Hemodynamics and Anatomy of Elastase-Induced Rabbit Aneurysm Models: Similarity to Human Cerebral Aneurysms?

Z. Zeng; D.F. Kallmes; M.J. Durka; Y. Ding; D. Lewis; R. Kadirvel; A.M. Robertson

doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2324

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Animal models provide a mechanism for fundamental studies of the coupling between hemodynamics and pathophysiology in diseases such as saccular aneurysms. In this work, we evaluated the capability of an elastase-induced saccular aneurysm model in rabbits to reproduce the anatomic and hemodynamic features typical for human intracranial aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Saccular aneurysms were created in 51 rabbits at the origin of the RCCA. Twelve weeks' postcreation, the lumen geometry of the aneurysm and surrounding vasculature was acquired by using 3DRA. Geometric features of these models were measured. Pulsatile 3D CFD studies were performed with rabbit-specific inlet profiles.

RESULTS: Geometric features, including aneurysm height, width, neck diameter, aspect ratio, and NSI of all 51 rabbit aneurysm models fell within the range reported for human IAs. The distribution and range in values of pressure, WSS, and OSI were also typical for human IAs. A single recirculation region was observed in 33 (65%) of 51 cases, whereas a second transient recirculation zone was observed in 18 (35%) cases. Both of these flow types are commonly observed in human IAs.

CONCLUSIONS: Most hemodynamic and geometric features in a commonly used elastase-induced rabbit saccular aneurysm model are qualitatively and quantitatively similar to those seen in large numbers of human cerebral aneurysms.

Abbreviations

AO: aortic arch
AR: aspect ratio
BF: bottleneck factor
CFD: computational fluid dynamics
D: maximum aneurysm diameter
D/N: bottleneck factor
D_DPA: hydraulic diameter of the distal parent artery
DPA: distal parent artery
D_PPA: hydraulic diameter of the proximal parent artery
3DRA: 3D rotational angiography
H: height of the aneurysm
H/N: aspect ratio
IA: intracranial aneurysm
LCCA: left common carotid artery
N: neck diameter
NSI: nonsphericity index
OSI: oscillatory shear index
PA: parent artery
PPA: proximal parent artery
RCCA: right common carotid artery
Re: Reynolds number
S: aneurysm surface area
TAWSS: time-averaged wall shear stress
V: aneurysm volume
WSS: wall shear stress

The ability of the arterial wall to respond appropriately to hemodynamic stresses is critical to arterial health. This response takes the form of short-term changes such as vasodilation as well as long-term structural changes. It is commonly accepted that hemodynamics play a role in the initiation and further development of arterial pathologies such as IAs. These IAs are characterized by degeneration of the internal elastic lamina and media, accompanied by local enlargements of the arterial wall, typically into a saccular shape.

Previous investigators have postulated that the manner in which the walls of IAs remodel under the abnormal intrasaccular hemodynamic stresses plays a major role in the stabilization or eventual rupture of the aneurysm.^1–6 As a result, a large body of research has been directed at categorizing the hemodynamics inside human IAs and correlating aneurysm growth as well as rupture with specific hemodynamic markers such as abnormally high or low magnitudes of WSS and OSI.^2–8 The intra-aneurysmal flow is affected by the geometry of the aneurysm sac and surrounding vasculature; including the existence, size, and symmetry of branches arising near the aneurysm; and the position of the aneurysm sac relative to the parent vessel (eg, sidewall, terminal, or bifurcation). Effort has been made to correlate rupture with these various geometric features.^3,9–15

The coupling between hemodynamics and aneurysm pathophysiology is complex and remains poorly understood. Patient-specific prognostication regarding risk of rupture might be substantially advanced by improving our understanding of the in vivo response of the aneurysm wall to intrasaccular hemodynamic stresses.¹⁶ While in vitro systems such as parallel plate and T-chamber flow systems provide an opportunity for highly controlled investigations of cellular response to various types of hemodynamic stresses, such model systems are limited to short-duration studies.¹⁷ Furthermore, those systems typically only provide information about an isolated layer of endothelial cells, though recent coculture models have yielded results for the coupled response of multiple wall components.¹⁸ In contrast, animal models provide a mechanism for fundamental studies of the impact of chronically altered WSS on the intact vascular wall. To make meaningful use of these models, one must evaluate their relevance to human biomechanics and pathophysiology.

A number of animal models have been created for studying aneurysm pathogenesis.^19–22 One such model is a saccular aneurysm model in rabbits in which aneurysms are created by elastase infusion in the RCCA.¹⁹ This model has previously been used to study the pathobiology of aneurysms and to speed development of numerous endovascular devices.^23,24 The central goal of the current work is to evaluate the homology of both the geometric and estimated hemodynamic features in elastase-induced rabbit aneurysms compared with previously reported values for human IAs. This comparison is necessary to justify the use of the animal model as a test bed for hemodynamic-based human IA research. Furthermore, the results of this study will enhance our ability to interpret fundamental biologic studies in this model aneurysm system.

To achieve this objective, we evaluated the anatomy and hemodynamics for elastase-induced rabbit aneurysms (N = 51) by using CFD and compared them with published results for human aneurysms. The relevance of this model was evaluated in 2 contexts: The first was to determine whether the range of geometric and hemodynamic parameters of the rabbit model is realistic for humans—that is, do they lie within the range reported for human IAs? The second focus was to determine whether the range of geometric parameters produced in the rabbit model provide a large enough spectrum to test the current hypotheses about the role of geometry in aneurysm development and rupture.

Materials and Methods

Aneurysm Creation

Saccular aneurysms were created in 51 New Zealand white rabbits (body weight, 3–4 kg) by using a previously reported protocol^19,25–27 that was approved by the animal review committee at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Briefly, anesthesia was induced with an intramuscular injection of ketamine, xylazine, and acepromazine (75, 5, and 1 mg/kg, respectively). By using a balloon catheter, we incubated porcine elastase (Worthington Biochemical, Freehold, New Jersey) within the lumen of the proximal RCCA for 20 minutes, after which the balloon was deflated, followed by removal of the catheter system. The RCCA was then ligated at its midportion. Dilated arterial segments were thus formed from the stump of the RCCA, which was defined as an “aneurysm” (Fig 1A).²⁵ For the current study, a range of aneurysm sizes was purposefully created by using previously reported techniques.^25–27

Fig 1.

