Research ArticleBRAIN
Dynamic Spin Labeling Angiography in Extracranial Carotid Artery Stenosis
Carsten Warmuth, Maria Rüping, Annette Förschler, Hans-Christian Koennecke, Jose Manuel Valdueza, Andreas Kauert, Stephan J. Schreiber, Ralf Siekmann and Claus Zimmer
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2005, 26 (5) 1035-1043;
Carsten Warmuth
Maria Rüping
Annette Förschler
Hans-Christian Koennecke
Jose Manuel Valdueza
Andreas Kauert
Stephan J. Schreiber
Ralf Siekmann

References
- ↵Nederkoorn PJ, van der Graaf Y, Hunink MG, et al. Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review. Stroke 2003;34:1324–1332
- ↵Guckel FJ, Brix G, Schmiedek P, et al. Cerebrovascular reserve capacity in patients with occlusive cerebrovascular disease: assessment with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging and the acetazolamide stimulation test. Radiology 1996;201:405–412
- ↵Reith W, Heiland S, Erb G, Benner T, Forsting M, Sartor K. Dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted MRI in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Neuroradiology 1997;39:250–257
- ↵Rutgers DR, Klijn CJ, Kappelle LJ, van Huffelen AC, van der Grond J. A longitudinal study of collateral flow patterns in the circle of Willis and the ophthalmic artery in patients with a symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion. Stroke 2000;31:1913–1920
- ↵Bendszus M, Koltzenburg M, Burger R, Warmuth-Metz M, Hoffmann E, Solymosi L. Silent embolism in diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: a prospective study. Lancet 1999;354:1594–1597
- ↵Williams DS, Detre JA, Leigh JS, Koretsky AP. Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using spin inversion of arterial water. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:212–216
- ↵Wong EC, Buxton RB, Frank LR. Quantitative Imaging of perfusion using a single substraction (QUIPSS and QUIPSS II). Magn Reson Med 1998;39:702–708
- ↵Dixon WT, Du LN, Faul DD, Gado M, Rossnick S. Projection angiograms of blood labeled by adiabatic fast passage. Magn Reson Med 1986;3:454–462
- ↵Nishimura DG, Macovski A, Pauly JM, Conolly SM. MR angiography by selective inversion recovery. Magn Reson Med 1987;4:193–202
- ↵
- ↵Wang SJ, Nishimura DG, Macovski A. Fast angiography using selective inversion recovery. Magn Reson Med 1990;23:109–121
- ↵Wang SJ, Nishimura DG, Macovski a. Multiple-readout selective inversion recovery angiography. Magn Reson Med 1991;17:244–251
- ↵Edelman RR, Siewert B, Darby DG, et al. Qualitative mapping of cerebral blood flow and functional localization with echo-planar MR imaging and signal targeting with alternating radio frequency. Radiology 1994;192:513–520
- ↵Detre JA, Leigh JS, Williams DS, Koretsky AP. Perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 1992;23:37–45
- ↵Kim SG. Quantification of relative cerebral blood flow change by flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) technique: application to functional mapping. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:293–301
- ↵Kwong KK, Chesler DA, Weisskoff RM, et al. MR Perfusion Studies with T1-Weighted Echo Planar Imaging. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:878–887
- ↵Look D, Locker D. Time saving in measurement of NMR and EPR relaxation times. Rev Sci Instrum 1970;41:250–251
- ↵
- ↵Clinical alert: benefit of carotid endarterectomy for patients with high-grade stenosis of the internal carotid artery. Stroke 1991;22:816–817
- ↵MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis—European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Lancet 1991;337:1235–1243
- ↵Rothwell PM, Gibson RJ, Slattery J, Sellar RJ, Warlow CP. Equivalence of measurements of carotid stenosis: a comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms—European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Stroke 1994;25:2435–2439
- ↵Boczko ML, Caplan LH. Alteration of flow dynamics in the carotid artery system of “stroke” patients: clinical and arteriographic study. Invest Radiol 1967;2:33–40
- ↵Oldendorf WH, Crandall PH, Nordyke RA, Rose AS. A comparison of the arrival in the cerebral hemispheres of intravenously injected radioisotope: a preliminary report. Neurology 1960;10:223–227
