Hyperpolarized MR Imaging: Neurologic Applications of Hyperpolarized Metabolism

B.D. Ross; P. Bhattacharya; S. Wagner; T. Tran; N. Sailasuta

doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1790

Abstract

SUMMARY: Hyperpolarization is the general term for a method of enhancing the spin-polarization difference of populations of nuclei in a magnetic field. No less than 5 distinct techniques (dynamic nuclear polarization [DNP]; parahydrogen-induced polarization−parahydrogen and synthesis allow dramatically enhanced nuclear alignment [PHIP-PASADENA]; xenon/helium polarization transfer; Brute Force; ¹H hyperpolarized water) are currently under exhaustive investigation as means of amplifying the intrinsically (a few parts per million) weak signal intensity used in conventional MR neuroimaging and spectroscopy. HD-MR imaging in vivo is a metabolic imaging tool causing much of the interest in HD-MR imaging. The most successful to date has been DNP, in which carbon-13 (¹³C) pyruvic acid has shown many. PHIP-PASADENA with ¹³C succinate has shown HD-MR metabolism in vivo in tumor-bearing mice of several types, entering the Krebs−tricarboxylic acid cycle for ultrafast detection with ¹³C MR imaging, MR spectroscopy, and chemical shift imaging. We will discuss 5 promising preclinical studies: ¹³C succinate PHIP in brain tumor; ¹³C ethylpyruvate DNP and ¹³C acetate; DNP in rodent brain; ¹³C succinate PHIP versus gadolinium imaging of stroke; and ¹H hyperpolarized imaging. Recent developments in clinical ¹³C neurospectroscopy encourage us to overcome the remaining barriers to clinical HD-MR imaging.

The symposium¹ dealt with the topic of novel contrast agents “that enhance your image.” If the definition of contrast is the addition of any new dimension, then a reasonable theme for this review—which asks whether hyperpolarized (HD)-MR imaging and spectroscopy of the brain are both feasible and contributory—would be to discuss the novel contrast that is enhanced by chemistry.

Chemical Contrast

More than 80 brain metabolites can be distinguished and displayed (as a spectrum) by using MR spectroscopy. However, a quick glance at the metabolic diagram provided as a guide to the human single-voxel proton brain examination (the conventional and automated PROBE/SV; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) shows that we do not directly observe any metabolites of the Krebs−tricarboxylic acid (TCA—the centerpiece of cerebral mitochondrial energy metabolism) cycle and do not draw any conclusions about it or several other important aspects of brain chemistry, except by inference. Under special circumstances, the TCA cycle intermediates do appear in a human brain spectrum. As an example, succinate, at an estimated concentration of 25 mmol/L, appears at a chemical shift of 2.42 ppm. The concentration has been estimated on the basis of the reference creatine (Cr) peak at 3.02 ppm, which is generally present at a 10-mmol/L concentration (an “amount” of succinate, for the 8-cm³ result, equivalent to 200 μmol). For future reference, for the proton spectrum, 4 minutes' accumulation detected 200 μmol of succinate, approximately 50 μmol/min.

Spatial Contrast

Chemical shift imaging, so-called because multiple spectra are acquired during a single MR spectroscopy examination, provides a regionally specific diagnosis of brain tumor, based on a 20% increase or more in biomarkers choline/Cr and myo-inositol/Cr ratios. However, when these individual spectral peaks are used to develop a true image from each brain metabolite, chemical shift imaging is not comparable with MR images; more often than not, a color image of the tumor marker choline is completely unreliable for diagnostic purposes.

Exogenous Contrast

Intravenous or oral administration of exogenous chemical contrast agents, including the stable isotope carbon 13 (¹³C), has played a prominent part in the development of MR neurochemical diagnosis. The appearance in the brain of 1-¹³C enriched glucose, a neuronal substrate, and its conversion via the TCA cycle in real-time to neuronal ¹³C glutamate, aspartate, and other metabolites (Fig 1, right) in enriched brain spectra acquired with time, provides the metabolic flux rate of the TCA cycle, not available through ¹H-MR spectroscopy or indeed from any current brain imaging method.

Fig 1.

Enhanced neuronal contrast through selective ¹³C enrichment. With noninvasive ¹³C MR spectroscopy, it is possible to separately evaluate glial metabolism by use of the precursor 1-¹³C acetate (left panel), which is selectively transported into astrocytes and metabolized to glutamate (Glu) and glutamine (Gln) enriched in carbon 5 (C5). Neuronal metabolism favors ¹³C glucose (GLc, right panel), which is also converted to glutamate and glutamine, enriched in carbon 2 (C2), as well as carbons 3 and 4 (C4) (not shown). Both acetate and glucose are metabolized to ¹³C bicarbonate (HCO₃, left panel), respectively quantifying glial and neuronal tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle rates of the intact human brain. Oral Ac indicates administered load of 1-¹³C enriched sodium acetate, followed 80-100 min later by enrichment of cerebral metabolites as indicated; mins, minutes; Gln, glutamine; Asp, aspartate; Cr, creatine; Cho, choline; NAA, N-acetylaspartate.

“Smart” (Glial) Contrast

Distinguishing cell types is another source of contrast: In the brain, where acetate is a fuel for glia but not for neurons, 1-¹³C acetate provides in vivo images of the glial-TCA cycle rate (Fig 1, left). The ¹³C contrast in turn allows in vivo MR imaging of the glutamate-neurotransmitter flux rate, a process that involves cycling of glutamate between neurons and glia.² Recent technical advances have liberated the spectroscopist, previously confined to performing ¹³C MR spectroscopy with proton decoupling in the posterior brain, to imaging frontal brain regions believed to be responsible for most cognitive functions. Using a technique of low-power noise decoupling³, glial TCA flux can now be determined for the frontal brain (Fig 2, right). By the simple device of infusing another “smart” ¹³C contrast agent, 2-¹³C glucose, rather than the convention described above, which uses 1-¹³C glucose, the ¹³C label preferentially enters carbon 5 of glutamate and glutamine. This permits neuronal (as well as glial) TCA fluxes to be imaged independently in the frontal lobe without the need for proton decoupling (Fig 3).⁴

Fig 2.

