Contrast-Enhanced CISS Imaging for Evaluation of Neurovascular Compression in Trigeminal Neuralgia: Improved Correlation with Symptoms and Prediction of Surgical Outcomes

A.M. Blitz; B. Northcutt; J. Shin; N. Aygun; D.A. Herzka; D. Theodros; C.R. Goodwin; M. Lim; D.P. Seeburg

doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5743

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Thin-section MR imaging through the posterior fossa is frequently used for trigeminal neuralgia. Typical heavily T2-weighted imaging methods yield high anatomic detail and contrast between CSF and neurovascular structures, but poor contrast between vessels and nerves. We hypothesized that the addition of gadolinium-based contrast material to 3D-constructive interference in steady-state imaging would improve the characterization of trigeminal compression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of high-resolution MRIs was performed in patients without prior microvascular decompression. 3D-CISS imaging without contrast and with contrast for 81 patients with trigeminal neuralgia and 15 controls was intermixed and independently reviewed in a blinded fashion. Cisternal segments of both trigeminal nerves were assessed for the grade of neurovascular conflict, cross-sectional area, and degree of flattening. Data were correlated with symptom side and pain relief after microvascular decompression using the Fisher exact test, receiver operating curve analysis, and a paired t test.

RESULTS: Contrast-enhanced CISS more than doubled the prevalence of the highest grade of neurovascular conflict (14.8% versus 33.3%, P = .001) and yielded significantly lower cross-sectional area (P = 8.6 × 10⁻⁶) and greater degree of flattening (P = .02) for advanced-grade neurovascular conflict on the symptoms side compared with non-contrast-enhanced CISS. Patients with complete pain relief after microvascular decompression had significantly lower cross-sectional area on contrast-enhanced CISS compared with non-contrast-enhanced CISS on preoperative imaging (P = 2.0 × 10⁻⁷). Performance based on receiver operating curve analysis was significantly improved for contrast-enhanced CISS compared with non-contrast-enhanced CISS.

CONCLUSIONS: The addition of contrast material to 3D-CISS imaging improves the performance of identifying unilateral neurovascular compression for symptomatic trigeminal neuralgia and predicting outcomes after microvascular decompression.

ABBREVIATIONS:

AUC: area under the curve
CSA: cross-sectional area
CE: contrast-enhanced
DOF: degree of flattening
MVD: microvascular decompression
NE: non-contrast-enhanced
TN: trigeminal neuralgia

It is generally accepted that vascular compression of the trigeminal nerve (CN V) is an etiologic factor in trigeminal neuralgia (TN).¹ Lingering controversy stems mainly from 2 frequently made observations: First, neurovascular contact of the cisternal segment of CN V is not uncommon in asymptomatic individuals, ranging in prevalence from 14% to 88%.^2⇓⇓–5 Second, it is not uncommon to find patients with TN who have no neurovascular contact at all.⁵ However, more severe neurovascular conflict (eg, resulting in deformity or displacement of the nerve) is commonly seen in patients with TN, but not in patients without TN.^4,6,7 Moreover, both the presence and severity of trigeminal nerve root compression have been shown intraoperatively^4,8⇓–10 and by imaging^11⇓–13 to be predictive of favorable outcomes after microvascular decompression (MVD). Thus, from these studies, the concept emerges that it is the degree of compression of the CN V root, rather than simply whether there is any neurovascular contact, that is most predictive of symptoms of TN and favorable outcomes after MVD.

MVD is one of the most commonly performed surgical interventions for TN¹⁴ and has shown high effectiveness in relieving pain.⁹ MVD is an invasive procedure, however, and careful preoperative patient selection is important. Although rare, complications like meningitis, CSF leak, wound infections, and short- or long-term deficits such as hearing loss may occur.¹⁴

High-resolution 3D T2-weighted steady-state free precession sequences, including 3D-CISS or FIESTA, yield high spatial resolution and high contrast between CSF and neurovascular structures and have become the standard sequence for preoperative imaging in TN.^15,16 However, these sequences have poor contrast between vessels and nerves because both are low in intensity, potentially limiting detection and characterization of higher grade neurovascular conflict when there is little or no intervening CSF. We hypothesized that the addition of intravenous contrast material to 3D-CISS sequences, which appear to be T2-weighted but, in fact, have both T2- and T1-weighting¹⁷ and therefore demonstrate enhancement,^18⇓–20 would improve the contrast between enhancing vessels and adjacent unenhanced trigeminal nerve roots. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether contrast-enhanced 3D-CISS (CE-CISS) improves our ability to predict the symptom side in patients with TN and further to predict which patients are most likely to have favorable outcomes after MVD, compared with 3D-CISS without contrast (NE-CISS).

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Patient Sample

A retrospective review of 310 consecutive high-resolution 3D TN protocol MR imaging studies acquired between 2011 and 2014 at our institution was performed. The study was institutional review board–approved and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act–compliant. Of the 261 patients imaged for TN (49 studies belonged to subjects imaged more than once) with this protocol during this period, we selected all 116 patients with a history of TN who had imaging performed before undergoing MVD. Of those, 26 patients were excluded because they had had a previous intervention for TN (rhizotomy or gamma knife treatment). Nine studies were excluded because a full set of clinical characteristics was not available or the imaging data were incomplete. A total of 81 studies qualified for the pre-MVD TN group. Separately, 51 patients without the diagnosis of TN were imaged with the same parameters performed as a component of an evaluation of the skull base. Of these, 15 studies were chosen at random as non-TN controls. An equal number of cases and asymptomatic controls would bias the reader to overestimate the asymptomatic controls as TN cases because most asymptomatic individuals do not undergo the high-resolution trigeminal neuralgia imaging protocol. Assuming a statistical power of 80% and exposure defined by those undergoing the high-resolution trigeminal neuralgia imaging protocol, 1-β is 20% exposure in controls (chance of type II error). Considering that the number of symptomatic cases was 81, fifteen (18.5%) were selected as the number of asymptomatic controls to remain below 20%.^21,22

The mean age for the pre-MVD TN group was 49.2 years (range, 27–71 years), with 52 female and 29 male patients. The mean age for the control group was 44.6 years (range, 15–71 years), with 10 female and 5 male patients. There was no statistical difference in the age of the 2 groups (P = .2, two-tailed Student t test).

