1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => FreeToRead
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)


  
    

























































































    Toward Improving Fidelity of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations: Boundary Conditions Matter | American Journal of Neuroradiology  
    



















    































    
  
  




    
    

  

      


    

      

  
  
  

    

  

    

  

                
    

      

  

    

  
      
  
  

    


Advertisement



  



  


  
  



  



    

  


  


  


  
  
  
  
  
  

  	      


    
      

    
  
    
        
    

  

    
                        

  

                
    

      

	  

		
		

			

			  

  
      
  
  

    

  
  
      
Article CommentaryInterventional

  
      

  
      
Toward Improving Fidelity of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations: Boundary Conditions Matter
  
    	
Christof Karmonik

  
    	
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2014,  35 (8) 1549-1550; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3984 

  
  
  



  


  
  



			

		

	
	
 	
	  
  

		
		

			

			  

  
      
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

  

    

  
      
  
  

    
REFERENCES
  1. 1.↵


    1. Jansen  IG, 
    2. Schneiders  JJ, 
    3. Potters  WV, 
    4. et al
    . Generalized versus patient-specific inflow boundary conditions in computational fluid dynamics simulations of cerebral aneurysmal hemodynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1543–48
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵


    1. Karmonik  C, 
    2. Yen  C, 
    3. Diaz  O, 
    4. et al
    . Temporal variations of wall shear stress parameters in intracranial aneurysms–importance of patient-specific inflow waveforms for CFD calculations. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010;152:1391–98; discussion 1398
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵


    1. Karmonik  C, 
    2. Yen  C, 
    3. Grossman  RG, 
    4. et al
    . Intra-aneurysmal flow patterns and wall shear stresses calculated with computational flow dynamics in an anterior communicating artery aneurysm depend on knowledge of patient-specific inflow rates. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2009;151:479–85; discussion 485
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵


    1. Venugopal  P, 
    2. Valentino  D, 
    3. Schmitt  H, 
    4. et al
    . Sensitivity of patient-specific numerical simulation of cerebal aneurysm hemodynamics to inflow boundary conditions. J Neurosurg 2007;106:1051–60
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵


    1. Marzo  A, 
    2. Singh  P, 
    3. Larrabide  I, 
    4. et al
    . Computational hemodynamics in cerebral aneurysms: the effects of modeled versus measured boundary conditions. Ann Biomed Eng 2011;39:884–96
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵


    1. Burleson  AC, 
    2. Strother  CM, 
    3. Turitto  VT
    . Computer modeling of intracranial saccular and lateral aneurysms for the study of their hemodynamics. Neurosurgery 1995;37:774–82; discussion 782–84
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵


    1. Byrne  G, 
    2. Mut  F, 
    3. Cebral  J
    . Quantifying the large-scale hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:333–38
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵


    1. Cebral  JR, 
    2. Mut  F, 
    3. Weir  J, 
    4. et al
    . Association of hemodynamic characteristics and cerebral aneurysm rupture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:264–70
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵


    1. Jou  LD, 
    2. Lee  DH, 
    3. Morsi  H, 
    4. et al
    . Wall shear stress on ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms at the internal carotid artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1761–67
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵


    1. Jiang  J, 
    2. Strother  C
    . Computational fluid dynamics simulations of intracranial aneurysms at varying heart rates: a “patient-specific” study. J Biomech Eng 2009;131:091001
  11. 11.↵


    1. Ford  MD, 
    2. Stuhne  GR, 
    3. Nikolov  HN, 
    4. et al
    . Virtual angiography for visualization and validation of computational models of aneurysm hemodynamics. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2005;24:1586–92
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵


    1. Endres  J, 
    2. Kowarschik  M, 
    3. Redel  T, 
    4. et al
    . A workflow for patient-individualized virtual angiogram generation based on CFD simulation. Comput Math Methods Med 2012;2012:306765
    PubMed
  13. 13.↵


    1. Sun  Q, 
    2. Groth  A, 
    3. Bertram  M, 
    4. et al
    . Phantom-based experimental validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations on cerebral aneurysms. Med Phys 2010;37:5054–65
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵


    1. Sun  Q, 
    2. Groth  A, 
    3. Aach  T
    . Comprehensive validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations of in-vivo blood flow in patient-specific cerebral aneurysms. Med Phys 2012;39:742–54
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵


    1. Karmonik  C, 
    2. Klucznik  R, 
    3. Benndorf  G
    . Blood flow in cerebral aneurysms: comparison of phase contrast magnetic resonance and computational fluid dynamics–preliminary experience. Rofo 2008;180:209–15
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵


    1. Karmonik  C, 
    2. Klucznik  R, 
    3. Benndorf  G
    . Comparison of velocity patterns in an AComA aneurysm measured with 2D phase contrast MRI and simulated with CFD. Technol Health Care 2008;16:119–28
    PubMed
  17. 17.↵


    1. Boussel  L, 
    2. Rayz  V, 
    3. Martin  A, 
    4. et al
    . Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements in intracranial aneurysms in vivo of flow patterns, velocity fields, and wall shear stress: comparison with computational fluid dynamics. Magn Reson Med 2009;61:409–17
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵


    1. Rayz  VL, 
    2. Boussel  L, 
    3. Acevedo-Bolton  G, 
    4. et al
    . Numerical simulations of flow in cerebral aneurysms: comparison of CFD results and in vivo MRI measurements. J Biomed Eng 2008;130:051011
  19. 19.↵


    1. Berg  P, 
    2. Stucht  D, 
    3. Janiga  G, 
    4. et al
    . Cerebral blood flow in a healthy circle of Willis and two intracranial aneurysms: computational fluid dynamics versus 4D phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. J Biomed Eng 2014;136:041003
  20. 20.↵


    1. Jiang  J, 
    2. Johnson  K, 
    3. Valen-Sendstad  K, 
    4. et al
    . Flow characteristics in a canine aneurysm model: a comparison of 4D accelerated phase-contrast MR measurements and computational fluid dynamics simulations. Med Phys 2011;38:6300–12
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵


    1. Cebral  JR, 
    2. Meng  H
    . Counterpoint: realizing the clinical utility of computational fluid dynamics–closing the gap. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:396–98
    FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵


    1. Kallmes  DF
    . Point: CFD–computational fluid dynamics or confounding factor dissemination. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:395–96
    FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵


    1. Strother  CM, 
    2. Jiang  J
    . Intracranial aneurysms, cancer, x-rays, and computational fluid dynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:991–92
    FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵


    1. Hentschel  S, 
    2. Mardal  KA, 
    3. Lovgren  AE, 
    4. et al
    . Characterization of cyclic CSF flow in the foramen magnum and upper cervical spinal canal with MR flow imaging and computational fluid dynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:997–1002
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵


    1. Linge  SO, 
    2. Mardal  KA, 
    3. Haughton  V, 
    4. et al
    . Simulating CSF flow dynamics in the normal and the Chiari I subarachnoid space during rest and exertion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:41–45
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵


    1. Karmonik  C, 
    2. Chintalapani  G, 
    3. Redel  T, 
    4. et al
    . Hemodynamics at the ostium of cerebral aneurysms with relation to post-treatment changes by a virtual flow diverter: a computational fluid dynamics study. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2013;2013:1895–98
    PubMed
  


  
  



  




  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

     Back to top  


  
  



			

		

		
		

			

			  

  
        
In this issue

    
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

  

    

  
      
  
  

    


Advertisement



  



  


  
  



  



  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

	  
  

		

          

            

  
      
  
  

     Print  


  
  



  
      
  
  

     Download PDF  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
 Email Article
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
 Citation Tools
  


  
  



          

        

        
        

          

            



  
      
  
  

    

  

    

  
      
  
  

    

  
  
  
  
      
Toward Improving Fidelity of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations: Boundary Conditions Matter
  
    	
Christof Karmonik

  
    	
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2014, 35 (8) 1549-1550; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3984 

  
  
  



  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

  
    
  
  
    
  
  
    
  


  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  


  
  



  



  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
  


  
  



          

        

	
 	
	
	


  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
              Purchase  


  
  



  
        
Jump to section

    
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
  


  
  



			

		

	
	
 	
	
	


    

  



  

                
    

      

  

    

  
      
  
  

    


Advertisement