Intratympanic Contrast in the Evaluation of Menière Disease: Understanding the Limits

J. Bykowski; J.P. Harris; M. Miller; J. Du; M.F. Mafee

doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4277

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Studies describing endolymphatic hydrops in Menière disease after off-label intratympanic gadolinium-based contrast have been limited by long acquisition times. We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of post-intratympanic imaging on a 3T MR imaging system within a clinically tolerable acquisition time and to address potential pitfalls in acquisition or interpretation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: FDA Investigational New Drug 115,342 and institutional review board approval were obtained for intratympanic injection of 8-fold diluted Gd-DTPA into the more symptomatic ear of 6 adults with Menière disease. 3T MR imaging was performed using a 3-inch surface coil before and up to 28 hours after injection using FLAIR to define the nonenhancing endolymphatic space within the enhancing perilymph. Variable FLAIR TI images were used to determine the impact of fluid-suppression on interpretation. Image quality was assessed for perilymphatic and extralabyrinthine contrast enhancement, definition of endolymphatic anatomy, and other anatomic variants or pathologic findings.

RESULTS: The surface coil afforded 0.375 × 0.375 mm in-plane FLAIR resolution in <4 minutes 30 seconds, sufficient to perceive the nonenhancing spiral lamina, interscalar septa, and endolymphatic structures. Coronal views highlighted a potential interpretation pitfall of vestibular endolymphatic distention overestimation due to partial volume averaging. Varying FLAIR TI resulted in visible changes in the perception of the cochlear endolymphatic space. CSF enhancement was detectable at the internal auditory canal fundus on the injected side in half of the patients, which may confound interpretation.

CONCLUSIONS: Using a surface coil preserves high resolution within a clinically acceptable acquisition time. Pitfalls remain regarding the interpretation of these images and optimizing protocols across platforms in the absence of a clear internal reference for standardization.

ABBREVIATIONS:

IAC: internal auditory canal
GBCA: gadolinium-based contrast agents
IT: intratympanic

Menière disease can be debilitating due to the severity and unpredictability of symptom onset.¹ Currently, routine MR imaging plays a supportive role in the evaluation of these patients, mainly by excluding alternative diagnoses. The translation of intratympanic (IT) gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) in animal models of endolymphatic hydrops^{2⇓⇓⇓–6} into the evaluation of membranous labyrinthine spaces in human patients with Menière disease was pioneered by Nakashima et al.^7⇓–9 Following IT injection, contrast diffuses through the round window membrane and also likely though the oval window, resulting in perilymphatic space enhancement, while the endolymphatic space remains nonenhancing. The underlying premise is that increased production or impaired clearance of endolymph from the scala media results in deflection of the imaging-occult Reissner membrane into the perilymphatic space of the scala vestibuli.

Studies of IT injections at other centers have demonstrated that the endolymphatic space is conspicuously distended in patients with Menière disease and less commonly in other causes of sensorineural hearing loss.^10,11 Most interesting, endolymphatic distention characterized by these methods has been demonstrated in 20%–65% of contralateral asymptomatic ears in patients with Menière disease via IT or IV-GBCA methods,^12⇓–14 furthering the debate regarding imaging overestimation or clinical underestimation of Menière disease.

A variety of sequences has been used to evaluate the ear following IT injection of GBCA, including 3D real inversion recovery,^8,15 3D-inversion recovery TSE,¹⁶ and 3D sampling perfection with application-optimized contrast using different flip angle evolutions FLAIR,¹² with versions of 3D FLAIR techniques most commonly used.^7,17⇓–19 While the availability of 32-channel head coils has improved resolution to 0.4 × 0.4 × 0.8 mm, these volumetric sequences come at the cost of time, requiring up to 15 minutes for an acquisition, with potential for motion degradation and decreased SNR due to parallel imaging techniques.^20,21 A recent publication has shown reduced acquisition time to 5 minutes 26 seconds but at the cost of resolution, achieving only 0.7 × 0.7 × 0.8 mm.¹¹

The aims of our study were to optimize resolution of post-IT contrast images within a clinically reasonable acquisition time on a clinical 3T scanner and to address potential pitfalls in acquisition or interpretation that should be considered as research continues into this methodology.

Materials and Methods

Participants

A 39-year-old healthy, asymptomatic adult volunteer man was recruited for noncontrast MR imaging as part of sequence optimization. Six adult patients with clinically diagnosed Menière disease and symptoms refractory to therapy were recruited from our neurotology clinic. Demographics, symptoms, and audiometric findings are summarized in Table 1. Exclusions to participation included contraindications to MR imaging or GBCA. Diuretics were not stopped for this study. All 6 patients had recent (<6 month prior) bilateral audiograms, and repeat audiometric evaluation of the symptomatic ear was performed within 1 week post-IT GBCA.

View this table:

Table 1:

Participant demographics

IT Injection

Under the auspices of FDA Investigational New Drug 115,342 and institutional review board approval, IT injection of the more symptomatic ear was performed by neurotology faculty or by neurotology fellows under direct faculty supervision. The external auditory canal was cleaned, the tympanic membrane of the more symptomatic ear was anesthetized with phenol, and a small vent hole was made by using a 23-ga spinal needle. A 1-mL syringe of 1:7 volume/volume Gd-DTPA (Magnevist; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Wayne, New Jersey) contrast from single-use vials diluted in sterile saline was hand-warmed to minimize caloric side effects. A total of 0.4–0.5 mL of the solution was injected into the tympanic cavity under direct visualization, until reflux occurred. The patient remained in a lateral decubitus position with the injected ear up for 30 minutes to facilitate contrast diffusion into the perilymphatic space. During this time, the patient was instructed to spit instead of swallowing saliva, to minimize drainage of tympanic contrast into the Eustachian tube.

