Apparent Diffusion Coefficient with Higher b-Value Correlates Better with Viable Cell Count Quantified from the Cavity of Brain Abscess

V. Tomar; A. Yadav; R.K.S. Rathore; S. Verma; R. Awasthi; V. Bharadwaj; B.K. Ojha; K.N. Prasad; R.K. Gupta

doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2674

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: DWI by using higher b-values provides tissue diffusivity with less T2 shinethrough effect. VCD in the abscess cavity correlates with ADC values. The purpose of this study was to investigate which b-value−derived ADC correlates better with VCD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with brain abscess underwent conventional MR imaging and DWI with b = 1000, 2000, and 3000 s/mm² on a 3T MR imaging scanner. ADC values were quantified by placing regions of interest inside the abscess cavity in all sections where the lesion was apparent on coregistered ADC maps derived from different b-values. VCD was measured on pus aspirated.

RESULTS: An increase in b-value was associated with a decrease in ADC values in normal parenchyma as well as in the abscess cavity. The most significant negative correlation of VCD was observed with b = 3000 s/mm² (r = −0.98, P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS: VCD in the abscess cavity can be best assessed at b = 3000 s/mm² secondary to the reduction in the T2 shinethrough effect. DWI with b = 3000 s/mm² is of promising value in the assessment of the therapeutic response of brain abscess.

ABBREVIATIONS

ADC: apparent diffusion coefficient
CNWM: contralateral normal white matter
DWI: diffusion-weighted imaging
FLAIR: fluid-attenuated inversion recovery
FWM: frontal white matter
GM: gray matter
spp: species
VCD: viable cell density
WM: white matter

Brain abscess is a focal suppurative process within the brain parenchyma.¹ The incidence of brain abscess is highly variable. Brain abscesses comprise 1%–2% and up to 8% of all the patients with intracranial space-occupying lesions seen in the developed and developing countries, respectively.² Despite significant advances in diagnosis and treatment, brain abscess remains a potentially fatal central nervous system infection.³ The abscess cavity contains inflammatory cells with intact cell membranes and nuclei, necrotic tissue debris, proteinaceous exudates, bacterial metabolites, and cytosolic amino acids, with or without the brain abscess's causative organism.⁴

CT and conventional MR imaging are the main noninvasive modalities used to diagnose brain abscess. However, the imaging features of brain abscesses are nonspecific and may simulate those of cystic rim-enhancing mass lesions of varying etiologies.⁵ DWI is widely used in the detection and characterization of a large number of brain pathologies, such as stroke, abscess, encephalitis, and tumors involving the central nervous system.^6,7 DWI has been shown to be useful in distinguishing brain abscess from necrotic or cystic brain tumors.^8,9

The restriction of diffusion in brain abscess is mainly influenced by the attenuation of viable inflammatory cells present in the pus, irrespective of the etiology of the abscess.¹⁰ Treated brain abscesses have higher ADCs compared with untreated abscesses, and return to low ADCs suggests reactivation of the disease.¹¹ Recently a few studies have shown the utility of high b-values in the diagnosis of various disease conditions.^{12⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–19} Theoretically, higher b-value DWI provides better contrast with its reflection of more tissue diffusivity and less T2 shinethrough effect.^13,14 However, at 1.5T or lower field strengths, higher b-values are not usually used in clinical practice due to inferior signal intensity–to-noise ratios.^15⇓–17

It has been shown in vitro that the magnitude of diffusion in intracellular water molecules is an order smaller than that in the extracellular space.^20,21 The water diffusion in biologic tissues can be described in terms of 2 main components: water molecules of low mobility with slow diffusion (either bound to macromolecules or confined within the cell membrane) and of high mobility with high diffusion (mostly extracellular).^22,23 The acquisition of DWI up to b = 4000 s/mm² amplifies the sensitivity of DWI to assess water diffusion properties and enables the separation of signals arising from the intracellular and extracellular water molecules.^20,21 Hence, DWI should be sensitive to several physiologic and morphologic characteristics of the tissues, which are associated with the diffusion of the low and high mobility of water molecules. Two water compartments separated with different diffusion coefficients (ie, extracellular water for the compartment with high ADC) have been explained on the basis of the biexponential fit model for water signal-intensity decay with different b-values.^20,21–22 This biexponential diffusion property of water has been used in functional task-activation assessments.²⁴

The purpose of this study was to investigate which b-value−derived ADC correlates better with VCD. We computed a biexponential fit to understand which component is influenced by the high b-value in the abscess cavity.

Materials and Methods

Study Design

Thirty-five patients with suspected intracranial abscess (24 males and 11 females; mean age, 25 years; ranging from 9 to 47 years of age) admitted to the Department of Neurosurgery, Chhatrapati Sahuji Maharaj Medical University, Lucknow, India, from August 2009 to December 2010 and 10 healthy controls (ranging from 23 to 45 years of age) were enrolled in the study prospectively. These subjects underwent conventional MR imaging and DWI in the Department of Radiodiagnosis, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India, on a 3T MR imaging scanner (Signa Hdxt; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) with a 12-channel head coil. Institutional ethics approval and informed consent from all patients or their nearest kin were obtained before the investigation. Diagnosis of brain abscess was suggested on the basis of diffusion imaging in 30 patients and formed the basis of inclusion for the study protocol design. The diagnosis was confirmed in all these 30 patients after surgery.