A, Digital subtraction angiogram of an elastase-induced aneurysm. B, Reconstructed 3D geometry from 3DRA images. C, Idealized maximum velocity waveform applied at inlet. D, Computational domain for CFD analysis with flow directions (red arrows), inlet surfaces (Γ₁), and outflow surface (Γ₂ and Γ₃ for high AR models and Γ₂-Γ₆ for low AR models).

Imaging Procedures, Lumen Reconstruction, and Arterial Waveforms

Standard digital subtraction angiography and 3DRA were performed 12 weeks after aneurysm creation using Axiom Artis Zee with Syngo InSpace 3D software (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The 3D geometric models of the aneurysm and sections of local vasculature were reconstructed from the serial image data by using Mimics software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) (Fig 1B). Arterial waveforms were captured in the LCCA and DPA of each rabbit by using transthoracic duplex Doppler sonography (Acuson Sequoia 512 with a 15L8 transducer, Siemens) (Fig 1C).

Geometric Data Acquisition

Geometric measurements were obtained from the 3D reconstructed models by using Mimics, Geomagic studio (Geomagic, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina), and SolidWorks (Dassault Systèmes SolidWorks, Concord, Massachusetts). Briefly, the centerlines of the parent vessel and aneurysm were determined, after which the neck cross-section and cross-section of maximum area were extracted perpendicular to the centerline.

The hydraulic neck diameter (N) and maximum aneurysm diameter (D) were measured for these cross-sections. The height of the aneurysm (H) was specified as the distance from the geometric center of the neck cross-section to the aneurysm apex. The aneurysm surface area (S) and aneurysm volume (V) were obtained from numeric integration of the surface and volume of the reconstructed aneurysm sac. The D_PPA and D_DPA were measured 1 neck diameter upstream and downstream to the closest edge of the aneurysm neck respectively. We considered 4 nondimensional geometric parameters: the AR,^11,28 D/H,⁹ bottleneck factor (BF),²⁹ and nonsphericity index.¹⁰

A cutoff AR of 1.8 was used to distinguish low and high AR aneurysms. This cutoff is intermediate between the value of 1.6 proposed by Ujiie et al (2001)¹¹ and Weir et al (2003)¹² and of 1.85 proposed by Raghavan et al (2005)¹⁰ as being valuable for predicting IA rupture.

CFD Analysis

Blood flow in the reconstructed models was simulated on the basis of the unsteady 3D Navier-Stokes equations, by using the finite-element method with ADINA software (64 bit) (Adina R & D, Watertown, Massachusetts). The blood density and viscosity were chosen as ρ = 1050 kg/m³ and μ = 0.0035 Pa/s, respectively. The extent of the vascular domain necessary to obtain reliable CFD results in the elastase-induced rabbit model was evaluated in an earlier work.³⁰ Following that work, the LCCA, P_PA, DPA and the aneurysm itself were included in the computational domain of the high AR cases. The low AR domains consisted of the high AR domain plus the downstream trifurcation/quadrification structure (Fig 1D).

The vessel wall was idealized as rigid, and the no-slip boundary condition was applied to the walls of all models. The inflow and outflow conditions follow those specified previously.³⁰ Briefly, a time-varying uniform velocity profile was specified at all outlets of the models (cross-sections, Γ₂- Γ₆ for low AR models; Γ₂ and Γ₃, for high AR models) (Fig 1D). The magnitude was chosen to match the animal-specific waveform measured in vivo, as noted above. A modified traction condition or so-called “do nothing” boundary condition was applied at the inlet (Γ₁) of all the models.³¹

The finite-element mesh of the computational domain was composed of 40,000–60,000 hexahedral (brick) elements. This mesh attenuation was found to give <3% change in maximum WSS compared with results from a model with double the mesh attenuation along the centerline. CFD analyses were performed for each model for a duration of 2 cardiac cycles by using 100 time-steps per cycle. Simulations were performed by using a 3 GHz dual Xeon processor workstation with 8 GB of memory. The simulation time ranged from 16 to 20 hours, depending on the model size.

Hemodynamic Parameters

We evaluated several measures of the hemodynamic wall sheer stress vector τ_w: the magnitude of the WSS vector, the TAWSS, and the OSI,³² defined as, where T is the duration of 1 cardiac cycle.

Two dimensionless flow parameters, time-averaged Re and the Womersley number α, were also considered. where U is a cross-sectional average velocity, further averaged over 1 cardiac cycle, and f is the fundamental frequency of the pulsatile waveform.

Human Intracranial Aneurysm Data: Literature Review

A systematic search of previously published human IA geometric and hemodynamic parameters was conducted by using the following keywords: “cerebral,” “aneurysm,” “geometry,” and “hemodynamics” in the PubMed on-line data base. In general, only studies with at least 20 cases and a quantitative analysis of aneurysm geometry and/or hemodynamics were included in the analysis (Table 1). Only 2 studies were available for quantitative OSI values and distribution in human IAs.^7,8 Therefore, despite the small sample sizes of 2 and 6, they were included in the analysis.

View this table:

Table 1:

Previously reported geometric and hemodynamic features of human aneurysms

Results

Aneurysm Geometry

Table 2 and Fig 2 display geometric results for 51 elastase-induced aneurysm models and human IAs from the literature. Parlea et al⁹ analyzed the geometry of 87 simple-lobed aneurysms by using 2D angiographic data. Raghavan et al¹⁰ evaluated geometric features from 3D reconstructions from 27 aneurysms. The dimensional geometric parameters of the 51 cases for the rabbit model all fell within the range reported for human IAs, including aneurysm height, width, neck, volume, and surface area (Table 2, Fig 2A).

View this table:

Table 2:

Comparison of geometric features in rabbit aneurysms (N = 51) and human aneurysms

Fig 2.

