1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => OpenAccess
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)


  
    






























































































































































































































































    Imaging Recommendations for Acute Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack Patients: A Joint Statement by the American Society of Neuroradiology, the American College of Radiology, and the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery | American Journal of Neuroradiology  
    



















    































    
  
  




    
    

  

      


    

      

  
  
  

    

  

    

  

                
    

      

  

    

  
      
  
  

    


Advertisement



  



  


  
  



  



    

  


  


  


  
  
  
  
  
  

  	      



          


    
      

    
  
    
        
    

  

    
                        

  

                
    

      

	  

		
		

			

			  

  
      
  
  

    

  
  
      
Research ArticleWhite Paper

  
      
Open Access

  
      
Imaging Recommendations for Acute Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack Patients: A Joint Statement by the American Society of Neuroradiology, the American College of Radiology, and the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery
  
    	
M. Wintermark, P.C. Sanelli, G.W. Albers, J. Bello, C. Derdeyn, S.W. Hetts, M.H. Johnson, C. Kidwell, M.H. Lev, D.S. Liebeskind, H. Rowley, P.W. Schaefer, J.L. Sunshine, G. Zaharchuk and C.C. Meltzer

  
    	
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2013,  34 (11) E117-E127; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3690 

  
  
  



  


  
  



			

		

	
	
 	
	  
  

		
		

			

			  

  
      
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

  

    

  
      
  
  

    
REFERENCES
  1. 1.↵


    1. Rowley  HA
    . Extending the time window for thrombolysis: evidence from acute stroke trials. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2005;15:575–87, x
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵


    1. Sims  J, 
    2. Schwamm  LH
    . The evolving role of acute stroke imaging in intravenous thrombolytic therapy: patient selection and outcomes assessment. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2005;15:421–40, xii
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵


    1. Schellinger  PD
    . The evolving role of advanced MR imaging as a management tool for adult ischemic stroke: a Western-European perspective. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2005;15:245–58, ix
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 3a.↵


    Oxford University. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine - Levels of Evidence (March 2009) http://www.cebm.net/?O=1025 Accessed June 26, 2013.
  5. 4.↵


    1. DeLaPaz  RL, 
    2. Wippold  FJ  2nd., 
    3. Cornrlius  RS, 
    4. et al
    . ACR appropriateness criteria® on cerebrovascular disease. J Am Coll Radiol 2011;8:532–38
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 5.↵


    1. von Kummer  R, 
    2. Bourquain  H, 
    3. Bastianello  S, 
    4. et al
    . Early prediction of irreversible brain damage after ischemic stroke at CT. Radiology 2001;219:95–100
    PubMedWeb of Science
  7. 6.↵


    1. Paxton  R, 
    2. Ambrose  J
    . The EMI scanner: a brief review of the first 650 patients. Br J Radiol 1974;47:530–65
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 7.↵


    1. Jacobs  L, 
    2. Kinkel  WR, 
    3. Heffner  RR  Jr.
    . Autopsy correlations of computerized tomography: experience with 6,000 CT scans. Neurology 1976;26:1111–18
    CrossRef
  9. 8.↵


    1. Fiebach  JB, 
    2. Schellinger  PD, 
    3. Gass  A, 
    4. et al
    . Stroke magnetic resonance imaging is accurate in hyperacute intracerebral hemorrhage: a multicenter study on the validity of stroke imaging. Stroke 2004;35:502–06
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 9.↵


    1. Kidwell  CS, 
    2. Chalela  JA, 
    3. Saver  JL, 
    4. et al
    . Comparison of MRI and CT for detection of acute intracerebral hemorrhage. JAMA 2004;292:1823–30
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 10.↵


    1. Kakuda  W, 
    2. Thijs  VN, 
    3. Lansberg  MG, 
    4. et al
    . Clinical importance of microbleeds in patients receiving IV thrombolysis. Neurology 2005;65:1175–78
    CrossRef
  12. 11.↵


    1. Lee  SH, 
    2. Kang  BS, 
    3. Kim  N, 
    4. et al
    . Does microbleed predict haemorrhagic transformation after acute atherothrombotic or cardioembolic stroke? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79:913–16
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 12.↵


    1. Boulanger  JM, 
    2. Coutts  SB, 
    3. Eliasziw  M, 
    4. et al
    . Cerebral microhemorrhages predict new disabling or fatal strokes in patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Stroke 2006;37:911–14
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 13.↵


    1. Fiehler  J, 
    2. Albers  GW, 
    3. Boulanger  JM, 
    4. et al
    . Bleeding Risk Analysis in Stroke Imaging before Thrombolysis (BRASIL): pooled analysis of T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data from 570 patients. Stroke 2007;38:2738–44
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 14.↵


    1. Kidwell  CS, 
    2. Wintermark  M
    . Imaging of intracranial haemorrhage. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:256–67
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 15.↵