Moving to the frontal lobe through low-power ¹³C MR spectroscopy. Traditionally, in vivo ¹³C MR spectroscopy of the human brain has been confined to “safe” areas, such as the occipital cortex (left panel), to avoid heat deposition in the ocular lens. With increased interest in metabolic abnormalities of the frontal lobe involved in executive functions, a novel ¹³C MR spectroscopy method uses low-power nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) to safely obtain glial metabolic data (right panel) from the frontal cortex. DC indicates (proton) decoupling. Reprinted with permission from Journal of Magnetic Resonance.³ Copyright 2008, Elsevier Ltd.

Fig 3.

¹³C MR spectroscopy of neuronal function in the frontal brain. To obtain equivalent data concerning neuronal function, the isotope infused must be C2-enriched ¹³C glucose which, in contrast to carbon 1 (C1)-glucose, enriches glutamate and glutamine in C5 and C1 (left panel). These products can safely be measured with a low-power NOE method in the frontal lobes (right panel). PCr indicates phosphocreatine. Reproduced with permission from Radiology.⁴ Copyright 2009, Radiological Society of North America.

Imaging the 2-Hit Hypothesis of Clinical Glutamate Neurotransmitter Dysfunction

This level of sophistication in metabolic brain imaging invites novel hypotheses to explain the much-debated function and dysfunction of glutamate neurotransmission. Sailasuta et al⁵ have recently proposed, in drug-abuse subjects, a 2-hit neurochemical mechanism, involving first a drastic reduction in the TCA cycle rate of frontal brain glia (Fig 4).⁶ These patients also demonstrate significantly elevated steady-state concentrations of brain glutamate,⁷ which in turn was hypothesized to provide the second hit, excitotoxicity of the surrounding neurons. The ¹³C MR imaging contrast will assist in establishing not only the cellular specificity but the chronology of these events to illuminate novel mechanisms for several different disorders believed to depend on altered glutamatergic neurotransmission: methamphetamine abuse, depression, multiple sclerosis, schizophrenia, hepatic encephalopathy, epilepsy, and human immunodeficiency virus−encephalopathy.⁸

Fig 4.

¹³C MR spectroscopy schematic for examining the “two-hit” hypothesis of drug abuse in the frontal brain. Combining dynamic ¹³C measures of glial and neuronal glutamate metabolism with ¹H-MR spectroscopy assays of steady-state glutamate concentration provides a novel window on drug abuse. Inhibition of acetate metabolism by methamphetamine (Meth) abuse indicates a possible mechanism whereby reduced clearance of glutamate in glia (hit 1) results in glutamate excitotoxicity of neurons (hit 2). Variations on this theme may contribute to other neurologic syndromes for which selective assays of glial and neuronal function provide enhanced imaging tools. Na indicates sodium; ATPase, adenosine triphosphatase; K, potassium; EAAT, excitatory amino acid transporter. Reprinted with permission from Science.⁶ Copyright 1999, The American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Temporal Contrast

In the esoteric world of neurotransmitter chemistry, yet another compartment, the extracellular or synaptic space, becomes important as well as the element of time. With the duration of a typical action potential equivalent to 50 ms and a common epileptic seizure equivalent to <1 minute, rapid changes in extracellular glutamate and glutamine can be defined and the predicted changes in intracellular glutamate and glutamine can be detected with either ¹³C or nitrogen 15 (¹⁵N) MR spectroscopy in vivo (Kanamori, unpublished work in the laboratory, 2009). Neuroimaging techniques would ideally be completed in a similar time scale. Although that is currently feasible for x-ray, CT, electroencephalography, and magnetoencephalography, none of these imaging techniques command the necessary chemical contrast; conventional positron-emission tomography (PET) and MR spectroscopy each require several minutes to form an in vivo image. The ¹³C MR spectroscopy studies described above typically occupy ≥1 hour.

Need for HD-MR Imaging

The need for a new imaging technique in neuroradiology is clear from the preceding arguments. Water-based MR imaging, which can be completed in seconds, has diversified as each new spin property of protons is exploited. The problem for chemical contrast is the inherently low metabolite concentrations, all of which lie between 0.1 and 10.0 mmol/L, a level some 8000–100,000-fold lower than that of the protons in water (80 mol/L). HD-MR imaging offers a means of closing the gap. Conventional (Boltzmann) MR imaging depends on the population of nuclear spins, which can be brought to a different energy state in a static magnetic field, generally a few parts per million. Raising the population of nuclei at this higher energy level to unity would enhance MR signal intensity approximately 250,000-fold, not simply a few-fold as is obtained by moving to high-field 3T, 7T, or 9.4T MR imaging scanners but up to the needed level for parity with proton MR imaging, which as we pointed out, is 8,000–100,000-fold.

Methods for HD-MR imaging have proliferated^9–15 since the first parahydrogen-induced polarization (PHIP) was explored 20 years ago. Five methods are illustrated by the equipment acquired to prepare the exogenous contrast agent for each one (Fig 5). In Fig 5, top left, is the rather simple equipment consisting of a very-low-field magnet (red), driven by a computer and through which reagents can be pumped while mixed and heated with parahydrogen gas (the source of high-polarized nuclei) and a catalyst, norbornadiene. Hydrogenation is followed by spin transfer from the hydrogen to ¹³C, in which high polarization can be retained for several tens of seconds. This contrast agent now needs to be injected rapidly into a biologic system, held within a conventional MR spectrometer.