MR Imaging Protocol

The conventional MR imaging protocol included T2-weighted fast spin-echo with TE/ TR/NEX = 88/4400 ms/1.2; number of sections = 42; section thickness = 3 mm; FOV = 240 mm; T2 FLAIR with TE/TR/NEX = 140/9000 ms/2; number of sections = 42; section thickness = 3 mm; FOV = 240 mm; and spin-echo T1 FLAIR with TE/TR/NEX/flip angle = 14/1300 ms/1/65°; number of sections = 42; section thickness = 3 mm; FOV = 240 mm with image matrix = 256 × 256 and no intersection gap.

All patients underwent DWI at b = 1000, 2000, and 3000 s/mm². DWI parameters were the following: TE = 93.2 ms; TR = 7075 ms; NEX = 2.0; number of sections = 42; section thickness = 3 mm; FOV = 240 mm; image matrix = 128 × 128 with no interslice gap. Postcontrast T1-weighted images were acquired after intravenous injection of gadadiamide dimeglamine (Omniscan, Oslo, Norway) at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg of body weight.

Culture of Abscess Aspirate

All patients underwent surgery within 24 hours of imaging. The pus was collected in a sterilized vial and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately after surgery/aspiration. At the same time, 1–2 mL of aspirated pus was inoculated into BACTEC Plus Aerobic/Anaerobic media (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, Maryland) to isolate the aerobic, facultative anaerobic, and anaerobic bacteria for the confirmation of the diagnosis of etiologic agents. The inoculated media were incubated at 37°C, and growth was monitored in BACTEC 9050 (Becton Dickinson) for 5 days. Media with positive growth were subcultured on appropriate solid media and incubated aerobically and anaerobically at 37°C. Anaerobic incubation was carried out in jars filled with a gas mixture of nitrogen gas (80%–90%), carbon dioxide (5%–10%), and deuterium (5%–10%), through an Anoxomat system (Mart Microbiology, Drachten, the Netherlands). All of the isolates were identified by standard biochemical tests as described previously.²⁵ Cultures and smear examinations were performed for Mycobacterium tuberculosis as well as for fungi in all cases.²⁶

Viable Cell Count

In this study, the viability of the cells was calculated by a hemocytometer (Burker-Turk; Erma, Tokyo, Japan) after diluting pus 100- to 1000-fold in white blood cell diluting solution and expressed as cells/milliliter as described previously.¹⁰ Inflammatory cells (leukocytes) with intact cell membranes and nuclei, as identified by 0.5% trypan blue staining, were referred to as viable cells. The method for the calculation of cell attenuation has been described elsewhere.^10,27

Data Analysis

A Java-based Image J plug-in (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij) was developed to generate the ADC maps from DWI datasets with different b-values.

Biexponential Fit and Its Quantification

The diffusion-weighted signal intensity in case of biexponential decay is given by

where S(b) is the signal intensity in the presence of a diffusion gradient, S(0) is the signal intensity in the absence of a diffusion gradient, D_fast and D_slow are the fast and slow ADCs, and f_fast and f_slow represent the respective fractional contributions to the signal intensity. With a_fast = S(0) − a_slow = S(0)f_fast, equation 1 can be written as

Coregistration was done between datasets with different b-values before fitting of equation 2 to obtain the ADCs of fast and slow diffusing components. Also the conventional ADC maps were calculated by using the monoexponential diffusion equation, S(b) = S(0)exp(−b·D) from the above coregistered datasets with different b-values from patients as well as controls.²⁸ The mean ADCs, ADC_fast, and ADC_slow components were calculated by placing elliptic or circular regions of interest (40–60 mm²) on any 1 of the above maps (and applying the same region of interest on other maps) inside the abscess cavity in all sections where the lesion was present. Similarly mean ADC values were also quantified from the CNWM and GM regions of the each patient with brain abscess in each section as they were from the abscess cavity.

Statistical Analysis

Bivariate analysis of the Pearson correlation was performed to study the relationship between mean ADC values, fast and slow ADC values, and VCD quantified from the abscess cavity. An independent Student t test was also performed to see any changes in ADC values quantified from the abscess cavity, CNWM, and GM regions of patients with brain abscess as well as FWM and GM regions of healthy controls at different b-values. All statistical analyses were performed by using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Version 16.0 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois).