    1. Huisman  TA
    . Intracranial hemorrhage: ultrasound, CT and MRI findings. Eur Radiol 2005;15:434–40
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 16.↵


    1. Hoggard  N, 
    2. Wilkinson  ID, 
    3. Paley  MN, 
    4. et al
    . Imaging of haemorrhagic stroke. Clin Radiol 2002;57:957–68
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 17.↵


    1. Kim  J, 
    2. Smith  A, 
    3. Hemphill  JC, 
    4. et al
    . Contrast extravasation on CT predicts mortality in primary intracerebral hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:520–25
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 18.↵


    1. Demchuk  AM, 
    2. Dowlatshahi  D, 
    3. Rodriguez-Luna  D, 
    4. et al
    . Prediction of haematoma growth and outcome in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage using the CT-angiography spot sign (PREDICT): a prospective observational study. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:307–14
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 19.↵


    1. Brouwers  HB, 
    2. Falcone  GJ, 
    3. McNamara  KA, 
    4. et al
    . CTA spot sign predicts hematoma expansion in patients with delayed presentation after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2012;17:421–28
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 20.↵


    1. Koculym  A, 
    2. Huynh  TJ, 
    3. Jakubovic  R, 
    4. et al
    . CT perfusion spot sign improves sensitivity for prediction of outcome compared with CTA and postcontrast CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:965–70
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 21.↵


    European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Executive Committee; ESO Writing Committee. Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008;25:457–507
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 22.↵


    1. Saver  JL
    . Time is brain–quantified. Stroke 2006;37:263–66
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 23.↵


    1. Wahlgren  N, 
    2. Ahmed  N, 
    3. Eriksson  N, 
    4. et al
    . Multivariable analysis of outcome predictors and adjustment of main outcome results to baseline data profile in randomized controlled trials: Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST). Stroke 2008;39:3316–22
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 24.↵


    Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke: the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1581–87
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 25.↵


    1. Adams  HP  Jr., 
    2. Brott  TG, 
    3. Furlan  AJ, 
    4. et al
    . Guidelines for thrombolytic therapy for acute stroke: a supplement to the guidelines for the management of patients with acute ischemic stroke—a statement for healthcare professionals from a Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Circulation 1996;94:1167–74
    FREE Full Text
  27. 26.↵


    1. Hacke  W, 
    2. Kaste  M, 
    3. Fieschi  C, 
    4. et al
    . Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute hemispheric stroke: the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS). JAMA 1995;274:1017–25
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 27.↵


    1. Hacke  W, 
    2. Kaste  M, 
    3. Bluhmki  E, 
    4. et al
    . Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1317–29
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 28.↵


    1. Bluhmki  E, 
    2. Chamorro  A, 
    3. Davalos  A, 
    4. et al
    . Stroke treatment with alteplase given 3.0–4.5 h after onset of acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS III): additional outcomes and subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:1095–102
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 29.↵


    1. Lees  KR, 
    2. Bluhmki  E, 
    3. von Kummer  R, 
    4. et al
    . Time to treatment with intravenous alteplase and outcome in stroke: an updated pooled analysis of ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS, and EPITHET trials. Lancet 2010;375:1695–703
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 30.↵


    1. von Kummer  R, 
    2. Meyding-Lamade  U, 
    3. Forsting  M, 
    4. et al
    . Sensitivity and prognostic value of early CT in occlusion of the middle cerebral artery trunk. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:9–15, discussion 16–18
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 31.↵


    1. Larrue  V, 
    2. von Kummer  RR, 
    3. Muller  A, 
    4. et al
    . Risk factors for severe hemorrhagic transformation in ischemic stroke patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator: a secondary analysis of the European-Australasian acute stroke study (ECASS II). Stroke 2001;32:438–41
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 32.↵


    1. Lee  KH, 
    2. Lee  SJ, 
    3. Cho  SJ, 
    4. et al
    . Usefulness of triphasic perfusion computed tomography for intravenous thrombolysis with tissue-type plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke. Arch Neurol 2000;57:1000–08
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. 33.↵


    1. Lev  MH, 
    2. Segal  AZ, 
    3. Farkas  J, 
    4. et al
    . Utility of perfusion-weighted CT imaging in acute middle cerebral artery stroke treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis: prediction of final infarct volume and clinical outcome. Stroke 2001;32:2021–28
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 34.↵


    1. Wintermark  M, 
    2. Reichhart  M, 
    3. Thiran  JP, 
    4. et al
    . Prognostic accuracy of cerebral blood flow measurement by perfusion computed tomography, at the time of emergency room admission, in acute stroke patients. Ann Neurol 2002;51:417–32
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 35.↵


    1. Koroshetz  WJ, 
    2. Lev  MH
    . Contrast computed tomography scan in acute stroke: “You can't always get what you want but you get what you need.” Ann Neurol 2002;51:415–16
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. 36.↵