The diagnosis of TN was based on clinical history and physical examination performed by the neurosurgery team (C.R.G. and M.L.). Demographic and baseline disease characteristics were collected during the presurgical work-up for MVD. Patients were classified as having either type 1 TN (classic TN, purely paroxysmal) or type 2 TN (TN with persistent facial pain). The clinical outcome of pain relief following MVD was assessed during follow-up clinic visits and classified as type 1: complete pain relief without need for medication; type 2: complete pain relief with continued need for medication; type 3: partial pain relief with continued need for medication; and type 4: no pain relief despite medication. The range of clinical follow-up was 3 days to 1228 days, with an average of 275 days. On-line Tables 1 and 2 list the patients and clinical outcomes. For one of the patients, clinical outcome data were not available because the patient was lost to follow up.

Imaging Technique

All studies were conducted on Verio or Magnetom Trio 3T scanners (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) (n = 78) or Magnetom Espree or Avanto 1.5T scanners (Siemens) (n = 3) using a standardized high-resolution TN protocol. The protocol included triplanar pre- and postcontrast 3D-CISS (slice thickness, 0.6 mm; matrix, 256 × 256; FOV, 16.9 × 24.6) and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography.

Image and Data Analysis

The studies of patients with TN and controls were intermixed and reviewed independently by 2 neuroradiologists (D.S. and B.N., each with >5 years of experience) blinded to patient history, including the presence or absence and side of symptoms. The cisternal segment of CN V was assessed on both sides for the presence or absence of neurovascular conflict. The following types of data were acquired for each side: type of vessel involved (vein, artery, or both), nerve surface involved (superior, inferior, medial, or lateral), the grade of neurovascular conflict (0 = none, 1 = simple contact without displacement or distortion of the nerve, 2 = displacement and/or mild distortion, 3 = severe distortion or decrease in cross-sectional area of the nerve), the cross-sectional area (CSA) of CN V at the site of neurovascular conflict, orthogonal dimensions of the nerve root at the site of neurovascular conflict (degree of flattening [DOF]), and the distance of neurovascular conflict from the apparent origin of the nerve at the surface of the pons.

Orthogonal dimensions were obtained by first measuring the greatest possible dimension of the nerve in the coronal plane and then taking the measurement of the nerve orthogonal to and at the midportion of the first measurement (see illustrative drawing in On-line Fig 1) from multiplanar reformats. For statistical analysis, we took the mean of the CSA, the distance of neurovascular conflict from the pons, and DOF between the 2 observers. For the type of vessel in conflict, grading of neurovascular conflict, and the surface of the nerve involved, if there was discrepancy between the 2 readers, those cases were re-reviewed jointly, blinded to study type, and a consensus was reached. 3D TOF MRA was used to help in the assessment of the type of vessel in conflict with the nerve (the artery is bright).

Statistical Analysis

We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of characteristics of neurovascular conflict (grade and type of vessel) comparing the symptomatic (diseased) with the asymptomatic side or controls (healthy). Statistical comparisons for CSA and DOF were performed by a paired t test with the Holm-Bonferroni method of P value adjustment for multiple comparisons after performing Shapiro-Wilk normality tests. Statistical comparisons between the area under the curves were performed as described in DeLong et al.²³ The Fisher exact test was applied when assessing associations of categoric variables such as grades of neurovascular conflicts or types of vascular involvement. The κ statistic for interobserver agreement was calculated. All analyses were performed using R statistical and computing software, Version 3.2.2 (http://www.r-project.org) with packages caroline, plotrix, beeswarm, and pROC. A P value of <.05 was considered significant.

Results

Comparison of Neurovascular Conflict on the Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Sides and in Controls on NE-CISS and CE-CISS Imaging

Examples of the different grades of neurovascular conflict (0–3) and examples illustrating improvement in contrast between trigeminal nerve roots and adjacent vessels in advanced grades of neurovascular conflict are shown in Figs 1 ⇓⇓–4. On NE-CISS, neurovascular conflict in general (grade 1, 2, or 3) was common on the asymptomatic side and in controls (54/81 [66.7%] and 18/30 [60%], respectively), and it was even more common on the symptomatic side (71/81 [87.7%]; Table 1). On the asymptomatic side and in controls, this consisted mostly of grade 1 neurovascular conflict (48/54 [88.9%] and 18/18 [100%] cases, respectively). Advanced-grade neurovascular conflict (grade 2 or 3) was encountered in 38/81 (46.9%; n = 26 for grade 2 and n = 12 for grade 3) cases on the symptomatic side versus in only 6/81 (7.4%, all grade 2) on the asymptomatic side and not at all in controls. Most of the advanced-grade cases of neurovascular conflict (grade 2 or 3) had involvement of an artery (33/38 [86.8%]), but venous involvement was found in more than half of these cases as well (22/38 [57.9%]).

Fig 1.

Grades 0 and 1 neurovascular conflict. Coronal NE-CISS (A) and CE-CISS (B) images show grade 1 (simple contact) on the patient's right side with a branch from the superior cerebellar artery (white solid arrow) contacting the cisternal segment of the trigeminal nerve root (dashed black arrow) from above. Note enhancement of the artery on the CE-CISS image. On the patient's left, the cisternal trigeminal nerve root (dashed black arrow) has no neurovascular conflict (grade 0).

Fig 2.

Grade 2 neurovascular conflict. Coronal NE-CISS (A) and CE-CISS (B) and sagittal NE-CISS (C) and CE-CISS (D) images show neurovascular conflict of the cisternal segment of the patient's right trigeminal nerve with a branch of the superior cerebellar artery from above (solid white arrow) and the superior petrosal vein from below (dashed white arrow), resulting in flattening of the nerve near the porus trigeminus. On the NE-CISS images (A and C), the nerve is not well-delineated from the adjacent vascular structures. On the CE-CISS images (B and D), the vessels enhance, outlining the compressed nerve between them. Zoomed-in images of the site of neurovascular conflict in the coronal plane (E and F) illustrate the poor contrast between vessels and nerve on the NE-CISS image (E) and the improved contrast after administration of gadolinium contrast material (F), allowing more confident delineation of the compressed nerve from the adjacent vessels (G). Both NE-CISS and CE-CISS images were interpreted as grade 2 compression. On the patient's left, grade 0 was given for both the NE-CISS and CE-CISS images.

Fig 3.