Results

Clinical and Laboratory Examination

The predisposing factors were recognized in 24 cases: otitis media (n = 15), congenital heart disease (n = 3), postoperative infection (n = 1), steroid therapy (n = 2), head injury (n = 1), and pulmonary tuberculosis (n = 2). In the remaining 6 patients, the source of infection could not be ascertained. Of a total of 30 brain abscesses, 18 were found to be pyogenic, 1 was fungal, and 3 were confirmed as tubercular on a culture of aspirated pus. The micro-organisms isolated on culture and confirmed by standard biochemical test were aerobic Streptococci spp (n = 10), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 1), Bacteroides spp (n = 2), Nocardia spp (n = 1), Histoplasma capsulatum (n = 1), mixed microbes (aerobic and anaerobic) (n = 4), and tubercular (n = 3). Eight cases were sterile and were considered pyogenic due to the presence of acute inflammatory cells and the absence of Mycobacterium spp and fungal growth on microscopy and culture. In the abscess cavity, the VCD varied from 6000 to 11 000 cells/mm³.

Imaging Findings

Brain abscesses were located in the frontal lobe (n = 3), parietal lobe (n = 4), temporal lobe (n = 10), parietotemporal lobe (n = 4), and cerebellum (n = 9). The brain abscess appeared hyperintense on T2-weighted images with a peripheral hypointense rim (Fig 1A) and iso- to hypointense on T1-weighted images (Fig 1B). Postcontrast study showed rim enhancement (Fig 1C). A few brain abscesses showed homogeneous hyperintensity on DWI (Fig 1D−F), with corresponding homogeneous hypointensity on ADC images (Fig 1G−I). However, most brain abscesses showed heterogeneity on DWI and corresponding ADC images.

Fig 1.

A 16-year-old male patient with brain abscess. A, T2-weighted image shows bilobed centrally hyperintense lesions with a peripheral hypointense rim and surrounding edema in the left tempoparietal region causing mass effect. B and C, The lesion shows central hypointensity with a peripheral isointense rim on the T1-weighted image (B) and rim enhancement on the postcontrast T1-weighted image (C). D−F, DWI at b-values of 1000 (D), 2000 (E), and 3000 s/mm² (F), respectively, show intense hyperintensity inside the lesions with maximal suppression of free water at 3000 s/mm² (F). G−I, ADC maps generated from DWI at different b-values (1000, 2000, and 3000 s/mm²) show a decrease in signal intensity inside the lesions with increasing b-values, suggestive of maximal suppression of extracellular water. J and K, The fast (J) and slow (K) component ADC maps derived from the biexponential fit in the abscess cavity have values of (1.11 ± 0.06) × 10⁻³ s/mm² and (0.15 ± 0.23) × 10⁻³ s/mm², respectively. Pus culture showed S aureus.

Quantification of ADC

The mean ADC values of the abscess cavity, CNWM, and GM regions quantified by placing regions of interest on ADC maps obtained from different b-values are summarized in Table 1. On independent Student t tests, a significant decrease in mean ADC values was observed in the abscess cavity at different b-values. In CNWM, there was no significant difference among mean ADC values obtained from different b-values. In GM regions, there was a significant difference only between mean ADC values of b = 1000 and b = 3000 s/mm² (Table 1). In healthy controls, we observed significant differences in mean ADC values quantified from FWM and GM regions at different b-values (Table 1).

View this table:

Table 1:

ADC values quantified from the abscess cavity, CNWM, and GM of patients with brain abscess and the WM and GM of healthy controls at different b-values

On independent Student t tests, no significant difference was observed between ADC_fast of brain abscess lesions, CNWM, and GM regions of patients with brain abscess. ADC_slow of the abscess cavity was found to be significantly lower than the ADC_slow of the GM of patients with brain abscess (Table 2).

View this table:

Table 2:

Mean values of fast and slow components of ADC quantified from the abscess cavity, CNWM, and GM at different b-values of patients with brain abscess

On bivariate analysis by using the Pearson correlation, a significant negative correlation was observed between the VCD and mean ADC values from different b-values (b = 1000 s/mm², r = −0.76, P = .01; b = 2000 s/mm², r = −0.86, P = .01; and b = 3000 s/mm², r = −0.98, P = .01) (Fig 2). No significant correlation was observed between VCD and fast and slow ADC components computed through biexponential fit (ADC_fast [r = −0.17, P = .56] and ADC_slow[r = −0.15, P = .58]).

Fig 2.

Scatterplot shows correlation between VCD with mean ADC values measured from different b-values (b = 1000, 2000, and 3000 s/mm²) within the abscess cavity of patients with brain abscess.

The biexponential fit of combined and fast components revealed a decrease in signal intensity with increasing b-values in the WM and GM regions and abscess cavity (Fig 3 A−C). However, there was a gradient in decrease in the signal intensity of the slow component moving from GM to WM regions with not much change in the abscess cavity as a function of b-values (Fig 3A−C).

Fig 3.

Graph shows biexponential fitting in the WM (A), GM (B), and abscess cavity (C) of patients with brain abscess. On increasing the b-value, there is a reduction in the signal intensity of combined ADC values and the fast ADC component in WM, GM, and the abscess cavity, but slow ADC component show gradual reduction from GM to WM with not much change in the abscess cavity.