A, Range in geometric features for human aneurysms and rabbit model aneurysms: maximum diameter (millimeters), neck diameter (millimeters), height (millimeters), volume (cubic millimeters), and surface area (square millimeters). B, Range in geometric indices: D/N, D/H, H/N, and NSI. C, Distribution of AR for rabbit aneurysms. D, Distribution of NSI for rabbit aneurysms.

The ARs in the 51 prospectively created rabbit aneurysms ranged from 0.56 to 3.98, with a good distribution of ARs across the cases (Fig 2C). The rabbit AR values fell nearly completely within the range reported for human IAs and were almost evenly split between low and high aneurysms (25 low and 26 high).

The NSI value in the rabbit models ranged from 0.15 to 0.36, extending above the 0.32 maximum reported in humans (Fig 2B, D). Mean NSI values of 0.156 and 0.233 were reported for unruptured and ruptured human IAs, respectively (Table 2). The range of NSI in the rabbit model includes both these values, though it is skewed toward the higher NSI range (Fig 2B).

The range of rabbit D/H values shows excellent agreement with human data, nearly coinciding with the human IA range (Table 2 and Fig 2B). The rabbit BF values also fall within the human range, though they are at the low end of these values.

Intrasacular Hemodynamics

Hemodynamic results for all 51 rabbit models are shown in Table 3 and Fig 3. Corresponding results for human IAs are summarized in Table 3.

View this table:

Table 3:

Hemodynamic features from rabbit aneurysms (N = 51) and human aneurysms

Fig 3.

Hemodynamic results for representative low and high AR cases. A, Top row: Streamlines at peak systole displaying 2 types of flow structures. Color designates velocity magnitude (millimeters per second). Bottom row: Corresponding normal component of velocity (millimeters per second) at the aneurysm neck are shown below. Heights are not drawn to scale. Color reflects magnitude. B, Left column: Pressure (left column, pascals) at peak systole relative to zero reference pressure at the inlet surface Γ₁ (1 mm Hg = 133.3 Pa). Center and right columns: Two views of OSI distribution. Arrows indicate regions of elevated OSI. C, TAWSS (pascals) and WSS (pascals) at peak systole (1 PA = 10 dynes/cm²). WSS contours in logarithmic scale. Red and black arrows indicate the maximum/minimum value in aneurysm sac.

Nondimensional Flow Parameters

Re for the rabbit model ranges from 200 to 400, comparing well with values of 200–500 in and around the circle of Willis of humans.^33,34 The rabbit Womersley number by using a representative f of 3.3 Hz was 2.5–5.0 compared with reported values of 1.5–5³⁵ for humans.

Qualitative Features of Flow

The systolic streamlines for 2 representative rabbit sacs are shown in Fig 3A. For all rabbit models, the fluid entered the sac from the distal side and exited from the proximal side. The flow structures could be categorized as type A with a single and stationary circulation inside the aneurysm sac and type B with a transient secondary circulation in the dome as well as a primary (larger) stationary circulation below this. This transient secondary circulation was apparent at diastole and disappeared by systole. For type A flows, the inflow velocity was faster and occupied a smaller percentage of the neck.

In their study of hemodynamics in 62 human IAs, Cebral et al² identified 4 categories of flow based on the nature of the inflow jet and the number and transient nature of circulation regions in the sac. Type I displayed an inflow jet with an unchanging direction and a single circulation region (44%) as seen in the type A rabbit model described above. Type III displayed a shifting inflow jet with 1 stationary and 1 transient circulation region (17%), similar to the type B rabbit model. The other categories observed by Cebral et al displayed multiple stationary circulation patterns (19%), and 1 stable and multiple transient recirculation regions (20%). Hence, the flow types in the elastase-induced aneurysms correspond to 61% of those analyzed by Cebral et al.

The impingement region of the rabbit models is always located at the distal neck, and a slow jet flow is observed at the distal wall. This impingement location was reported in 20% of all human IAs by Cebral et al,² though impingement was also found at the aneurysm dome and sidewalls.

Wall Pressure

The spatial variations in pressure within and around the aneurysm sac are small (Fig 3B). The range in pressure was <0.05 mm Hg within the sac and <0.5 mm Hg between the sac and its parent artery (Table 3). Similarly, the pressure in human IAs is relatively constant and deviates <1 mm Hg from the pressure in the parent vessel (Table 3).^2,6

OSI

OSI ranged from 0.3 to 0.4 in subregions of the neck of the 51 rabbit aneurysms (Table 3 and Fig 3B). A second region of elevated OSI was found at the top of the aneurysm for all type B flows (n = 18) and was not seen in any type A flows. This is to be expected from the transient secondary circulation in those flows. The OSI was also elevated along the sidewalls of the sac for a smaller group of cases (n = 15). Literature on human aneurysms similarly reported elevated OSI in the neck, sidewall, and dome.^7,8 The maximum values of OSI ranged from 0.3 to 0.4 for both human and rabbit aneurysms.

WSS

The average TAWSS across the PPA of the rabbit models was 0.81 PA and ranged from 0.23 to 1.48 PA. TAWSS was markedly lower inside most of the sac and was elevated on the distal neck compared with the parent artery (n = 51) (Fig 3C). On the distal neck, the TAWSS was >0.5 PA, while in the aneurysm domes, the TAWSS was <0.1 PA and nearly uniform (n = 47) (Fig 3 and Table 3). While there were large quantitative differences between WSS at peak systole and TAWSS, the qualitative structure was very similar (Fig 3C).

In human aneurysms, the distal neck has been identified as the region of highest WSS.^3–5,7 Shojima et al⁵ noted that 18 of 20 middle cerebral artery aneurysms displayed a highly localized region of elevated WSS, either just inside (n = 10) or just outside (n = 8) the neck. In all 51 rabbit aneurysms, the highest WSS was found at the neck. The WSS inside the rabbit aneurysms was markedly lower (< 1 PA) than the WSS in the parent arteries, particularly in the aneurysm dome where it was always <0.1 PA. In contrast, Cebral et al² reported a second region of highly elevated WSS (on the order of 5 Pa) within the upper sac.