    1. Patel  SC, 
    2. Levine  SR, 
    3. Tilley  BC, 
    4. et al
    . Lack of clinical significance of early ischemic changes on computed tomography in acute stroke. JAMA 2001;286:2830–38
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 37.↵


    1. von Kummer  R, 
    2. Nolte  PN, 
    3. Schnittger  H, 
    4. et al
    . Detectability of cerebral hemisphere ischaemic infarcts by CT within 6 h of stroke. Neuroradiology 1996;38:31–33
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 38.↵


    1. Schellinger  PD, 
    2. Fiebach  JB, 
    3. Hacke  W
    . Imaging-based decision making in thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke: present status. Stroke 2003;34:575–83
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 39.↵


    1. Schriger  DL, 
    2. Kalafut  M, 
    3. Starkman  S, 
    4. et al
    . Cranial computed tomography interpretation in acute stroke: physician accuracy in determining eligibility for thrombolytic therapy. JAMA 1998;279:1293–97
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. 40.↵


    1. Grotta  JC, 
    2. Chiu  D, 
    3. Lu  M, 
    4. et al
    . Agreement and variability in the interpretation of early CT changes in stroke patients qualifying for intravenous rtPA therapy. Stroke 1999;30:1528–33
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 41.↵


    1. Kalafut  MA, 
    2. Schriger  DL, 
    3. Saver  JL, 
    4. et al
    . Detection of early CT signs of >1/3 middle cerebral artery infarctions: interrater reliability and sensitivity of CT interpretation by physicians involved in acute stroke care. Stroke 2000;31:1667–71
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 42.↵


    1. Barber  PA, 
    2. Demchuk  AM, 
    3. Zhang  J, 
    4. et al
    . Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy; aspects study group—Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score. Lancet 2000;355:1670–74
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 43.↵


    1. Pexman  JH, 
    2. Barber  PA, 
    3. Hill  MD, 
    4. et al
    . Use of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) for assessing CT scans in patients with acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1534–42
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 44.↵


    1. Demchuk  AM, 
    2. Coutts  SB
    . Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score in Acute Stroke Triage. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2005;15:409–19, xii
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. 45.↵


    1. Schramm  P, 
    2. Schellinger  PD, 
    3. Fiebach  JB, 
    4. et al
    . Comparison of CT and CT angiography source images with diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute stroke within 6 hours after onset. Stroke 2002;33:2426–32
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 46.↵


    1. Schramm  P, 
    2. Schellinger  PD, 
    3. Klotz  E, 
    4. et al
    . Comparison of perfusion computed tomography and computed tomography angiography source images with perfusion-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute stroke of less than 6 hours' duration. Stroke 2004;35:1652–58
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 47.↵


    1. Sharma  M, 
    2. Fox  AJ, 
    3. Symons  S, 
    4. et al
    . CT angiographic source images: flow- or volume-weighted? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:359–64
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 48.↵


    1. Chalela  JA, 
    2. Kidwell  CS, 
    3. Nentwich  LM, 
    4. et al
    . Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute stroke: a prospective comparison. Lancet 2007;369:293–98
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. 49.↵


    1. Fiebach  JB, 
    2. Schellinger  PD, 
    3. Jansen  O, 
    4. et al
    . CT and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in randomized order: diffusion-weighted imaging results in higher accuracy and lower interrater variability in the diagnosis of hyperacute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2002;33:2206–10
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 50.↵


    1. González  RG, 
    2. Schaefer  PW, 
    3. Buonanno  FS, 
    4. et al
    . Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: diagnostic accuracy in patients imaged within 6 hours of stroke symptom onset. Radiology 1999;210:155–62
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. 51.↵


    1. Kucharczyk  J, 
    2. Mintorovitch  J, 
    3. Asgari  HS, 
    4. et al
    . Diffusion/perfusion MR imaging of acute cerebral ischemia. Magn Reson Med 1991;19:311–15
    PubMed
  53. 52.↵


    1. Warach  S, 
    2. Gaa  J, 
    3. Siewert  B, 
    4. et al
    . Acute human stroke studied by whole brain echo planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 1995;37:231–41
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. 53.↵


    1. Brazzelli  M, 
    2. Sandercock  PA, 
    3. Chappell  FM, 
    4. et al
    . Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for detection of acute vascular lesions in patients presenting with stroke symptoms. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009:CD007424
  55. 54.↵


    1. Lövblad  KO, 
    2. Laubach  HJ, 
    3. Baird  AE, 
    4. et al
    . Clinical experience with diffusion-weighted MR in patients with acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1061–66
    Abstract
  56. 55.↵


    1. Marks  MP, 
    2. de Crespigny  A, 
    3. Lentz  D, 
    4. et al
    . Acute and chronic stroke: navigated spin-echo diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 1996;199:403–08
    PubMedWeb of Science
  57. 56.↵


