Carotid Intraplaque-Hemorrhage Volume and Its Association with Cerebrovascular Events

L. Saba; G. Micheletti; W. Brinjikji; P. Garofalo; R. Montisci; A. Balestrieri; J.S. Suri; J.K. DeMarco; G. Lanzino; R. Sanfilippo

doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6189

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our aim was to assess the relationship between volume and percentage of intraplaque hemorrhage measured using CT and the occurrence of cerebrovascular events at the time of CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred-twenty-three consecutive subjects (246 carotid arteries) with a mean age of 69 years who underwent CTA were included in this retrospective study. Plaque volume of components and subcomponents (including intraplaque hemorrhage volume) was quantified with dedicated software.

RESULTS: Forty-six arteries were excluded because no plaque was identified. In the remaining 200 carotid arteries, a statistically significant difference was found between presentation with cerebrovascular events and lipid volume (P = .002), intraplaque hemorrhage volume (P = .002), percentage of lipid (P = .002), percentage of calcium (P = .001), percentage of intraplaque hemorrhage (P = .001), percentage of lipid-intraplaque hemorrhage (P = .001), and intraplaque hemorrhage/lipid ratio (P = .001). The highest receiver operating characteristic area under the curve was obtained with the intraplaque hemorrhage volume with a value of 0.793 (P = .001), percentage of intraplaque hemorrhage with an area under the curve of 0.812 (P = .001), and the intraplaque hemorrhage/lipid ratio with an area under the curve value of 0.811 (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS: Results of our study suggest that Hounsfield unit values <25 have a statistically significant association with the presence of cerebrovascular events and that the ratio intraplaque hemorrhage/lipid volume represents a strong parameter for the association of cerebrovascular events.

ABBREVIATIONS:

AUC: area under the curve
IPH: intraplaque hemorrhage
ROC: receiver operating characteristic

Several studies have demonstrated, in recent years, that the degree of stenosis should not be considered the only parameter to identify carotid plaque at risk of distal embolization and that additional plaque features can increase or reduce risk of plaque rupture and embolic events.^1⇓⇓–4 In particular, intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) has been convincingly associated with a higher risk of ipsilateral cerebrovascular events.^5,6

Although MR imaging has been widely used to identify IPH,^7⇓–9 recent evidence suggests that CT,¹⁰ using a threshold of attenuation values of <25 HU in the carotid artery, can consistently identify the presence of IPH. Moreover, with improved algorithmic and hardware evolution, there has been an increasing role of volumetric quantification of tissue components for plaque characterization.^{11⇓⇓–14}

In the present study, we assessed the relationship between volume and the percentage of IPH measured using software analysis in volumetric CT and the occurrence of cerebrovascular events (stroke and TIA).

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Patient Population

Institutional review board approval for this study was obtained, and patient consent was waived because of the retrospective nature. On the basis of a power calculation (type I error, α = .05; type II error, β = 0.1; area under the curve [AUC] null hypothesis value = 0.5; AUC significant value = 0.7, pooled group), we estimated that a sample size of at least 130 (with a 30% IPH prevalence) carotid arteries would be sufficient to investigate the potential effect of CT-detected IPH versus the occurrence of cerebrovascular events. We decided to also include a correction factor of 10%, yielding a necessary sample size of 143 carotid arteries. Moreover, because in each subject, there are 2 carotid arteries and this determined a bias in the model, we decided to study 200 carotid arteries to avoid the inference determined by the 2 carotid arteries in each patient.

Consecutive subjects who underwent CT of the carotid arteries in our hospital from March 2013 were included until the threshold of 200 carotid arteries was reached (January 2014) for a total of 246 carotid arteries in 123 subjects (94 men, 29 women; mean age, 69 years; age range, 45–86 years). For each subject, when both carotid arteries showed atherosclerotic plaque, the left and right sides were included. