1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => FreeToRead
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)


  
    































































































































    Noninvasive Evaluation of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations by 4D-MRA for Preoperative Planning and Postoperative Follow-Up in 56 Patients: Comparison with DSA and Intraoperative Findings | American Journal of Neuroradiology  
    



















    































    
  
  




    
    

  

      


    

      

  
  
  

    

  

    

  

                
    

      

  

    

  
      
  
  

    


Advertisement



  



  


  
  



  



    

  


  


  


  
  
  
  
  
  

  	      



          


    
      

    
  
    
        
    

  

    
                        

  

                
    

      

	  

		
		

			

			  

  
      
  
  

    

  
  
      
Research ArticleBrain

  
      

  
      
Noninvasive Evaluation of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations by 4D-MRA for Preoperative Planning and Postoperative Follow-Up in 56 Patients: Comparison with DSA and Intraoperative Findings
  
    	
D.R. Hadizadeh, G.M. Kukuk, D.T. Steck, J. Gieseke, H. Urbach, H.J. Tschampa, S. Greschus, A. Kovàcs, M. Möhlenbruch, A. Bostroem, H.H. Schild and W.A. Willinek

  
    	
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2012,  33 (6) 1095-1101; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2921 

  
  
  



  


  
  



			

		

	
	
 	
	  
  

		
		

			

			  

  
      
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

  

    

  
      
  
  

    
References
  1. 1.↵


    1. Friedlander  RM.
    . Clinical practice: arteriovenous malformations of the brain. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2704–12
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    

  2. 2.↵


    1. Kondziolka  D, 
    2. McLaughlin  MR, 
    3. Kestle  JR.
    . Simple risk predictions for arteriovenous malformation hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1995;37:851–55
    PubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵


    1. Du  J, 
    2. Fain  SB, 
    3. Korosec  FR, 
    4. et al
    . Time-resolved contrast-enhanced carotid imaging using undersampled projection reconstruction acquisition. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:1093–99
    CrossRefPubMed
    

  4. 4.↵


    1. Mistretta  CA, 
    2. Grist  TM, 
    3. Korosec  FR, 
    4. et al
    . 3D time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR DSA: advantages and tradeoffs. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:571–81
    PubMedWeb of Science
    

  5. 5.↵


    1. Willinek  WA, 
    2. Hadizadeh  DR, 
    3. von Falkenhausen  M, 
    4. et al
    . 4D time-resolved MR angiography with keyhole (4D-TRAK): more than 60 times accelerated MRA using a combination of CENTRA, keyhole, and SENSE at 3.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27:1455–60
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    

  6. 6.↵


    1. Eddleman  CS, 
    2. Jeong  HJ, 
    3. Hurley  MC, 
    4. et al
    . 4D radial acquisition contrast-enhanced MR angiography and intracranial arteriovenous malformations: quickly approaching digital subtraction angiography. Stroke 2009;40:2749–53
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
    

  7. 7.↵


    1. Warren  DJ, 
    2. Hoggard  N, 
    3. Walton  L, 
    4. et al
    . Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: comparison of novel magnetic resonance angiographic techniques and conventional catheter angiography. Neurosurgery 2007;61:187–96
    PubMed
    

  8. 8.↵


    1. Dion  JE, 
    2. Gates  PC, 
    3. Fox  AJ, 
    4. et al
    . Clinical events following neuroangiography: a prospective study. Stroke 1987;18:997–1004
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
    

  9. 9.↵


    1. Earnest  F, 
    2. Forbes  G, 
    3. Sandok  BA, 
    4. et al
    . Complications of cerebral angiography: prospective assessment of risk. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984;142:247–53
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    

  10. 10.↵


    1. Johnston  DC, 
    2. Chapman  KM, 
    3. Goldstein  LB.
    . Low rate of complications of cerebral angiography in routine clinical practice. Neurology 2001;57:2012–14
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
    

  11. 11.↵


    1. Willinsky  RA, 
    2. Taylor  SM, 
    3. TerBrugge  K, 
    4. et al
    . Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003;227:522–28
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    

  12. 12.↵


    1. Gauvrit  JY, 
    2. Law  M, 
    3. Xu  J, 
    4. et al
    . Time-resolved MR angiography: optimal parallel imaging method. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:835–38
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
    

  13. 13.↵


    1. Reinacher  P, 
    2. Reinges  MH, 
    3. Simon  VA, 
    4. et al
    . Dynamic 3-D contrast-enhanced angiography of cerebral tumours and vascular malformations. Eur Radiol 2007;17(suppl 6):F52–62