    1. Kidwell  CS, 
    2. Alger  JR, 
    3. Di Salle  F, 
    4. et al
    . Diffusion MRI in patients with transient ischemic attacks. Stroke 1999;30:1174–80
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  58. 57.↵


    1. Ay  H, 
    2. Buonanno  FS, 
    3. Rordorf  G, 
    4. et al
    . Normal diffusion-weighted MRI during stroke-like deficits. Neurology 1999;52:1784–92
    CrossRef
  59. 58.↵


    1. Barber  PA, 
    2. Darby  DG, 
    3. Desmond  PM, 
    4. et al
    . Identification of major ischemic change: diffusion-weighted imaging versus computed tomography. Stroke 1999;30:2059–65
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  60. 59.↵


    1. Lee  LJ, 
    2. Kidwell  CS, 
    3. Alger  J, 
    4. et al
    . Impact on stroke subtype diagnosis of early diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance angiography. Stroke 2000;31:1081–89
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  61. 60.↵


    1. Warach  S, 
    2. Pettigrew  LC, 
    3. Dashe  JF, 
    4. et al
    . Effect of citicoline on ischemic lesions as measured by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: Citicoline 010 Investigators. Ann Neurol 2000;48:713–22
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  62. 61.↵


    1. Tong  DC, 
    2. Yenari  MA, 
    3. Albers  GW, 
    4. et al
    . Correlation of perfusion- and diffusion-weighted MRI with NIHSS score in acute (<6.5 hour) ischemic stroke. Neurology 1998;50:864–70
    CrossRef
  63. 62.↵


    1. Lövblad  KO, 
    2. Baird  AE, 
    3. Schlaug  G, 
    4. et al
    . Ischemic lesion volumes in acute stroke by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging correlate with clinical outcome. Ann Neurol 1997;42:164–70
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  64. 63.↵


    1. Latchaw  RE, 
    2. Alberts  MJ, 
    3. Lev  MH, 
    4. et al
    . Recommendations for imaging of acute ischemic stroke: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 2009;40:3646–78
    FREE Full Text
  65. 64.↵


    1. Jauch  E, 
    2. Saver  J, 
    3. Adams  HP, 
    4. et al
    . Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2013;44:870–947
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  66. 65.↵


    1. Kidwell  CS, 
    2. Jahan  R, 
    3. Gornbein  J, 
    4. et al
    . A trial of imaging selection and endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:914–23
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  67. 66.↵


    1. Broderick  JP, 
    2. Palesch  YY, 
    3. Demchuk  AM, 
    4. et al
    . Endovascular therapy after intravenous T-PA versus T-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:893–903
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  68. 67.↵


    1. Ciccone  A, 
    2. Valvassori  L, 
    3. Nichelatti  M, 
    4. et al.
    , for the SYNTHESIS Expansion Investigators. Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:904–13
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  69. 68.↵


    1. Rha  JH, 
    2. Saver  JL
    . The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke outcome: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2007;38:967–73
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  70. 69.↵


    1. Caplan  LR
    . Treatment of acute stroke: still struggling. JAMA 2004;292:1883–85
    CrossRefPubMed
  71. 70.↵


    1. Caplan  LR
    . Stroke thrombolysis: slow progress. Circulation 2006;114:187–90
    FREE Full Text
  72. 71.↵


    1. Saqqur  M, 
    2. Uchino  K, 
    3. Demchuk  AM, 
    4. et al
    . Site of arterial occlusion identified by transcranial Doppler predicts the response to intravenous thrombolysis for stroke. Stroke 2007;38:948–54
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  73. 72.↵


    1. Sims  JR, 
    2. Rordorf  G, 
    3. Smith  EE, 
    4. et al
    . Arterial occlusion revealed by CT angiography predicts NIH stroke score and acute outcomes after IV TPA treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:246–51
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  74. 73.↵


    1. Ogawa  A, 
    2. Mori  E, 
    3. Minematsu  K, 
    4. et al
    . Randomized trial of intraarterial infusion of urokinase within 6 hours of middle cerebral artery stroke: the middle cerebral artery embolism local fibrinolytic intervention trial (MELT) Japan. Stroke 2007;38:2633–39
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  75. 74.↵


    1. Saver  JL
    . Intra-arterial fibrinolysis for acute ischemic stroke: the message of MELT. Stroke 2007;38:2627–28
    FREE Full Text
  76. 75.↵


    1. Marder  VJ, 
    2. Chute  DJ, 
    3. Starkman  S, 
    4. et al
    . Analysis of thrombi retrieved from cerebral arteries of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2006;37:2086–93
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  77. 76.↵


    1. Liebeskind  DS, 
    2. Sanossian  N, 
    3. Yong  WH, 
    4. et al
    . CT and MRI early vessel signs reflect clot composition in acute stroke. Stroke 2011;42:1237–43
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  78. 77.↵