Discussion

In this study, significantly low mean ADC values were observed in the abscess cavity at different b-values. With increasing b-values, ADC values decreased in the abscess cavity, GM, and CNWM regions of brain. The decrease in ADC values between b = 1000 and b = 3000 s/mm² was significant in the GM of patients and controls, while it also showed only a significant decrease from FWM in healthy controls. Although there was a significant negative correlation of VCD with all 3 b-values, the correlation at b = 3000 s/mm² was found to be close to 1. The quantification of fast and slow components of ADC by using a biexponential fit in the abscess cavity did not correlate with VCD.

It has been shown by in vivo and ex vivo experiments that the increase in cell attenuation in brain abscesses negatively correlates with mean ADC values.¹⁰ The mean ADC values measured from the abscess cavity showed trends similar to those exhibited by cellular tumors in humans²⁶ and animal tumor models.²⁷ It has been reported that b-value is inversely proportional to ADC.²⁹ DeLano et al¹⁴ have reported that when b-values increase from 1000 to 3000 s/mm², ADC values decrease from 30% to 35% for the same regions of interest. The authors related it to the biexponential decay in signal intensity. The signal-intensity decay observed in their study as a function of b factor is in close agreement with our results from a biexponential model in the abscess cavity of these patients (Fig 3A−C).

It has been reported that the ADC of viable tissue is a result of independent contributions from the intracellular and extracellular compartments.^30,31 Therefore, at least 2 factors contribute to a decrease in ADC values with increasing cell attenuation. The first is that tissues with high cell attenuation have a large fraction of intracellular water compared with tissues with low cell attenuation. The intracellular water has presumably lower ADC than the extracellular water due to a higher content of diffusion barriers in the intracellular compartment.³⁰ Second, tissues with high cell attenuation have small extracellular compartments compared with tissues with low cell attenuation. The mobility and mean ADC decrease in tissues with high cellularity results in low ADC because of small extracellular water content. The influence of this factor is strengthened because the ADC is biased toward the diffusion coefficient of the compartment with the longest T2 (ie, the extracellular compartment).³¹

On the biexponential fit model, we observed a decrease in signal intensity of the fast component as we moved from low to high b-values. The strongest correlation of VCD with ADC values at b = 3000 s/mm² can be attributed to the fact that on increasing diffusion weighting, there is a decrease in T2 shinethrough effect, resulting in removal of fast components, which in turn is responsible for more precise measurements of ADC values of the intact inflammatory cells inside the abscess cavity. The absence of any change in signal intensity of the slow component inside the abscess cavity further suggests that mainly the fast component is probably responsible for the T2 shinethrough effect, which is removed on increasing the diffusion-weighting.

On the basis of biexponential fit, the fast and slow diffusion components of water have been described in human brain and interpreted as from extracellular and intracellular compartments, respectively.^32,33 Le Bihan²⁴ has suggested that fast and slow components of the water diffusion correspond to 2 differently structured water pools, rather than specific water compartments. He proposed a model where both the slow and fast components of water diffusion originate partly in the intracellular space and partly in the extracellular space.²⁴ Although we observed the best correlation with ADC at b = 3000 s/mm², we did not observe any correlation of fast and slow components of the ADC with the actual cell count, suggesting that these 2 components may not represent the extra- and intracellular water compartments, respectively. Our results further confirm that these 2 components of water diffusion originate from the 2 different pools rather than from the 2 different compartments of water.

The viable inflammatory cells in the abscess cavity are the result of active inflammation, and a decrease in inflammatory cells is considered a marker for the response to therapy. This has been shown by serial ADC measures in which an increase in ADC indicates a response, while a decrease in its value suggests reactivation of the disease.¹¹ Similar results have been shown by using serial fractional anisotropy measurements in brain abscess, in which an increase in fractional anisotropy is associated with upregulation of inflammatory cytokines and increased inflammatory cells, while the reverse is true when there is a positive response.^34,35 Usiskin et al³⁶ have also used serial high b-values (up to b = 3000 s/mm²) to assess the response to highly active antiretroviral therapy in a case of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Our data suggest that ADC maps derived from b = 3000 s/mm² may be ideal for quantification of intact inflammatory cells in the abscess cavity and may be able to predict therapeutic response much better than ones obtained from b = 1000 s/mm².

Various authors have used b-values up to 5000 s/mm² to demonstrate the biexponential fit in human brain.^22,23,29 In the current study, we used b-values up to 3000 s/mm², which may be suboptimal to demonstrate the biexponential fit and may be considered a limitation.

Conclusions

The viability of cells, a measure of disease activity, can be best quantified by ADC values derived by using b = 3000 s/mm² DWI. This may be used in the future to assess the therapeutic response to antibiotics in patients with brain abscess. The fast and slow components of diffusivity may not truly represent the extracellular and intracellular compartments and may simply represent the free and bound water present in the tissue.