    CrossRefPubMed
    

  14. 14.↵


    1. Petkova  M, 
    2. Gauvrit  JY, 
    3. Trystram  D, 
    4. et al
    . Three-dimensional dynamic time-resolved contrast-enhanced MRA using parallel imaging and a variable rate k-space sampling strategy in intracranial arteriovenous malformations. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29:7–12
    CrossRefPubMed
    

  15. 15.↵


    1. Hadizadeh  DR, 
    2. von Falkenhausen  M, 
    3. Gieseke  J, 
    4. et al
    . Cerebral arteriovenous malformation: Spetzler-Martin classification at subsecond-temporal-resolution four-dimensional MR angiography compared with that at DSA. Radiology 2008;246:205–13
    CrossRefPubMed
    

  16. 16.↵


    1. Pruessmann  KP, 
    2. Weiger  M, 
    3. Scheidegger  MB, 
    4. et al
    . SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952–62
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    

  17. 17.↵


    1. Jones  RA, 
    2. Haraldseth  O, 
    3. Muller  TB, 
    4. et al
    . K-space substitution: a novel dynamic imaging technique. Magn Reson Med 1993;29:830–34
    PubMedWeb of Science
    

  18. 18.↵


    1. van Vaals  JJ, 
    2. Brummer  ME, 
    3. Dixon  WT, 
    4. et al
    . “Keyhole” method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:671–75
    PubMedWeb of Science
    

  19. 19.↵


    1. Willinek  WA, 
    2. Gieseke  J, 
    3. Conrad  R, 
    4. et al
    . Randomly segmented central k-space ordering in high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries: initial experience. Radiology 2002;225:583–88
    PubMed
    

  20. 20.↵


    1. Hadizadeh  DR, 
    2. Gieseke  J, 
    3. Beck  G, 
    4. et al
    . View-sharing in keyhole imaging: partially compressed central k-space acquisition in time-resolved MRA at 3.0T. Eur J Radiol 2011;80:400–06. Epub 2010 May 5
    CrossRefPubMed
    

  21. 21.↵


    1. Spetzler  RF, 
    2. Martin  NA.
    . A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 1986;65:476–83
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    

  22. 22.↵


    1. Naehle  CP, 
    2. Kaestner  M, 
    3. Muller  A, 
    4. et al
    . First-pass and steady-state MR angiography of thoracic vasculature in children and adolescents. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:504–13
    CrossRefPubMed
    

  23. 23.↵


    1. Hadizadeh  DR, 
    2. von Falkenhausen  M, 
    3. Kukuk  GM, 
    4. et al
    . Contrast material for abdominal dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography with parallel imaging: intraindividual equimolar comparison of a macrocyclic 1.0 M gadolinium chelate and a linear ionic 0.5 M gadolinium chelate. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:821–29
    CrossRefPubMed
    

  24. 24.↵


    1. Buerke  B, 
    2. Allkemper  T, 
    3. Kugel  H, 
    4. et al
    . Qualitative and quantitative analysis of routinely postprocessed (CLEAR) CE-MRA data sets: are SNR and CNR calculations reliable? Acad Radiol 2008;15:1111–17
    CrossRefPubMed
    

  25. 25.↵


    1. Etienne  A, 
    2. Botnar  RM, 
    3. Van Muiswinkel  AM, 
    4. et al
    . “Soap-Bubble” visualization and quantitative analysis of 3D coronary magnetic resonance angiograms. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:658–66
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    

  26. 26.↵


    1. Geibprasert  S, 
    2. Pongpech  S, 
    3. Jiarakongmun  P, 
    4. et al
    . Radiologic assessment of brain arteriovenous malformations: what clinicians need to know. Radiographics 2010;30:483–501
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    

  27. 27.↵


    1. Saleh  RS, 
    2. Lohan  DG, 
    3. Villablanca  JP, 
    4. et al
    . Assessment of craniospinal arteriovenous malformations at 3T with highly temporally and highly spatially resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1024–31
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
    

  28. 28.↵


    1. Willinek  WA, 
    2. Gieseke  J, 
    3. von Falkenhausen  M, 
    4. et al
    . Sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for high spatial resolution time-of-flight MR angiography of the intracranial arteries at 3.0 T. Rofo 2004;176:21–26
    PubMed
    

  29. 29.↵


    1. Lee  KE, 
    2. Choi  CG, 
    3. Choi  JW, 
    4. et al
    . Detection of residual brain arteriovenous malformations after radiosurgery: diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional time of flight MR angiography at 3.0 Tesla. Korean J Radiol 2009;10:333–39
    CrossRefPubMed
    