Imaging

MR imaging was performed on a 3T TwinSpeed MR imaging system (Signa Excite HD; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) by using an 8-channel head coil and a 3-inch surface coil centered over the temporomandibular joint. The primary sequence for optimization was FLAIR, with T1 and FIESTA sequences then prescribed for anatomic correlation. Parameters used clinically with the 8-channel head coil were adapted to the reduced FOV of the 3-inch surface coil while scanning the healthy volunteer subject with serial scans altering the matrix, number of excitations, section thickness, TR, and TI, with the goal of achieving at least 0.4-mm in-plane resolution in <5-minute acquisition time. Because contrast to noise could not be easily assessed on the noncontrast FLAIR sequence, emphasis was placed on appropriate fluid suppression in the internal auditory canals and labyrinthine structures. Scan parameters are summarized in Table 1.

The 6 enrolled participants underwent imaging of the more symptomatic temporal bone by using the 3-inch surface coil 20–28 hours after IT contrast injection, by using FLAIR, T1, and FIESTA sequences detailed in Table 1. The following variables were then introduced to assess the potential impact on scan schedule or interpretation: 1) Three participants also were scanned with the surface coil within 2 hours post-IT injection to assess the extent of contrast diffusion into the perilymph. 2) In 2 participants, FLAIR TI was varied from 2000 to 2800 ms during the 20- to 28-hour post-IT delayed surface coil scan session to assess the impact of variable fluid suppression on the interpretation of endolymphatic distention. 3) In 1 participant, dedicated coronal imaging was performed by using the surface coil FLAIR sequence for orthogonal evaluation; this was incomplete on a second patient due to a technical issue that ended the scanning session. Additionally, all 6 participants had imaging of the bilateral temporal bones with the 8-channel head coil by using FLAIR, FIESTA, and pre- and post-IV contrast T1 sequences (Table 1) to evaluate any regional anatomic variants or other pathology. In 2 patients, this was before any IT contrast; in 1 patient, it was within 2 hours after IT contrast injection (due to scheduling complications precluding pre-IT injection scanning); and in 3 patients, it occurred 20–28 hours after IT contrast injection.

Assessment

Participants were asked to describe any discomfort associated with the IT injection, IV injection, or scanning session (comfort, noise, and so forth). Image quality was assessed by 2 neuroradiologists with expertise in head and neck imaging (J.B., M.F.M.) to assess perilymphatic contrast enhancement, the definition of endolymphatic anatomy, any extralabyrinthine contrast enhancement, and other anatomic variants or pathologic findings. Apparent endolymphatic volume on delayed post-IT (20–28 hour) FLAIR images obtained with the surface coil was determined by visual assessment on the PACS workstation and compared with proposed grading scales.^8,13

Results

Four adult female and 2 adult male consenting adults with Menière symptoms refractory to medical therapy participated in this protocol (Table 2). All participants met the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 1995 criteria²² of “Definite Meniere's Disease” with appropriate clinical imaging and audiometry. In-plane resolution of 0.375 × 0.375 mm was achieved for the FLAIR sequence by using the 3-inch surface coil, with a maximum acquisition time of 4 minutes 24 seconds. No scans were degraded by patient motion. There were no procedural complications from intratympanic injection or complications associated with the MR image. Patients reported mild discomfort at the time of phenol anesthesia of the tympanic membrane and a sense of aural fullness post-IT injection. Initially, we accepted audiogram results within the prior 6 months as a baseline. One participant demonstrated a change from mild to moderate low-frequency hearing loss (250–500 Hz) on the post-IT injection audiogram compared with the baseline 5 months prior, with a speech reception threshold change from 15 dB, 96% speech discrimination score threshold, to 20 dB, 96% speech discrimination score. A repeat audiogram 6 weeks after IT contrast and 2 weeks after preplanned IT dexamethasone injection demonstrated a 10-dB hearing improvement at 250 Hz, 15-dB improvement at 500 Hz, and speech reception threshold change of 15 dB, 96% speech discrimination score. The participant had ongoing symptoms since the baseline audiogram; however, we could not exclude any changes possibly attributed to contrast injection. At the patient's last audiogram approximately 11 months later, fluctuation was again noted, now with a speech reception threshold of 10 dB, and a 100% speech discrimination score. Therefore, we revised the protocol to perform audiometry immediately before IT injection. No other audiometric changes between pre- and postinjection were identified in the 3 subsequent participants.

View this table:

Table 2:

MR imaging parameters and schedule^{^a}

Assessment of surface coil FLAIR imaging 20–28 hours after IT injection showed contrast in the perilymphatic spaces of the basal, middle, and apical cochlear turns; vestibule; and semicircular canals of all injected ears (Fig 1), sufficient to visibly discriminate the nonenhancing spiral lamina, interscalar septa, and endolymphatic structures. In the 3 ears that were also imaged with the surface coil within 2 hours post-IT injection, contrast enhancement was only evident in the cochlear basal turn and vestibule. Contrast did not persist within the tympanic cavity in any delayed scans, though contrast was seen within mastoid air cells on the side of injection in 2 patients. Contrast was not evident in the perilymphatic space along the endolymphatic duct, and there was no endolymphatic duct or sac distention in any patient.

Fig 1.

Differentiation of the perilymphatic-versus-endolymphatic spaces is evident when comparing FLAIR (A) and FIESTA images (B) obtained 21 hours after IT injection of 1:7 volume/volume diluted Magnevist contrast with a 3-inch surface coil. The nonenhancing fibro-osseous structures are evident on both sequences: the interscalar septa, separating the basal and middle turns and middle and apical turns (arrows), and the spiral lamina apparatus within each cochlear turn (caret). The FLAIR sequence shows central nonenhancement of the endolymphatic space of the vestibule (A, asterisk) and suggestion of distention of the scala media (A, arrowheads) into the scala vestibuli, whereas on FIESTA image (B), the endolymph and perilymph are both hyperintense and indistinguishable (patient 2).

The nonenhancing endolymphatic space represented 34%–50% of the enhancing vestibule area in 4 ears and >50% in 2 ears. This finding corresponds to mild and moderate vestibular hydrops, respectively, per the proposed Nagoya criteria,⁸ with only the 2 latter cases meeting grade I hydrops per Baráth et al.¹³ All surveyed ears demonstrated distention of the scala media without obliteration of the scala vestibuli, corresponding to mild cochlear hydrops⁹ and grade I hydrops,¹³ respectively. Partial volume effects were evident when comparing axial and coronal planes, which could lead to overestimation of endolymphatic distention in the vestibule, depending on the section profile and thickness of axial images (Fig 2).

Fig 2.

The nonenhancing endolymphatic space (A, arrow) occupies >33% of the area of the vestibule on axial FLAIR image (A) obtained 28 hours after IT GBCA injection, suggesting endolymphatic distention. Coronal FLAIR obtained concurrently (B) demonstrates that the extent of distention of the endolymphatic space is overestimated on the axial view, due to partial volume averaging and section prescription through the membranous utricle (B, arrow). Partial volume averaging also likely contributes to signal heterogeneity within the semicircular canals (A). Arrowheads (B) correspond to the endolymphatic ductal ampullae of the superior and lateral semicircular canals (patient 6).

Variant vascular anatomy was noted in 3 patients, including a prominent vein paralleling the vestibular aqueduct on the symptomatic side (Fig 3), ICA hypoplasia contralateral to the symptomatic side, and a large, high-riding jugular bulb on the symptomatic side, without diverticulum.

Fig 3.

FLAIR imaging performed 28 hours after left IT contrast injection reveals a hyperintense structure (A, arrowhead) extending parallel to the expected course of the vestibular aqueduct (not seen). Comparison with positive-contrast T1-weighted images obtained before IT injection confirms that this structure is an enhancing dural vessel (B and C, arrowheads) coursing parallel to the posterior semicircular canal, extending from the middle cranial fossa to the sigmoid sinus. Correlation with anatomic imaging is imperative to avoid the misinterpretation of dilated endolymphatic space in the vestibular aqueduct (patient 4).

If we kept all other parameters fixed, variation of the TI from 2000 to 2800 on surface coil FLAIR imaging 20–28 hours after IT injection resulted in a visually conspicuous difference of the nonenhancing endolymphatic space. Decreasing fluid suppression resulted in decreased conspicuity of the endolymphatic space in the cochlea at a longer TI (Fig 4).

Fig 4.

The impact of variable fluid suppression is visually evident with direct comparison of FLAIR sequences with TIs of 2000 ms (A and D), 2500 ms (B and E), and 2800 ms (C and F), with all other parameters remaining fixed. The nonenhancing scala media (arrowheads) becomes less conspicuous during this short range of TI (A–C), which may result in altered perception of endolymphatic space distention. Variation corresponding to the larger endolymphatic space in the vestibule (arrows, D–F) is less perceptible with changes in TI (patient 4).

Visual analysis of surface coil FLAIR and T1-weighted imaging 20–28 hours after IT injection revealed clear enhancement in the CSF at the internal auditory canal (IAC) fundus in 1 patient (Fig 5) and subtle enhancement in 2 additional patients. Enhancement was detectable on both FLAIR and T1 images and, therefore, was not attributed to incomplete fluid suppression; additionally, it was only evident at the fundus, not throughout the CSF of the IAC.

Fig 5.

Enhancement is visible at the fundus of the IAC (arrow) on delayed imaging after IT GBCA, conspicuous on FLAIR (A) and T1-weighted imaging (B) in this patient who had profound distention of the endolymphatic space in the basal and middle cochlear turns (arrowheads) (patient 5).

Discussion

The diagnosis of Menière disease may be delayed for years in up to 20% of patients who ultimately receive the diagnosis.¹⁴ Since Mark et al²³ reported asymmetric labyrinthine enhancement after IV contrast in patients with sudden deafness and vertigo, continued technologic advances have improved our ability to resolve the delicate structures of the inner ear. Different methods have been used to assess the membranous labyrinth, with inherent variations among scanner vendors, protocols, coils, and contrast agents. For this project, we focused on 1 promising option by using a 3-inch surface coil 20–28 hours after IT injection of diluted Magnevist. With an acquisition time of <4 minutes 30 seconds for the high-resolution FLAIR sequence, it could be easily added to a routine clinical IAC protocol, achieving better in-plane resolution within less time than any reported protocol to date.

Advantages of using the surface coil include the ability to reduce the FOV with minimization of wrap artifacts due to the inherent limited penetration of the coil, reduced acquisition time compared with 3D techniques, and improved SNR relative to 3D sequences in which acceleration for parallel imaging results in signal loss.^20,21 A limitation of the surface coil is that a 2-mm section thickness was required for optimal signal, requiring precision in the prescription for centering the cochlea and vestibule. This can be overcome with the surface coil by obtaining direct coronal and oblique acquisitions. With the shorter acquisition time per scan, there is less risk of motion degradation that may occur with longer volumetric protocols. These techniques on a GE Healthcare 3T system have not been previously reported, though multiple sites have published series performed on Siemens Verio and Trio 3T scanners (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany),^{10,12,17,18,24⇓–26} progressing from 8- to 32-channel head coils, and techniques have been reproduced on a Philips Achieva 3T system (Best, the Netherlands).²⁷ Because protocols vary across platforms and scanners, development of internal references/controls will be important for accurate characterization of findings. Our results demonstrate the visually conspicuous variation in the suppression of intrinsic endolymphatic fluid signal across a narrow range of TIs. While visual assessment can approximate the extent of fluid suppression through comparison to CSF signal in the IAC or cerebellopontine angle cistern, some method of assessment is important as these protocols are used, to ensure normalization and reproducibility before postprocessing algorithms are applied to the data.^19,28

When one evaluates these protocols for the clinical setting, it is important to consider whether or how this information may change management. There remains interest in using IT GBCA as a surrogate for IT drug delivery, acknowledging differences in chemical composition and molecular weight among different GBCAs, steroids, and gentamicin.²⁹ Poor-to-absent contrast penetration into the perilymph has been reported after IT injection in up to 18% of patients,^9,30 suggesting a means to screen for potential poor responders to IT interventions. Nevertheless, series have not found a reliable correlation between the extent of endolymphatic distention and patient response to subsequent IT steroids,^16,18 and there has been variable correlation between imaging with summating potential/action potential ratios electrocochleography and vestibular-evoked myogenic potential.^17,25,31 These outcomes may be partially due to lack of standardization of criteria for severity based on imaging findings^8,12,13 but also may reflect the spectrum of findings through the range associated with the natural history of Menière disease.

The delayed post-IT injection FLAIR sequence should be interpreted with multiplanar projections, to avoid interpretation errors due to partial volume averaging as illustrated in Fig 2. Additionally, any nonstandard sequences must be reviewed in the context of a full IAC protocol, including fluid-sensitive, DWI, FLAIR, and postcontrast T1 sequences of the entire auditory pathway, to exclude a schwannoma³² or other source of symptoms.

An unexpected finding in our study was the prevalence of enhancement in the CSF at the IAC fundus on 20- to 28-hour post-IT contrast FLAIR and T1 images. This was evident in half of our patients, and although our study group was small, this finding suggests that it may occur more frequently than has been noted in the literature.^7,33,34 This observation prompts caution regarding proceeding directly to delayed postcontrast imaging in the evaluation of suspected Menière disease, to avoid potentially obscuring hemorrhage or protein that may be responsible for symptoms.^10,35 MR imaging 4 hours after IV contrast has been promoted as an alternative, allowing simultaneous evaluation of both ears and not requiring IT injection or institutional review board approval. The 2 methods are complementary in that delayed IV methods reflect blood-labyrinthine barrier integrity, whereas IT methods reflect round window permeability; however, delayed IV methods have reduced contrast to noise. Careful attention to extralabyrinthine enhancement in both delayed IV and IT protocols is necessary for better understanding of the mechanism and significance of increased modiolar permeability and in the context of the timing of imaging for clinical interpretation. Despite the described limitations, the improved resolution and contrast achievable with IT methods should be of particular value as we continue to evaluate the reproducibility of these methods to define the normal and diseased endolymphatic systems.

Conclusions

Using a surface coil with a 3T system affords high-resolution FLAIR imaging of the inner ear after IT contrast administration in a clinically reasonable time. Because these techniques are only an indirect evaluation of endolymphatic distention, however, and not a proved surrogate for Menière symptoms or response to therapy, continued investigation is necessary before use in clinical diagnosis. Evaluation should include correlation with a full IAC protocol to exclude other sources for symptoms, with awareness that diffusion of IT contrast into the CSF in the IAC may mimic or obscure hemorrhage or enhancement. Additionally, work remains to be done to optimize protocols in the absence of a clear internal reference for standardization and to better understand the implications of modiolar permeability.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Sharon Mick, NP, for her help in coordinating patient scheduling.

