1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => FreeToRead
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)


  
    



















































































































    Comparing Perfusion Metrics Obtained from a Single Compartment Versus Pharmacokinetic Modeling Methods Using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging with Glioma Grade | American Journal of Neuroradiology  
    



















    





























    
  
  




    
    

  

      


    

      

  
  
  

    

  

    

  

                
    

      

  

    

  
      
  
  

    


Advertisement



  



  


  
  



  



    

  


  


  


  
  
  
  
  
  

  	      



          


    
      

    
  
    
        
    

  

    
                        

  

                
    

      

	  

		
		

			

			  

  
      
  
  

    

  
  
      
Research ArticleBRAIN

  
      

  
      
Comparing Perfusion Metrics Obtained from a Single Compartment Versus Pharmacokinetic Modeling Methods Using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging with Glioma Grade
  
    	
M. Law, R. Young, J. Babb, M. Rad, T. Sasaki, D. Zagzag and G. Johnson

  
    	
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2006,  27 (9) 1975-1982; 

  
  
  



  


  
  



			

		

	
	
 	
	  
  

		
		

			

			  

  
      
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

  

    

  
      
  
  

    
References
  1. ↵
    Kleihues P, Cavanee P. WHO Classification of Tumors: Pathology and Genetic of Tumours of the Nervous System. Lyon, France: IARC Press,2000
  2. ↵
    Daumas-Duport C, Scheithauer B, O’Fallon J, et al. Grading of astrocytomas: a simple and reproducible method. Cancer 1988;62:2152–65
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    Jackson RJ, Fuller GN, Abi-Said D, et al. Limitations of stereotactic biopsy in the initial management of gliomas. Neuro-oncol 2001;3:193–200
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Cha S, Knopp EA, Johnson G, et al. Intracranial mass lesions: dynamic contrast-enhanced susceptibility-weighted echo-planar perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 2002;223:11–29
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    Burger P. Malignant astrocytic neoplasms: classification, pathology, anatomy, and response to therapy. Semin Oncol 1986;13:16–20
    PubMed
  6. ↵
    Aronen HJ, Gazit IE, Louis DN, et al. Cerebral blood volume maps of gliomas: comparison with tumor grade and histologic findings. Radiology 1994;191:41–51
    PubMedWeb of Science
  7. Bruening R, Kwong KK, Vevea MJ, et al. Echo-planar MR determination of relative cerebral blood volume in human brain tumors: T1 versus T2 weighting. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:831–40
    Abstract
  8. Knopp EA, Cha S, Johnson G, et al. Glial neoplasms: dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 1999;211:791–98
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. Law M, Yang S, Babb JS, et al. Comparison of cerebral blood volume and vascular permeability from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with glioma grade. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:746–55
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Law M, Yang S, Wang H, et al. Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of perfusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging compared with conventional MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1989–98
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Lev MH, Ozsunar Y, Henson JW, et al. Glial tumor grading and outcome prediction using dynamic spin-echo MR susceptibility mapping compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR: confounding effect of elevated rCBV of oligodendrogliomas [corrected]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:214–21
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. Lev MH, Rosen BR. Clinical applications of intracranial perfusion MR imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 1999;9:309–31
    PubMedWeb of Science
  13. Petrella JR, Provenzale JM. MR perfusion imaging of the brain: techniques and applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:207–19
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Shin JH, Lee HK, Kwun BD, et al. Using relative cerebral blood flow and volume to evaluate the histopathologic grade of cerebral gliomas: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:783–89
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, et al. Correlation of MR imaging-determined cerebral blood volume maps with histologic and angiographic determination of vascularity of gliomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:1479–86
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Shigematsu Y, et al. Value of dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of intracranial tumors. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:114–24
    PubMed
  17. ↵
    Wong ET, Jackson EF, Hess KR, et al. Correlation between dynamic MRI and outcome in patients with malignant gliomas. Neurology 1998;50:777–81
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Wolf RL, Wang J, Wang S, et al. Grading of CNS neoplasms using continuous arterial spin-labeled perfusion MR imaging at 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:475–82
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Warmuth C, Gunther M, Zimmer C. Quantification of blood flow in brain tumors: comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2003;228:523–32
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    Tofts PS, Kermode AG. Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging: fundamental concepts. Magn Res Med 1991;17:357–67
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:223–32
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    Rosen BR, Belliveau JW, Vevea, et al. Perfusion imaging with NMR contrast agents. Magn Res Med 1990;14:249–65
    PubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    Rosen BR, Belliveau JW, Buchbinder BR, et al. Contrast agents and cerebral hemodynamics. Magn Reson Med 1991;19:285–92
    PubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    Wetzel SG, Cha S, Johnson G, et al. Relative cerebral blood volume measurements in intracranial mass lesions: interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility study. Radiology 2002;224:797–803
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    Johnson G, Wetzel S, Cha S, et al. A new approach to measuring blood volume and vascular transfer constant from dynamic, contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Res Med 2004;51:961–68
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Leenders KL, Perani D, Lammertsma AA, et al. Cerebral blood flow, blood volume and oxygen utilization: normal values and effect of age. Brain 1990;113(Pt 1):27–47
  27. ↵
    Rempp KA, Brix G, Wenz F, et al. Quantification of regional cerebral blood flow and volume with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1994;193:637–41
    PubMedWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    Ostergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Chesler DA, et al. High-resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I. Mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:715–25
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    Carroll TJ, Rowley HA, Haughton VM. Automatic calculation of the arterial input function for cerebral perfusion imaging with MR imaging. Radiology 2003;227:593–600
    PubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    Cha S, Tihan T, Crawford F, et al. Differentiation of low-grade oligodendrogliomas from low-grade astrocytomas by using quantitative blood-volume measurements derived from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:266–73
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Engelhard HH, Stelea A, Cochran EJ. Oligodendroglioma: pathology and molecular biology. Surg Neurol 2002;58:111–17
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    Watanabe T, Nakamura M, Kros JM, et al. Phenotype versus genotype correlation in oligodendrogliomas and low-grade diffuse astrocytomas. Acta Neuropathol (Berl)2002;103:267–75
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    McDonald DM, Choyke PL. Imaging of angiogenesis: from microscope to clinic. Nat Med 2003;9:713–25
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    Vajkoczy P, Menger MD. Vascular microenvironment in gliomas. J Neurooncol 2000;50:99–108
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    McDonald DM, Blank P. Significance of blood vessel leakiness in cancer. Cancer Res 2002;62:5381–85
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  36. Li KL, Zhu XP, Checkley DR, et al. Simultaneous mapping of blood volume and endothelial permeability surface area product in gliomas using iterative analysis of first-pass dynamic contrast enhanced MRI data. Br J Radiol 2003;76:39–51
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Harrer JU, Parker GJ, Haroon HA, et al. Comparative study of methods for determining vascular permeability and blood volume in human gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:748–57
    CrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Roberts HC, Roberts TP, Bollen AW, et al.. Correlation of microvascular permeability derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with histologic grade and tumor labeling index: a study in human brain tumors. Acad Radiol 2001;8:384–91
    CrossRefPubMed
  39. Roberts HC, Roberts TP, Ley S, et al. Quantitative estimation of microvascular permeability in human brain tumors: correlation of dynamic Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging with histopathologic grading. Acad Radiol 2002;9 (suppl 1):S151–155
  40. ↵
    Roberts HC, Roberts TPL, Brasch RC, et al. Quantitative measurement of microvascular permeability in human brain tumors achieved using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with histologic grade. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:891–99
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  


  
  



  




  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

     Back to top  


  
  



			

		

		
		

			

			  

  
        
In this issue

    
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

  

    

  
      
  
  

    


Advertisement



  



  


  
  



  



  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

	  
  

		

          

            

  
      
  
  

     Print  


  
  



  
      
  
  

     Download PDF  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
 Email Article
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
 Citation Tools
  


  
  



          

        

        
        

          

            



  
      
  
  

    

  

    

  
      
  
  

    

  
  
  
  
      
Comparing Perfusion Metrics Obtained from a Single Compartment Versus Pharmacokinetic Modeling Methods Using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging with Glioma Grade
  
    	
M. Law, R. Young, J. Babb, M. Rad, T. Sasaki, D. Zagzag, G. Johnson

  
    	
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2006, 27 (9) 1975-1982; 

  
  
  



  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

  
    
  
  
    
  
  
    
  


  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  


  
  



  



  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
  


  
  



          

        

	
 	
	
	


  


  
  



  
        
Jump to section

    
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

  

    
 Related Articles
  • No related articles found.
 Cited By...
 More in this TOC Section
 Similar Articles

  



  


  
  



			

		

	
	
 	
	
	


    

  



  

                
    

      

  

    

  
      
  
  

    


Advertisement