  30. 30.↵


    1. Nishimura  S, 
    2. Hirai  T, 
    3. Sasao  A, 
    4. et al
    . Evaluation of dural arteriovenous fistulas with 4D contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:80–85
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
    

  31. 31.↵


    1. Farb  RI, 
    2. Agid  R, 
    3. Willinsky  RA, 
    4. et al
    . Cranial dural arteriovenous fistula: diagnosis and classification with time-resolved MR angiography at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1546–51
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
    

  32. 32.↵


    1. Ali  S, 
    2. Cashen  TA, 
    3. Carroll  TJ, 
    4. et al
    . Time-resolved spinal MR angiography: initial clinical experience in the evaluation of spinal arteriovenous shunts. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1806–10
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
    

  33. 33.↵


    1. Wu  Y, 
    2. Kim  N, 
    3. Korosec  FR, 
    4. et al
    . 3D time-resolved contrast-enhanced cerebrovascular MR angiography with subsecond frame update times using radial k-space trajectories and highly constrained projection reconstruction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:2001–04
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
    

  34. 34.↵


    1. Fink  C, 
    2. Ley  S, 
    3. Kroeker  R, 
    4. et al
    . Time-resolved contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of the chest: combination of parallel imaging with view sharing (TREAT). Invest Radiol 2005;40:40–48
    PubMed
    

  35. 35.↵


    1. Velikina  JV, 
    2. Johnson  KM, 
    3. Wu  Y, 
    4. et al
    . PC HYPR flow: a technique for rapid imaging of contrast dynamics. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;31:447–56
    CrossRefPubMed
    

  36. 36.↵


    1. Wetzel  S, 
    2. Meckel  S, 
    3. Frydrychowicz  A, 
    4. et al
    . In vivo assessment and visualization of intracranial arterial hemodynamics with flow-sensitized 4D MR imaging at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:433–38
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
    

  37. 37.↵


    1. Yan  L, 
    2. Wang  S, 
    3. Zhuo  Y, 
    4. et al
    . Unenhanced dynamic MR angiography: high spatial and temporal resolution by using true FISP-based spin tagging with alternating radiofrequency. Radiology 2010;256:270–79
    CrossRefPubMed
    

  38. 38.↵


    1. Fatima  Z, 
    2. Ishigame  K, 
    3. Hori  M, 
    4. et al
    . Time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance digital subtraction angiography (MRDSA) in an infant with congenital pial arteriovenous fistula in the brain: a case report. Childs Nerv Syst 2010;26:1121–24
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    

  39. 39.↵


    1. Cashen  TA, 
    2. Carr  JC, 
    3. Shin  W, 
    4. et al
    . Intracranial time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:822–29
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵


    European Medicines Agency. European Medicines Agency makes recommendations to minimise risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis with gadolinium-containing contrast agents. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Referrals_document/gadolinium_31/WC500015635.pdf. Accessed November 15, 2011.
  41. 41.↵


    1. Kramer  H, 
    2. Michaely  HJ, 
    3. Requardt  M, 
    4. et al
    . Effects of injection rate and dose on image quality in time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) by using 1.0M contrast agents. Eur Radiol 2007;17:1394–402. Epub 2006 Nov 18
    CrossRefPubMed
  


  
  



  




  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

     Back to top  


  
  



			

		

		
		

			

			  

  
        
In this issue

    
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

  

    

  
      
  
  

    


Advertisement



  



  


  
  



  



  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

	  
  

		

          

            

  
      
  
  

     Print  


  
  



  
      
  
  

     Download PDF  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
 Email Article
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
 Citation Tools
  


  
  



          

        

        
        

          

            



  
      
  
  

    

  

    

  
      
  
  

    

  
  
  
  
      
Noninvasive Evaluation of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations by 4D-MRA for Preoperative Planning and Postoperative Follow-Up in 56 Patients: Comparison with DSA and Intraoperative Findings
  
    	
D.R. Hadizadeh, G.M. Kukuk, D.T. Steck, J. Gieseke, H. Urbach, H.J. Tschampa, S. Greschus, A. Kovàcs, M. Möhlenbruch, A. Bostroem, H.H. Schild, W.A. Willinek

  
    	
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2012, 33 (6) 1095-1101; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2921 

  
  
  



  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

  
    
  
  
    
  
  
    
  


  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  


  
  



  



  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
  


  
  



          

        

	
 	
	
	


  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
              Purchase  


  
  



  
        
Jump to section

    
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
  


  
  



			

		

	
	
 	
	
	


    

  



  

                
    

      

  

    

  
      
  
  

    


Advertisement