Footnotes

Abhishek Yadav received financial support from grant 5/9/62/2008-RHN funded by Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India. Rishi Awasthi acknowledges financial support (grant 3/1/JRF/43/MPD/2007; 33342) from the Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

1.↵
1. Gupta RK,
2. Hasan KM,
3. Mishra AM,
4. et al
. High fractional anisotropy in brain abscesses versus other cystic intracranial lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1107–14
Abstract/FREE Full Text
2.↵
1. Osenbach RK,
2. Loftus CM
. Diagnosis and management of brain abscess. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1992;3:403–20
PubMed
3.↵
1. Kao PT,
2. Tseng HK,
3. Liu CP,
4. et al
. Brain abscess: clinical analysis of 53 cases. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2003;36:129–36
PubMed
4.↵
1. Poptani H,
2. Gupta RK,
3. Jain VK,
4. et al
. Cystic intracranial mass lesions: possible role of in vivo MR spectroscopy in its differential diagnosis. Magn Reson Imaging 1995;13:1019–29
CrossRef PubMed
5.↵
1. Garg M,
2. Gupta RK,
3. Husain M,
4. et al
. Brain abscess: etiological categorization with in vivo proton MR spectroscopy. Radiology 2004;230:519–27
PubMed
6.↵
1. Le Bihan D,
2. Breton E,
3. Lallemand D,
4. et al
. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology 1986;161:401–07
CrossRef PubMed
7.↵
1. Kim YJ,
2. Chang KH,
3. Song IC,
4. et al
. Brain abscess and necrotic or cystic brain tumor: discrimination with signal intensity on diffusion-weighted MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:1487–90
CrossRef PubMed
8.↵
1. Desbarats LN,
2. Herlidou S,
3. Marco G,
4. et al.
Differential MRI diagnosis between brain abscesses and necrotic or cystic brain tumors using the apparent diffusion coefficient and normalized diffusion-weighted images. Magn Reson Imaging 2003;21:645–50
CrossRef PubMed
9.↵
1. Desprechins B,
2. Stadnik T,
3. Koerts G,
4. et al
. Use of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in differential diagnosis between intracerebral necrotic tumors and cerebral abscesses. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1252–57
Abstract/FREE Full Text
10.↵
1. Mishra AM,
2. Gupta RK,
3. Saksena S,
4. et al
. Biological correlates of diffusivity in brain abscess. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:878–85
CrossRef PubMed
11.↵
1. Cartes-Zumelzu FW,
2. Stavrou I,
3. Castillo M,
4. et al
. Diffusion-weighted imaging in the assessment of brain abscesses therapy AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1310–17
Abstract/FREE Full Text
12.↵
1. Seo HS,
2. Chang KH,
3. Na DG,
4. et al
. High b-value diffusion (b = 3000 s/mm²) MR imaging in cerebral gliomas at 3T: visual and quantitative comparisons with b = 1000 s/mm². AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:458–63. Epub 2007 Dec 7
Abstract/FREE Full Text
13.↵
1. Mardor Y,
2. Roth Y,
3. Ochershvilli A,
4. et al
. Pretreatment prediction of brain tumors' response to radiation therapy using high b-value diffusion-weighted MRI. Neoplasia 2004;6:136–42
CrossRef PubMed
14.↵
1. DeLano MC,
2. Cooper TG,
3. Siebert JE,
4. et al
. High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of adult brain: image contrast and apparent diffusion coefficient map features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1830–36
Abstract/FREE Full Text
15.↵
1. Burdette JH,
2. Durden DD,
3. Elster AD,
4. et al
. High b-value diffusion-weighted MRI of normal brain. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001;25:515–19
CrossRef PubMed
16.↵
1. Kim HJ,
2. Choi CG,
3. Lee DH,
4. et al
. High b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of hyperacute ischemic stroke at 1.5T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:208–15
Abstract/FREE Full Text
17.↵
1. Tha KK,
2. Terae S,
3. Yamamoto T,
4. et al
. Early detection of global cerebral anoxia: improved accuracy by high-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging with long echo time. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1487–97
Abstract/FREE Full Text
18.↵
1. Meyer JR,
2. Gutierrez A,
3. Mock B,
4. et al
. High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of suspected brain infarction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1821–29
Abstract/FREE Full Text
19.↵
1. Burdette JH,
2. Elster AD
. Diffusion-weighted imaging of cerebral infarctions: are higher B values better? J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002;26:622–27
CrossRef PubMed
20.↵
1. van Zijl PC,
2. Moonen CT,
3. Faustino PJ,
4. et al
. Complete separation of intracellular and extracellular information in NMR spectra by diffusion weighting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991;88:3228–32
Abstract/FREE Full Text
21.↵
1. Pilatus U,
2. Shim H,
3. Artemov D,
4. et al
. Intracellular volume and apparent diffusion constants of perfused cancer cell cultures, as measured by NMR. Magn Reson Med 1997;37:825–32
PubMed
22.↵
1. Niendorf T,
2. Dijkhuizen RM,
3. Norris DG,
4. et al
. Biexponential diffusion attenuation in various states of brain tissue: implications for diffusion-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:847–57
PubMed
23.↵
1. Mulkern RV,
2. Gudbjartsson H,
3. Westin CF,
4. et al
. Multi-component apparent diffusion coefficients in human brain. NMR Biomed 1999;12:51–52
CrossRef PubMed
24.↵
1. Le Bihan D
. The ‘wet mind': water and functional neuroimaging. Phys Med Biol 2007;52:R57–60. Epub 2007 Mar 9
CrossRef PubMed
25.↵
1. Prasad KN,
2. Mishra AM,
3. Gupta D,
4. et al
. Analysis of microbial etiology and mortality in patients with brain abscess. J Infect 2006;53:221–27
CrossRef PubMed
26.↵
1. Gupta RK,
2. Cloughesy TF,
3. Sinha U,
4. et al
. Relationships between choline magnetic resonance spectroscopy, apparent diffusion coefficient and quantitative histopathology in human glioma. J Neurooncol 2000;50:215–26
CrossRef PubMed
27.↵
1. Lyng H,
2. Haraldseth O,
3. Rofstad EK
. Measurement of cell density and necrotic fraction in human melanoma xenograft by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:828–36
CrossRef PubMed
28.↵
1. Awasthi R,
2. Verma SK,
3. Haris M,
4. et al
. Comparative evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion with diffusion tensor imaging metrics in assessment of corticospinal tract infiltration in malignant glioma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010;34:82–88
CrossRef PubMed
29.↵
1. Brugieres P,
2. Thomas P,
3. Maraval A,
4. et al
. Water diffusion compartmentation at high b values in ischemic human brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:692–98
Abstract/FREE Full Text
30.↵
1. Szafer A,
2. Zhong J,
3. Gore JC
. Theoretical model for water diffusion in tissues. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:697–12
CrossRef PubMed
31.↵
1. Duong TQ,
2. Ackerman JJH,
3. Ying HS,
4. et al
. Evaluation of extra- and intracellular apparent diffusion in normal and globally ischemic rat brain via 19F NMR. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:1–13
PubMed
32.↵
1. Sehy JV,
2. Ackerman JJ,
3. Neil JJ
. Evidence that both fast and slow water ADC components arise from intracellular space. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:765–70
CrossRef PubMed
33.↵
1. Clark CA,
2. Le Bihan D
. Water diffusion compartmentation and anisotropy at high b values in human brain. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:852–59
CrossRef PubMed
34.↵
1. Gupta RK,
2. Nath K,
3. Prasad A,
4. et al
. In vivo demonstration of neuroinflammatory molecule expression in brain abscess with diffusion tensor imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:326–32
Abstract/FREE Full Text
35.↵
1. Nath K,
2. Ramola M,
3. Husain M,
4. et al
. Assessment of therapeutic response in patients with brain abscess using diffusion tensor imaging. World Neurosurg 2010;73:63–68
CrossRef PubMed
36.↵
1. Usiskin SI,
2. Bainbridge A,
3. Miller RF,
4. et al
. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: serial high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient measurements to assess response to highly active antiretroviral therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:285–86
Abstract/FREE Full Text