Fig 5.

Four methods for hyperpolarized-MR imaging and spectroscopy. In the historic order of discovery, parahydrogen-induced polarization (PASADENA); optical pumping of noble gases helium and xenon; dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP); and Brute Force have each been harnessed to the challenge of increasing enhancement above the Boltzmann distribution of approximately 1 ppm toward unity, with upwards of 10,000-fold enhancement of MR signal intensity for in vivo MR imaging and MR spectroscopy.

The lower left of Fig 5 illustrates a commercial dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) device (Hypersense; Oxford Instruments Molecular Biotools, Witney, UK). Here, the principle is quite different and involves no chemical synthesis. The ¹³C reagent is exposed, at very low temperature and high field, to irradiation, whereby the almost complete polarization of unpaired electrons is transferred to nuclei (“dynamic nuclear polarization”). The only exogenous agent apart from the ¹³C-enriched substrate is a free radical, which ideally would be removed before injection. Most familiar of hyperpolarization technologies, optical pumping (Fig 5, top right) has, for many years, permitted human lung imaging after inhalation of the hyperpolarized noble gases helium or xenon. Most recently Lisitza et al¹⁶ demonstrated the transfer of polarization from the gas to a ¹³C molecule of interest. Expansion of the methodology and improvements beyond the 3- to 20-fold signal-intensity enhancement for ¹³C so far achieved will make this a valuable method because no catalyst or other addition is required and the gas phase, which is volatile, can easily be removed before injection.

Figure 5 bottom right illustrates another device that uses low field and low temperature alone (BruteForce, Millikelvin Technologies, Marblehead, Massachusetts) to hyperpolarize any ¹³C-enriched compound. While kept at a low temperature, the hyperpolarized ¹³C reagent, to which there have been no chemical additions, can be shipped over distances. Finally, and not illustrated, is the technique of hyperpolarization of water,¹⁷ which on injection into an animal, enhances the MR image 2–3-fold above the enhancement of the native water. While the image enhancement so far achieved is relatively small, the potential of using water as a natural contrast agent is obvious.

HD-MR Imaging in Practice

First published under the smart acronym PASADENA (parahydrogen and synthesis allow dramatically enhanced nuclear alignment) but synchronously and subsequently known as PHIP in 1987,¹⁸ it took 24 years from invention to bioimaging. With a highly toxic ¹³C-enriched contrast agent and acetone as the required solvent, not surprisingly this subsecond ¹³C PHIP imaging, while technically “in vivo,” was lethal.¹⁹ The first water-soluble reagent capable of PHIP was hydroxymethyl acrylate, which on (para)-hydrogenation becomes ¹³C hydroxyethylpropionate (HEP), developed by Amersham (Malmo, Sweden) and used in surviving animals to provide ultrafast ¹³C angiography in pigs.²⁰ HEP is toxic, as is the novel catalyst, but 2 successor molecules developed at Huntington Medical Research Institutes, Pasadena, California, 1-¹³C malic acid¹⁰ (Fig 6, left) and 1-¹³C fumaric acid¹⁴ (Fig 6, right), both provided a practical synthetic route to the biologic intermediate of the Krebs-TCA cycle, 1-¹³C succinate. Also illustrated in Fig 6 are the chemical process, the molecular addition of parahydrogen under the influence of a specific catalyst and the spin physics of polarization transfer,²¹ which were developed in Malmo, Sweden, to dramatically elevate the yield and bring hyperpolarization to ≥40% within a few seconds in the specially designed polarizer. Quality assurance routines achieved somewhat lower but still impressive levels of hyperpolarization of 1-¹³C succinate to the high degree of reproducibility suited to biologic experimentation (Fig 7).^22,23

Fig 6.

Two techniques for producing hyperpolarized ¹³C succinate, the first biologic imaging agent generated by the parahydrogen method. Starting with the toxic precursor acetylene dicarboxylic acid (left panel) or with the biologically safe 1-¹³C fumarate (right panel), a high degree of polarization can be achieved during the molecular addition of parahydrogen, followed by polarization transfer to the ¹³C atom shown in red (below). D indicates deuterium; d2, deuteration; RF, radio-frequency; mT, milli-Tesla; HO, hydroxyl; H, hydrogen; T, spin relaxation time (seconds); D₂O, deuterized water; ^JHH, proton-carbon coupling constants; ^JCH, carbon-carbon coupling constants.

Fig 7.

Quality assurance and reproducibility of hyperpolarization. A−C, The signal-intensity enhancement (19% polarization equivalent to 47,000-fold) due to hyperpolarization, estimated by comparison of the test reagent (A) with a standard solution of natural-abundance ¹³C ethanol (B ), while remarkably constant during 4 days and 16 successive in vitro experiments (C ), is more variable in vivo. The effects of dilution, mixing in blood, circulation times, T1 relaxation time of the ¹³C (and ¹⁵N) reagents, combined with the effects of radio-frequency pulses used for signal-intensity detection significantly reduce available signal-intensity enhancement in vivo. HMRI indicates Huntington Medical Research Institutes; P = polarization (%).