    1. Moftakhar  P, 
    2. English  JD, 
    3. Cooke  DL, 
    4. et al
    . Density of thrombus on admission CT predicts revascularization efficacy in large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2013;44:243–45
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  79. 78.↵


    1. Albers  GW, 
    2. Thijs  VN, 
    3. Wechsler  L, 
    4. et al
    . Magnetic resonance imaging profiles predict clinical response to early reperfusion: the diffusion and perfusion imaging evaluation for understanding stroke evolution (DEFUSE) study. Ann Neurol 2006;60:508–17
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  80. 79.↵


    1. Lansberg  MG, 
    2. Straka  M, 
    3. Kemp  S, 
    4. et al
    . MRI profile and response to endovascular reperfusion after stroke (DEFUSE 2): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:860–67
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  81. 80.↵


    1. Schellinger  PD, 
    2. Bryan  RN, 
    3. Caplan  LR, 
    4. et al
    . Evidence-based guideline: the role of diffusion and perfusion MRI for the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke—report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2010;75:177–85
    CrossRef
  82. 81.↵


    1. Breuer  L, 
    2. Schellinger  PD, 
    3. Huttner  HB, 
    4. et al
    . Feasibility and safety of magnetic resonance imaging-based thrombolysis in patients with stroke on awakening: initial single-centre experience. Int J Stroke 2010;5:68–73
    PubMed
  83. 82.↵


    1. Köhrmann  M, 
    2. Schellinger  PD
    . Stroke-MRI: extending the time-window—recent trials and clinical practice. Int J Stroke 2007;2:53–54
    CrossRefPubMed
  84. 83.↵


    1. Hirai  T, 
    2. Korogi  Y, 
    3. Ono  K, 
    4. et al
    . Prospective evaluation of suspected stenoocclusive disease of the intracranial artery: combined MR angiography and CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:93–101
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  85. 84.↵


    1. Katz  DA, 
    2. Marks  MP, 
    3. Napel  SA, 
    4. et al
    . Circle of Willis: evaluation with spiral CT angiography, MR angiography, and conventional angiography. Radiology 1995;195:445–49
    PubMedWeb of Science
  86. 85.↵


    1. Knauth  M, 
    2. von Kummer  R, 
    3. Jansen  O, 
    4. et al
    . Potential of CT angiography in acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1001–10
    Abstract
  87. 86.↵


    1. Shrier  DA, 
    2. Tanaka  H, 
    3. Numaguchi  Y, 
    4. et al
    . CT angiography in the evaluation of acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1011–20
    Abstract
  88. 87.↵


    1. Wildermuth  S, 
    2. Knauth  M, 
    3. Brandt  T, 
    4. et al
    . Role of CT angiography in patient selection for thrombolytic therapy in acute hemispheric stroke. Stroke 1998;29:935–38
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  89. 88.↵


    1. Verro  P, 
    2. Tanenbaum  LN, 
    3. Borden  NM, 
    4. et al
    . CT angiography in acute ischemic stroke: preliminary results. Stroke 2002;33:276–78
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  90. 89.↵


    1. Graf  J, 
    2. Skutta  B, 
    3. Kuhn  FP, 
    4. et al
    . Computed tomographic angiography findings in 103 patients following vascular events in the posterior circulation: potential and clinical relevance. J Neurol 2000;247:760–66
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  91. 90.↵


    1. Nguyen-Huynh  MN, 
    2. Wintermark  M, 
    3. English  J, 
    4. et al
    . How accurate is CT angiography in evaluating intracranial atherosclerotic disease? Stroke 2008;39:1184–88
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  92. 91.↵


    1. Bash  S, 
    2. Villablanca  JP, 
    3. Jahan  R, 
    4. et al
    . Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusive disease: evaluation with CT angiography, MR angiography, and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1012–21
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  93. 92.↵


    1. Pulli  B, 
    2. Schaefer  PW, 
    3. Hakimelahi  R, 
    4. et al
    . Acute ischemic stroke: infarct core estimation on CT angiography source images depends on CT angiography protocol. Radiology 2012;262:593–604
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  94. 93.↵


    1. Hacke  W, 
    2. Furlan  AJ, 
    3. Al-Rawi  Y, 
    4. et al
    . Intravenous desmoteplase in patients with acute ischaemic stroke selected by MRI perfusion-diffusion weighted imaging or perfusion CT (DIAS-2): a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:141–50
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  95. 94.↵


    1. Davis  SM, 
    2. Donnan  GA, 
    3. Parsons  MW, 
    4. et al
    . Effects of alteplase beyond 3 h after stroke in the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET): a placebo-controlled randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:299–309
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  96. 95.↵


    1. Butcher  KS, 
    2. Parsons  M, 
    3. MacGregor  L, 
    4. et al
    . Refining the perfusion-diffusion mismatch hypothesis. Stroke 2005;36:1153–59
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  97. 96.↵


