High-Resolution 3D-Constructive Interference in Steady-State MR Imaging and 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography in Neurovascular Compression: A Comparison between 3T and 1.5T

M. Garcia; R. Naraghi; T. Zumbrunn; J. Rösch; P. Hastreiter; A. Dörfler

doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2974

References

1.↵
1. Tarnaris A,
2. Renowden S,
3. Coakham HB
. A comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and constructive interference in steady state-three-dimensional Fourier transformation magnetic resonance imaging in patients with hemifacial spasm. Br J Neurosurg 2007;21:375–81
CrossRef PubMed
2.↵
1. Naraghi R,
2. Tanrikulu L,
3. Troescher-Weber R,
4. et al
. Classification of neurovascular compression in typical hemifacial spasm: three-dimensional visualization of the facial and the vestibulocochlear nerves. J Neurosurg 2007;107:1154–63
CrossRef PubMed
3.↵
1. Kakizawa Y,
2. Seguchi T,
3. Kodama K,
4. et al
. Anatomical study of the trigeminal and facial cranial nerves with the aid of 3.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 2008;108:483–90
CrossRef PubMed Web of Science
4.↵
1. Miller J,
2. Acar F,
3. Hamilton B,
4. et al
. Preoperative visualization of neurovascular anatomy in trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 2008;108:477–82
CrossRef PubMed
5.↵
1. Satoh T,
2. Onoda K,
3. Date I
. Fusion imaging of three-dimensional magnetic resonance cisternograms and angiograms for the assessment of microvascular decompression in patients with hemifacial spasms. J Neurosurg 2007;106:82–89
CrossRef PubMed Web of Science
6.↵
1. Yamakami I,
2. Kobayashi E,
3. Hirai S,
4. et al
. Preoperative assessment of trigeminal neuralgia and hemifacial spasm using constructive interference in steady state-three-dimensional Fourier transformation magnetic resonance imaging. Neurol Med Chir 2000;40:554–55
7.↵
1. Pagni CA,
2. Fariselli L,
3. Zeme S
. Trigeminal neuralgia: non-invasive techniques versus microvascular decompression—it is really available any further improvement? Acta Neurochir Suppl 2008;101:27–33
CrossRef PubMed
8.↵
1. Liu JK,
2. Apfelbaum RI
. Treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2004;15:319–34
CrossRef PubMed
9.↵
1. Benes L,
2. Shiratori K,
3. Gurschi M,
4. et al
. Is preoperative high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging accurate in predicting neurovascular compression in patients with trigeminal neuralgia? A single-blind study. Neurosurg Rev 2005;28:131–36
CrossRef PubMed
10.↵
1. Anderson VC,
2. Berryhill PC,
3. Sandquist MA,
4. et al
. High-resolution three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography and three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled imaging in the evaluation of neurovascular compression in patients with trigeminal neuralgia: a double-blind pilot study. Neurosurgery 2006;58:666–73
CrossRef PubMed Web of Science
11.↵
1. Hastreiter P,
2. Naraghi R,
3. Tomandl B,
4. et al
. Analysis and 3-dimensional visualization of neurovascular compression syndromes. Acad Radiol 2003;10:1369–79
CrossRef PubMed
12.↵
1. Naraghi R,
2. Hastreiter P,
3. Tomandl B,
4. et al
. Three-dimensional visualization of neurovascular relationships in the posterior fossa: technique and clinical application. J Neurosurg 2004;100:1025–35
PubMed
13.↵
1. Stankiewicz JM,
2. Glanz BI,
3. Healy BC,
4. et al
. Brain MRI lesion load at 1.5T and 3T versus clinical status in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging 2011;21. e50–56
CrossRef PubMed Web of Science
14.↵
1. Stobo DB,
2. Lindsay RS,
3. Connell J,
4. et al
. Initial experience of 3 Tesla versus conventional field strength magnetic resonance imaging of small functioning pituitary tumours. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2011;75:673–77
CrossRef PubMed
15.↵
1. Ross JS
. The high-field-strength curmudgeon. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:168–69
FREE Full Text
16.↵
1. Frayne R,
2. Goodyear BG,
3. Dickhoff P,
4. et al
. Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: challenges and advantages in clinical neurological imaging. Invest Radiol 2003;38:385–401
CrossRef PubMed
17.↵
1. Willinek WA,
2. Gieseke J,
3. von Falkenhausen M,
4. et al
. Sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for high spatial resolution time-of-flight MR angiography of the intracranial arteries at 3.0 T. Rofo 2004;176:21–26
PubMed
18.↵
1. Pattany PM
. 3T MR imaging: the pros and cons. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1455–56
FREE Full Text
19.↵
1. Schwindt W,
2. Kugel H,
3. Bachmann R,
4. et al
. Magnetic resonance imaging protocols for examination of the neurocranium at 3 T. Eur Radiol 2003;13:2170–79
CrossRef PubMed
20.↵
1. Benjamini Y,
2. Yekutieli D
. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Stat 2001;29:1165–88
CrossRef Web of Science
21.↵
1. Leal PR,
2. Hermier M,
3. Froment JC,
4. et al
. Preoperative demonstration of the neurovascular compression characteristics with special emphasis on the degree of compression, using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective study, with comparison to surgical findings, in 100 consecutive patients who underwent microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010;152:817–25. Epub 2010 Jan 28
CrossRef PubMed
22.↵
1. Tanrikulu L,
2. Hastreiter P,
3. Richer G,
4. et al
. Virtual neuroendoscopy: MRI-based three-dimensional visualization of the cranial nerves in the posterior cranial fossa. Br J Neurosurg 2008;22:207–12
CrossRef PubMed
23.↵
1. Hastreiter P,
2. Naraghi R,
3. Tomandl B,
4. et al
. 3D-visualization and registration for neurovascular compression syndrome analysis. In: MICCAI ‘02 Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-Part I. London, UK: Springer-Verlag; 2002;5:396–403
24.↵
1. Willinek WA,
2. Schild HH
. Clinical advantages of 3.0 T MRI over 1.5 T. Eur J Radiol 2008;65:2–14
CrossRef PubMed
25.↵
1. Schmitz BL,
2. Aschoff AJ,
3. Hoffmann MH,
4. et al
. Advantages and pitfalls in 3T MR brain imaging: a pictorial review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2229–37
FREE Full Text
26.↵
1. Tanenbaum LN
. Clinical 3T MR imaging: mastering the challenges. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2006;14:1–15
CrossRef PubMed
27.↵
1. Leal PR,
2. Hermier M,
3. Souza MA,
4. et al
. Visualization of vascular compression of the trigeminal nerve with high-resolution 3T MRI: a prospective study comparing preoperative imaging analysis to surgical findings in 40 consecutive patients who underwent microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosugery 2011;69:15–26
CrossRef PubMed
28.↵
1. Willinek WA,
2. Born M,
3. Simon B,
4. et al
. Time-of-flight MR angiography: comparison of 3.0-T imaging and 1.5-T imaging—initial experience. Radiology 2003;229:913–20
CrossRef PubMed Web of Science
29.↵
1. Al-Kwifi O,
2. Emery DJ,
3. Wilman AH
. Vessel contrast at three Tesla in time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial and carotid arteries. Magn Reson Imaging 2002;20:181–87
CrossRef PubMed