HD-MR Imaging of the Brain

The earliest known attempt to image the brain with HD-MR imaging used PHIP with HEP (Fig 8),²⁴ a reagent which, in the time scale of the study, did not pass beyond the vasculature and, as far as is known, cannot be metabolized further. Ultrafast ¹³C angiography may, nevertheless, be of value, as shown previously¹⁹ for the coronary vasculature, because there is no background signal intensity. The first intracerebral ¹³C HD-MR imaging attempted used a novel ¹³C reagent, 1-¹³C maleate plus succinate¹⁰ (not shown here), in tumor-bearing rats. While the reagent appeared to enter the brain, crossing the blood-brain barrier (BBB), no cerebral metabolites were identified. A biopsy examined later when the brain was at a Boltzmann state did, however, indicate that succinate had entered the tumor (Fig 9) and had been further metabolized to bicarbonate, glutamine, and glutamate. The biopsy findings of normal host brain tissue were devoid of ¹³C succinate and its metabolites, suggesting that PHIP of succinate might in the future provide a specific contrast agent for cerebral tumor in vivo. Due to the need for a unique glial substrate in ¹³C neurospectroscopy (see above), 1-¹³C acetate was hyperpolarized by DNP and shown to enter the head during a 2-minute imaging session.¹³ As with the preceding PHIP study, the intact BBB may have delayed entry into the brain, which was not categorically enhanced in this HD-MR imaging of 1-¹³C acetate.

Fig 8.

Real-time ¹³C PASADENA images of carotid artery and major blood vessels of the pig brain. Two of a time-lapse series of images obtained subsequent to a single injection of aqueous hydroxyethyl propionate (1, ¹³C) with initial polarization P = 0.4.

Fig 9.

Toward hyperpolarized ¹³C succinate imaging of brain cancer. In this early study, ¹³C hyperpolarized images of the 9L brain tumor are obtained, but no metabolites are detected in vivo when hyperpolarized “succinate” (generated from ¹³C acetylene dicarboxylic acid; Fig 6, left) is injected via the jugular vein. Harvested brain tumor subsequently showed nonhyperpolarized ¹³C metabolites anticipated from metabolism of ¹³C succinate (Succ) through the neuronal and glial pathways indicated. No metabolites were isolated from the intact brain, indicating possibly the importance of a defective blood-brain barrier (BBB) for in vivo hyperpolarization neuroimaging. α-KG indicates alpha-ketoglutarate; V_gh, velocity glutamine-glutamate cycle. Reprinted with permission from Journal of Magnetic Resonance.¹⁰ Copyright 2007, Elsevier Ltd.

The critical problem of BBB may be circumvented by testing ¹³C-PHIP reagents in animals with extracerebral tumors.²⁵ Prolonged imaging times can be obtained by using PHIP to hyperpolarize ¹⁵N incorporated in the tumor biomarker choline, which is then detected by using ultrafast ¹⁵N MR spectroscopy in vivo.²⁶

The first success in ultrafast ¹³C brain imaging was described by R. Hurd and colleagues at the University of California, San Francisco (personal communication, 2009), using DNP to hyperpolarize the pyruvate analog ethyl 1-¹³C-pyruvate (E-P). Not only was hyperpolarized E-P identified in the intact rat brain after intravenous injection, but several of its anticipated neurometabolites were visualized in ¹³C spectra and images. E-P has a long history as a safe antishock and neuroprotective agent in animals and in man²⁷; therefore, it appears poised to be the first clinical HD-MR neuroimaging reagent.

A parallel study with PHIP 1-¹³C succinate recently confirmed that, once the BBB has been disrupted, in this case by experimental stroke (Fig 10), this HD-MR imaging technology can also achieve ultrafast neuroimaging. Most interesting, ¹³C succinate chemical shift is pH-sensitive over a wide range (Fig 11). Two hyperpolarized ¹³C resonances within the brain of a rat manifesting stroke (Fig 11, inset) may represent unmetabolized ¹³C succinate at an acid pH and a reduced metabolic product, ¹³C malate, within the stroke.²⁸ The latter may reflect the altered mitochondrial redox state expected in stroke brain.²⁹ If confirmed, one could imagine an extension of current emergency stroke MR imaging protocol to include a subsecond assay of tissue pH and redox state by using HD-MR imaging, because this may be more predictive of tissue viability than an assay of lactate or diffusion-weighted imaging alone.

Fig 10.

In vivo neuroimaging and spectroscopy of hyperpolarized ¹³C succinate. In confirmation of the role of BBB, the first truly in vivo hyperpolarized ¹³C spectra arose predominantly from the stroke region of rat brain (left and center) as shown in 2D ultrafast chemical shift imaging (CSI) series (right panel) (Avance, Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany). PHIP indicates parahydrogen-induced polarization.

Fig 11.

Hyperpolarized ¹³C metabolites of succinate in stroke brain. The effect of in vitro pH was verified on chemical shift of ¹³C succinate (right). A spectrum (inset) from the in vivo hyperpolarized dataset in Fig 10 indicates 2 resonances that are tentatively assigned to ¹³C succinate (S) at approximately pH 8 and its hyperpolarized metabolic product, C4 malate (M). The intracellular pH of stroke in vivo might, in the future, be estimated from hyperpolarized ¹³C spectra acquired in 3.5 seconds. Suc indicates succinate. (T. Tran and N. Sailasuta, unpublished data, HMRI, May 2009)

Roll Over Warburg and Tell Hans Krebs the News!

Given the not inconsiderable technical challenge of bringing HD-MR imaging to the neuroradiology clinic, what “killer application” can we envisage on the basis of these early and faltering steps? Glioblastoma multiforme expresses the oncoprotein hypoxia-induced factor (HIF)-1α at an exceptionally high titer (Fig 12). In examining a representative extracerebral tumor renal cancer (RENCA) cell, believed to express succinate dehydrogenase oncogene, almost the entire Krebs-TCA cycle was successfully imaged by using the PHIP reagent hyperpolarized 1-¹³C succinate (Fig 13), while another tumor, lymphoma A-20 expressing HIF-1α, albeit at a much lower titer than that of glioblastoma, metabolized 1-¹³C succinate through the TCA cycle only as far as malate.²⁵ If tumors do indeed have functional TCA, we must first question the Warburg hypothesis of cancer biochemistry, perhaps replacing it with the Krebs-TCA hypothesis. Perhaps HD-MR imaging can fill the gap left by 2-deoxyglucose PET in brain scans performed for early diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of metabolically more active tumors, such as glioblastoma.