Grade 3 neurovascular conflict. Coronal NE-CISS (A) and CE-CISS (B) images show compression of the cisternal segment of the patient's right trigeminal nerve (black dashed arrow) by branches of the superior cerebellar artery from above (solid white arrow). On the unenhanced image (A), the nerve root is not well-distinguished from the compressing arterial branches. After contrast administration (B), at least 2 arterial branches enhance, allowing more confident delineation of the markedly compressed nerve. Zoomed-in images of the site of neurovascular conflict in the coronal plane (C–E) illustrate the poor contrast between vessels and nerve on the NE-CISS image (C) and the improved contrast after administration of gadolinium contrast material (D), allowing more confident delineation of the compressed nerve from the adjacent vessels (E). In this patient, grade 3 was given for both the NE-CISS and CE-CISS images, but the measured CSA was lower and the degree of flattening was more pronounced on the CE-CISS images. On the patient's left, grade 0 was given for both the NE-CISS and CE-CISS images.

Fig 4.

High-grade neurovascular conflict. Coronal NE-CISS (A) and CE-CISS (B) images show compression of the distal cisternal segment of the patient's left trigeminal nerve (gray dashed arrow) by a branch of the superior petrosal venous complex from below (solid white arrow). On the unenhanced image (A), the nerve root is not well-distinguished from the compressing venous branch. After contrast administration (B), the venous branch fills with contrast, showing a severely compressed unenhanced adjacent trigeminal nerve root at the level of the porus trigeminus. Zoomed-in images of the site of neurovascular conflict in the coronal plane (C–E) illustrate the poor contrast between vessels and nerve on the NE-CISS image (C) and the improved contrast after administration of gadolinium contrast material (D), allowing more confident delineation of the compressed nerve from the adjacent vessel (E). In this patient, grade 2 was given on the NE-CISS and grade 3 was given on CE-CISS images. On the patient's right, grade 1 was given on both the NE-CISS and CE-CISS images.

View this table:

Table 1:

Prevalence of various grades of neurovascular conflict and types of vascular involvement in patients with TN and in controls

Grade 3 neurovascular conflict was encountered only on the symptomatic side, so it was 100% specific for that group. Its sensitivity for the symptomatic side was 14.8% on NE-CISS imaging, which more than doubled to 33.3% on CE-CISS (P = 9.6 × 10⁻³, Tables 2 and 3). Advanced-grade neurovascular conflict (grade 2 or 3) had a specificity for the symptomatic side of 94.6% on both NE-CISS and CE-CISS and a sensitivity of 46.9% and 51.9% on NE-CISS and CE-CISS, respectively (P = .64). The κ statistic for interobserver agreement in grading of neurovascular conflict was 0.68 for NE-CISS, which increased to 0.72 for CE-CISS.

View this table:

Table 2:

Statistical analysis

View this table:

Table 3:

Characteristics of neurovascular involvement

Grade 1 neurovascular conflict occurred with similar frequency along the course of the cisternal segment of the trigeminal nerve root, with 8/29 (27.6%) occurrences between 0 and 3 mm from the surface of the pons, 11/29 (37.9%) between 3 and 6 mm, and 9/29 (31.0%) distal to 6 mm (On-line Fig 2). Advanced-grade neurovascular conflict (grade 2 or 3), on the other hand, was most prevalent between 3 and 6 mm from the surface of the pons (32/42 [76.2%]), with 6/42 (14.3%) cases occurring between 0 and 3 mm, and 4/42 (9.5%) cases occurring distal to 6 mm.

Comparison between NE-CISS and CE-CISS in the Evaluation of CSA and DOF

When we compared CSA and DOF between the symptomatic and asymptomatic sides on either NE-CISS or CE-CISS, there was no significant difference in the setting of grade 1 neurovascular conflict (On-line Fig 1). However, with higher grades of neurovascular conflict (grade 2 or 3), there was a significant difference in CSA and DOF between the symptomatic and asymptomatic sides on both NE-CISS and on CE-CISS. Moreover, when we compared the CSA and DOF on the symptomatic side between NE-CISS and CE-CISS, there was a significant decrease in CSA and an increase in DOF on CE-CISS for higher grades of neurovascular conflict, but no significant difference in the setting of low-grade neurovascular conflict. There was also no significant difference when comparing the CSA or DOF on the asymptomatic side between NE-CISS and CE-CISS.

Correlation between Postsurgical Symptomatic Relief and the Metrics of Preoperative Neurovascular Conflict and Comparison of NE-CISS versus CE-CISS in Predicting the Symptomatic Side and Symptomatic Relief after MVD in Patients with TN

On-line Table 3 shows the correlation between the grade of neurovascular conflict as determined on CE-CISS and NE-CISS with the type of postoperative outcome after MVD. There was a significant difference between the grades of compression found in patients with type 1 postsurgical outcome when comparing NE-CISS with CE-CISS images (P = .031), but not in patients with type 2, 3, or 4 outcome. The proportion of patients with complete relief from pain postoperatively with or without a continued need for analgesics (type 1 and 2 outcomes, respectively) was 26/38 (68%) in patients with grade 0 or 1 neurovascular conflict and 37/42 (88%) in patients with grade 2 or 3 neurovascular conflict, a difference that did not quite reach statistical significance (P = .054, Fig 5A).

Fig 5.

Correlation of the metrics of neurovascular conflict with postsurgical outcomes after MVD. Grades of neurovascular conflict (A), CSA (B), and DOF (C) were correlated with different postsurgical outcomes after MVD, as described in the individual graphs. Non-con indicates non-contrast; Con, contrast-enhanced.

The CSA in patients with type 1 outcome was significantly lower on CE-CISS compared with NE-CISS (P = 2.03 × 10⁻⁷, Fig 5B). With the other types of outcome,^2⇓–4 there was no significant difference between the CSA on NE-CISS and CE-CISS. Using receiver operating curve analysis, we compared the performance of NE-CISS versus CE-CISS in predicting the symptomatic side or relief of symptoms after MVD based on the grade of neurovascular conflict, CSA, and DOF (Fig 6). All tests were found to be useful in predicting the outcome in question (area under the curve [AUC] > 0.65). Optimum cutoffs to maximize sensitivity and specificity are given in Table 4. Using the grade of neurovascular conflict to predict complete relief after MVD yielded an AUC of 0.804 on NE-CISS and a significantly higher AUC of 0.835 on CE-CISS (P = .017, Fig 6A). The grade of neurovascular conflict was also the best predictor of the side of symptoms, with an AUC of 0.746 on NE-CISS and a significantly higher AUC of 0.767 on CE-CISS (P = 1.7 × 10⁻¹⁴, Fig 6G).