Received February 10, 2011.
Accepted after revision March 28, 2011.

View Abstract

In this issue

Download PDF

Email Article

Citation Tools

Purchase

Cited By...

No citing articles found.

More in this TOC Section

Show more BRAIN

[1] 1.↵
Gupta RK,
Hasan KM,
Mishra AM,
et al
. High fractional anisotropy in brain abscesses versus other cystic intracranial lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1107–14
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[2] Gupta RK,

[3] Hasan KM,

[4] Mishra AM,

[5] et al

[6] 2.↵
Osenbach RK,
Loftus CM
. Diagnosis and management of brain abscess. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1992;3:403–20
PubMed

[7] Osenbach RK,

[8] Loftus CM

[9] 3.↵
Kao PT,
Tseng HK,
Liu CP,
et al
. Brain abscess: clinical analysis of 53 cases. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2003;36:129–36
PubMed

[10] Kao PT,

[11] Tseng HK,

[12] Liu CP,

[13] et al

[14] 4.↵
Poptani H,
Gupta RK,
Jain VK,
et al
. Cystic intracranial mass lesions: possible role of in vivo MR spectroscopy in its differential diagnosis. Magn Reson Imaging 1995;13:1019–29
CrossRef PubMed

[15] Poptani H,

[16] Gupta RK,

[17] Jain VK,

[18] et al

[19] 5.↵
Garg M,
Gupta RK,
Husain M,
et al
. Brain abscess: etiological categorization with in vivo proton MR spectroscopy. Radiology 2004;230:519–27
PubMed

[20] Garg M,

[21] Gupta RK,

[22] Husain M,

[23] et al

[24] 6.↵
Le Bihan D,
Breton E,
Lallemand D,
et al
. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology 1986;161:401–07
CrossRef PubMed

[25] Le Bihan D,

[26] Breton E,

[27] Lallemand D,

[28] et al

[29] 7.↵
Kim YJ,
Chang KH,
Song IC,
et al
. Brain abscess and necrotic or cystic brain tumor: discrimination with signal intensity on diffusion-weighted MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:1487–90
CrossRef PubMed

[30] Kim YJ,

[31] Chang KH,

[32] Song IC,

[33] et al

[34] 8.↵
Desbarats LN,
Herlidou S,
Marco G,
et al.
Differential MRI diagnosis between brain abscesses and necrotic or cystic brain tumors using the apparent diffusion coefficient and normalized diffusion-weighted images. Magn Reson Imaging 2003;21:645–50
CrossRef PubMed

[35] Desbarats LN,

[36] Herlidou S,

[37] Marco G,

[38] et al.