Fig 12.

New directions for enhanced ¹³C imaging of brain cancer. Immunocytochemical stain for the hypoxia-induced factor (HIF)-1α indicates glioblastoma to be particularly rich in this cancer biomarker protein. This may, in the future, provide a uniquely sensitive means of in vivo imaging of brain cancer grade and metabolic activity (see Fig 13). RENCA, renal cancer; A-20-A (top left, top right, and bottom right ×160; bottom left ×312). (Courtesy of Dr. Ashraf Imam).

Fig 13.

Hyperpolarized ¹³C succinate—a probe for the in vivo TCA cycle. Subcutaneous RENCA was used to demonstrate the potential for subsecond imaging of the Krebs (TCA) cycle in vivo. Not yet achieved in intact brain (see Fig 9), this novel means of enhancing metabolic images may be effective when used with short-term opening of the BBB. For abbreviations in this depiction of the Krebs tricarboxylic acid cycle, please see standard texts: metabolite peaks associated with those intermediates displayed in red were enriched in this model tumor and appear as hyperpolarized ¹³C resonances during the first 18 seconds after intravenous (IV) injection of 6 micromoles ¹³C succinate.

Summary and Conclusions

First, HD-MR imaging, of which there are no less than 5 competing technologies, has been successful in 2 preclinical demonstrations of neuroimaging and spectroscopy. DNP of E-P may offer imaging and neuroprotection after shock and brain injury.²⁷ PHIP may offer an early and specific diagnosis for tumor and for stroke, based on unique ¹³C metabolic profiles obtained in seconds. Detection of HD-MR imaging of ¹³C succinate does appear to fulfill its promise of enhancing our in vivo brain images ≫10,000-fold. (Calculations are based on estimates of the ¹³C succinate observed by HD-MR imaging in rodent stroke of between 0.05 and 0.5 μmol in 3 seconds [=0.1 mol/sec]. This compares with ¹H succinate observed in human brain with conventional ¹H-MR spectroscopy of 50 μmol per minute. HD-MR imaging/conventional ¹H-MR spectroscopy = 60 × 500 = 30,000 signal enhancement.) The remaining technologies, ¹³C-xenon hyperpolarized H₂0 and Brute Force, while promising, currently deliver much lower degrees of polarization (3- to 20-fold enhancements, respectively) and, to our knowledge, have not yet been attempted in the brain.

Second, no successful clinical application can be reported at this time (apart from the highly successful optical pumping of helium and xenon to generate 30,000-fold image enhancement of healthy and diseased lungs). Obstacles to DNP and PHIP are similar and will likely be overcome first for applications in oncology, cardiology, or angiography. T1, the length of time for which hyperpolarization is preserved, is characteristically <1 minute and remains the Achilles heel of HD-MR imaging generally. T1 is receiving increasing attention from chemists and spin physicists and may be “solved” in a number of different ways, from use of ¹⁵N with intrinsically longer T1, inverse detection (“spin-storage”), or by prolonging the singlet state.³⁰

Third, the good news for HD-MR imaging is that, despite all the difficulties in its implementation, lesser degrees of hyperpolarization can have a major impact on applications in which stable-isotope flux is diagnostic; this includes ¹³C MR spectroscopy of neuronal-glial interactions, which play an increasingly important role in understanding neurologic function and dysfunction. While it is true that 100,000-fold signal-intensity enhancement by HD-MR imaging would bring MR imaging sensitivity (currently 10⁻³Molar) into line with PET sensitivity (10⁻⁹Molar), less dramatic advances have significant value. Ten- or 20-fold image enhancement would reduce conventional MR imaging times by 90%. Once implemented, clinical experience will teach us, as it has so often before, how a novel imaging technology offers new ways of thinking about the brain from which new clinical applications arise.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Henry Chan, MD; Eduard Chekmenev, PhD; Kent Harris, PhD; William Perman, PhD; and Lawrence Robertson for their valuable contributions.

Footnotes

This work was supported by the Rudi Schulte Research Institute; National Institutes of Health (National Cancer Institute: grants R01 CA 122513, 1R21 CA118509, 1K99CA134749-01); and Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program (grants 16KT-0044 and 16RT-0184).
Paper previously presented at: Annual Meeting of the American Society of Neuroradiology, May 16–21, 2009; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

