1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => FreeToRead
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)


  
    














































































































    Radiation Risk Due to Shunted Hydrocephalus and the Role of MR Imaging–Safe Programmable Valves | American Journal of Neuroradiology  
    



















    































    
  
  




    
    

  

      


    

      

  
  
  

    

  

    

  

                
    

      

  

    

  
      
  
  

    


Advertisement



  



  


  
  



  



    

  


  


  


  
  
  
  
  
  

  	      



          


    
      

    
  
    
        
    

  

    
                        

  

                
    

      

	  

		
		

			

			  

  
      
  
  

    

  
  
      
EditorialEditorials

  
      

  
      
Radiation Risk Due to Shunted Hydrocephalus and the Role of MR Imaging–Safe Programmable Valves
  
    	
S. Krishnamurthy, B. Schmidt and M.D. Tichenor

  
    	
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2013,  34 (4) 695-697; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3334 

  
  
  



  


  
  



			

		

	
	
 	
	  
  

		
		

			

			  

  
      
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

  

    

  
      
  
  

    
References
  1. 1.↵


    1. Mpakopoulou  M, 
    2. Brotis  AG, 
    3. Gatos  H, 
    4. et al
    . Ten years of clinical experience in the use of fixed-pressure versus programmable valves: a retrospective study of 159 patients. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2012;113:25–28
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵


    1. Griebel  R, 
    2. Khan  M, 
    3. Tan  L
    . CSF shunt complications: an analysis of contributory factors. Childs Nerv Syst 1985;1:77–80
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵


    1. Bondurant  CP, 
    2. Jimenez  DF
    . Epidemiology of cerebrospinal fluid shunting. Pediatr Neurosurg 2002;32:700–06
  4. 4.↵


    1. Patwardhan  RV, 
    2. Nanda  A
    . Implanted ventricular shunts in the United States: the billion-dollar-a-year cost of hydrocephalus treatment. Neurosurgery 2005;56:139–44
    PubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵


    1. Stein  SC, 
    2. Guo  W
    . Have we made progress in preventing shunt failure? A critical analysis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2008;1:40–47
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵


    1. Kestle  J, 
    2. Drake  J, 
    3. Milner  R, 
    4. et al
    . Long-term follow-up data from the shunt design trial. Pediatr Neurosurg 2000;33:230–36
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵


    1. Page  SJ, 
    2. Sisto  SA, 
    3. Levine  P, 
    4. et al
    . Modified constraint induced therapy: a randomized feasibility and efficacy study. J Rehabil Res Dev 2001;38:583–90
    PubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵


    1. Pople  IK
    . Hydrocephalus and shunts: what the neurologist should know. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;73(suppl 1);i17–22
    FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵


    1. Rice  HE, 
    2. Frush  DP, 
    3. Farmer  D, 
    4. et al
    . Review of radiation risks from computed tomography: essentials for the pediatric surgeon. J PediatrSurg 2007;42:603–07
  10. 10.↵


    1. Hall  EJ
    . Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Pediatr Radiol 2002;32:700–06
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵


    1. Mettler  FA, 
    2. Huda  W, 
    3. Yoshizumi  TT, 
    4. et al
    . Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 2008;248:254–63
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵


    1. Garton  HJ, 
    2. Kestle  JR, 
    3. Drake  JM
    . Predicting shunt failure on the basis of clinical symptoms and signs in children. J Neurosurg 2001;94:202–10
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵


    1. Strauss  KJ, 
    2. Goske  MJ, 
    3. Kaste  SC, 
    4. et al
    . Image gently: ten steps you can take to optimize image quality and lower CT dose for pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:868–73
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵


    1. Hall  EJ, 
    2. Brenner  DJ
    . Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Br J Radiol 2008;81:362–78
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵


    National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States (2009): NCRP Report No. 160. Bethesda, Maryland: NCRP; 142–46
  16. 16.↵


    1. Firestine  K
    . CT dose reduction in pediatric patients. Radiol Manage 2011;33:40–44
    PubMed
  17. 17.↵


    1. Koenig  TR, 
    2. Wolff  D, 
    3. Mettler  FA, 
    4. et al
    . Skin injuries from fluoroscopically guided procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:3–11
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵


    1. Krauss  JK, 
    2. Regel  JP, 
    3. Vach  W, 
    4. et al
    . Vascular risk factors and arteriosclerotic disease in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus of the elderly. Stroke 1996;27:24–29
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵


    1. Holmberg  O, 
    2. Malone  J, 
    3. Rehani  M, 
    4. et al
    . Current issues and actions in radiation protection of patients. Eur J Radiol 2010;76:15–19
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵


    1. Berrington de González  A, 
    2. Mahesh  M, 
    3. Kim  KP, 
    4. et al
    . Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:2071–77
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵


    1. Meer  AB, 
    2. Basu  PA, 
    3. Baker  LC, 
    4. et al
    . Atlas SW exposure to ionizing radiation and estimate of secondary cancers in the era of high-speed CT scanning: projections from the Medicare population. J Am Coll Radiol 2012;9:245–50
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵


    1. Pearce  MS, 
    2. Salotti  JA, 
    3. Little  MP, 
    4. et al
    . Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. The Lancet 2012;380:499–505
  23. 23.↵


    ICRP. Managing Patient Dose in Computed Tomography: ICRP Publication 87. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science; 2002
  24. 24.↵


    1. Engelbrecht  V, 
    2. Malms  J, 
    3. Kahn  T, 
    4. et al
    . Fast spin-echo MR imaging of the pediatric brain. Pediatr Radiol 1996;26:259–64
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵


    1. Penzkofer  AK, 
    2. Pfluger  T, 
    3. Pochmann  Y, 
    4. et al
    . MR imaging of the brain in pediatric patients: diagnostic value of HASTE sequences. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:509–14
    PubMed
  26. 26.↵


