Index by author
Ringstad, G.
- You have accessReply:G. Ringstad, K.E. Emblem, O. Geier, N. Alperin and P.K. EideAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology September 2015, 36 (9) 1633-1634; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4488
- EDITOR'S CHOICEADULT BRAINOpen AccessAqueductal Stroke Volume: Comparisons with Intracranial Pressure Scores in Idiopathic Normal Pressure HydrocephalusG. Ringstad, K.E. Emblem, O. Geier, N. Alperin and P.K. EideAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology September 2015, 36 (9) 1623-1630; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4340
Phase-contrast MR imaging was performed in 21 patients with probable idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Patients were selected for shunting on the basis of pathologically increased intracranial pressure pulsatility. Patients with shunts were offered a second MR imaging after 12 months. Ventricular volume and transverse aqueductal area were calculated. No correlations between aqueductal stroke volume and preoperative scores of mean intracranial pressure or mean wave amplitudes were observed. Aqueductal stroke volume does not reflect intracranial pressure pulsatility or symptom score, but rather aqueduct area and ventricular volume.
Robertson, A.M.
- INTERVENTIONALOpen AccessWall Mechanical Properties and Hemodynamics of Unruptured Intracranial AneurysmsJ.R. Cebral, X. Duan, B.J. Chung, C. Putman, K. Aziz and A.M. RobertsonAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology September 2015, 36 (9) 1695-1703; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4358
Rosen, B.R.
- EDITOR'S CHOICEADULT BRAINOpen AccessRepeatability of Standardized and Normalized Relative CBV in Patients with Newly Diagnosed GlioblastomaM.A. Prah, S.M. Stufflebeam, E.S. Paulson, J. Kalpathy-Cramer, E.R. Gerstner, T.T. Batchelor, D.P. Barboriak, B.R. Rosen and K.M. SchmaindaAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology September 2015, 36 (9) 1654-1661; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4374
Relative CBV estimates were calculated from dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging in double-baseline examinations of 33 patients with treatment-naïve and pathologically proved glioblastoma multiforme. Normalized and standardized relative CBV were calculated by using 6 common postprocessing methods. The ΔR2* estimation method that incorporates leakage correction offers the best repeatability for rCBV, with standardized rCBV being less variable.
Ryu, C.-W.
- INTERVENTIONALYou have accessComplications in Stent-Assisted Endovascular Therapy of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms and Relevance to Antiplatelet Administration: A Systematic ReviewC.-W. Ryu, S. Park, H.S. Shin and J.S. KohAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology September 2015, 36 (9) 1682-1688; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4365
Sagara, Y.
- INTERVENTIONALOpen AccessArtery of the Superior Orbital Fissure: An Undescribed Branch from the Pterygopalatine Segment of the Maxillary Artery to the Orbital Apex Connecting with the Anteromedial Branch of the Inferolateral TrunkH. Kiyosue, S. Tanoue, N. Hongo, Y. Sagara and H. MoriAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology September 2015, 36 (9) 1741-1747; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4331
Sainte-rose, C.
- PEDIATRICSYou have accessChoroid Plexus Neoplasms: Toward a Distinction between Carcinoma and Papilloma Using Arterial Spin-LabelingV. Dangouloff-Ros, D. Grevent, M. Pagès, T. Blauwblomme, R. Calmon, C. Elie, S. Puget, C. Sainte-Rose, F. Brunelle, P. Varlet and N. BoddaertAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology September 2015, 36 (9) 1786-1790; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4332
Schmainda, K.M.
- EDITOR'S CHOICEADULT BRAINOpen AccessRepeatability of Standardized and Normalized Relative CBV in Patients with Newly Diagnosed GlioblastomaM.A. Prah, S.M. Stufflebeam, E.S. Paulson, J. Kalpathy-Cramer, E.R. Gerstner, T.T. Batchelor, D.P. Barboriak, B.R. Rosen and K.M. SchmaindaAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology September 2015, 36 (9) 1654-1661; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4374
Relative CBV estimates were calculated from dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging in double-baseline examinations of 33 patients with treatment-naïve and pathologically proved glioblastoma multiforme. Normalized and standardized relative CBV were calculated by using 6 common postprocessing methods. The ΔR2* estimation method that incorporates leakage correction offers the best repeatability for rCBV, with standardized rCBV being less variable.
Sellar, R.
- INTERVENTIONALYou have accessHydroCoils Are Associated with Lower Angiographic Recurrence Rates Than Are Bare Platinum Coils in Treatment of “Difficult-to-Treat” Aneurysms: A Post Hoc Subgroup Analysis of the HELPS TrialW. Brinjikji, P.M. White, H. Nahser, J. Wardlaw, R. Sellar, A. Gholkar, H.J. Cloft and D.F. KallmesAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology September 2015, 36 (9) 1689-1694; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4349
Shen, N.
- FELLOWS' JOURNAL CLUBADULT BRAINOpen AccessThe Benefits of High Relaxivity for Brain Tumor Imaging: Results of a Multicenter Intraindividual Crossover Comparison of Gadobenate Dimeglumine with Gadoterate Meglumine (The BENEFIT Study)M. Vaneckova, M. Herman, M.P. Smith, M. Mechl, K.R. Maravilla, J. Weichet, M.V. Spampinato, J. Žižka, F.J. Wippold, J.J. Baima, R. Babbel, E. Bültmann, R.Y. Huang, J.-H. Buhk, A. Bonafé, C. Colosimo, S. Lui, M.A. Kirchin, N. Shen, G. Pirovano and A. SpinazziAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology September 2015, 36 (9) 1589-1598; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4468
The authors performed a crossover, intraindividual comparison of 0.1-mmol/kg gadobenate with 0.1-mmol/kg gadoterate (Arm 1) and 0.05-mmol/kg gadobenate with 0.1-mmol/kg gadoterate (Arm 2). In Arm 1, a significant superiority of 0.1-mmol/kg gadobenate was demonstrated by all readers for all end points. In Arm 2, no significant differences were observed for any reader and any end point, with the exception of percentage enhancement for reader 2 in favor of 0.05-mmol/kg gadobenate.
Sherif, C.
- INTERVENTIONALYou have accessComputerized Angiographic Occlusion Rating for Ruptured Clipped Aneurysms is Superior to Subjective Occlusion RatingA.R. Al-Schameri, G. Baltsavias, P. Winkler, M. Lunzer, M. Kral, L. Machegger, F. Weymayr, S. Emich, C. Sherif and B. RichlingAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology September 2015, 36 (9) 1704-1709; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4399