Discussion

The primary focus of this work was to determine whether the geometric and hemodynamic environments created in an elastase-induced aneurysm model in rabbits are similar to those reported for human IAs. This aneurysm model is receiving increased attention as a system for testing novel therapies and for studying fundamental issues in the aneurysm pathophysiology. It is therefore of great importance to demonstrate the relevance of this model to human aneurysms. The results of the current work also provide a data base of geometric and flow properties in a large set (n = 51) of elastase-induced aneurysms. Data of this kind will be useful in applications such as the design of representative in vitro systems to complement in vivo studies in the rabbit model.

The dimensional geometric parameters of the 51 elastase-induced aneurysms all fall in the human range. With the exception of NSI, the nondimensional geometric parameters are nearly within the human IA range.

The AR has been proposed as an important parameter for predicting the likelihood of IA rupture.^11,12 Recently, methodologies have been developed for constructing a large range of necks and heights in the rabbit model.^{26, 27} Using these techniques, we created a good distribution of human AR, evenly divided between low and high ARs. The AR values for the rabbit model lie almost completely within the human range (Fig 2B).

The recently introduced NSI was found to be the best geometric predictor of rupture in a study of 27 IA considering 13 geometric parameters.¹⁰ The range of the NSI in the rabbit model includes the mean value reported for both ruptured and unruptured human IAs, though it is skewed toward the higher NSI range (Fig 2B). If the clinical usefulness of this shape index is supported by a larger prospective study, it may be worthwhile to increase the pool of low NSI cases in future rabbit studies. This shape ratio does not distinguish between increases in surface area from different causes such as ellipticity and surface undulation, and it does not distinguish between different orientations of the long axis of the aneurysm relative to the parent vessel.

No data are available for the correlation of D/H and IA rupture. However, both the BF and the geometric ratio D/H have been proposed as useful parameters for predicting the success of endovascular coil placement and surgical clip applications.²⁹ The range of rabbit D/H values nearly coincides with human values. While the range of BF in the rabbit model is in the low range for human IAs, it includes the mean for both ruptured and unruptured IAs (Table 2 and Fig 2B).¹⁰

Cebral et al² categorized the human intra-aneurysmal flow into 4 types depending on the complexity and transient nature of the flow: Types I and III were identified in 50% and 79% of human bifurcation and terminal aneurysms, respectively. These same 2 flow types are the most common in the rabbit model, despite the fact that it is more similar to a sidewall aneurysm. This is likely due to the influence of the surrounding vasculature. The rabbit aneurysm is just downstream of a large branch (LCCA) and lies on a curve segment of the artery. Curvature has been shown to affect flow in sidewall aneurysms in human models.^36,37

The spatial distribution of WSS and OSI in and around the rabbit aneurysm sac is typical for large groups of human IAs.^2–5,7,8 The ranges in Re and α for the 51 rabbits are also in very good agreement with typical values for humans. However, α includes information about the frequency of the waveform but not its shape or magnitude. The rabbit aneurysms are constructed along extracranial vessels and exposed to low or absent antegrade flow during diastole, in contrast to human intracranial vessels, which are exposed to constant antegrade flow.³⁸ This difference is likely responsible for the diminished WSS maximum and flow rates found in the rabbit model compared with some human aneurysms. The relatively constant pressure distribution and small deviation from parent vessel pressure inside the aneurysm sac of the rabbit model are also observed in human cerebral aneurysms.^2,6 This similarity is consistent with the low-inflow speed and slow secondary recirculation in the sac.

This work extends an earlier study of a smaller number of rabbit subjects in which geometric parameters were measured at 2 weeks by using 2D angiograms and compared with human IAs.³⁹ In the present work, a much wider range of geometric parameters was determined from 3D reconstructions of the lumen. Hemodynamic results were previously reported in a smaller study of flow in 5 rabbit aneurysms⁴⁰ and are consistent with those reported here.

This study had a number of limitations. As for most CFD studies of intra-aneurysmal flow, we have assumed that the flow domain is fixed (rigid walls). In both human and rabbit aneurysms, the elastin component is absent or nearly absent, resulting in much stiffer walls than those found in the surrounding arteries. The motion of the aneurysm wall is generally accepted as being of secondary importance compared with geometric and unsteady flow effects.⁷ On the basis of earlier results,³⁰ we applied modified traction boundary conditions at the inlet of the computational domain. In the future, we intend to further evaluate this choice by using phase-contrast MR angiograms in the parent vessels.⁴¹

The identification of the most significant hemodynamic and geometric parameters for aneurysm growth and rupture remains an active area of research. We have confined attention to parameters that are currently considered significant. In some cases, such as for the OSI and NSI, the data are somewhat sparse and the clinical relevance is still under investigation.

While the flow structures and geometry of the rabbit model successfully reproduce those commonly found in human IAs, including bifurcation and terminal aneurysms, they do not span all types of flow categories identified in humans. Furthermore, it is possible that there is some other important as yet unidentified aspect of flow that is different in bifurcation and terminal aneurysm geometries. It could be of interest in the future to develop animal models with the other 2 flow types identified by Cebral et al,² as well as bifurcation or terminal aneurysm geometries.

In this work, we have confined attention to a comparison of geometry and hemodynamics. Future investigations will evaluate growth and remodeling in the rabbit model and will compare these results with published data for human aneurysms. The current work lays an important foundation for these studies.

Conclusions

Hemodynamic and geometric features in a commonly used elastase-induced rabbit saccular aneurysm model are qualitatively and quantitatively similar to those seen in large numbers of human cerebral aneurysms.

Footnotes

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant NS42646–02).

