1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => FreeToRead
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)


  
    
































































































































    MR Angiographic Follow-Up of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Detachable Coils: Evaluation of a Blood-Pool Contrast Medium | American Journal of Neuroradiology  
    



















    































    
  
  




    
    

  

      


    

      

  
  
  

    

  

    

  

                
    

      

  

    

  
      
  
  

    


Advertisement



  



  


  
  



  



    

  


  


  


  
  
  
  
  
  

  	      


    
      

    
  
    
        
    

  

    
                        

  

                
    

      

	  

		
		

			

			  

  
      
  
  

    

  
  
      
Research ArticleInterventional

  
      

  
      
MR Angiographic Follow-Up of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Detachable Coils: Evaluation of a Blood-Pool Contrast Medium
  
    	
T. Kau, J. Gasser, S. Celedin, E. Rabitsch, W. Eicher, E. Uhl and K.A. Hausegger

  
    	
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2009,  30 (8) 1524-1530; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1622 

  
  
  



  


  
  



			

		

	
	
 	
	  
  

		
		

			

			  

  
      
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

  

    

  
      
  
  

    
References
  1. 1.↵


    1. Molyneux  A, 
    2. Kerr  R, 
    3. Stratton  I, 
    4. et al.
    
for the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group.
International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial.
Lancet
2002;
360:
1267–
74
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵


    1. Pelz  D, 
    2. Lylyk  P, 
    3. Negoro  M
    .
Interventional neuroradiology.
Stroke
2004;
35:
381–
82
    FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵


    1. Standhardt  H, 
    2. Boecher-Schwarz  H, 
    3. Gruber  A, 
    4. et al
    .
Endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils: short- and long-term results of a single-centre series.
Stroke
2008;
39:
899–
904
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵


    1. Raymond  J, 
    2. Guilbert  F, 
    3. Weill  A, 
    4. et al
    .
Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils.
Stroke
2003;
34:
1398–
403
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵


    1. Gallas  S, 
    2. Pasco  A, 
    3. Cottier  JP, 
    4. et al
    .
A multicenter study of 705 ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
2005;
26:
1723–
31
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵


    1. Pierot  L, 
    2. Bonafé  A, 
    3. Bracard  S, 
    4. et al.
    
for the French Matrix Registry Investigators.
Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with Matrix detachable coils: immediate posttreatment results from a prospective multicenter registry.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
2006;
27:
1693–
99
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵


    1. Gauvrit  JY, 
    2. Caron  S, 
    3. Taschner  CA, 
    4. et al
    .
Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: long-term imaging follow-up with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.
J Neurosurg
2008;
108:
443–
49
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵


    1. Vinuela  F, 
    2. Duckwiler  G, 
    3. Mawad  M, 
    4. et al
    .
Detachable coil embolization of acute intracranial aneurysm: perioperative anatomical and clinical outcome in 403 patients.
J Neurosurg
1997;
86:
475–
82
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵


    1. Wallace  RC, 
    2. Karis  JP, 
    3. Partovi  S, 
    4. et al
    .
Noninvasive imaging of treated cerebral aneurysms. Part I. MR angiographic follow-up of coiled aneurysms.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
2007;
28:
1001–
08
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵


    1. Gönner  F, 
    2. Heid  O, 
    3. Remonda  L, 
    4. et al
    .
MR angiography with ultrashort echo time in cerebral aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
1998;
19:
1324–
28
    Abstract
  11. 11.↵


    1. Kähärä  VJ, 
    2. Seppänen  SK, 
    3. Ryymin  PS, 
    4. et al
    .
MR angiography with three-dimensional time-of-flight and targeted maximum-intensity-projection reconstructions in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms embolized with Guglielmi detachable coils.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
1999;
20:
1470–
75
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵


    1. Brunereau  L, 
    2. Cottier  JP, 
    3. Sonier  CB, 
    4. et al
    .
Prospective evaluation of time-of-flight MR angiography in the follow-up of intracranial saccular aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils.
J Comput Assist Tomogr
1999;
23:
216–
23
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵


    1. Anzalone  N, 
    2. Righi  C, 
    3. Simionato  F, 
    4. et al
    .
Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
2000;
21:
746–
52
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵


    1. Michardière  R, 
    2. Bensalem  D, 
    3. Martin  D, 
    4. et al
    .
Comparison of MRA and angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with GDC [in French].
J Neuroradiol
2001;
28:
75–
83
    PubMed
  15. 15.↵


    1. Boulin  A, 
    2. Pierot  L
    .
Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
Radiology
2001;
219:
108–
13
    PubMed
  16. 16.↵


    1. Nome  T, 
    2. Bakke  SJ, 
    3. Nakstad  PH
    .
MR angiography in the follow-up of coiled cerebral aneurysms after treatment with Guglielmi detachable coils.
Acta Radiol
2002;
43:
10–
14
    FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵


    1. Cottier  JP, 
    2. Bleuzen-Couthon  A, 
    3. Gallas  S, 
    4. et al
    .
Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: is contrast material necessary in the follow-up with 3D time-of-flight MR angiography?
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
2003;
24:
1797–
803
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵


    1. Cottier  JP, 
    2. Bleuzen-Couthon  A, 
    3. Gallas  S, 
    4. et al
    .
Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: comparison of plain radiographs, 3D time-of-flight MRA and digital subtraction angiography.
Neuroradiology
2003;
45:
818–
24
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵


    1. Yamada  N, 
    2. Hayashi  K, 
    3. Murao  K, 
    4. et al
    .
Time-of-flight MR angiography targeted to coiled intracranial aneurysms is more sensitive to residual flow than is digital subtraction angiography.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
2004;
25:
1154–
57
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵


    1. Okahara  M, 
    2. Kiyosue  H, 
    3. Hori  Y, 
    4. et al
    .
Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography for evaluation of intracranial aneurysms after endosaccular packing with Guglielmi detachable coils: comparison with 3D digital subtraction angiography.
Eur Radiol
2004;
14:
1162–
68
    PubMed
  21. 21.↵


    1. Majoie  CB, 
    2. Sprengers  ME, 
    3. van Rooij  WJ, 
    4. et al
    .
MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
2005;
26:
1349–
56
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵


    1. Gauvrit  JY, 
    2. Leclerc  X, 
    3. Pernodet  M, 
    4. et al
    .
Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: usefulness of 6-month imaging follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
2005;
26:
515–
21
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵


    1. Westerlaan  HE, 
    2. van der Vliet  AM, 
    3. Hew  JM, 
    4. et al
    .
Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils.
Neuroradiology
2005;
47:
622–
29
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵


    1. Farb  RI, 
    2. Nag  S, 
    3. Scott  JN, 
    4. et al
    .
Surveillance of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: a comparison of MRA techniques.
Neuroradiology
2005;
47:
507–
15
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵


    1. Pierot  L, 
    2. Delcourt  C, 
    3. Bouquigny  F, 
    4. et al
    .
Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms selectively treated with coils: prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
2006;
27:
744–
49
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵


    1. Gauvrit  JY, 
    2. Leclerc  X, 
    3. Caron  S, 
    4. et al
    .
Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: imaging follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
Stroke
2006;
37:
1033–
37
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵


    1. Wong  JH, 
    2. Mitha  AP, 
    3. Willson  M, 
    4. et al
    .
Assessment of brain aneurysms by using high-resolution magnetic resonance angiography after endovascular coil delivery.
J Neurosurg
2007;
107:
283–
89
    PubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵


    1. Lubicz  B, 
    2. Levivier  M, 
    3. Sadeghi  N, 
    4. et al
    .
Immediate intracranial aneurysm occlusion after embolization with detachable coils: a comparison between MR angiography and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography.
J Neuroradiol
2007;
34:
190–
97
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵


    1. Deutschmann  HA, 
    2. Augustin  M, 
    3. Simbrunner  J, 
    4. et al
    .
Diagnostic accuracy of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography for follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: influence of aneurysm size.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
2007;
28:
628–
34
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵


    1. Kwee  TC, 
    2. Kwee  RM
    .
MR angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Neuroradiology
2007;
49:
703–
13
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵


    1. Anzalone  N, 
    2. Scomazzoni  F, 
    3. Cirillo  M, 
    4. et al
    .
Follow-up of coiled cerebral aneurysms at 3T: comparison of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
2008;
29:
1530–
36
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵


    1. Anzalone  N, 
    2. Scomazzoni  F, 
    3. Cirillo  M, 
    4. et al
    .
Follow-up of coiled cerebral aneurysms: comparison of three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography at 3 Tesla with three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 1.5 Tesla.
Invest Radiol
2008;
43:
559–
67
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵


    1. Kang  HS, 
    2. Moon  WJ, 
    3. Roh  HG, 
    4. et al
    .
MR angiographic evaluation is limited in intracranial aneurysms embolized with Nexus coils.
Neuroradiology
2008;
50:
171–
78
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵


    1. Wikström  J, 
    2. Ronne-Engström  E, 
    3. Gal  G, 
    4. et al
    .
Three-dimensional time-of-flight (3D TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and contrast-enhanced MRA of intracranial aneurysms treated with platinum coils.
Acta Radiol
2008;
49:
190–
96
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵


    1. Urbach  H, 
    2. Dorenbeck  U, 
    3. von Falkenhausen  M, 
    4. et al
    .
Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography at 3 T compared to digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of ruptured and coiled intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study.
Neuroradiology
2008;
50:
383–
89
    CrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵


    1. Essig  M, 
    2. Nikolaou  K, 
    3. Meaney  JF
    .
Magnetic resonance angiography of the head and neck vessels.
Eur Radiol
2007;
17
(suppl 2):
B30–
37
    PubMed
  37. 37.↵


    1. Fink  C, 
    2. Goyen  M, 
    3. Lotz  J
    .
Magnetic resonance angiography with blood-pool contrast agents: future applications.
Eur Radiol
2007;
17
(suppl 2):
B38–
44
    PubMed
  38. 38.↵


    1. Rohrer  M, 
    2. Geerts-Ossevoort  L, 
    3. Laub  G
    .
Technical requirements, biophysical considerations and protocol optimization with magnetic resonance angiography using blood-pool agents.
Eur Radiol
2007;
17
(suppl 2):
B7–
12
    PubMed
  39. 39.↵