- ↵Tolonen U. Quantitative 99mTechnetium cerebral circulation time in brain infarction. Its relation to clinical findings, electroencephalograms and conventional radionuclide studies. Acta Neurol Scand 1981;5:337–352
- ↵
- ↵Schreiber S, Weih M, Hofmann O, Rückert R, Einhäupl KM, Valdueza JM. Delayed transcranial echo-contrast bolus arrival in carotid artery disease.In: Proceedings of the 4th Meeting of the European Society of Neurosonology and Cerebral Hemodynamics. 1999 :48
- ↵Nighoghossian N, Berthezene Y, Philippon B, Adeleine P, Froment JC, Trouillas P. Hemodynamic parameter assessment with dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging in unilateral symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion. Stroke 1996;27:474–479
- ↵Wang Y, Johnston DL, Breen JF, et al. Dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using contrast enhancement, fast data acquisition, and complex subtraction. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:551–556
- ↵Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, Mistretta CA. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:345–351
- ↵Johnston DCC, Eastwood JD, Nguyen T, Goldstein LB. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of carotid arteries: utility in routine clinical practice. Stroke 2002;33:2834–2838
- Patel SG, Collie DA, Wardlaw JM, et al. Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;73:21–28
- ↵Wardlaw JM, Lewis SC, Humphrey P, Young G, Collie D, Warlow CP. How does the degree of carotid stenosis affect the accuracy and interobserver variability of magnetic resonance angiography? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;71:155–160
- ↵Araki CT, Babikian VL, Cantelmo NL, Johnson WC. Cerebrovascular hemodynamic changes associated with carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 1991;13:854–859
- ↵
- ↵Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA, et al. Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 2003;361:107–116
- ↵Szabo K, Kern R, Gass A, Hirsch J, Hennerici M. Acute stroke patterns in patients with internal carotid artery disease: a diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke 2001;32:1323–1329
- ↵Wolfle KD, Schnur C, Pfadenhauer K, Bruijnen H, Bohndorf K, Loeprecht H. MR-angiography and duplex-ultrasonography: predictive reliability for angiographically determined internal carotid artery stenosis >/=70 –99%. Zentralbl Chir 2002;127:81–88
- ↵Tiev KP, Sevestre MA, Reix T, et al. Quantitative assessment of carotid stenosis: comparison between Doppler ultrasound, spiral computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and digital angiography. J Mal Vasc 2000;25:325–331
- ↵Amann M, Warmuth C, Günther M, Zimmer C, Schad LR. Dynamic spin labeling cerebral 2-D angiography: a comparison between FLASH and spiral readout. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, CA: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine;2002 :629
In this issue
Advertisement
Dynamic Spin Labeling Angiography in Extracranial Carotid Artery Stenosis
Carsten Warmuth, Maria Rüping, Annette Förschler, Hans-Christian Koennecke, Jose Manuel Valdueza, Andreas Kauert, Stephan J. Schreiber, Ralf Siekmann, Claus Zimmer
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2005, 26 (5) 1035-1043;
Dynamic Spin Labeling Angiography in Extracranial Carotid Artery Stenosis
Carsten Warmuth, Maria Rüping, Annette Förschler, Hans-Christian Koennecke, Jose Manuel Valdueza, Andreas Kauert, Stephan J. Schreiber, Ralf Siekmann, Claus Zimmer
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2005, 26 (5) 1035-1043;
Jump to section
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Cited By...
- Highly Accelerated Vessel-Selective Arterial Spin Labelling Angiography using Sparsity and Smoothness Constraints
- MR Imaging of Individual Perfusion Reorganization Using Superselective Pseudocontinuous Arterial Spin-Labeling in Patients with Complex Extracranial Steno-Occlusive Disease
- Assessment of Intracranial Collateral Flow by Using Dynamic Arterial Spin Labeling MRA and Transcranial Color-Coded Duplex Ultrasound
This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.
More in this TOC Section
Similar Articles
Advertisement