    1. Parsons  MW, 
    2. Barber  PA, 
    3. Chalk  J, 
    4. et al
    . Diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI response to thrombolysis in stroke. Ann Neurol 2002;51:28–37
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  98. 97.↵


    1. Sorensen  AG, 
    2. Copen  WA, 
    3. Ostergaard  L, 
    4. et al
    . Hyperacute stroke: simultaneous measurement of relative cerebral blood volume, relative cerebral blood flow, and mean tissue transit time. Radiology 1999;210:519–27
    PubMedWeb of Science
  99. 98.↵


    1. Perkins  CJ, 
    2. Kahya  E, 
    3. Roque  CT, 
    4. et al
    . Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI abnormalities in 117 consecutive patients with stroke symptoms. Stroke 2001;32:2774–81
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  100. 99.↵


    1. Furlan  AJ, 
    2. Eyding  D, 
    3. Albers  GW, 
    4. et al
    . Dose escalation of Desmoteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke (DEDAS): evidence of safety and efficacy 3 to 9 hours after stroke onset. Stroke 2006;37:1227–31
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  101. 100.↵


    1. Hacke  W, 
    2. Albers  G, 
    3. Al-Rawi  Y, 
    4. et al
    . The Desmoteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke trial (DIAS): a phase II MRI-based 9-hour window acute stroke thrombolysis trial with intravenous desmoteplase. Stroke 2005;36:66–73
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  102. 101.↵


    1. Lansberg  MG, 
    2. Lee  J, 
    3. Christensen  S, 
    4. et al
    . Rapid automated patient selection for reperfusion therapy: a pooled analysis of the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET) and the Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution (DEFUSE) study. Stroke 2011;42:1608–14
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  103. 102.↵


    1. Mlynash  M, 
    2. Lansberg  MG, 
    3. De Silva  DA, 
    4. et al
    . Refining the definition of the malignant profile: insights from the DEFUSE-EPITHET pooled data set. Stroke 2011;42:1270–75
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  104. 103.↵


    1. Olivot  JM, 
    2. Mlynash  M, 
    3. Thijs  VN, 
    4. et al
    . Optimal Tmax threshold for predicting penumbral tissue in acute stroke. Stroke 2009;40:469–75
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  105. 104.↵


    1. Wintermark  M, 
    2. Flanders  AE, 
    3. Velthuis  B, 
    4. et al
    . Perfusion-CT assessment of infarct core and penumbra: receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in 130 patients suspected of acute hemispheric stroke. Stroke 2006;37:979–85
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  106. 105.↵


    1. Mayer  TE, 
    2. Hamann  GF, 
    3. Baranczyk  J, 
    4. et al
    . Dynamic CT perfusion imaging of acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1441–49
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  107. 106.↵


    1. Bivard  A, 
    2. McElduff  P, 
    3. Spratt  N, 
    4. et al
    . Defining the extent of irreversible brain ischemia using perfusion computed tomography. Cerebrovasc Dis 2011;31:238–45
    CrossRefPubMed
  108. 107.↵


    1. Arakawa  S, 
    2. Wright  PM, 
    3. Koga  M, 
    4. et al
    . Ischemic thresholds for gray and white matter: a diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance study. Stroke 2006;37:1211–16
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  109. 108.↵


    1. Sobesky  J, 
    2. Zaro Weber  O, 
    3. Lehnhardt  FG, 
    4. et al
    . Does the mismatch match the penumbra? Magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography in early ischemic stroke. Stroke 2005;36:980–85
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  110. 109.↵


    1. Bivard  A, 
    2. Levi  C, 
    3. Spratt  N, 
    4. et al
    . Perfusion CT in acute stroke: a comprehensive analysis of infarct and penumbra. Radiology 2013;267:543–50
    CrossRefPubMed
  111. 110.↵


    1. Bivard  A, 
    2. Spratt  N, 
    3. Levi  C, 
    4. et al
    . Perfusion computer tomography: imaging and clinical validation in acute ischaemic stroke. Brain 2011;134:3408–16
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  112. 111.↵


    1. Kamalian  S, 
    2. Kamalian  S, 
    3. Maas  MB, 
    4. et al
    . CT cerebral blood flow maps optimally correlate with admission diffusion-weighted imaging in acute stroke but thresholds vary by postprocessing platform. Stroke 2011;42:1923–28
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  113. 112.↵


    1. Payabvash  S, 
    2. Souza  LC, 
    3. Wang  Y, 
    4. et al
    . Regional ischemic vulnerability of the brain to hypoperfusion: the need for location specific computed tomography perfusion thresholds in acute stroke patients. Stroke 2011;42:1255–60
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  114. 113.↵


    1. Kloska  SP, 
    2. Nabavi  DG, 
    3. Gaus  C, 
    4. et al
    . Acute stroke assessment with CT: do we need multimodal evaluation? Radiology 2004;233:79–86
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  115. 114.↵