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

1.↵
1. Burleson AC,
2. Turitto VT
. Identification of quantifiable hemodynamic factors in the assessment of cerebral aneurysm behavior: on behalf of the Subcommittee on Biorheology of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the ISTH. Thromb Haemost 1996;76:118–23
PubMed
2.↵
1. Cebral JR,
2. Castro MA,
3. Burgess JE,
4. et al
. Characterization of cerebral aneurysms for assessing risk of rupture by using patient-specific computational hemodynamics models. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2550–59
Abstract/FREE Full Text
3.↵
1. Hassan T,
2. Timofeev EV,
3. Saito T,
4. et al
. A proposed parent vessel geometry-based categorization of saccular intracranial aneurysms: computational flow dynamics analysis of the risk factors for lesion rupture. J Neurosurg 2005;103:662–80
PubMed
4.↵
1. Jou LD,
2. Lee DH,
3. Morsi H,
4. et al
. Wall shear stress on ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms at the internal carotid artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1761–67
Abstract/FREE Full Text
5.↵
1. Shojima M,
2. Oshima M,
3. Takagi K,
4. et al
. Magnitude and role of wall shear stress on cerebral aneurysm: computational fluid dynamic study of 20 middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Stroke 2004;35:2500–05
Abstract/FREE Full Text
6.↵
1. Shojima M,
2. Oshima M,
3. Takagi K,
4. et al
. Role of the bloodstream impacting force and the local pressure elevation in the rupture of cerebral aneurysms. Stroke 2005;36:1933–38
Abstract/FREE Full Text
7.↵
1. Steinman DA,
2. Milner JS,
3. Norley CJ,
4. et al
. Image-based computational simulation of flow dynamics in a giant intracranial aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:559–66
Abstract/FREE Full Text
8.↵
1. Karmonik C,
2. Yen C,
3. Diaz O,
4. et al
. Temporal variations of wall shear stress parameters in intracranial aneurysms: importance of patient-specific inflow waveforms for CFD calculations. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010;152:1391–98, discussion 1398
CrossRef PubMed
9.↵
1. Parlea L,
2. Fahrig R,
3. Holdsworth DW,
4. et al
. An analysis of the geometry of saccular intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1079–89
Abstract/FREE Full Text
10.↵
1. Raghavan ML,
2. Ma B,
3. Harbaugh RE
. Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk. J Neurosurg 2005;102:355–62
CrossRef PubMed
11.↵
1. Ujiie H,
2. Tamano Y,
3. Sasaki K,
4. et al
. Is the aspect ratio a reliable index for predicting the rupture of a saccular aneurysm? Neurosurgery 2001;48:495–502, discussion 502–03
CrossRef PubMed
12.↵
1. Weir B,
2. Amidei C,
3. Kongable G,
4. et al
. The aspect ratio (dome/neck) of ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2003;99:447–51
CrossRef PubMed
13.↵
1. Avolio A,
2. Avolio A,
3. Farnoush A,
4. et al
. Hemodynamic models of cerebral aneurysms for assessment of effect of vessel geometry on risk of rupture. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009;2009:2351–53
PubMed
14.↵
1. Piccinelli M,
2. Veneziani A,
3. Steinman DA,
4. et al
. A framework for geometric analysis of vascular structures: application to cerebral aneurysms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2009;28:1141–55
CrossRef PubMed
15.↵
1. Ingebrigtsen T,
2. Morgan MK,
3. Faulder K,
4. et al
. Bifurcation geometry and the presence of cerebral artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2004;101:108–13
CrossRef PubMed
16.↵
1. Frosen J,
2. Piippo A,
3. Paetau A,
4. et al
. Remodeling of saccular cerebral artery aneurysm wall is associated with rupture: histological analysis of 24 unruptured and 42 ruptured cases. Stroke 2004;35:2287–93
Abstract/FREE Full Text
17.↵
1. Sequeira A,
2. Rannacher R
1. Zeng Z,
2. Chung BJ,
3. Durka M,
4. et al
. An in-vitro device for evaluation of cellular response to flows found at the apex of arterial bifurcations. In: Sequeira A, Rannacher R eds. Advances in Mathematical Fluid Mechanics. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, Wien; 2010:631–57
18.↵
1. Sakamoto N,
2. Ohashi T,
3. Sato M
. Effect of fluid shear stress on migration of vascular smooth muscle cells in cocultured model. Ann Biomed Eng 2006;34:408–15. Epub 2006 Feb 16
CrossRef PubMed
19.↵
1. Altes TA,
2. Cloft HJ,
3. Short JG,
4. et al
. 1999 ARRS Executive Council Award: creation of saccular aneurysms in the rabbit—a model suitable for testing endovascular devices. American Roentgen Ray Society. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:349–54
CrossRef PubMed
20.↵
1. Fukuda S,
2. Hashimoto N,
3. Naritomi H,
4. et al
. Prevention of rat cerebral aneurysm formation by inhibition of nitric oxide synthase. Circulation 2000;101:2532–38
Abstract/FREE Full Text
21.↵
1. Kondo S,
2. Hashimoto N,
3. Kikuchi H,
4. et al
. Cerebral aneurysms arising at nonbranching sites: an experimental study. Stroke 1997;28:398–403, discussion 403–04
Abstract/FREE Full Text
22.↵
1. Thiex R,
2. Moller-Hartmann W,
3. Hans FJ,
4. et al
. Are the configuration and neck morphology of experimental aneurysms predictable? A technical approach. Neuroradiology 2004;46:571–76
PubMed
23.↵
1. Kallmes DF,
2. Ding YH,
3. Dai D,
4. et al
. A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2007;38:2346–52
Abstract/FREE Full Text
24.↵
1. Sadasivan C,
2. Cesar L,
3. Seong J,
4. et al
. An original flow-diversion device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: evaluation in the rabbit elastase-induced model. Stroke 2009;40:952–58
Abstract/FREE Full Text
25.↵
1. Ding YH,
2. Danielson MA,
3. Kadirvel R,
4. et al
. Modified technique to create morphologically reproducible elastase-induced aneurysms in rabbits. Neuroradiology 2006;48:528–32
CrossRef PubMed
26.↵
1. Ding YH,
2. Dai D,
3. Lewis DA,
4. et al
. Can neck size in elastase-induced aneurysms be controlled? A prospective study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2364–67
Abstract/FREE Full Text
27.↵
1. Ding YH,
2. Dai D,
3. Lewis DA,
4. et al
. Can neck size in elastase-induced aneurysms be controlled? A retrospective study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1681–84
Abstract/FREE Full Text
28.↵
1. Ujiie H,
2. Tachibana H,
3. Hiramatsu O,
4. et al
. Effects of size and shape (aspect ratio) on the hemodynamics of saccular aneurysms: a possible index for surgical treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1999;45:119–29, discussion 129–30
CrossRef PubMed
29.↵
1. Ebina K,
2. Shimizu T,
3. Sohma M,
4. et al
. Clinico-statistical study on morphological risk factors of middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1990;106:153–59
CrossRef PubMed
30.↵
1. Zeng Z,
2. Kallmes DF,
3. Durka M,
4. et al
. Sensitivity of CFD based hemodynamic results in rabbit aneurysm models to idealizations in surrounding vasculature. J Biomech Eng 2010;132:091009
CrossRef PubMed
31.↵
1. Heywood JG,
2. Rannacher R,
3. Turek S
. Artificial boundaries and flux and pressure conditions for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1996;22:325–52
CrossRef
32.↵
1. He X,
2. Ku DN
. Pulsatile flow in the human left coronary artery bifurcation: average conditions. J Biomech Eng 1996;118:74–82
CrossRef PubMed
33.
1. Hendrikse J,
2. van Raamt AF,
3. van der Graaf Y,
4. et al
. Distribution of cerebral blood flow in the circle of Willis. Radiology 2005;235:184–89
CrossRef PubMed
34.
1. Zhao M,
2. Amin-Hanjani S,
3. Ruland S,
4. et al
. Regional cerebral blood flow using quantitative MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1470–73
Abstract/FREE Full Text
35.
1. Vriens EM,
2. Wieneke GH,
3. Hillen B,
4. et al
. Flow redistribution in the major cerebral arteries after carotid endarterectomy: a study with transcranial Doppler scan. J Vasc Surg 2001;33:139–47
CrossRef PubMed
36.↵
1. Mantha A,
2. Karmonik C,
3. Benndorf G,
4. et al
. Hemodynamics in a cerebral artery before and after the formation of an aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1113–18
Abstract/FREE Full Text
37.↵
1. Hoi Y,
2. Meng H,
3. Woodward SH,
4. et al
. Effects of arterial geometry on aneurysm growth: three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics study. J Neurosurg 2004;101:676–81
CrossRef PubMed
38.↵
1. Yilmaz C,
2. Utebay B,
3. Kalaycioglu S,
4. et al
. Non-visualization of the internal carotid artery with a normal ipsilateral common carotid artery Doppler waveform: a finding suggesting congenital absence of the ICA on colour Doppler ultrasound. Br J Radiol 2006;79:108–11
CrossRef
39.↵
1. Short JG,
2. Fujiwara NH,
3. Marx WF,
4. et al
. Elastase-induced saccular aneurysms in rabbits: comparison of geometric features with those of human aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1833–37
Abstract/FREE Full Text
40.↵
1. Kadirvel R,
2. Ding Y-H,
3. Dai D,
4. et al
. The influence of hemodynamic forces on biomarkers in the walls of elastase-induced aneurysms in rabbits. Neuroradiology 2007;49:1041–53
CrossRef PubMed
41.↵
1. Karmonik C,
2. Klucznik R,
3. Benndorf G
. Blood flow in cerebral aneurysms: comparison of phase contrast magnetic resonance and computational fluid dynamics—preliminary experience. Rofo 2008;180:209–15
PubMed