In this issue

Download PDF

Email Article

Citation Tools

Purchase

Cited By...

Imaging and Surgical Findings in Patients with Hemi-Laryngopharyngeal Spasm and the Potential Role of MRI in the Diagnostic Work-Up

More in this TOC Section

Show more HEAD & NECK

[1] 1.↵
Tarnaris A,
Renowden S,
Coakham HB
. A comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and constructive interference in steady state-three-dimensional Fourier transformation magnetic resonance imaging in patients with hemifacial spasm. Br J Neurosurg 2007;21:375–81
CrossRef PubMed

[2] Tarnaris A,

[3] Renowden S,

[4] Coakham HB

[5] 2.↵
Naraghi R,
Tanrikulu L,
Troescher-Weber R,
et al
. Classification of neurovascular compression in typical hemifacial spasm: three-dimensional visualization of the facial and the vestibulocochlear nerves. J Neurosurg 2007;107:1154–63
CrossRef PubMed

[6] Naraghi R,

[7] Tanrikulu L,

[8] Troescher-Weber R,

[9] et al

[10] 3.↵
Kakizawa Y,
Seguchi T,
Kodama K,
et al
. Anatomical study of the trigeminal and facial cranial nerves with the aid of 3.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 2008;108:483–90
CrossRef PubMed Web of Science

[11] Kakizawa Y,

[12] Seguchi T,

[13] Kodama K,

[14] et al

[15] 4.↵
Miller J,
Acar F,
Hamilton B,
et al
. Preoperative visualization of neurovascular anatomy in trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 2008;108:477–82
CrossRef PubMed