Fig 6.

Receiver operating curves assessing the performance of the grade of neurovascular conflict (A, D, and G), CSA (B, E, and H), and DOF (C, F, and I) in predicting complete relief without further need for analgesic medication (type 1 outcome) after MVD (A–C), complete relief with or without further need for analgesic medication (type 1 or 2 outcome) after MVD (D–F), and symptom side in patients with TN (G–I) for both NE-CISS and CE-CISS images, as delineated in the graphs. The area under the curve and P values comparing the NE-CISS and CE-CISS curves are provided in the individual graphs.

View this table:

Table 4:

Cutoff values for grade of neurovascular conflict, CSA, and DOF to obtain the highest sum of sensitivity and specificity in predicting complete relief of pain after MVD (type 1 outcome), complete relief of pain with or without need for analgesic medication (type 1 or 2 outcome), or in predicting the side of symptoms in patients with TN

Discussion

We found that while neurovascular conflict in general was prevalent in both patients with TN and controls, higher grade (grade 2 or 3) neurovascular conflict was specific to the symptomatic side in patients with TN, but only about 50% sensitive, like findings in previous studies.^6,7 These findings imply that neurovascular compression is sufficient but not necessary to induce symptoms of TN.¹ Patients with little or no neurovascular conflict were less likely to experience pain relief after MVD compared with patients with advanced-grade neurovascular conflict; these resultscorroborate previous reports from preoperative imaging and intraoperative findings.^{4,9⇓⇓⇓⇓–14} In these patients, other etiologic considerations, including pathology in or near the trigeminal root ganglion, may be in play^1,24 and an initial trial with rhizotomy of the trigeminal ganglion could be a rational alternative to MVD, especially if the patient is not an ideal surgical candidate.^1,12

Most higher grade neurovascular conflict was found between 3 and 6 mm from the surface of the pons, corresponding to the location of the root entry zone, in line with findings in previous reports.^6,7,25,26 This relates to the proposed pathophysiologic mechanism (ignition hypothesis) of vascular compression resulting in microstructural damage to the nerve root at this vulnerable transition zone between central and peripheral myelin, making the axons hyperexcitable and giving rise to pain paroxysms as a result of synchronization after discharge activity.¹

Like findings published by Zhou et al,²⁷ we found evidence of the known somatotopic organization of the trigeminal nerve,²⁸ which relates the surface of the compressed nerve to distribution of symptoms. Advanced-grade neurovascular conflict had a venous component in approximately 58% of the cases, most commonly along the inferior or lateral surface of the trigeminal nerve root, corresponding to the most common drainage pattern of the superior petrosal venous complex into the superior petrosal sinus between the porus trigeminus and porus acusticus.²⁹ Venous contribution to neurovascular compression has been reported previously, though typically as constituting less than half of the cases of neurovascular conflict.^{6,7,11,26,28,30} The differences may be due to differences in technique, for instance related to increased sensitivity for venous detection after contrast administration. The reporting of a venous component in neurovascular conflict is important for presurgical planning because these cases may have a higher recurrence rate³¹ and different surgical techniques have been proposed for decompression of culprit veins.³² In a notable study of healthy subjects by Yousry et al,³³ the enhanced 3D-CISS sequence was determined to be superior for visualization of the trigeminal ganglion, sinus ganglion, and sinus lips. The current study, however, is unique in assessing symptomatic trigeminal compression.

Metrics (CSA, DOF, grading) of neurovascular conflict between NE-CISS and CE-CISS sequences in cases of little or no neurovascular conflict demonstrate little difference, which is expected because the nerve is mostly outlined by CSF in those cases and is thus well-characterized on NE-CISS. However, in cases of advanced-grade nerve root compression, significant differences in the metrics of neurovascular conflict between NE-CISS and CE-CISS emerged. These differences, in turn, resulted in significantly improved performance based on receiver operating curve analysis for CE-CISS compared with NE-CISS in predicting the symptom side and the degree of relief of symptoms after MVD. Notably, a cutoff of grade 2 neurovascular conflict or higher on CE-CISS predicted complete relief of symptoms after MVD, with a specificity of 90.7% and a sensitivity of 67.3% (AUC on the receiver operating curve analysis = 0.835), and the side of symptoms, with a specificity of 94.6% and a sensitivity 51.9% (AUC on the receiver operating curve analysis = 0.767). Given the invasiveness of MVD and potential risks to the patient, such advances in the optimization of preoperative imaging, allowing improved preoperative planning and patient selection, are of potential importance for clinical care.¹⁴

Limitations of our study include inherent biases associated with the retrospective study design and those of a single-institution cohort. In addition, although the reviewers were blinded to the type of subject (control versus patient with TN), it is not possible to blind the reviewers to the presence or absence of contrast in the grading of neurovascular conflict, CSA, and degree of flattening. Another limitation in this retrospective study was the range in duration of clinical follow-up for postoperative patients, raising the possibility that some patients might have had a different pain-relief outcome if they were followed for a shorter or longer time. Finally, our measurements of CSA and DOF were performed at the submillimeter level, which is at the limits of the spatial resolution of even high-resolution 3D-CISS volumetric imaging. However, spatial resolution for acquisition and measurement techniques during evaluation was consistent across all conditions.

Conclusions

Low-grade neurovascular conflict is common in control patients and on the asymptomatic side in patients with TN, while the presence of higher grade neurovascular conflict is highly specific for the symptomatic side in TN and in predicting symptomatic relief after MVD. The addition of contrast material to 3D-CISS imaging improves characterization of higher grade neurovascular conflict and improves performance in predicting both the side of symptoms in patients with TN and favorable outcomes after MVD. These improvements in TN imaging may be helpful in optimizing patient selection and preoperative planning.