Received May 6, 2010.
Accepted after revision July 29, 2010.

View Abstract

[1] 1.↵
Burleson AC,
Turitto VT
. Identification of quantifiable hemodynamic factors in the assessment of cerebral aneurysm behavior: on behalf of the Subcommittee on Biorheology of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the ISTH. Thromb Haemost 1996;76:118–23
PubMed

[2] Burleson AC,

[3] Turitto VT

[4] 2.↵
Cebral JR,
Castro MA,
Burgess JE,
et al
. Characterization of cerebral aneurysms for assessing risk of rupture by using patient-specific computational hemodynamics models. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2550–59
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[5] Cebral JR,

[6] Castro MA,

[7] Burgess JE,

[8] et al

[9] 3.↵
Hassan T,
Timofeev EV,
Saito T,
et al
. A proposed parent vessel geometry-based categorization of saccular intracranial aneurysms: computational flow dynamics analysis of the risk factors for lesion rupture. J Neurosurg 2005;103:662–80
PubMed

[10] Hassan T,

[11] Timofeev EV,

[12] Saito T,

[13] et al

[14] 4.↵
Jou LD,
Lee DH,
Morsi H,
et al
. Wall shear stress on ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms at the internal carotid artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1761–67
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[15] Jou LD,

[16] Lee DH,

[17] Morsi H,

[18] et al

[19] 5.↵
Shojima M,
Oshima M,
Takagi K,
et al
. Magnitude and role of wall shear stress on cerebral aneurysm: computational fluid dynamic study of 20 middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Stroke 2004;35:2500–05
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[20] Shojima M,

[21] Oshima M,

[22] Takagi K,

[23] et al

[24] 6.↵
Shojima M,
Oshima M,
Takagi K,
et al
. Role of the bloodstream impacting force and the local pressure elevation in the rupture of cerebral aneurysms. Stroke 2005;36:1933–38
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[25] Shojima M,

[26] Oshima M,

[27] Takagi K,

[28] et al

[29] 7.↵
Steinman DA,
Milner JS,
Norley CJ,
et al
. Image-based computational simulation of flow dynamics in a giant intracranial aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:559–66
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[30] Steinman DA,

[31] Milner JS,

[32] Norley CJ,

[33] et al

[34] 8.↵
Karmonik C,
Yen C,
Diaz O,
et al
. Temporal variations of wall shear stress parameters in intracranial aneurysms: importance of patient-specific inflow waveforms for CFD calculations. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010;152:1391–98, discussion 1398
CrossRef PubMed