    1. Wintermark  M, 
    2. Fischbein  NJ, 
    3. Smith  WS, 
    4. et al
    . Accuracy of dynamic perfusion CT with deconvolution in detecting acute hemispheric stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:104–12
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  116. 115.↵


    1. Scharf  J, 
    2. Brockmann  MA, 
    3. Daffertshofer  M, 
    4. et al
    . Improvement of sensitivity and interrater reliability to detect acute stroke by dynamic perfusion computed tomography and computed tomography angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006;30:105–10
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  117. 116.↵


    1. Keedy  A, 
    2. Soares  B, 
    3. Wintermark  M
    . A pictorial essay of brain perfusion-CT: not every abnormality is a stroke! J Neuroimaging 2012;22:e20–33
    CrossRefPubMed
  118. 117.↵


    1. Tan  JC, 
    2. Dillon  WP, 
    3. Liu  S, 
    4. et al
    . Systematic comparison of perfusion-CT and CT-angiography in acute stroke patients. Ann Neurol 2007;61:533–43
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  119. 118.↵


    1. Ryoo  JW, 
    2. Na  DG, 
    3. Kim  SS, 
    4. et al
    . Malignant middle cerebral artery infarction in hyperacute ischemic stroke: evaluation with multiphasic perfusion computed tomography maps. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004;28:55–62
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  120. 119.↵


    1. Hom  J, 
    2. Dankbaar  JW, 
    3. Soares  BP, 
    4. et al
    . Blood-brain barrier permeability assessed by perfusion CT predicts symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation and malignant edema in acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:41–48
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  121. 120.↵


    1. Bang  OY, 
    2. Saver  JL, 
    3. Kim  SJ, 
    4. et al
    . Collateral flow predicts response to endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2011;42:693–99
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  122. 121.↵


    1. Kim  SJ, 
    2. Seok  JM, 
    3. Bang  OY, 
    4. et al
    . MR mismatch profiles in patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stroke: a comprehensive approach comparing stroke subtypes. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2009;29:1138–45
    CrossRefPubMed
  123. 122.↵


    1. del Zoppo  GJ, 
    2. Sharp  FR, 
    3. Heiss  WD, 
    4. et al
    . Heterogeneity in the penumbra. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2011;31:1836–51
    CrossRefPubMed
  124. 123.↵


    1. Easton  JD, 
    2. Saver  JL, 
    3. Albers  GW, 
    4. et al
    . Definition and evaluation of transient ischemic attack: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; and the Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease—The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this statement as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke 2009;40:2276–93
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  125. 124.↵


    1. Coutts  SB, 
    2. Hill  MD, 
    3. Simon  JE, 
    4. et al
    . Silent ischemia in minor stroke and TIA patients identified on MR imaging. Neurology 2005;65:513–17
    CrossRef
  126. 125.↵


    1. Restrepo  L, 
    2. Jacobs  MA, 
    3. Barker  PB, 
    4. et al
    . Assessment of transient ischemic attack with diffusion- and perfusion-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1645–52
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  127. 126.↵


    1. Cucchiara  BL, 
    2. Messe  SR, 
    3. Taylor  RA, 
    4. et al
    . Is the ABCD score useful for risk stratification of patients with acute transient ischemic attack? Stroke 2006;37:1710–14
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  128. 127.↵


    1. Kang  DW, 
    2. Chalela  JA, 
    3. Ezzeddine  MA, 
    4. et al
    . Association of ischemic lesion patterns on early diffusion-weighted imaging with TOAST stroke subtypes. Arch Neurol 2003;60:1730–34
    CrossRefPubMed
  129. 128.↵


    1. Wessels  T, 
    2. Wessels  C, 
    3. Ellsiepen  A, 
    4. et al
    . Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging in determination of stroke etiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:35–39
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  130. 129.↵


    1. Rovira  A, 
    2. Grive  E, 
    3. Rovira  A, 
    4. et al
    . Distribution territories and causative mechanisms of ischemic stroke. Eur Radiol 2005;15:416–26
    CrossRefPubMed
  131. 130.↵


    1. Mlynash  M, 
    2. Olivot  JM, 
    3. Tong  DC, 
    4. et al
    . Yield of combined perfusion and diffusion MR imaging in hemispheric TIA. Neurology 2009;72:1127–33
    CrossRef
  132. 131.↵


    1. Zaharchuk  G, 
    2. Olivot  JM, 
    3. Fischbein  NJ, 
    4. et al
    . Arterial spin labeling imaging findings in transient ischemic attack patients: comparison with diffusion- and bolus perfusion-weighted imaging. Cerebrovasc Dis 2012;34:221–28
    CrossRefPubMed
  133. 132.↵