[39] 9.↵
Desprechins B,
Stadnik T,
Koerts G,
et al
. Use of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in differential diagnosis between intracerebral necrotic tumors and cerebral abscesses. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1252–57
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[40] Desprechins B,

[41] Stadnik T,

[42] Koerts G,

[43] et al

[44] 10.↵
Mishra AM,
Gupta RK,
Saksena S,
et al
. Biological correlates of diffusivity in brain abscess. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:878–85
CrossRef PubMed

[45] Mishra AM,

[46] Gupta RK,

[47] Saksena S,

[48] et al

[49] 11.↵
Cartes-Zumelzu FW,
Stavrou I,
Castillo M,
et al
. Diffusion-weighted imaging in the assessment of brain abscesses therapy AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1310–17
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[50] Cartes-Zumelzu FW,

[51] Stavrou I,

[52] Castillo M,

[53] et al

[54] 12.↵
Seo HS,
Chang KH,
Na DG,
et al
. High b-value diffusion (b = 3000 s/mm²) MR imaging in cerebral gliomas at 3T: visual and quantitative comparisons with b = 1000 s/mm². AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:458–63. Epub 2007 Dec 7
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[55] Seo HS,

[56] Chang KH,

[57] Na DG,

[58] et al

[59] 13.↵
Mardor Y,
Roth Y,
Ochershvilli A,
et al
. Pretreatment prediction of brain tumors' response to radiation therapy using high b-value diffusion-weighted MRI. Neoplasia 2004;6:136–42
CrossRef PubMed

[60] Mardor Y,

[61] Roth Y,

[62] Ochershvilli A,

[63] et al

[64] 14.↵
DeLano MC,
Cooper TG,
Siebert JE,
et al
. High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of adult brain: image contrast and apparent diffusion coefficient map features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1830–36
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[65] DeLano MC,

[66] Cooper TG,

[67] Siebert JE,

[68] et al

[69] 15.↵
Burdette JH,
Durden DD,
Elster AD,
et al
. High b-value diffusion-weighted MRI of normal brain. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001;25:515–19
CrossRef PubMed

[70] Burdette JH,

[71] Durden DD,

[72] Elster AD,

[73] et al

[74] 16.↵
Kim HJ,
Choi CG,
Lee DH,
et al
. High b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of hyperacute ischemic stroke at 1.5T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:208–15
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[75] Kim HJ,

[76] Choi CG,

[77] Lee DH,

[78] et al

[79] 17.↵
Tha KK,
Terae S,
Yamamoto T,
et al
. Early detection of global cerebral anoxia: improved accuracy by high-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging with long echo time. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1487–97
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[80] Tha KK,

[81] Terae S,

[82] Yamamoto T,

[83] et al

[84] 18.↵
Meyer JR,
Gutierrez A,
Mock B,
et al
. High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of suspected brain infarction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1821–29
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[85] Meyer JR,

[86] Gutierrez A,

[87] Mock B,

[88] et al

[89] 19.↵
Burdette JH,
Elster AD
. Diffusion-weighted imaging of cerebral infarctions: are higher B values better? J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002;26:622–27
CrossRef PubMed

[90] Burdette JH,

[91] Elster AD

[92] 20.↵
van Zijl PC,
Moonen CT,
Faustino PJ,
et al
. Complete separation of intracellular and extracellular information in NMR spectra by diffusion weighting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991;88:3228–32
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[93] van Zijl PC,

[94] Moonen CT,

[95] Faustino PJ,

[96] et al

[97] 21.↵
Pilatus U,
Shim H,
Artemov D,
et al
. Intracellular volume and apparent diffusion constants of perfused cancer cell cultures, as measured by NMR. Magn Reson Med 1997;37:825–32
PubMed

[98] Pilatus U,

[99] Shim H,

[100] Artemov D,

[101] et al

[102] 22.↵
Niendorf T,
Dijkhuizen RM,
Norris DG,
et al
. Biexponential diffusion attenuation in various states of brain tissue: implications for diffusion-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:847–57
PubMed

[103] Niendorf T,

[104] Dijkhuizen RM,

[105] Norris DG,

[106] et al

[107] 23.↵
Mulkern RV,
Gudbjartsson H,
Westin CF,
et al
. Multi-component apparent diffusion coefficients in human brain. NMR Biomed 1999;12:51–52
CrossRef PubMed