Footnotes

Disclosures: Julie Bykowski—RELATED: Grant: American Society of Head and Neck Radiology Hanafee Award*; Other: Off-label use of Magnevist contrast per FDA Investigational New Drug 115,342. Mia Miller—UNRELATED: Grants/Grants Pending: Hearing Research Inc*; Travel/Accommodations/Meeting Expenses Unrelated to Activities Listed: resident travel grant,* Mount Zion travel grant.* *Money paid to the institution.
This work was supported by the William Hanafee Award, American Society of Head and Neck Radiology.
Paper previously presented in part at: Annual Meeting of the American Society of Head and Neck Radiology, October 3–7, 2012; Miami Beach, Florida; and American Society of Neuroradiology Annual Meeting and the Foundation of the ASNR Symposium, May 17–22, 2014; Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

REFERENCES

1.↵
Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the diagnosis and evaluation of therapy in Meniere's disease: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Foundation, Inc. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;113:181–85
FREE Full Text
2.↵
2. Counter SA,
3. Bjelke B,
4. Borg E, et al
. Magnetic resonance imaging of the membranous labyrinth during in vivo gadolinium (Gd-DTPA-BMA) uptake in the normal and lesioned cochlea. Neuroreport 2000;11:3979–83
CrossRef PubMed
3.↵
2. Duan M,
3. Bjelke B,
4. Fridberger A, et al
. Imaging of the guinea pig cochlea following round window gadolinium application. Neuroreport 2004;15:1927–30
CrossRef PubMed
4.↵
2. Zou J,
3. Pyykko I,
4. Bjelke B, et al
. Communication between the perilymphatic scalae and spiral ligament visualized by in vivo MRI. Audiol Neurootol 2005;10:145–52
CrossRef PubMed
5.↵
2. Kakigi A,
3. Nishimura M,
4. Takeda T, et al
. Effects of gadolinium injected into the middle ear on the stria vascularis. Acta Otolaryngol 2008;128:841–45
CrossRef PubMed
6.↵
2. Zou J,
3. Poe D,
4. Bolje B, et al
. Visualization of inner ear disorders with MRI in vivo: from animal models to human applications. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2009:22–31
7.↵
2. Nakashima T,
3. Naganawa S,
4. Suguira M, et al
. Visualization of endolymphatic hydrops in patients with Meniere's disease. Laryngoscope 2007;117:415–20
CrossRef PubMed
8.↵
2. Nakashima T,
3. Naganawa S,
4. Pyykko I, et al
. Grading of endolymphatic hydrops using magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2009:5–8
9.↵
2. Nakashima T,
3. Naganawa S,
4. Katayama N, et al
. Clinical significance of endolymphatic imaging after intratympanic gadolinium injection. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2009:9–14
10.↵
2. Sugiura M,
3. Naganawa S,
4. Teranishi M, et al
. Three-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Laryngoscope 2006;116:1451–54
CrossRef PubMed
11.↵
2. Yamazaki M,
3. Naganawa S,
4. Tagaya M, et al
. Comparison of contrast effect on the cochlear perilymph after intratympanic and intravenous gadolinium injection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:773–78
Abstract/FREE Full Text
12.↵
2. Fang ZM,
3. Chen X,
4. Gu X, et al
. A new magnetic resonance imaging scoring system for perilymphatic space appearance after intratympanic gadolinium injection, and its clinical application. J Laryngol Otol 2012;126:454–59
CrossRef PubMed
13.↵
2. Baráth K,
3. Schuknecht B,
4. Naldi AM, et al
. Detection and grading of endolymphatic hydrops in Meniere disease using MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1387–92
Abstract/FREE Full Text
14.↵
2. Pyykko I,
3. Nakashima T,
4. Yoshida T, et al
. Meniere's disease: a reappraisal supported by a variable latency of symptoms and the MRI visualisation of endolymphatic hydrops. BMJ Open 2013;3:e001555
Abstract/FREE Full Text
15.↵
2. Naganawa S,
3. Satake H,
4. Kawamura M, et al
. Separate visualization of endolymphatic space, perilymphatic space and bone by a single pulse sequence: 3D-inversion recovery imaging utilizing real reconstruction after intratympanic Gd-DTPA administration at 3 Tesla. Eur Radiol 2008;18:920–24
CrossRef PubMed
16.↵
2. Gürkov R,
3. Flatz W,
4. Louza J, et al
. In vivo visualization of endolyphatic hydrops in patients with Meniere's disease: correlation with audiovestibular function. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011;268:1743–48
CrossRef PubMed
17.↵
2. Seo YJ,
3. Kim J,
4. Choi JY, et al
. Visualization of endolymphatic hydrops and correlation with audio-vestibular functional testing in patients with definite Meniere's disease. Audis Nasus Larynx 2013;40:167–72
CrossRef
18.↵
2. Fiorino F,
3. Pizzini FB,
4. Beltramello A, et al
. Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging performed after intratympanic administration of gadolinium in the identification of endolymphatic hydrops in patients with Ménière's disease. Otol Neurotol 2011;32:472–77
CrossRef PubMed
19.↵
2. Naganawa S,
3. Yamazaki M,
4. Kawai H, et al
. Imaging of Ménière's disease by subtraction of MR cisternography from positive perilymph image. Magn Reson Med Sci 2012;11:303–09
CrossRef PubMed
20.↵
2. Glockner JF,
3. Hu HH,
4. Stanley DW, et al
. Parallel imaging: a user's guide. Radiographics 2005;25:1279–97
CrossRef PubMed
21.↵
2. Moseley M,
3. Liu C,
4. Rodriguez S, et al
. Advances in magnetic resonance neuroimaging. Neurol Clin 2009;27:1–19, xiii
CrossRef PubMed
22.↵
2. Monsell EM
. New and revised reporting guidelines from the Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;113:176–78
FREE Full Text
23.↵
2. Mark AS,
3. Seltzer S,
4. Nelson-Drake J, et al
. Labyrinthine enhancement on gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in sudden deafness and vertigo: correlation with audiologic and electronystagmographic studies. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992;101:459–64
Abstract/FREE Full Text
24.↵
2. Claes G,
3. Van den Hauwe L,
4. Wuyts F, et al
. Does intratympanic gadolinium injection predict efficacy of gentamicin partial chemolabyrinthectomy in Menière's disease patients? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012;269:413–18
CrossRef PubMed
25.↵
2. Fukuoka H,
3. Takumi Y,
4. Tsukada K, et al
. Comparison of the diagnostic value of 3 T MRI after intratympanic injection of GBCA, electrocochleography, and the glycerol test in patients with Meniere's disease. Acta Otolaryngol 2012;132:141–45
CrossRef PubMed
26.↵
2. Jerin C,
3. Krause E,
4. Ertl-Wagner B, et al
. Longitudinal assessment of endolymphatic hydrops with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the labyrinth. Otol Neurotol 2014;35:880–83
CrossRef PubMed
27.↵
2. Homann G,
3. Fahrendorf D,
4. Niederstadt T, et al
. HR 3 Tesla MRI for the diagnosis of endolymphatic hydrops and differential diagnosis of inner ear tumors: demonstrated by two cases with similar symptoms. Rofo 2014;186:225–29
CrossRef PubMed
28.↵
2. Naganawa S,
3. Ishihara S,
4. Iwano S, et al
. Estimation of gadolinium-induced T1-shortening with measurement of simple signal intensity ratio between the cochlea and brain parenchyma on 3D-FLAIR: correlation with T1 measurement by TI scout sequence. Magn Reson Med Sci 2010;9:17–22
CrossRef PubMed
29.↵
2. Pyykko I,
3. Zou J,
4. Poe D, et al
. Magnetic resonance imaging of the inner ear in Meniere's disease. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 2010;43:1059–80
CrossRef PubMed
30.↵
2. Yoshioka M,
3. Naganawa S,
4. Sone M, et al
. Individual differences in the permeability of the round window: evaluating the movement of intratympanic gadolinium into the inner ear. Otol Neurotol 2009;30:645–48
CrossRef PubMed
31.↵
2. Katayama N,
3. Yamamoto M,
4. Teranishi M, et al
. Relationship between endolymphatic hydrops and vestibular-evoked myogenic potential. Acta Otolaryngol 2010;130:917–23
CrossRef PubMed
32.↵
2. Tieleman A,
3. Casselman JW,
4. Somers T, et al
. Imaging of intralabyrinthine schwannomas: a retrospective study of 52 cases with emphasis on lesion growth. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:898–905
Abstract/FREE Full Text
33.↵
2. Naganawa S,
3. Satake H,
4. Iwano S, et al
. Communication between cochlear perilymph and cerebrospinal fluid through the cochlear modiolus visualized after intratympanic administration of Gd-DTPA. Radiat Med 2008;26:597–602
CrossRef PubMed
34.↵
2. Kawai H,
3. Naganawa S,
4. Ishihara S, et al
. MR imaging of the cochlear modiolus after intratympanic administration of Gd-DTPA. Magn Reson Med Sci 2010;9:23–29
CrossRef PubMed
35.↵
2. Naganawa S,
3. Ishihara S,
4. Iwano S, et al
. Detection of presumed hemorrhage in the ampullar endolymph of the semicircular canal: a case report. Magn Reson Med Sci 2009;8:187–91
CrossRef PubMed