1.↵
1. Barker P
. How to enhance your image. Advanced Imaging Seminar: Contrast Agents. Proc ASNR; 2009, Vancouver, Canada.
2.↵
1. Ross B,
2. Lin A,
3. Harris K,
4. et al
. Clinical experience with 13C MRS in vivo. NMR Biomed 2003; 16: 358–69
CrossRef PubMed
3.↵
1. Sailasuta N,
2. Robertson LW,
3. Harris KC,
4. et al
. Clinical NOE 13C MRS for neuropsychiatric disorders of the frontal lobe. J Magn Reson 2008; 195: 219–25. Epub 2008 Sep 17
CrossRef PubMed
4.↵
1. Gropman AL,
2. Sailasuta N,
3. Harris KC,
4. et al
. Ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency with persistent abnormality in cerebral glutamate metabolism in adults. Radiology 2009; 252: 833–41
CrossRef PubMed
5.↵
1. Sailasuta N,
2. Harris KC,
3. Abulseoud O,
4. et al
. 1-13C acetate MRS to study glial glutamate dysfunction in methamphetamine users. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 2009; 17: 92
6.↵
1. Magistretti PJ,
2. Pellerin L,
3. Rothman DL,
4. et al
. Energy on demand. Science 1999; 283: 496–7
FREE Full Text
7.↵
1. Abulseoud O,
2. Sailasuta N,
3. Hernandez M,
4. et al
. Impact of depression on cerebral glutamate and cognitive function in abstinent methamphetamine users. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 2009; 17: 210
8.↵
1. Sailasuta N,
2. Shriner K,
3. Ross B
. Evidence of reduced glutamate in the frontal lobe of HIV-seropositive patients. NMR Biomed 2009; 22: 326–31
CrossRef PubMed
9.↵
1. Golman K,
2. Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH,
3. Petersson JS,
4. et al
. Molecular imaging with endogenous substances. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100: 10435–39
Abstract/FREE Full Text
10.↵
1. Bhattacharya P,
2. Chekmenev EY,
3. Perman WH,
4. et al
. Towards hyperpolarized (13)C-succinate imaging of brain cancer. J Magn Reson 2007; 186: 150–55
CrossRef PubMed
11.↵
1. Bhattacharya P,
2. Harris K,
3. Lin AP,
4. et al
. Ultra fast steady state free precession imaging of hyperpolarized 13C in vivo. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine; 2005; 18: 245–56
CrossRef
12.↵
1. Chen AP,
2. Tropp J,
3. Hurd RE,
4. et al
. In vivo hyperpolarized 13C MR spectroscopic imaging with 1H decoupling. J Magn Reson 2009; 197: 100–06. Epub 2008 Dec 13
CrossRef PubMed
13.↵
1. Comment A,
2. Uffmann K,
3. Jannin S,
4. et al
. In vivo DNP-enhanced 13C-labeled acetate brain studies in a 9.4T animal scanner. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 2007; 15: 369
14.↵
1. Chekmenev EY,
2. Hovener J,
3. Norton VA,
4. et al
. PASADENA hyperpolarization of succinic acid for MRI and NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 2008; 130: 4212–13. Epub 2008 Mar 12
CrossRef PubMed
15.↵
1. McCarney ER,
2. Armstrong BD,
3. Lingwood MD,
4. et al
. Hyperpolarized water as an authentic magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104: 1754–9
Abstract/FREE Full Text
16.↵
1. Lisitza N,
2. Chekmenev EY,
3. Muradian I,
4. et al
. Enhanced biomedical 13C NMR by thermal mixing with hyperpolarized 129Xe. In: Proceedings of Annual Meeting of Experimental NMR Conference, Pacific Grove, CA. March 2-April 3, 2009
17.↵
1. Lingwood MD,
2. Tokuyama ST,
3. Brown ER,
4. et al
. Continuous flow dynamic nuclear polarization of water under ambient conditions for in-vivo perfusion MRI. In: Proceedings of the 17th Scientific Meeting and Exhibition of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Honolulu. April 18–24, 2009: 2456
18.↵
1. Bowers CR,
2. Weitekamp DP
. Parahydrogen and synthesis allow dramatically enhanced nuclear alignment. J Am Chem Soc 1987; 109: 5541–42
CrossRef
19.↵
1. Golman K,
2. Axelsson O,
3. Johannesson H,
4. et al
. Parahydrogen-induced polarization in imaging: subsecond (13)C angiography. Magn Reson Med 2001; 46: 1–5
CrossRef PubMed
20.↵
1. Magnusson P,
2. Johansson E,
3. Mansson S,
4. et al
. Passive catheter tracking during interventional MRI using hyperpolarized 13C. Magn Reson Med 2007; 57: 1140–47
CrossRef PubMed
21.↵
1. Goldman M,
2. Johannesson H,
3. Axelsson O,
4. et al
. Hyperpolarization of 13C through order transfer from parahydrogen: a new contrast agent for MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 23: 153–7
CrossRef PubMed
22.↵
1. Hovener JB,
2. Chekmenev EY,
3. Harris KC,
4. et al
. PASADENA hyperpolarization of 13C biomolecules: equipment design and installation. MAGMA 2009; 22: 111–21
CrossRef PubMed
23.↵
1. Hovener JB,
2. Chekmenev EY,
3. Harris KC,
4. et al
. Quality assurance of PASADENA hyperpolarization for 13C biomolecules. MAGMA 2009; 22: 123–34
CrossRef PubMed
24.↵
1. Måansson S,
2. Johansson E,
3. Magnusson P,
4. et al
. 13C imaging—a new diagnostic platform. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 57–67
CrossRef PubMed
25.↵
1. Bhattacharya P,
2. Ross B
. Imaging TCA cycle metabolism by PHIP hyperpolarization of 13C succinate in vivo. Radiology 2009, Submitted.
26.↵
1. Lajtha A,
2. Reith ME
1. Bhattacharya P,
2. Ross B
. Hyperpolarized 15N NMR: D15NP and PASADENA. In: Lajtha A, Reith MEeds. Handbook of Neurochemistry and Molecular Neurobiology. Vol 4. 3rd ed. New York: Springer; 2009
27.↵
1. Kim J,
2. Young-Mi Y,
3. Seung-Woo K,
4. et al
. Anti-inflammatory mechanism is involved in ethyl pyruvate-mediated efficacious neuroprotection in the postischemic brain. Brain Res 2005; 1060: 188–92
CrossRef PubMed
28.↵
1. Combs DJ,
2. Dempsey RJ,
3. Maley M,
4. et al
. Relationship between plasma glucose, brain lactate, and intracellular pH during cerebral ischemia in gerbils. Stroke 1990; 21: 936–42
Abstract/FREE Full Text
29.↵
1. Shino A,
2. Matsuda M,
3. Handa J,
4. et al
. Poor recovery of mitochondrial redox state in CA1 after transient forebrain ischemia in gerbils. Stroke 1998; 29: 2421–25
Abstract/FREE Full Text
30.↵
1. Carravetta M,
2. Levitt MH.
. Long-lived nuclear spin states in high-field solution NMR. J Am Chem 2004; 126: 6228–29
CrossRef PubMed

View Abstract

In this issue

Download PDF

Email Article

Citation Tools

Purchase

Cited By...