[16] Miller J,

[17] Acar F,

[18] Hamilton B,

[19] et al

[20] 5.↵
Satoh T,
Onoda K,
Date I
. Fusion imaging of three-dimensional magnetic resonance cisternograms and angiograms for the assessment of microvascular decompression in patients with hemifacial spasms. J Neurosurg 2007;106:82–89
CrossRef PubMed Web of Science

[21] Satoh T,

[22] Onoda K,

[23] Date I

[24] 6.↵
Yamakami I,
Kobayashi E,
Hirai S,
et al
. Preoperative assessment of trigeminal neuralgia and hemifacial spasm using constructive interference in steady state-three-dimensional Fourier transformation magnetic resonance imaging. Neurol Med Chir 2000;40:554–55

[25] Yamakami I,

[26] Kobayashi E,

[27] Hirai S,

[28] et al

[29] 7.↵
Pagni CA,
Fariselli L,
Zeme S
. Trigeminal neuralgia: non-invasive techniques versus microvascular decompression—it is really available any further improvement? Acta Neurochir Suppl 2008;101:27–33
CrossRef PubMed

[30] Pagni CA,

[31] Fariselli L,

[32] Zeme S

[33] 8.↵
Liu JK,
Apfelbaum RI
. Treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2004;15:319–34
CrossRef PubMed

[34] Liu JK,

[35] Apfelbaum RI

[36] 9.↵
Benes L,
Shiratori K,
Gurschi M,
et al
. Is preoperative high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging accurate in predicting neurovascular compression in patients with trigeminal neuralgia? A single-blind study. Neurosurg Rev 2005;28:131–36
CrossRef PubMed

[37] Benes L,

[38] Shiratori K,

[39] Gurschi M,

[40] et al

[41] 10.↵
Anderson VC,
Berryhill PC,
Sandquist MA,
et al
. High-resolution three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography and three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled imaging in the evaluation of neurovascular compression in patients with trigeminal neuralgia: a double-blind pilot study. Neurosurgery 2006;58:666–73
CrossRef PubMed Web of Science

[42] Anderson VC,

[43] Berryhill PC,

[44] Sandquist MA,

[45] et al

[46] 11.↵
Hastreiter P,
Naraghi R,
Tomandl B,
et al
. Analysis and 3-dimensional visualization of neurovascular compression syndromes. Acad Radiol 2003;10:1369–79
CrossRef PubMed

[47] Hastreiter P,

[48] Naraghi R,

[49] Tomandl B,

[50] et al

[51] 12.↵
Naraghi R,
Hastreiter P,
Tomandl B,
et al
. Three-dimensional visualization of neurovascular relationships in the posterior fossa: technique and clinical application. J Neurosurg 2004;100:1025–35
PubMed

[52] Naraghi R,

[53] Hastreiter P,

[54] Tomandl B,

[55] et al

[56] 13.↵
Stankiewicz JM,
Glanz BI,
Healy BC,
et al
. Brain MRI lesion load at 1.5T and 3T versus clinical status in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging 2011;21. e50–56
CrossRef PubMed Web of Science

[57] Stankiewicz JM,

[58] Glanz BI,

[59] Healy BC,

[60] et al

[61] 14.↵
Stobo DB,
Lindsay RS,
Connell J,
et al
. Initial experience of 3 Tesla versus conventional field strength magnetic resonance imaging of small functioning pituitary tumours. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2011;75:673–77
CrossRef PubMed

[62] Stobo DB,

[63] Lindsay RS,

[64] Connell J,

[65] et al

[66] 15.↵
Ross JS
. The high-field-strength curmudgeon. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:168–69
FREE Full Text

[67] Ross JS

[68] 16.↵
Frayne R,
Goodyear BG,
Dickhoff P,
et al
. Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: challenges and advantages in clinical neurological imaging. Invest Radiol 2003;38:385–401
CrossRef PubMed

[69] Frayne R,

[70] Goodyear BG,

[71] Dickhoff P,

[72] et al

[73] 17.↵
Willinek WA,
Gieseke J,
von Falkenhausen M,
et al
. Sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for high spatial resolution time-of-flight MR angiography of the intracranial arteries at 3.0 T. Rofo 2004;176:21–26
PubMed