    1. Forbes  KP, 
    2. Pipe  JG, 
    3. Karis  JP, 
    4. et al
    . Brain imaging in the unsedated patient: comparison of periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction and single-shot fast spin-echo sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:794–98
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵


    1. Ashley  WW  Jr., 
    2. McKinstry  RC, 
    3. Leonard  JR, 
    4. et al
    . Use of rapid-sequence magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of hydrocephalus in children. J Neurosurg 2005;103(2 suppl):124–30
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵


    1. Iskandar  BJ, 
    2. Sansone  JM, 
    3. Medow  J, 
    4. et al
    . The use of quick-brain magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of shunt-treated hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 2004;101(2 suppl):147–51
    PubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵


    1. Liang  L, 
    2. Korogi  Y, 
    3. Sugahara  T, 
    4. et al
    . Detection of intracranial hemorrhage with susceptibility-weighted MR sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1527–34
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵


    1. Jones  KM, 
    2. Mulkern  RV, 
    3. Mantello  MT
    . Brain hemorrhage: evaluation with fast spin-echo and conventional dual spin-echo images. Radiology 1992;182:53–58
    PubMed
  31. 31.↵


    1. Miller  JH, 
    2. Walkiewicz  T, 
    3. Towbin  RB, 
    4. et al
    . Improved delineation of ventricular shunt catheters using fast steady-state gradient recalled-echo sequences in a rapid brain MR imaging protocol in nonsedated pediatric patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:430–35
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵


    1. Shellock  FG, 
    2. Wilson  SF, 
    3. Mauge  CP
    . Magnetically programmable shunt valve: MRI at 3-Tesla. Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:1116–21
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵


    1. Nakashima  K, 
    2. Nakajo  T, 
    3. Kawamo  M, 
    4. et al
    . Programmable shunt valves: in vitro assessment of safety of the magnetic field generated by a portable game machine. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2011;51:635–38
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵


    1. Nomura  S, 
    2. Fujisawa  H, 
    3. Suzuki  M
    . Effect of cell phone magnetic fields on adjustable cerebrospinal fluid shunt valves. Surg Neurol 2005;63:467–68
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵


    1. Schneider  T, 
    2. Knauff  U, 
    3. Nitsch  J, 
    4. et al
    . Electromagnetic field hazards involving adjustable shunt valves in hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 2002;96:331–34
    CrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵


    1. Lavinio  A, 
    2. Harding  S, 
    3. Boogaard  FV, 
    4. et al
    . Magnetic field interactions in adjustable hydrocephalus shunts. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2008;2:222–28
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵


    1. Strahle  J, 
    2. Selzer  BJ, 
    3. Muraszko  KM, 
    4. et al
    . Programmable shunt valve affected by exposure to a tablet computer. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2012;10:118–20
    CrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵


    1. Anderson  RC, 
    2. Walker  ML, 
    3. Viner  JM, 
    4. et al
    . Adjustment and malfunction of a programmable valve after exposure to toy magnets: case report. J Neurosurg 2004;101(2 suppl):222–25
    PubMed
  39. 39.↵


    1. Turner  SG, 
    2. Hall  WA
    . Programmable shunt-related suicide attempt. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006;148:1307–10, discussion 1310
    CrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵


    1. Kataria  R, 
    2. Kumar  V, 
    3. Mehta  VS
    . Programmable valve shunts: are they really better? Turk Neurosurg 2012;22:237–38
    PubMed
  41. 41.↵


    1. Lavinio  A, 
    2. Harding  S, 
    3. Boogaard  FVD, 
    4. et al
    . Magnetic field interactions in adjustable hydrocephalus shunts. J Neurosurg Pediatrics 2008;2:222–28
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵


    1. Frank  E, 
    2. Buonocore  M, 
    3. Hein  L
    . Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of extremely slow flow in a shunt model system. Childs Nerv Syst 1992;8:73–75
    CrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵


    1. Gideon  P, 
    2. Stahlberg  F, 
    3. Thomsen  C, 
    4. et al
    . Cerebral fluid flow and production in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus studied by MRI. Neuroradiology 1994;36:210–15
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵


    1. Lee  JH, 
    2. Lee  HK, 
    3. Kim  JK, 
    4. et al
    . CSF flow quantification of the cerebral aqueduct in normal volunteers using phase contrast cine MR imaging. Korean J Radiol 2004;5:81–86
    PubMed
  


  
  



  




  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

     Back to top  


  
  



			

		

		
		

			

			  

  
        
In this issue

    
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

  

    

  
      
  
  

    


Advertisement



  



  


  
  



  



  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

	  
  

		

          

            

  
      
  
  

     Print  


  
  



  
      
  
  

     Download PDF  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
 Email Article
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
 Citation Tools
  


  
  



          

        

        
        

          

            



  
      
  
  

    

  

    

  
      
  
  

    

  
  
  
  
      
Radiation Risk Due to Shunted Hydrocephalus and the Role of MR Imaging–Safe Programmable Valves
  
    	
S. Krishnamurthy, B. Schmidt, M.D. Tichenor

  
    	
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2013, 34 (4) 695-697; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3334 

  
  
  



  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

  
    
  
  
    
  
  
    
  


  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  


  
  



  



  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
  


  
  



          

        

	
 	
	
	


  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
              Purchase  


  
  



  
        
Jump to section

    
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

  

    
 Related Articles
  • No related articles found.
 Cited By...
 More in this TOC Section
 Similar Articles

  



  


  
  



			

		

	
	
 	
	
	


    

  



  

                
    

      

  

    

  
      
  
  

    


Advertisement