Received September 15, 2014.
Accepted after revision December 28, 2014.

View Abstract

In this issue

Download PDF

Email Article

Citation Tools

Purchase

Cited By...

No citing articles found.

More in this TOC Section

Show more HEAD & NECK

[1] 1.↵
Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the diagnosis and evaluation of therapy in Meniere's disease: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Foundation, Inc. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;113:181–85
FREE Full Text

[2] 2.↵

Counter SA,
Bjelke B,
Borg E, et al
. Magnetic resonance imaging of the membranous labyrinth during in vivo gadolinium (Gd-DTPA-BMA) uptake in the normal and lesioned cochlea. Neuroreport 2000;11:3979–83
CrossRef PubMed

[4] Counter SA,

[5] Bjelke B,

[6] Borg E, et al

[7] 3.↵

Duan M,
Bjelke B,
Fridberger A, et al
. Imaging of the guinea pig cochlea following round window gadolinium application. Neuroreport 2004;15:1927–30
CrossRef PubMed

[9] Duan M,

[10] Bjelke B,

[11] Fridberger A, et al

[12] 4.↵

Zou J,
Pyykko I,
Bjelke B, et al
. Communication between the perilymphatic scalae and spiral ligament visualized by in vivo MRI. Audiol Neurootol 2005;10:145–52
CrossRef PubMed

[14] Zou J,

[15] Pyykko I,

[16] Bjelke B, et al

[17] 5.↵

Kakigi A,
Nishimura M,
Takeda T, et al
. Effects of gadolinium injected into the middle ear on the stria vascularis. Acta Otolaryngol 2008;128:841–45
CrossRef PubMed