    1. Rapp  JH, 
    2. Wolff  SD, 
    3. Quinn  SF, 
    4. et al
    .
Aortoiliac occlusive disease in patients with known or suspected peripheral vascular disease: safety and efficacy of gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography—multicenter comparative phase III study.
Radiology
2005;
236:
71–
78
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵


    1. Goyen  M, 
    2. Edelman  M, 
    3. Perreault  P, 
    4. et al
    .
MR angiography of aortoiliac occlusive disease: a phase III study of the safety and effectiveness of the blood-pool contrast agent MS-325.
Radiology
2005;
236:
825–
33
    PubMed
  41. 41.↵


    1. Bosch  E, 
    2. Kreitner  KF, 
    3. Peirano  MF, 
    4. et al
    .
Safety and efficacy of gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography for evaluation of pedal arterial disease: multicenter comparative phase 3 study.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
2008;
190:
179–
86
    CrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵


    1. Lauffer  RB, 
    2. Parmelee  DJ, 
    3. Ouellet  HS, 
    4. et al
    .
MS-325: a small-molecule vascular imaging agent for magnetic resonance imaging.
Acad Radiol
1996;
3
(suppl 2):
S356–
58
    CrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵


    1. Parmelee  DJ, 
    2. Walovitch  RC, 
    3. Ouellet  HS, 
    4. et al
    .
Preclinical evaluation of the pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and elimination of MS-325, a blood pool agent for magnetic resonance imaging.
Invest Radiol
1997;
32:
741–
47
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵


    1. Lauffer  RB, 
    2. Parmelee  DJ, 
    3. Dunham  SU, 
    4. et al
    .
MS-325: albumin-targeted contrast agent for MR angiography.
Radiology
1998;
207:
529–
38
    PubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵


    1. Grist  TM, 
    2. Korosec  FR, 
    3. Peters  DC, 
    4. et al
    .
Steady-state and dynamic MR angiography with MS-325: initial experience in humans.
Radiology
1998;
207:
539–
44
    PubMed
  46. 46.↵


    1. Bremerich  J, 
    2. Bilecen  D, 
    3. Reimer  P
    .
MR angiography with blood pool contrast agents.
Eur Radiol
2007;
17:
3017–
24
    CrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵


    1. Cloft  HJ, 
    2. Kaufmann  T, 
    3. Kallmes  DF
    .
Observer agreement in the assessment of endovascular aneurysm therapy and aneurysm recurrence.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
2007;
28:
497–
500
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵


    1. Raymond  J, 
    2. Roy  D, 
    3. Bojanowski  M, 
    4. et al
    .
Endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured and unruptured aneurysms of the basilar bifurcation.
J Neurosurg
1997;
86:
211–
19
    PubMedWeb of Science
  49. 49.↵


    1. Murayama  Y, 
    2. Nien  YL, 
    3. Duckwiler  G, 
    4. et al
    .
Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years’ experience.
J Neurosurg
2003;
98:
959–
66
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. 50.↵


    1. Thornton  J, 
    2. Debrun  GM, 
    3. Aletich  VA, 
    4. et al
    .
Follow-up angiography of intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular placement of Guglielmi detachable coils.
Neurosurgery
2002;
50:
239–
49
    PubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵


    1. Hartman  J, 
    2. Nguyen  T, 
    3. Larsen  D, 
    4. et al
    .
MR artifacts, heat production, and ferromagnetism of Guglielmi detachable coils: preliminary experience.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
1997;
18:
279–
86
    Abstract
  52. 52.↵


    1. Buhk  JH, 
    2. Kallenberg  K, 
    3. Mohr  A, 
    4. et al
    .
No advantage of time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography at 3 Tesla compared to 1.5 Tesla in the follow-up after endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms.
Neuroradiology
2008;
50:
855–
61
    CrossRefPubMed
  


  
  



  




  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

     Back to top  


  
  



			

		

		
		

			

			  

  
        
In this issue

    
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

  

    

  
      
  
  

    


Advertisement



  



  


  
  



  



  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

	  
  

		

          

            

  
      
  
  

     Print  


  
  



  
      
  
  

     Download PDF  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
 Email Article
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
 Citation Tools
  


  
  



          

        

        
        

          

            



  
      
  
  

    

  

    

  
      
  
  

    

  
  
  
  
      
MR Angiographic Follow-Up of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Detachable Coils: Evaluation of a Blood-Pool Contrast Medium
  
    	
T. Kau, J. Gasser, S. Celedin, E. Rabitsch, W. Eicher, E. Uhl, K.A. Hausegger

  
    	
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2009, 30 (8) 1524-1530; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1622 

  
  
  



  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

  
    
  
  
    
  
  
    
  


  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  


  
  



  



  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
  


  
  



          

        

	
 	
	
	


  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
              Purchase  


  
  



  
        
Jump to section

    
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
  


  
  



			

		

	
	
 	
	
	


    

  



  

                
    

      

  

    

  
      
  
  

    


Advertisement