[35] Karmonik C,

[36] Yen C,

[37] Diaz O,

[38] et al

[39] 9.↵
Parlea L,
Fahrig R,
Holdsworth DW,
et al
. An analysis of the geometry of saccular intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1079–89
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[40] Parlea L,

[41] Fahrig R,

[42] Holdsworth DW,

[43] et al

[44] 10.↵
Raghavan ML,
Ma B,
Harbaugh RE
. Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk. J Neurosurg 2005;102:355–62
CrossRef PubMed

[45] Raghavan ML,

[46] Ma B,

[47] Harbaugh RE

[48] 11.↵
Ujiie H,
Tamano Y,
Sasaki K,
et al
. Is the aspect ratio a reliable index for predicting the rupture of a saccular aneurysm? Neurosurgery 2001;48:495–502, discussion 502–03
CrossRef PubMed

[49] Ujiie H,

[50] Tamano Y,

[51] Sasaki K,

[52] et al

[53] 12.↵
Weir B,
Amidei C,
Kongable G,
et al
. The aspect ratio (dome/neck) of ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2003;99:447–51
CrossRef PubMed

[54] Weir B,

[55] Amidei C,

[56] Kongable G,

[57] et al

[58] 13.↵
Avolio A,
Avolio A,
Farnoush A,
et al
. Hemodynamic models of cerebral aneurysms for assessment of effect of vessel geometry on risk of rupture. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009;2009:2351–53
PubMed

[59] Avolio A,

[60] Avolio A,

[61] Farnoush A,

[62] et al

[63] 14.↵
Piccinelli M,
Veneziani A,
Steinman DA,
et al
. A framework for geometric analysis of vascular structures: application to cerebral aneurysms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2009;28:1141–55
CrossRef PubMed

[64] Piccinelli M,

[65] Veneziani A,

[66] Steinman DA,

[67] et al

[68] 15.↵
Ingebrigtsen T,
Morgan MK,
Faulder K,
et al
. Bifurcation geometry and the presence of cerebral artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2004;101:108–13
CrossRef PubMed

[69] Ingebrigtsen T,

[70] Morgan MK,

[71] Faulder K,

[72] et al

[73] 16.↵
Frosen J,
Piippo A,
Paetau A,
et al
. Remodeling of saccular cerebral artery aneurysm wall is associated with rupture: histological analysis of 24 unruptured and 42 ruptured cases. Stroke 2004;35:2287–93
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[74] Frosen J,

[75] Piippo A,

[76] Paetau A,

[77] et al

[78] 17.↵
Sequeira A,
Rannacher R
Zeng Z,
Chung BJ,
Durka M,
et al
. An in-vitro device for evaluation of cellular response to flows found at the apex of arterial bifurcations. In: Sequeira A, Rannacher R eds. Advances in Mathematical Fluid Mechanics. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, Wien; 2010:631–57

[79] Sequeira A,

[80] Rannacher R

[81] Zeng Z,

[82] Chung BJ,

[83] Durka M,

[84] et al

[85] 18.↵
Sakamoto N,
Ohashi T,
Sato M
. Effect of fluid shear stress on migration of vascular smooth muscle cells in cocultured model. Ann Biomed Eng 2006;34:408–15. Epub 2006 Feb 16
CrossRef PubMed

[86] Sakamoto N,

[87] Ohashi T,

[88] Sato M

[89] 19.↵
Altes TA,
Cloft HJ,
Short JG,
et al
. 1999 ARRS Executive Council Award: creation of saccular aneurysms in the rabbit—a model suitable for testing endovascular devices. American Roentgen Ray Society. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:349–54
CrossRef PubMed

[90] Altes TA,

[91] Cloft HJ,

[92] Short JG,

[93] et al

[94] 20.↵
Fukuda S,
Hashimoto N,
Naritomi H,
et al
. Prevention of rat cerebral aneurysm formation by inhibition of nitric oxide synthase. Circulation 2000;101:2532–38
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[95] Fukuda S,

[96] Hashimoto N,

[97] Naritomi H,

[98] et al

[99] 21.↵
Kondo S,
Hashimoto N,
Kikuchi H,
et al
. Cerebral aneurysms arising at nonbranching sites: an experimental study. Stroke 1997;28:398–403, discussion 403–04
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[100] Kondo S,

[101] Hashimoto N,

[102] Kikuchi H,

[103] et al

[104] 22.↵
Thiex R,
Moller-Hartmann W,
Hans FJ,
et al
. Are the configuration and neck morphology of experimental aneurysms predictable? A technical approach. Neuroradiology 2004;46:571–76
PubMed

[105] Thiex R,

[106] Moller-Hartmann W,

[107] Hans FJ,

[108] et al

[109] 23.↵
Kallmes DF,
Ding YH,
Dai D,
et al
. A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2007;38:2346–52
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[110] Kallmes DF,

[111] Ding YH,

[112] Dai D,

[113] et al

[114] 24.↵
Sadasivan C,
Cesar L,
Seong J,
et al
. An original flow-diversion device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: evaluation in the rabbit elastase-induced model. Stroke 2009;40:952–58
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[115] Sadasivan C,

[116] Cesar L,

[117] Seong J,

[118] et al

[119] 25.↵
Ding YH,
Danielson MA,
Kadirvel R,
et al
. Modified technique to create morphologically reproducible elastase-induced aneurysms in rabbits. Neuroradiology 2006;48:528–32
CrossRef PubMed

[120] Ding YH,

[121] Danielson MA,

[122] Kadirvel R,

[123] et al

[124] 26.↵
Ding YH,
Dai D,
Lewis DA,
et al
. Can neck size in elastase-induced aneurysms be controlled? A prospective study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2364–67
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[125] Ding YH,

[126] Dai D,

[127] Lewis DA,

[128] et al

[129] 27.↵
Ding YH,
Dai D,
Lewis DA,
et al
. Can neck size in elastase-induced aneurysms be controlled? A retrospective study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1681–84
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[130] Ding YH,