    1. Thomalla  G, 
    2. Ebinger  M, 
    3. Fiehler  J, 
    4. et al
    . EU-funded treatment study: WAKE-UP—a randomized, placebo-controlled MRI-based trial of thrombolysis in wake-up stroke [in German]. Nervenarzt 2012;83:1241–51
    CrossRefPubMed
  134. 133.↵


    1. Thomalla  G, 
    2. Cheng  B, 
    3. Ebinger  M, 
    4. et al
    . DWI-FLAIR mismatch for the identification of patients with acute ischaemic stroke within 4.5 h of symptom onset (PRE-FLAIR): a multicentre observational study. Lancet Neurol 2011;10:978–86
    CrossRefPubMed
  135. 134.↵


    1. Kang  DW, 
    2. Kwon  JY, 
    3. Kwon  SU, 
    4. et al
    . Wake-up or unclear-onset strokes: are they waking up to the world of thrombolysis therapy? Int J Stroke 2012;7:311–20
    PubMed
  136. 135.↵


    1. Adams  RJ, 
    2. Albers  G, 
    3. Alberts  MJ, 
    4. et al
    . Update to the AHA/ASA recommendations for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack. Stroke 2008;39:1647–52
    FREE Full Text
  137. 136.↵


    1. Buskens  E, 
    2. Nederkoorn  PJ, 
    3. Buijs-Van Der Woude  T, 
    4. et al
    . Imaging of carotid arteries in symptomatic patients: cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies. Radiology 2004;233:101–12
    PubMedWeb of Science
  138. 137.↵


    1. Lovett  JK, 
    2. Dennis  MS, 
    3. Sandercock  PA, 
    4. et al
    . Very early risk of stroke after a first transient ischemic attack. Stroke 2003;34:e138–140
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  139. 138.↵


    1. Rothwell  PM, 
    2. Giles  MF, 
    3. Flossmann  E, 
    4. et al
    . A simple score (ABCD) to identify individuals at high early risk of stroke after transient ischaemic attack. Lancet 2005;366:29–36
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  140. 139.↵


    1. Blakeley  DD, 
    2. Oddone  EZ, 
    3. Hasselblad  V, 
    4. et al
    . Noninvasive carotid artery testing: a meta-analytic review. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:360–67
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  141. 140.↵


    1. Long  A, 
    2. Lepoutre  A, 
    3. Corbillon  E, 
    4. et al
    . Critical review of non- or minimally invasive methods (duplex ultrasonography, MR- and CT-angiography) for evaluating stenosis of the proximal internal carotid artery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002;24:43–52
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  142. 141.↵


    1. Randoux  B, 
    2. Marro  B, 
    3. Koskas  F, 
    4. et al
    . Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. Radiology 2001;220:179–85
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  143. 142.↵


    1. Johnston  DC, 
    2. Goldstein  LB
    . Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making: noninvasive vascular imaging versus angiography. Neurology 2001;56:1009–15
    CrossRef
  144. 143.↵


    1. Nederkoorn  PJ, 
    2. Mali  WP, 
    3. Eikelboom  BC, 
    4. et al
    . Preoperative diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of noninvasive testing. Stroke 2002;33:2003–08
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  145. 144.↵


    1. Lev  MH, 
    2. Romero  JM, 
    3. Goodman  DN, 
    4. et al
    . Total occlusion versus hairline residual lumen of the internal carotid arteries: accuracy of single section helical CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1123–29
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  


  
  



  




  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

     Back to top  


  
  



			

		

		
		

			

			  

  
        
In this issue

    
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

  

    

  
      
  
  

    


Advertisement



  



  


  
  



  



  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

	  
  

		

          

            

  
      
  
  

     Print  


  
  



  
      
  
  

     Download PDF  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
 Email Article
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
 Citation Tools
  


  
  



          

        

        
        

          

            



  
      
  
  

    

  

    

  
      
  
  

    

  
  
  
  
      
Imaging Recommendations for Acute Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack Patients: A Joint Statement by the American Society of Neuroradiology, the American College of Radiology, and the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery
  
    	
M. Wintermark, P.C. Sanelli, G.W. Albers, J. Bello, C. Derdeyn, S.W. Hetts, M.H. Johnson, C. Kidwell, M.H. Lev, D.S. Liebeskind, H. Rowley, P.W. Schaefer, J.L. Sunshine, G. Zaharchuk, C.C. Meltzer

  
    	
 American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2013, 34 (11) E117-E127; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3690 

  
  
  



  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

  
    
  
  
    
  
  
    
  


  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  


  
  



  



  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
  


  
  



          

        

	
 	
	
	


  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
              Purchase  


  
  



  
        
Jump to section

    
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

  

    
 Related Articles
  • No related articles found.
 Cited By...
 More in this TOC Section
 Similar Articles

  



  


  
  



			

		

	
	
 	
	
	


    

  



  

                
    

      

  

    

  
      
  
  

    


Advertisement