Footnotes

Disclosures: Ari M. Blitz—UNRELATED: Board Membership: Guerbet, Comments: Medical Advisory Board; Grants/Grants Pending: Aesculab, Siemens, National Institutes of Health, Comments: Aesculab, research funding on hydrocephalus; Siemens, in-kind support for a pulse programming course for graduate students; National Institutes of Health, support unrelated to this submission: R21 NS096497 (coinvestigator), FAIN U01DC013778 (lead radiologist)*; Payment for Lectures Including Service on Speakers Bureaus: Siemens, Comments: payment for an educational talk at a symposium. C. Rory Goodwin—UNRELATED: Grants/Grants Pending: Johns Hopkins Neurosurgery Pain Research Institute, Burroughs Wellcome Fund, United Negro College Fund-Merck Science Initiative.* Michael Lim—UNRELATED: Consultancy: Stryker; Grants/Grants Pending: Stryker*; Payment for Lectures Including Service on Speakers Bureaus: Stryker, Comments: consulting and speaking; Payment for Development of Educational Presentations: Stryker, Comments: speaker for education; Travel/Accommodations/Meeting Expenses Unrelated to Activities Listed: Stryker, Comments: pay for travel to consulting and speaking engagements. *Money paid to the Institution.
Paper preciously presented at: Annual Meeting of the American Society of Head and Neck Radiology, September 9–13, 2015; Naples, Florida, by Seeburg et al; and Annual Meeting of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, September 26–30, 2015; New Orleans, Louisiana, by Goodwin et al.

References

1.↵
2. Devor M,
3. Amir R,
4. Rappaport ZH
. Pathophysiology of trigeminal neuralgia: the ignition hypothesis. Clin J Pain 2002;18:4–13 doi:10.1097/00002508-200201000-00002 pmid:11803297
CrossRef PubMed
2.↵
2. Peker S,
3. Dinçer A,
4. Necmettin Pamir M
. Vascular compression of the trigeminal nerve is a frequent finding in asymptomatic individuals: 3-T MR imaging of 200 trigeminal nerves using 3D CISS sequences. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2009;151:1081–88 doi:10.1007/s00701-009-0329-y pmid:19415176
CrossRef PubMed
3.↵
2. Miller JP,
3. Acar F,
4. Hamilton BE, et al
. Radiographic evaluation of trigeminal neurovascular compression in patients with and without trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 2009;110:627–32 doi:10.3171/2008.6.17620 pmid:19338397
CrossRef PubMed
4.↵
2. Hamlyn PJ
. Neurovascular relationships in the posterior cranial fossa, with special reference to trigeminal neuralgia, 2: neurovascular compression of the trigeminal nerve in cadaveric controls and patients with trigeminal neuralgia—quantification and influence of method. Clin Anat 1997;10:380–88 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1997)10:6<380::AID-CA2>3.0.CO%3B2-T pmid:9358968
CrossRef PubMed
5.↵
2. Adams CB
. Microvascular compression: an alternative view and hypothesis. J Neurosurg 1989;70:1–12 doi:10.3171/jns.1989.70.1.0001 pmid:2642544
CrossRef PubMed
6.↵
2. Maarbjerg S,
3. Wolfram F,
4. Gozalov A, et al
. Significance of neurovascular contact in classical trigeminal neuralgia. Brain 2015;138:311–19 doi:10.1093/brain/awu349 pmid:25541189
CrossRef PubMed
7.↵
2. Antonini G,
3. Di Pasquale A,
4. Cruccu G, et al
. Magnetic resonance imaging contribution for diagnosing symptomatic neurovascular contact in classical trigeminal neuralgia: a blinded case-control study and meta-analysis. Pain 2014;155:1464–71 doi:10.1016/j.pain.2014.04.020 pmid:24785270
CrossRef PubMed
8.↵
2. Sindou M,
3. Leston J,
4. Decullier E, et al
. Microvascular decompression for primary trigeminal neuralgia: long-term effectiveness and prognostic factors in a series of 362 consecutive patients with clear-cut neurovascular conflicts who underwent pure decompression. J Neurosurg 2007;107:1144–53 doi:10.3171/JNS-07/12/1144 pmid:18077952
CrossRef PubMed
9.↵
2. Sarsam Z,
3. Garcia-Fiñana M,
4. Nurmikko TJ, et al
. The long-term outcome of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Br J Neurosurg 2010;24:18–25, 2010 doi:10.3109/02688690903370289 pmid:20158348
CrossRef PubMed
10.↵
2. Szapiro J Jr.,
3. Sindou M,
4. Szapiro J
. Prognostic factors in microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery 1985;17:920–29 doi:10.1227/00006123-198512000-00009 pmid:4080125
CrossRef PubMed
11.↵
2. Leal PR,
3. Barbier C,
4. Hermier M, et al
. Atrophic changes in the trigeminal nerves of patients with trigeminal neuralgia due to neurovascular compression and their association with the severity of compression and clinical outcomes. J Neurosurg 2014;120:1484–95 doi:10.3171/2014.2.JNS131288 pmid:24745706
CrossRef PubMed
12.↵
2. Han-Bing S,
3. Wei-Guo Z,
4. Jun Z, et al
. Predicting the outcome of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia using magnetic resonance tomographic angiography. J Neuroimaging 2010;20:345–49 doi:10.1111/j.1552-6569.2009.00378.x pmid:19490372
CrossRef PubMed
13.↵
2. Duan Y,
3. Sweet J,
4. Munyon C, et al
. Degree of distal trigeminal nerve atrophy predicts outcome after microvascular decompression for type 1a trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 2015;123:1512–18 doi:10.3171/2014.12.JNS142086 pmid:26186027
CrossRef PubMed
14.↵
2. Zakrzewska JM,
3. Coakham HB
. Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: update. Curr Opin Neurol 2012;25:296–301 doi:10.1097/WCO.0b013e328352c465 pmid:22547101
CrossRef PubMed
15.↵
2. Casselman JW,
3. Kuhweide R,
4. Deimling M, et al
. Constructive interference in steady state-3DFT MR imaging of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1993;14:47–57 pmid:8427111
Abstract/FREE Full Text
16.↵
2. Blitz AM,
3. Macedo LL,
4. Chonka ZD, et al
. High-resolution CISS MR imaging with and without contrast for evaluation of the upper cranial nerves: segmental anatomy and selected pathologic conditions of the cisternal through extraforaminal segments. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2014;24:17–34 doi:10.1016/j.nic.2013.03.021 pmid:24210310
CrossRef PubMed
17.↵
2. Chavhan GB,
3. Babyn PS,
4. Jankharia BG, et al
. Steady-state MR imaging sequences: physics, classification, and clinical applications. Radiographics 2008;28:1147–60 doi:10.1148/rg.284075031 pmid:18635634
CrossRef PubMed
18.↵
2. Shigematsu Y,
3. Korogi Y,
4. Hirai T, et al
. Contrast-enhanced CISS MRI of vestibular schwannomas: phantom and clinical studies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:224–31 doi:10.1097/00004728-199903000-00010 pmid:10096329
CrossRef PubMed
19.↵
2. Blitz AM,
3. Choudhri AF,
4. Chonka ZD, et al
. Anatomic considerations, nomenclature, and advanced cross-sectional imaging techniques for visualization of the cranial nerve segments by MR imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2014;24:1–15 doi:10.1016/j.nic.2013.03.020 pmid:24210309
CrossRef PubMed
20.↵
2. Amemiya S,
3. Aoki S,
4. Ohtomo K
. Cranial nerve assessment in cavernous sinus tumors with contrast-enhanced 3D fast-imaging employing steady-state acquisition MR imaging. Neuroradiology 2009;51:467–70 doi:10.1007/s00234-009-0513-z pmid:19238368
CrossRef PubMed
21.↵
2. Greenland S,
3. Thomas DC
. On the need for the rare disease assumption in case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol 1982;116:547–53 doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113439 pmid:7124721
CrossRef PubMed
22.↵
2. Noordzij M,
3. Tripepi G,
4. Dekker FW, et al
. Sample size calculations: basic principles and common pitfalls. Nephrol Dial Transpl 2010;25:1388–93 doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp732 pmid:20067907
CrossRef PubMed
23.↵
2. DeLong ER,
3. DeLong DM,
4. Clarke-Pearson DL
. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837–45 doi:10.2307/2531595 pmid:3203132
CrossRef PubMed
24.↵
2. Beaver DL
. Electron microscopy of the gasserian ganglion in trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 1967;26(Suppl):138–50 doi:10.3171/jns.1967.26.1part2.0138 pmid:4163663
CrossRef PubMed
25.↵
2. Yousry I,
3. Moriggl B,
4. Holtmannspoetter M, et al
. Detailed anatomy of the motor and sensory roots of the trigeminal nerve and their neurovascular relationships: a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosurg 2004;101:427–34 doi:10.3171/jns.2004.101.3.0427 pmid:15352600
CrossRef PubMed
26.↵
2. Leal PR,
3. Hermier M,
4. Souza MA, et al
. Visualization of vascular compression of the trigeminal nerve with high-resolution 3T MRI: a prospective study comparing preoperative imaging analysis to surgical findings in 40 consecutive patients who underwent microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery 2011;69:15–25; discussion 26 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318212bafa pmid:21346659
CrossRef PubMed
27.↵
2. Zhou Q,
3. Liu ZL,
4. Qu CC, et al
. Preoperative demonstration of neurovascular relationship in trigeminal neuralgia by using 3D FIESTA sequence. Magn Reson Imaging 2012;30:666–71 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2011.12.022 pmid:22405984
CrossRef PubMed
28.↵
2. Gudmundsson K,
3. Rhoton AL Jr.,
4. Rushton JG
. Detailed anatomy of the intracranial portion of the trigeminal nerve. J Neurosurg 1971;35:592–600 doi:10.3171/jns.1971.35.5.0592 pmid:5120007
CrossRef PubMed
29.↵
2. Tanriover N,
3. Abe H,
4. Rhoton AL Jr., et al
. Microsurgical anatomy of the superior petrosal venous complex: new classifications and implications for subtemporal transtentorial and retrosigmoid suprameatal approaches. J Neurosurg 2007;106:1041–50 doi:10.3171/jns.2007.106.6.1041 pmid:17564177
CrossRef PubMed
30.↵
2. Matsushima T,
3. Huynh-Le P,
4. Miyazono M
. Trigeminal neuralgia caused by venous compression. Neurosurgery 2004;55:334–37; discussion 338–39 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000129552.87291.87 pmid:15271239
CrossRef PubMed
31.↵
2. Lee SH,
3. Levy EI,
4. Scarrow AM, et al
. Recurrent trigeminal neuralgia attributable to veins after microvascular decompression. Neurosurgery 2000;46:356–61; discussion 361–62 doi:10.1097/00006123-200002000-00019 pmid:10690724
CrossRef PubMed
32.↵
2. Hong W,
3. Zheng X,
4. Wu Z, et al
. Clinical features and surgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia caused solely by venous compression. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011;153:1037–42 doi:10.1007/s00701-011-0957-x pmid:21298451
CrossRef PubMed
33.↵
2. Yousry I,
3. Moriggl B,
4. Schmid UD, et al
. Trigeminal ganglion and its divisions: detailed anatomic MR imaging with contrast-enhanced 3D constructive interference in the steady state sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1128–35 pmid:15891171
Abstract/FREE Full Text