Convergence of Nanotechnology and Cancer Prevention: Are We There Yet?

More in this TOC Section

Show more Methodologic Perspectives

[1] 1.↵
Barker P
. How to enhance your image. Advanced Imaging Seminar: Contrast Agents. Proc ASNR; 2009, Vancouver, Canada.

[2] Barker P

[3] 2.↵
Ross B,
Lin A,
Harris K,
et al
. Clinical experience with 13C MRS in vivo. NMR Biomed 2003; 16: 358–69
CrossRef PubMed

[4] Ross B,

[5] Lin A,

[6] Harris K,

[7] et al

[8] 3.↵
Sailasuta N,
Robertson LW,
Harris KC,
et al
. Clinical NOE 13C MRS for neuropsychiatric disorders of the frontal lobe. J Magn Reson 2008; 195: 219–25. Epub 2008 Sep 17
CrossRef PubMed

[9] Sailasuta N,

[10] Robertson LW,

[11] Harris KC,

[12] et al

[13] 4.↵
Gropman AL,
Sailasuta N,
Harris KC,
et al
. Ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency with persistent abnormality in cerebral glutamate metabolism in adults. Radiology 2009; 252: 833–41
CrossRef PubMed

[14] Gropman AL,

[15] Sailasuta N,

[16] Harris KC,

[17] et al

[18] 5.↵
Sailasuta N,
Harris KC,
Abulseoud O,
et al
. 1-13C acetate MRS to study glial glutamate dysfunction in methamphetamine users. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 2009; 17: 92

[19] Sailasuta N,

[20] Harris KC,

[21] Abulseoud O,

[22] et al

[23] 6.↵
Magistretti PJ,
Pellerin L,
Rothman DL,
et al
. Energy on demand. Science 1999; 283: 496–7
FREE Full Text

[24] Magistretti PJ,

[25] Pellerin L,

[26] Rothman DL,

[27] et al

[28] 7.↵
Abulseoud O,
Sailasuta N,
Hernandez M,
et al
. Impact of depression on cerebral glutamate and cognitive function in abstinent methamphetamine users. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 2009; 17: 210

[29] Abulseoud O,

[30] Sailasuta N,

[31] Hernandez M,

[32] et al

[33] 8.↵
Sailasuta N,
Shriner K,
Ross B
. Evidence of reduced glutamate in the frontal lobe of HIV-seropositive patients. NMR Biomed 2009; 22: 326–31
CrossRef PubMed

[34] Sailasuta N,

[35] Shriner K,

[36] Ross B

[37] 9.↵
Golman K,
Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH,
Petersson JS,
et al
. Molecular imaging with endogenous substances. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100: 10435–39
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[38] Golman K,

[39] Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH,

[40] Petersson JS,

[41] et al

[42] 10.↵
Bhattacharya P,
Chekmenev EY,
Perman WH,
et al
. Towards hyperpolarized (13)C-succinate imaging of brain cancer. J Magn Reson 2007; 186: 150–55
CrossRef PubMed

[43] Bhattacharya P,

[44] Chekmenev EY,

[45] Perman WH,

[46] et al

[47] 11.↵
Bhattacharya P,
Harris K,
Lin AP,
et al
. Ultra fast steady state free precession imaging of hyperpolarized 13C in vivo. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine; 2005; 18: 245–56
CrossRef

[48] Bhattacharya P,

[49] Harris K,

[50] Lin AP,

[51] et al

[52] 12.↵
Chen AP,
Tropp J,
Hurd RE,
et al
. In vivo hyperpolarized 13C MR spectroscopic imaging with 1H decoupling. J Magn Reson 2009; 197: 100–06. Epub 2008 Dec 13
CrossRef PubMed

[53] Chen AP,

[54] Tropp J,

[55] Hurd RE,

[56] et al

[57] 13.↵
Comment A,
Uffmann K,
Jannin S,
et al
. In vivo DNP-enhanced 13C-labeled acetate brain studies in a 9.4T animal scanner. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 2007; 15: 369

[58] Comment A,

[59] Uffmann K,

[60] Jannin S,

[61] et al

[62] 14.↵
Chekmenev EY,
Hovener J,
Norton VA,
et al
. PASADENA hyperpolarization of succinic acid for MRI and NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 2008; 130: 4212–13. Epub 2008 Mar 12
CrossRef PubMed

[63] Chekmenev EY,

[64] Hovener J,

[65] Norton VA,

[66] et al

[67] 15.↵
McCarney ER,
Armstrong BD,
Lingwood MD,
et al
. Hyperpolarized water as an authentic magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104: 1754–9
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[68] McCarney ER,

[69] Armstrong BD,

[70] Lingwood MD,

[71] et al

[72] 16.↵
Lisitza N,
Chekmenev EY,
Muradian I,
et al
. Enhanced biomedical 13C NMR by thermal mixing with hyperpolarized 129Xe. In: Proceedings of Annual Meeting of Experimental NMR Conference, Pacific Grove, CA. March 2-April 3, 2009

[73] Lisitza N,

[74] Chekmenev EY,

[75] Muradian I,

[76] et al

[77] 17.↵
Lingwood MD,
Tokuyama ST,
Brown ER,
et al
. Continuous flow dynamic nuclear polarization of water under ambient conditions for in-vivo perfusion MRI. In: Proceedings of the 17th Scientific Meeting and Exhibition of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Honolulu. April 18–24, 2009: 2456