[108] Mulkern RV,

[109] Gudbjartsson H,

[110] Westin CF,

[111] et al

[112] 24.↵
Le Bihan D
. The ‘wet mind': water and functional neuroimaging. Phys Med Biol 2007;52:R57–60. Epub 2007 Mar 9
CrossRef PubMed

[113] Le Bihan D

[114] 25.↵
Prasad KN,
Mishra AM,
Gupta D,
et al
. Analysis of microbial etiology and mortality in patients with brain abscess. J Infect 2006;53:221–27
CrossRef PubMed

[115] Prasad KN,

[116] Mishra AM,

[117] Gupta D,

[118] et al

[119] 26.↵
Gupta RK,
Cloughesy TF,
Sinha U,
et al
. Relationships between choline magnetic resonance spectroscopy, apparent diffusion coefficient and quantitative histopathology in human glioma. J Neurooncol 2000;50:215–26
CrossRef PubMed

[120] Gupta RK,

[121] Cloughesy TF,

[122] Sinha U,

[123] et al

[124] 27.↵
Lyng H,
Haraldseth O,
Rofstad EK
. Measurement of cell density and necrotic fraction in human melanoma xenograft by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:828–36
CrossRef PubMed

[125] Lyng H,

[126] Haraldseth O,

[127] Rofstad EK

[128] 28.↵
Awasthi R,
Verma SK,
Haris M,
et al
. Comparative evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion with diffusion tensor imaging metrics in assessment of corticospinal tract infiltration in malignant glioma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010;34:82–88
CrossRef PubMed

[129] Awasthi R,

[130] Verma SK,

[131] Haris M,

[132] et al

[133] 29.↵
Brugieres P,
Thomas P,
Maraval A,
et al
. Water diffusion compartmentation at high b values in ischemic human brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:692–98
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[134] Brugieres P,

[135] Thomas P,

[136] Maraval A,

[137] et al

[138] 30.↵
Szafer A,
Zhong J,
Gore JC
. Theoretical model for water diffusion in tissues. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:697–12
CrossRef PubMed

[139] Szafer A,

[140] Zhong J,

[141] Gore JC

[142] 31.↵
Duong TQ,
Ackerman JJH,
Ying HS,
et al
. Evaluation of extra- and intracellular apparent diffusion in normal and globally ischemic rat brain via 19F NMR. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:1–13
PubMed

[143] Duong TQ,

[144] Ackerman JJH,

[145] Ying HS,

[146] et al

[147] 32.↵
Sehy JV,
Ackerman JJ,
Neil JJ
. Evidence that both fast and slow water ADC components arise from intracellular space. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:765–70
CrossRef PubMed

[148] Sehy JV,

[149] Ackerman JJ,

[150] Neil JJ

[151] 33.↵
Clark CA,
Le Bihan D
. Water diffusion compartmentation and anisotropy at high b values in human brain. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:852–59
CrossRef PubMed

[152] Clark CA,

[153] Le Bihan D

[154] 34.↵
Gupta RK,
Nath K,
Prasad A,
et al
. In vivo demonstration of neuroinflammatory molecule expression in brain abscess with diffusion tensor imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:326–32
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[155] Gupta RK,

[156] Nath K,

[157] Prasad A,

[158] et al

[159] 35.↵
Nath K,
Ramola M,
Husain M,
et al
. Assessment of therapeutic response in patients with brain abscess using diffusion tensor imaging. World Neurosurg 2010;73:63–68
CrossRef PubMed

[160] Nath K,

[161] Ramola M,

[162] Husain M,

[163] et al

[164] 36.↵
Usiskin SI,
Bainbridge A,
Miller RF,
et al
. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: serial high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient measurements to assess response to highly active antiretroviral therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:285–86
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[165] Usiskin SI,

[166] Bainbridge A,

[167] Miller RF,

[168] et al

Main menu

User menu

Search

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient with Higher b-Value Correlates Better with Viable Cell Count Quantified from the Cavity of Brain Abscess

Abstract

ABBREVIATIONS

Materials and Methods

Study Design

MR Imaging Protocol

Culture of Abscess Aspirate

Viable Cell Count

Data Analysis

Biexponential Fit and Its Quantification

Statistical Analysis

Results

Clinical and Laboratory Examination

Imaging Findings

Quantification of ADC

Discussion

Conclusions

Footnotes

References

In this issue

Citation Manager Formats

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Similar Articles

News and Updates

Resources

Opportunities

American Society of Neuroradiology

Main menu

User menu

Search

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient with Higher b-Value Correlates Better with Viable Cell Count Quantified from the Cavity of Brain Abscess

Abstract

ABBREVIATIONS

Materials and Methods

Study Design

MR Imaging Protocol

Culture of Abscess Aspirate

Viable Cell Count

Data Analysis

Biexponential Fit and Its Quantification

Statistical Analysis

Results

Clinical and Laboratory Examination

Imaging Findings

Quantification of ADC

Discussion

Conclusions

Footnotes

References

In this issue

Citation Manager Formats

Jump to section

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Similar Articles

News and Updates

Resources

Opportunities

American Society of Neuroradiology