Received November 18, 2016.
Accepted after revision June 17, 2018.

View Abstract

In this issue

Download PDF

Email Article

Citation Tools

Purchase

Cited By...

Contrast-Enhanced CISS/FIESTA Imaging for Increased Conspicuity of Pituitary Microadenomas in Cushing Disease

More in this TOC Section

Show more HEAD & NECK

[1] 1.↵

Devor M,
Amir R,
Rappaport ZH
. Pathophysiology of trigeminal neuralgia: the ignition hypothesis. Clin J Pain 2002;18:4–13 doi:10.1097/00002508-200201000-00002 pmid:11803297
CrossRef PubMed

[3] Devor M,

[4] Amir R,

[5] Rappaport ZH

[6] 2.↵

Peker S,
Dinçer A,
Necmettin Pamir M
. Vascular compression of the trigeminal nerve is a frequent finding in asymptomatic individuals: 3-T MR imaging of 200 trigeminal nerves using 3D CISS sequences. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2009;151:1081–88 doi:10.1007/s00701-009-0329-y pmid:19415176
CrossRef PubMed

[8] Peker S,

[9] Dinçer A,

[10] Necmettin Pamir M

[11] 3.↵

Miller JP,
Acar F,
Hamilton BE, et al
. Radiographic evaluation of trigeminal neurovascular compression in patients with and without trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 2009;110:627–32 doi:10.3171/2008.6.17620 pmid:19338397
CrossRef PubMed

[13] Miller JP,

[14] Acar F,

[15] Hamilton BE, et al

[16] 4.↵

Hamlyn PJ
. Neurovascular relationships in the posterior cranial fossa, with special reference to trigeminal neuralgia, 2: neurovascular compression of the trigeminal nerve in cadaveric controls and patients with trigeminal neuralgia—quantification and influence of method. Clin Anat 1997;10:380–88 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1997)10:6<380::AID-CA2>3.0.CO%3B2-T pmid:9358968
CrossRef PubMed