[19] Kakigi A,

[20] Nishimura M,

[21] Takeda T, et al

[22] 6.↵

Zou J,
Poe D,
Bolje B, et al
. Visualization of inner ear disorders with MRI in vivo: from animal models to human applications. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2009:22–31

[24] Zou J,

[25] Poe D,

[26] Bolje B, et al

[27] 7.↵

Nakashima T,
Naganawa S,
Suguira M, et al
. Visualization of endolymphatic hydrops in patients with Meniere's disease. Laryngoscope 2007;117:415–20
CrossRef PubMed

[29] Nakashima T,

[30] Naganawa S,

[31] Suguira M, et al

[32] 8.↵

Nakashima T,
Naganawa S,
Pyykko I, et al
. Grading of endolymphatic hydrops using magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2009:5–8

[34] Nakashima T,

[35] Naganawa S,

[36] Pyykko I, et al

[37] 9.↵

Nakashima T,
Naganawa S,
Katayama N, et al
. Clinical significance of endolymphatic imaging after intratympanic gadolinium injection. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2009:9–14

[39] Nakashima T,

[40] Naganawa S,

[41] Katayama N, et al

[42] 10.↵

Sugiura M,
Naganawa S,
Teranishi M, et al
. Three-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Laryngoscope 2006;116:1451–54
CrossRef PubMed

[44] Sugiura M,

[45] Naganawa S,

[46] Teranishi M, et al

[47] 11.↵

Yamazaki M,
Naganawa S,
Tagaya M, et al
. Comparison of contrast effect on the cochlear perilymph after intratympanic and intravenous gadolinium injection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:773–78
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[49] Yamazaki M,

[50] Naganawa S,

[51] Tagaya M, et al

[52] 12.↵

Fang ZM,
Chen X,
Gu X, et al
. A new magnetic resonance imaging scoring system for perilymphatic space appearance after intratympanic gadolinium injection, and its clinical application. J Laryngol Otol 2012;126:454–59
CrossRef PubMed

[54] Fang ZM,

[55] Chen X,

[56] Gu X, et al

[57] 13.↵

Baráth K,
Schuknecht B,
Naldi AM, et al
. Detection and grading of endolymphatic hydrops in Meniere disease using MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1387–92
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[59] Baráth K,

[60] Schuknecht B,

[61] Naldi AM, et al

[62] 14.↵

Pyykko I,
Nakashima T,
Yoshida T, et al
. Meniere's disease: a reappraisal supported by a variable latency of symptoms and the MRI visualisation of endolymphatic hydrops. BMJ Open 2013;3:e001555
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[64] Pyykko I,

[65] Nakashima T,

[66] Yoshida T, et al

[67] 15.↵

Naganawa S,
Satake H,
Kawamura M, et al
. Separate visualization of endolymphatic space, perilymphatic space and bone by a single pulse sequence: 3D-inversion recovery imaging utilizing real reconstruction after intratympanic Gd-DTPA administration at 3 Tesla. Eur Radiol 2008;18:920–24
CrossRef PubMed

[69] Naganawa S,

[70] Satake H,

[71] Kawamura M, et al

[72] 16.↵

Gürkov R,
Flatz W,
Louza J, et al
. In vivo visualization of endolyphatic hydrops in patients with Meniere's disease: correlation with audiovestibular function. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011;268:1743–48
CrossRef PubMed

[74] Gürkov R,

[75] Flatz W,

[76] Louza J, et al

[77] 17.↵

Seo YJ,
Kim J,
Choi JY, et al
. Visualization of endolymphatic hydrops and correlation with audio-vestibular functional testing in patients with definite Meniere's disease. Audis Nasus Larynx 2013;40:167–72
CrossRef

[79] Seo YJ,

[80] Kim J,

[81] Choi JY, et al

[82] 18.↵

Fiorino F,
Pizzini FB,
Beltramello A, et al
. Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging performed after intratympanic administration of gadolinium in the identification of endolymphatic hydrops in patients with Ménière's disease. Otol Neurotol 2011;32:472–77
CrossRef PubMed

[84] Fiorino F,

[85] Pizzini FB,

[86] Beltramello A, et al

[87] 19.↵

Naganawa S,
Yamazaki M,
Kawai H, et al
. Imaging of Ménière's disease by subtraction of MR cisternography from positive perilymph image. Magn Reson Med Sci 2012;11:303–09
CrossRef PubMed

[89] Naganawa S,

[90] Yamazaki M,

[91] Kawai H, et al

[92] 20.↵

Glockner JF,
Hu HH,
Stanley DW, et al
. Parallel imaging: a user's guide. Radiographics 2005;25:1279–97
CrossRef PubMed

[94] Glockner JF,

[95] Hu HH,

[96] Stanley DW, et al

[97] 21.↵

Moseley M,
Liu C,
Rodriguez S, et al
. Advances in magnetic resonance neuroimaging. Neurol Clin 2009;27:1–19, xiii
CrossRef PubMed

[99] Moseley M,

[100] Liu C,

[101] Rodriguez S, et al

[102] 22.↵

Monsell EM
. New and revised reporting guidelines from the Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;113:176–78
FREE Full Text