[74] Willinek WA,

[75] Gieseke J,

[76] von Falkenhausen M,

[77] et al

[78] 18.↵
Pattany PM
. 3T MR imaging: the pros and cons. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1455–56
FREE Full Text

[79] Pattany PM

[80] 19.↵
Schwindt W,
Kugel H,
Bachmann R,
et al
. Magnetic resonance imaging protocols for examination of the neurocranium at 3 T. Eur Radiol 2003;13:2170–79
CrossRef PubMed

[81] Schwindt W,

[82] Kugel H,

[83] Bachmann R,

[84] et al

[85] 20.↵
Benjamini Y,
Yekutieli D
. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Stat 2001;29:1165–88
CrossRef Web of Science

[86] Benjamini Y,

[87] Yekutieli D

[88] 21.↵
Leal PR,
Hermier M,
Froment JC,
et al
. Preoperative demonstration of the neurovascular compression characteristics with special emphasis on the degree of compression, using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective study, with comparison to surgical findings, in 100 consecutive patients who underwent microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010;152:817–25. Epub 2010 Jan 28
CrossRef PubMed

[89] Leal PR,

[90] Hermier M,

[91] Froment JC,

[92] et al

[93] 22.↵
Tanrikulu L,
Hastreiter P,
Richer G,
et al
. Virtual neuroendoscopy: MRI-based three-dimensional visualization of the cranial nerves in the posterior cranial fossa. Br J Neurosurg 2008;22:207–12
CrossRef PubMed

[94] Tanrikulu L,

[95] Hastreiter P,

[96] Richer G,

[97] et al

[98] 23.↵
Hastreiter P,
Naraghi R,
Tomandl B,
et al
. 3D-visualization and registration for neurovascular compression syndrome analysis. In: MICCAI ‘02 Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-Part I. London, UK: Springer-Verlag; 2002;5:396–403

[99] Hastreiter P,

[100] Naraghi R,

[101] Tomandl B,

[102] et al

[103] 24.↵
Willinek WA,
Schild HH
. Clinical advantages of 3.0 T MRI over 1.5 T. Eur J Radiol 2008;65:2–14
CrossRef PubMed

[104] Willinek WA,

[105] Schild HH

[106] 25.↵
Schmitz BL,
Aschoff AJ,
Hoffmann MH,
et al
. Advantages and pitfalls in 3T MR brain imaging: a pictorial review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2229–37
FREE Full Text

[107] Schmitz BL,

[108] Aschoff AJ,

[109] Hoffmann MH,

[110] et al

[111] 26.↵
Tanenbaum LN
. Clinical 3T MR imaging: mastering the challenges. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2006;14:1–15
CrossRef PubMed

[112] Tanenbaum LN

[113] 27.↵
Leal PR,
Hermier M,
Souza MA,
et al
. Visualization of vascular compression of the trigeminal nerve with high-resolution 3T MRI: a prospective study comparing preoperative imaging analysis to surgical findings in 40 consecutive patients who underwent microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosugery 2011;69:15–26
CrossRef PubMed

[114] Leal PR,

[115] Hermier M,

[116] Souza MA,

[117] et al

[118] 28.↵
Willinek WA,
Born M,
Simon B,
et al
. Time-of-flight MR angiography: comparison of 3.0-T imaging and 1.5-T imaging—initial experience. Radiology 2003;229:913–20
CrossRef PubMed Web of Science

[119] Willinek WA,

[120] Born M,

[121] Simon B,

[122] et al

[123] 29.↵
Al-Kwifi O,
Emery DJ,
Wilman AH
. Vessel contrast at three Tesla in time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial and carotid arteries. Magn Reson Imaging 2002;20:181–87
CrossRef PubMed

[124] Al-Kwifi O,

[125] Emery DJ,

[126] Wilman AH

Main menu

User menu

Search

American Journal of Neuroradiology

High-Resolution 3D-Constructive Interference in Steady-State MR Imaging and 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography in Neurovascular Compression: A Comparison between 3T and 1.5T

References

In this issue

Citation Manager Formats

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Similar Articles

News and Updates

Resources

Opportunities

American Society of Neuroradiology

Main menu

User menu

Search

High-Resolution 3D-Constructive Interference in Steady-State MR Imaging and 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography in Neurovascular Compression: A Comparison between 3T and 1.5T

References

In this issue

Citation Manager Formats

Jump to section

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Similar Articles

News and Updates

Resources

Opportunities

American Society of Neuroradiology