[78] Lingwood MD,

[79] Tokuyama ST,

[80] Brown ER,

[81] et al

[82] 18.↵
Bowers CR,
Weitekamp DP
. Parahydrogen and synthesis allow dramatically enhanced nuclear alignment. J Am Chem Soc 1987; 109: 5541–42
CrossRef

[83] Bowers CR,

[84] Weitekamp DP

[85] 19.↵
Golman K,
Axelsson O,
Johannesson H,
et al
. Parahydrogen-induced polarization in imaging: subsecond (13)C angiography. Magn Reson Med 2001; 46: 1–5
CrossRef PubMed

[86] Golman K,

[87] Axelsson O,

[88] Johannesson H,

[89] et al

[90] 20.↵
Magnusson P,
Johansson E,
Mansson S,
et al
. Passive catheter tracking during interventional MRI using hyperpolarized 13C. Magn Reson Med 2007; 57: 1140–47
CrossRef PubMed

[91] Magnusson P,

[92] Johansson E,

[93] Mansson S,

[94] et al

[95] 21.↵
Goldman M,
Johannesson H,
Axelsson O,
et al
. Hyperpolarization of 13C through order transfer from parahydrogen: a new contrast agent for MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 23: 153–7
CrossRef PubMed

[96] Goldman M,

[97] Johannesson H,

[98] Axelsson O,

[99] et al

[100] 22.↵
Hovener JB,
Chekmenev EY,
Harris KC,
et al
. PASADENA hyperpolarization of 13C biomolecules: equipment design and installation. MAGMA 2009; 22: 111–21
CrossRef PubMed

[101] Hovener JB,

[102] Chekmenev EY,

[103] Harris KC,

[104] et al

[105] 23.↵
Hovener JB,
Chekmenev EY,
Harris KC,
et al
. Quality assurance of PASADENA hyperpolarization for 13C biomolecules. MAGMA 2009; 22: 123–34
CrossRef PubMed

[106] Hovener JB,

[107] Chekmenev EY,

[108] Harris KC,

[109] et al

[110] 24.↵
Måansson S,
Johansson E,
Magnusson P,
et al
. 13C imaging—a new diagnostic platform. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 57–67
CrossRef PubMed

[111] Måansson S,

[112] Johansson E,

[113] Magnusson P,

[114] et al

[115] 25.↵
Bhattacharya P,
Ross B
. Imaging TCA cycle metabolism by PHIP hyperpolarization of 13C succinate in vivo. Radiology 2009, Submitted.

[116] Bhattacharya P,

[117] Ross B

[118] 26.↵
Lajtha A,
Reith ME
Bhattacharya P,
Ross B
. Hyperpolarized 15N NMR: D15NP and PASADENA. In: Lajtha A, Reith MEeds. Handbook of Neurochemistry and Molecular Neurobiology. Vol 4. 3rd ed. New York: Springer; 2009

[119] Lajtha A,

[120] Reith ME

[121] Bhattacharya P,

[122] Ross B

[123] 27.↵
Kim J,
Young-Mi Y,
Seung-Woo K,
et al
. Anti-inflammatory mechanism is involved in ethyl pyruvate-mediated efficacious neuroprotection in the postischemic brain. Brain Res 2005; 1060: 188–92
CrossRef PubMed

[124] Kim J,

[125] Young-Mi Y,

[126] Seung-Woo K,

[127] et al

[128] 28.↵
Combs DJ,
Dempsey RJ,
Maley M,
et al
. Relationship between plasma glucose, brain lactate, and intracellular pH during cerebral ischemia in gerbils. Stroke 1990; 21: 936–42
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[129] Combs DJ,

[130] Dempsey RJ,

[131] Maley M,

[132] et al

[133] 29.↵
Shino A,
Matsuda M,
Handa J,
et al
. Poor recovery of mitochondrial redox state in CA1 after transient forebrain ischemia in gerbils. Stroke 1998; 29: 2421–25
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[134] Shino A,

[135] Matsuda M,

[136] Handa J,

[137] et al

[138] 30.↵
Carravetta M,
Levitt MH.
. Long-lived nuclear spin states in high-field solution NMR. J Am Chem 2004; 126: 6228–29
CrossRef PubMed

[139] Carravetta M,

[140] Levitt MH.

Main menu

User menu

Search

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Hyperpolarized MR Imaging: Neurologic Applications of Hyperpolarized Metabolism

Abstract

Chemical Contrast

Spatial Contrast

Exogenous Contrast

“Smart” (Glial) Contrast

Imaging the 2-Hit Hypothesis of Clinical Glutamate Neurotransmitter Dysfunction

Temporal Contrast

Need for HD-MR Imaging

HD-MR Imaging in Practice

HD-MR Imaging of the Brain

Roll Over Warburg and Tell Hans Krebs the News!

Summary and Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Footnotes

References

In this issue

Citation Manager Formats

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Similar Articles

News and Updates

Resources

Opportunities

American Society of Neuroradiology

Main menu

User menu

Search

Hyperpolarized MR Imaging: Neurologic Applications of Hyperpolarized Metabolism

Abstract

Chemical Contrast

Spatial Contrast

Exogenous Contrast

“Smart” (Glial) Contrast

Imaging the 2-Hit Hypothesis of Clinical Glutamate Neurotransmitter Dysfunction

Temporal Contrast

Need for HD-MR Imaging

HD-MR Imaging in Practice

HD-MR Imaging of the Brain

Roll Over Warburg and Tell Hans Krebs the News!

Summary and Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Footnotes

References

In this issue

Citation Manager Formats

Jump to section

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Similar Articles

News and Updates

Resources

Opportunities

American Society of Neuroradiology