[104] Monsell EM

[105] 23.↵

Mark AS,
Seltzer S,
Nelson-Drake J, et al
. Labyrinthine enhancement on gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in sudden deafness and vertigo: correlation with audiologic and electronystagmographic studies. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992;101:459–64
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[107] Mark AS,

[108] Seltzer S,

[109] Nelson-Drake J, et al

[110] 24.↵

Claes G,
Van den Hauwe L,
Wuyts F, et al
. Does intratympanic gadolinium injection predict efficacy of gentamicin partial chemolabyrinthectomy in Menière's disease patients? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012;269:413–18
CrossRef PubMed

[112] Claes G,

[113] Van den Hauwe L,

[114] Wuyts F, et al

[115] 25.↵

Fukuoka H,
Takumi Y,
Tsukada K, et al
. Comparison of the diagnostic value of 3 T MRI after intratympanic injection of GBCA, electrocochleography, and the glycerol test in patients with Meniere's disease. Acta Otolaryngol 2012;132:141–45
CrossRef PubMed

[117] Fukuoka H,

[118] Takumi Y,

[119] Tsukada K, et al

[120] 26.↵

Jerin C,
Krause E,
Ertl-Wagner B, et al
. Longitudinal assessment of endolymphatic hydrops with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the labyrinth. Otol Neurotol 2014;35:880–83
CrossRef PubMed

[122] Jerin C,

[123] Krause E,

[124] Ertl-Wagner B, et al

[125] 27.↵

Homann G,
Fahrendorf D,
Niederstadt T, et al
. HR 3 Tesla MRI for the diagnosis of endolymphatic hydrops and differential diagnosis of inner ear tumors: demonstrated by two cases with similar symptoms. Rofo 2014;186:225–29
CrossRef PubMed

[127] Homann G,

[128] Fahrendorf D,

[129] Niederstadt T, et al

[130] 28.↵

Naganawa S,
Ishihara S,
Iwano S, et al
. Estimation of gadolinium-induced T1-shortening with measurement of simple signal intensity ratio between the cochlea and brain parenchyma on 3D-FLAIR: correlation with T1 measurement by TI scout sequence. Magn Reson Med Sci 2010;9:17–22
CrossRef PubMed

[132] Naganawa S,

[133] Ishihara S,

[134] Iwano S, et al

[135] 29.↵

Pyykko I,
Zou J,
Poe D, et al
. Magnetic resonance imaging of the inner ear in Meniere's disease. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 2010;43:1059–80
CrossRef PubMed

[137] Pyykko I,

[138] Zou J,

[139] Poe D, et al

[140] 30.↵

Yoshioka M,
Naganawa S,
Sone M, et al
. Individual differences in the permeability of the round window: evaluating the movement of intratympanic gadolinium into the inner ear. Otol Neurotol 2009;30:645–48
CrossRef PubMed

[142] Yoshioka M,

[143] Naganawa S,

[144] Sone M, et al

[145] 31.↵

Katayama N,
Yamamoto M,
Teranishi M, et al
. Relationship between endolymphatic hydrops and vestibular-evoked myogenic potential. Acta Otolaryngol 2010;130:917–23
CrossRef PubMed

[147] Katayama N,

[148] Yamamoto M,

[149] Teranishi M, et al

[150] 32.↵

Tieleman A,
Casselman JW,
Somers T, et al
. Imaging of intralabyrinthine schwannomas: a retrospective study of 52 cases with emphasis on lesion growth. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:898–905
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[152] Tieleman A,

[153] Casselman JW,

[154] Somers T, et al

[155] 33.↵

Naganawa S,
Satake H,
Iwano S, et al
. Communication between cochlear perilymph and cerebrospinal fluid through the cochlear modiolus visualized after intratympanic administration of Gd-DTPA. Radiat Med 2008;26:597–602
CrossRef PubMed

[157] Naganawa S,

[158] Satake H,

[159] Iwano S, et al

[160] 34.↵

Kawai H,
Naganawa S,
Ishihara S, et al
. MR imaging of the cochlear modiolus after intratympanic administration of Gd-DTPA. Magn Reson Med Sci 2010;9:23–29
CrossRef PubMed

[162] Kawai H,

[163] Naganawa S,

[164] Ishihara S, et al

[165] 35.↵

Naganawa S,
Ishihara S,
Iwano S, et al
. Detection of presumed hemorrhage in the ampullar endolymph of the semicircular canal: a case report. Magn Reson Med Sci 2009;8:187–91
CrossRef PubMed

[167] Naganawa S,

[168] Ishihara S,

[169] Iwano S, et al

Main menu

User menu

Search

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Intratympanic Contrast in the Evaluation of Menière Disease: Understanding the Limits

Abstract

ABBREVIATIONS:

Materials and Methods

Participants

IT Injection

Imaging

Assessment

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Footnotes

REFERENCES

In this issue

Citation Manager Formats

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Similar Articles

News and Updates

Resources

Opportunities

American Society of Neuroradiology

Main menu

User menu

Search

Intratympanic Contrast in the Evaluation of Menière Disease: Understanding the Limits

Abstract

ABBREVIATIONS:

Materials and Methods

Participants

IT Injection

Imaging

Assessment

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Footnotes

REFERENCES

In this issue

Citation Manager Formats

Jump to section

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Similar Articles

News and Updates

Resources

Opportunities

American Society of Neuroradiology