[18] Hamlyn PJ

[19] 5.↵

Adams CB
. Microvascular compression: an alternative view and hypothesis. J Neurosurg 1989;70:1–12 doi:10.3171/jns.1989.70.1.0001 pmid:2642544
CrossRef PubMed

[21] Adams CB

[22] 6.↵

Maarbjerg S,
Wolfram F,
Gozalov A, et al
. Significance of neurovascular contact in classical trigeminal neuralgia. Brain 2015;138:311–19 doi:10.1093/brain/awu349 pmid:25541189
CrossRef PubMed

[24] Maarbjerg S,

[25] Wolfram F,

[26] Gozalov A, et al

[27] 7.↵

Antonini G,
Di Pasquale A,
Cruccu G, et al
. Magnetic resonance imaging contribution for diagnosing symptomatic neurovascular contact in classical trigeminal neuralgia: a blinded case-control study and meta-analysis. Pain 2014;155:1464–71 doi:10.1016/j.pain.2014.04.020 pmid:24785270
CrossRef PubMed

[29] Antonini G,

[30] Di Pasquale A,

[31] Cruccu G, et al

[32] 8.↵

Sindou M,
Leston J,
Decullier E, et al
. Microvascular decompression for primary trigeminal neuralgia: long-term effectiveness and prognostic factors in a series of 362 consecutive patients with clear-cut neurovascular conflicts who underwent pure decompression. J Neurosurg 2007;107:1144–53 doi:10.3171/JNS-07/12/1144 pmid:18077952
CrossRef PubMed

[34] Sindou M,

[35] Leston J,

[36] Decullier E, et al

[37] 9.↵

Sarsam Z,
Garcia-Fiñana M,
Nurmikko TJ, et al
. The long-term outcome of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Br J Neurosurg 2010;24:18–25, 2010 doi:10.3109/02688690903370289 pmid:20158348
CrossRef PubMed

[39] Sarsam Z,

[40] Garcia-Fiñana M,

[41] Nurmikko TJ, et al

[42] 10.↵

Szapiro J Jr.,
Sindou M,
Szapiro J
. Prognostic factors in microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery 1985;17:920–29 doi:10.1227/00006123-198512000-00009 pmid:4080125
CrossRef PubMed

[44] Szapiro J Jr.,

[45] Sindou M,

[46] Szapiro J

[47] 11.↵

Leal PR,
Barbier C,
Hermier M, et al
. Atrophic changes in the trigeminal nerves of patients with trigeminal neuralgia due to neurovascular compression and their association with the severity of compression and clinical outcomes. J Neurosurg 2014;120:1484–95 doi:10.3171/2014.2.JNS131288 pmid:24745706
CrossRef PubMed

[49] Leal PR,

[50] Barbier C,

[51] Hermier M, et al

[52] 12.↵

Han-Bing S,
Wei-Guo Z,
Jun Z, et al
. Predicting the outcome of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia using magnetic resonance tomographic angiography. J Neuroimaging 2010;20:345–49 doi:10.1111/j.1552-6569.2009.00378.x pmid:19490372
CrossRef PubMed

[54] Han-Bing S,

[55] Wei-Guo Z,

[56] Jun Z, et al

[57] 13.↵

Duan Y,
Sweet J,
Munyon C, et al
. Degree of distal trigeminal nerve atrophy predicts outcome after microvascular decompression for type 1a trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 2015;123:1512–18 doi:10.3171/2014.12.JNS142086 pmid:26186027
CrossRef PubMed

[59] Duan Y,

[60] Sweet J,

[61] Munyon C, et al

[62] 14.↵

Zakrzewska JM,
Coakham HB
. Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: update. Curr Opin Neurol 2012;25:296–301 doi:10.1097/WCO.0b013e328352c465 pmid:22547101
CrossRef PubMed

[64] Zakrzewska JM,

[65] Coakham HB

[66] 15.↵

Casselman JW,
Kuhweide R,
Deimling M, et al
. Constructive interference in steady state-3DFT MR imaging of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1993;14:47–57 pmid:8427111
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[68] Casselman JW,

[69] Kuhweide R,

[70] Deimling M, et al

[71] 16.↵

Blitz AM,
Macedo LL,
Chonka ZD, et al
. High-resolution CISS MR imaging with and without contrast for evaluation of the upper cranial nerves: segmental anatomy and selected pathologic conditions of the cisternal through extraforaminal segments. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2014;24:17–34 doi:10.1016/j.nic.2013.03.021 pmid:24210310
CrossRef PubMed

[73] Blitz AM,

[74] Macedo LL,

[75] Chonka ZD, et al

[76] 17.↵

Chavhan GB,
Babyn PS,
Jankharia BG, et al
. Steady-state MR imaging sequences: physics, classification, and clinical applications. Radiographics 2008;28:1147–60 doi:10.1148/rg.284075031 pmid:18635634
CrossRef PubMed

[78] Chavhan GB,

[79] Babyn PS,

[80] Jankharia BG, et al

[81] 18.↵

Shigematsu Y,
Korogi Y,
Hirai T, et al
. Contrast-enhanced CISS MRI of vestibular schwannomas: phantom and clinical studies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:224–31 doi:10.1097/00004728-199903000-00010 pmid:10096329
CrossRef PubMed

[83] Shigematsu Y,

[84] Korogi Y,

[85] Hirai T, et al

[86] 19.↵

Blitz AM,
Choudhri AF,
Chonka ZD, et al
. Anatomic considerations, nomenclature, and advanced cross-sectional imaging techniques for visualization of the cranial nerve segments by MR imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2014;24:1–15 doi:10.1016/j.nic.2013.03.020 pmid:24210309
CrossRef PubMed

[88] Blitz AM,

[89] Choudhri AF,

[90] Chonka ZD, et al

[91] 20.↵

Amemiya S,
Aoki S,
Ohtomo K
. Cranial nerve assessment in cavernous sinus tumors with contrast-enhanced 3D fast-imaging employing steady-state acquisition MR imaging. Neuroradiology 2009;51:467–70 doi:10.1007/s00234-009-0513-z pmid:19238368
CrossRef PubMed

[93] Amemiya S,

[94] Aoki S,

[95] Ohtomo K

[96] 21.↵

Greenland S,
Thomas DC
. On the need for the rare disease assumption in case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol 1982;116:547–53 doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113439 pmid:7124721
CrossRef PubMed

