, Ala Korpela M. Removal of the water resonance from 1H magnetic resonance spectra. In: Mathematics in signal processing, 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press;1994 :175–195
↵
Vanhamme L, van den BA, van Huffel S. Improved method for accurate and efficient quantification of MRS data with use of prior knowledge. J Magn Reson 1997;129:35–43
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Funauchi M, Ohno M, Nozaki Y, et al. Intrathecal corticosteroids for systemic lupus erythematosus with central nervous system involvement. J Rheumatol 2003;30:207–208
FREE Full Text
↵
Hoogervorst EL, Polman CH, Barkhof F. Cerebral volume changes in multiple sclerosis patients treated with high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone. Mult Scler 2002;8:415–419
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
Zivadinov R, Rudick RA, De Masi R, et al. Effects of IV methylprednisolone on brain atrophy in relapsing-remitting MS. Neurology 2001;57:1239–1247
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
Bilaniuk LT, Patel S, Zimmerman RA. Computed tomography of systemic lupus erythematosus. Radiology 1977;124:119–121
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Ostrov SG, Quencer RM, Gaylis NB, Altman RD. Cerebral atrophy in systemic lupus erythematosus: steroid- or disease-induced phenomenon? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1982;3:21–23
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
Friedman SD, Stidley CA, Brooks WM, et al. Brain injury and neurometabolic abnormalities in systemic lupus erythematosus. Radiology 1998;209:79–84
PubMed
↵
Khiat A, Yared Z, Bard C, Lacroix A, Boulanger Y. Long-term brain metabolic alterations in exogenous Cushing’s syndrome as monitored by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Brain Res 2001;911:134–140
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Brown ES, Woolston J, Frol A, et al. Hippocampal volume, spectroscopy, cognition, and mood in patients receiving corticosteroid therapy. Biol Psychiatry 2004;55:538–545
CrossRef PubMed
↵
Rollins N, Winick N, Bash R, Booth T. Acute methotrexate neurotoxicity: findings on diffusion-weighted imaging and correlation with clinical outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1688–1695
Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
Ebner F, Ranner G, Slavc I, et al. MR findings in methotrexate-induced CNS abnormalities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;153:1283–1288
PubMed

Received February 22, 2005.
Accepted after revision May 6, 2005.

View Abstract

In this issue

Download PDF

Email Article

Citation Tools

Cited By...

No citing articles found.

More in this TOC Section

Show more BRAIN

[1] ↵
Sibbitt WL, Sibbitt RR, Brooks WM. Neuroimaging in neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1999;42:2026–2038
CrossRef PubMed

[2] ↵
Huizinga TW, Steens SC, van Buchem MA. Imaging modalities in central nervous system systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2001;13:383–388
CrossRef PubMed

[3] ↵
Tofts PS, Steens SC, van Buchem MA. MT: magnetization transfer. In: Tofts PS, ed. Quantitative MRI of the brain: measuring changes caused by disease. 1st ed. Chichester: Wiley;2003 :257–298

[4] ↵
Wheeler-Kingshott CA, Barker GJ, Steens SC, et al. D: the diffusion of water. In: Tofts PS, ed. Quantitative MRI of the brain: measuring changes caused by disease. 1st ed. Chichester: Wiley;2003 :203–256

[5] ↵
Tofts PS, Waldman AD. Spectroscopy: 1H metabolite concentrations. In: Tofts PS, ed. Quantitative MRI of the brain: measuring changes caused by disease. 1st ed. Chichester: Wiley;2003 :299–339

[6] ↵
Bosma GP, Rood MJ, Zwinderman AH, et al. Evidence of central nervous system damage in patients with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus, demonstrated by magnetization transfer imaging. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:48–54
CrossRef PubMed

[7] ↵
Bosma GP, Rood MJ, Huizinga TW, et al. Detection of cerebral involvement in patients with active neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus by the use of volumetric magnetization transfer imaging. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:2428–2436
CrossRef PubMed

[8] Bosma GP, Huizinga TW, Mooijaart SP, van Buchem MA. Abnormal brain diffusivity in patients with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:850–854
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[9] ↵
Sibbitt WL, Haseler LJ, Griffey RH, et al. Analysis of cerebral structural changes in systemic lupus erythematosus by proton MR spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:923–928
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[10] Brooks WM, Sabet A, Sibbitt WL, et al. Neurochemistry of brain lesions determined by spectroscopic imaging in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 1997;24:2323–2329
PubMed

[11] ↵
Sibbitt WL, Haseler LJ, Griffey RR, et al. Neurometabolism of active neuropsychiatric lupus determined with proton MR spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1271–1277
Abstract

[12] ↵
Bosma GP, Steens SC, Petropoulos H, et al. Multisequence magnetic resonance imaging study of neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:3195–3202
CrossRef PubMed