[131] Dai D,

[132] Lewis DA,

[133] et al

[134] 28.↵
Ujiie H,
Tachibana H,
Hiramatsu O,
et al
. Effects of size and shape (aspect ratio) on the hemodynamics of saccular aneurysms: a possible index for surgical treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1999;45:119–29, discussion 129–30
CrossRef PubMed

[135] Ujiie H,

[136] Tachibana H,

[137] Hiramatsu O,

[138] et al

[139] 29.↵
Ebina K,
Shimizu T,
Sohma M,
et al
. Clinico-statistical study on morphological risk factors of middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1990;106:153–59
CrossRef PubMed

[140] Ebina K,

[141] Shimizu T,

[142] Sohma M,

[143] et al

[144] 30.↵
Zeng Z,
Kallmes DF,
Durka M,
et al
. Sensitivity of CFD based hemodynamic results in rabbit aneurysm models to idealizations in surrounding vasculature. J Biomech Eng 2010;132:091009
CrossRef PubMed

[145] Zeng Z,

[146] Kallmes DF,

[147] Durka M,

[148] et al

[149] 31.↵
Heywood JG,
Rannacher R,
Turek S
. Artificial boundaries and flux and pressure conditions for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1996;22:325–52
CrossRef

[150] Heywood JG,

[151] Rannacher R,

[152] Turek S

[153] 32.↵
He X,
Ku DN
. Pulsatile flow in the human left coronary artery bifurcation: average conditions. J Biomech Eng 1996;118:74–82
CrossRef PubMed

[154] He X,

[155] Ku DN

[156] 33.
Hendrikse J,
van Raamt AF,
van der Graaf Y,
et al
. Distribution of cerebral blood flow in the circle of Willis. Radiology 2005;235:184–89
CrossRef PubMed

[157] Hendrikse J,

[158] van Raamt AF,

[159] van der Graaf Y,

[160] et al

[161] 34.
Zhao M,
Amin-Hanjani S,
Ruland S,
et al
. Regional cerebral blood flow using quantitative MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1470–73
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[162] Zhao M,

[163] Amin-Hanjani S,

[164] Ruland S,

[165] et al

[166] 35.
Vriens EM,
Wieneke GH,
Hillen B,
et al
. Flow redistribution in the major cerebral arteries after carotid endarterectomy: a study with transcranial Doppler scan. J Vasc Surg 2001;33:139–47
CrossRef PubMed

[167] Vriens EM,

[168] Wieneke GH,

[169] Hillen B,

[170] et al

[171] 36.↵
Mantha A,
Karmonik C,
Benndorf G,
et al
. Hemodynamics in a cerebral artery before and after the formation of an aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1113–18
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[172] Mantha A,

[173] Karmonik C,

[174] Benndorf G,

[175] et al

[176] 37.↵
Hoi Y,
Meng H,
Woodward SH,
et al
. Effects of arterial geometry on aneurysm growth: three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics study. J Neurosurg 2004;101:676–81
CrossRef PubMed

[177] Hoi Y,

[178] Meng H,

[179] Woodward SH,

[180] et al

[181] 38.↵
Yilmaz C,
Utebay B,
Kalaycioglu S,
et al
. Non-visualization of the internal carotid artery with a normal ipsilateral common carotid artery Doppler waveform: a finding suggesting congenital absence of the ICA on colour Doppler ultrasound. Br J Radiol 2006;79:108–11
CrossRef

[182] Yilmaz C,

[183] Utebay B,

[184] Kalaycioglu S,

[185] et al

[186] 39.↵
Short JG,
Fujiwara NH,
Marx WF,
et al
. Elastase-induced saccular aneurysms in rabbits: comparison of geometric features with those of human aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1833–37
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[187] Short JG,

[188] Fujiwara NH,

[189] Marx WF,

[190] et al

[191] 40.↵
Kadirvel R,
Ding Y-H,
Dai D,
et al
. The influence of hemodynamic forces on biomarkers in the walls of elastase-induced aneurysms in rabbits. Neuroradiology 2007;49:1041–53
CrossRef PubMed

[192] Kadirvel R,

[193] Ding Y-H,

[194] Dai D,

[195] et al

[196] 41.↵
Karmonik C,
Klucznik R,
Benndorf G
. Blood flow in cerebral aneurysms: comparison of phase contrast magnetic resonance and computational fluid dynamics—preliminary experience. Rofo 2008;180:209–15
PubMed

[197] Karmonik C,

[198] Klucznik R,

[199] Benndorf G

Main menu

User menu

Search

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Hemodynamics and Anatomy of Elastase-Induced Rabbit Aneurysm Models: Similarity to Human Cerebral Aneurysms?

Abstract

Abbreviations

Materials and Methods

Aneurysm Creation

Imaging Procedures, Lumen Reconstruction, and Arterial Waveforms

Geometric Data Acquisition

CFD Analysis

Hemodynamic Parameters

Human Intracranial Aneurysm Data: Literature Review

Results

Aneurysm Geometry

Intrasacular Hemodynamics

Nondimensional Flow Parameters

Qualitative Features of Flow

Wall Pressure

OSI

WSS

Discussion

Conclusions

Footnotes

References

In this issue

Citation Manager Formats

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Similar Articles

News and Updates

Resources

Opportunities

American Society of Neuroradiology

Main menu

User menu

Search

Hemodynamics and Anatomy of Elastase-Induced Rabbit Aneurysm Models: Similarity to Human Cerebral Aneurysms?

Abstract

Abbreviations

Materials and Methods

Aneurysm Creation

Imaging Procedures, Lumen Reconstruction, and Arterial Waveforms

Geometric Data Acquisition

CFD Analysis

Hemodynamic Parameters

Human Intracranial Aneurysm Data: Literature Review

Results

Aneurysm Geometry

Intrasacular Hemodynamics

Nondimensional Flow Parameters

Qualitative Features of Flow

Wall Pressure

OSI

WSS

Discussion

Conclusions

Footnotes

References

In this issue

Citation Manager Formats

Jump to section

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Similar Articles

News and Updates

Resources

Opportunities

American Society of Neuroradiology