[98] Greenland S,

[99] Thomas DC

[100] 22.↵

Noordzij M,
Tripepi G,
Dekker FW, et al
. Sample size calculations: basic principles and common pitfalls. Nephrol Dial Transpl 2010;25:1388–93 doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp732 pmid:20067907
CrossRef PubMed

[102] Noordzij M,

[103] Tripepi G,

[104] Dekker FW, et al

[105] 23.↵

DeLong ER,
DeLong DM,
Clarke-Pearson DL
. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837–45 doi:10.2307/2531595 pmid:3203132
CrossRef PubMed

[107] DeLong ER,

[108] DeLong DM,

[109] Clarke-Pearson DL

[110] 24.↵

Beaver DL
. Electron microscopy of the gasserian ganglion in trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 1967;26(Suppl):138–50 doi:10.3171/jns.1967.26.1part2.0138 pmid:4163663
CrossRef PubMed

[112] Beaver DL

[113] 25.↵

Yousry I,
Moriggl B,
Holtmannspoetter M, et al
. Detailed anatomy of the motor and sensory roots of the trigeminal nerve and their neurovascular relationships: a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosurg 2004;101:427–34 doi:10.3171/jns.2004.101.3.0427 pmid:15352600
CrossRef PubMed

[115] Yousry I,

[116] Moriggl B,

[117] Holtmannspoetter M, et al

[118] 26.↵

Leal PR,
Hermier M,
Souza MA, et al
. Visualization of vascular compression of the trigeminal nerve with high-resolution 3T MRI: a prospective study comparing preoperative imaging analysis to surgical findings in 40 consecutive patients who underwent microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery 2011;69:15–25; discussion 26 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318212bafa pmid:21346659
CrossRef PubMed

[120] Leal PR,

[121] Hermier M,

[122] Souza MA, et al

[123] 27.↵

Zhou Q,
Liu ZL,
Qu CC, et al
. Preoperative demonstration of neurovascular relationship in trigeminal neuralgia by using 3D FIESTA sequence. Magn Reson Imaging 2012;30:666–71 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2011.12.022 pmid:22405984
CrossRef PubMed

[125] Zhou Q,

[126] Liu ZL,

[127] Qu CC, et al

[128] 28.↵

Gudmundsson K,
Rhoton AL Jr.,
Rushton JG
. Detailed anatomy of the intracranial portion of the trigeminal nerve. J Neurosurg 1971;35:592–600 doi:10.3171/jns.1971.35.5.0592 pmid:5120007
CrossRef PubMed

[130] Gudmundsson K,

[131] Rhoton AL Jr.,

[132] Rushton JG

[133] 29.↵

Tanriover N,
Abe H,
Rhoton AL Jr., et al
. Microsurgical anatomy of the superior petrosal venous complex: new classifications and implications for subtemporal transtentorial and retrosigmoid suprameatal approaches. J Neurosurg 2007;106:1041–50 doi:10.3171/jns.2007.106.6.1041 pmid:17564177
CrossRef PubMed

[135] Tanriover N,

[136] Abe H,

[137] Rhoton AL Jr., et al

[138] 30.↵

Matsushima T,
Huynh-Le P,
Miyazono M
. Trigeminal neuralgia caused by venous compression. Neurosurgery 2004;55:334–37; discussion 338–39 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000129552.87291.87 pmid:15271239
CrossRef PubMed

[140] Matsushima T,

[141] Huynh-Le P,

[142] Miyazono M

[143] 31.↵

Lee SH,
Levy EI,
Scarrow AM, et al
. Recurrent trigeminal neuralgia attributable to veins after microvascular decompression. Neurosurgery 2000;46:356–61; discussion 361–62 doi:10.1097/00006123-200002000-00019 pmid:10690724
CrossRef PubMed

[145] Lee SH,

[146] Levy EI,

[147] Scarrow AM, et al

[148] 32.↵

Hong W,
Zheng X,
Wu Z, et al
. Clinical features and surgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia caused solely by venous compression. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011;153:1037–42 doi:10.1007/s00701-011-0957-x pmid:21298451
CrossRef PubMed

[150] Hong W,

[151] Zheng X,

[152] Wu Z, et al

[153] 33.↵

Yousry I,
Moriggl B,
Schmid UD, et al
. Trigeminal ganglion and its divisions: detailed anatomic MR imaging with contrast-enhanced 3D constructive interference in the steady state sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1128–35 pmid:15891171
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[155] Yousry I,

[156] Moriggl B,

[157] Schmid UD, et al

Main menu

User menu

Search

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Contrast-Enhanced CISS Imaging for Evaluation of Neurovascular Compression in Trigeminal Neuralgia: Improved Correlation with Symptoms and Prediction of Surgical Outcomes

Abstract

ABBREVIATIONS:

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Patient Sample

Imaging Technique

Image and Data Analysis

Statistical Analysis

Results

Comparison of Neurovascular Conflict on the Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Sides and in Controls on NE-CISS and CE-CISS Imaging

Comparison between NE-CISS and CE-CISS in the Evaluation of CSA and DOF

Correlation between Postsurgical Symptomatic Relief and the Metrics of Preoperative Neurovascular Conflict and Comparison of NE-CISS versus CE-CISS in Predicting the Symptomatic Side and Symptomatic Relief after MVD in Patients with TN

Discussion

Conclusions

Footnotes

References

In this issue

Citation Manager Formats

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Similar Articles

News and Updates

Resources

Opportunities

American Society of Neuroradiology

Main menu

User menu

Search

Contrast-Enhanced CISS Imaging for Evaluation of Neurovascular Compression in Trigeminal Neuralgia: Improved Correlation with Symptoms and Prediction of Surgical Outcomes

Abstract

ABBREVIATIONS:

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Patient Sample

Imaging Technique

Image and Data Analysis

Statistical Analysis

Results

Comparison of Neurovascular Conflict on the Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Sides and in Controls on NE-CISS and CE-CISS Imaging

Comparison between NE-CISS and CE-CISS in the Evaluation of CSA and DOF

Correlation between Postsurgical Symptomatic Relief and the Metrics of Preoperative Neurovascular Conflict and Comparison of NE-CISS versus CE-CISS in Predicting the Symptomatic Side and Symptomatic Relief after MVD in Patients with TN

Discussion

Conclusions

Footnotes

References

In this issue

Citation Manager Formats

Jump to section

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Similar Articles

News and Updates

Resources

Opportunities

American Society of Neuroradiology