[13] ↵
Steens SC, Admiraal-Behloul F, Bosma GP, et al. Selective gray matter damage in neuropsychiatric lupus. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:2877–2881
CrossRef PubMed

[14] ↵
Badsha H, Edwards CJ. Intravenous pulses of methylprednisolone for systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2003;32:370–377
CrossRef PubMed

[15] ↵
Nadeau SE. Neurologic manifestations of connective tissue disease. Neurol Clin 2002;20:151–178, vi
CrossRef PubMed

[16] ↵
Lundberg IE, Grundtman C, Larsson E, Klareskog L. Corticosteroids: from an idea to clinical use. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2004;18:7–19
CrossRef PubMed

[17] ↵
Keenan PA, Jacobson MW, Soleymani RM, et al. The effect on memory of chronic prednisone treatment in patients with systemic disease. Neurology 1996;47:1396–1402
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[18] ↵
Zanardi VA, Magna LA, Costallat LT. Cerebral atrophy related to corticotherapy in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Clin Rheumatol 2001;20:245–250
CrossRef PubMed

[19] ↵
Rao AB, Richert N, Howard T, et al. Methylprednisolone effect on brain volume and enhancing lesions in MS before and during IFNbeta-1b. Neurology 2002;59:688–694
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[20] ↵
Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988;31:315–324
CrossRef PubMed

[21] ↵
Naressi A, Couturier C, Castang I, et al. Java-based graphical user interface for MRUI, a software package for quantitation of in vivo/medical magnetic resonance spectroscopy signals. Comput Biol Med 2001;31:269–286
CrossRef PubMed

[22] ↵
Woods RP, Grafton ST, Holmes CJ, et al. Automated image registration. I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998;22:139–152
CrossRef PubMed

[23] ↵
Woods RP, Grafton ST, Watson JD, et al. Automated image registration. II. Intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear models. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998;22:153–165
CrossRef PubMed

[24] ↵
Steens SC, Admiraal-Behloul F, Schaap JA, et al. Reproducibility of brain ADC histograms. Eur Radiol 2004;14:425–430
CrossRef PubMed

[25] ↵
van den Boogaart A, van Ormondt D, Pijnappel WWF, de Beer R, Ala Korpela M. Removal of the water resonance from 1H magnetic resonance spectra. In: Mathematics in signal processing, 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press;1994 :175–195

[26] ↵
Vanhamme L, van den BA, van Huffel S. Improved method for accurate and efficient quantification of MRS data with use of prior knowledge. J Magn Reson 1997;129:35–43
CrossRef PubMed

[27] ↵
Funauchi M, Ohno M, Nozaki Y, et al. Intrathecal corticosteroids for systemic lupus erythematosus with central nervous system involvement. J Rheumatol 2003;30:207–208
FREE Full Text

[28] ↵
Hoogervorst EL, Polman CH, Barkhof F. Cerebral volume changes in multiple sclerosis patients treated with high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone. Mult Scler 2002;8:415–419
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[29] ↵
Zivadinov R, Rudick RA, De Masi R, et al. Effects of IV methylprednisolone on brain atrophy in relapsing-remitting MS. Neurology 2001;57:1239–1247
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[30] ↵
Bilaniuk LT, Patel S, Zimmerman RA. Computed tomography of systemic lupus erythematosus. Radiology 1977;124:119–121
CrossRef PubMed

[31] ↵
Ostrov SG, Quencer RM, Gaylis NB, Altman RD. Cerebral atrophy in systemic lupus erythematosus: steroid- or disease-induced phenomenon? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1982;3:21–23
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[32] ↵
Friedman SD, Stidley CA, Brooks WM, et al. Brain injury and neurometabolic abnormalities in systemic lupus erythematosus. Radiology 1998;209:79–84
PubMed

[33] ↵
Khiat A, Yared Z, Bard C, Lacroix A, Boulanger Y. Long-term brain metabolic alterations in exogenous Cushing’s syndrome as monitored by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Brain Res 2001;911:134–140
CrossRef PubMed

[34] ↵
Brown ES, Woolston J, Frol A, et al. Hippocampal volume, spectroscopy, cognition, and mood in patients receiving corticosteroid therapy. Biol Psychiatry 2004;55:538–545
CrossRef PubMed

[35] ↵
Rollins N, Winick N, Bash R, Booth T. Acute methotrexate neurotoxicity: findings on diffusion-weighted imaging and correlation with clinical outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1688–1695
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[36] ↵
Ebner F, Ranner G, Slavc I, et al. MR findings in methotrexate-induced CNS abnormalities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;153:1283–1288
PubMed

Main menu

User menu

Search

American Journal of Neuroradiology

The Effect of Corticosteroid Medication on Quantitative MR Parameters of the Brain

Abstract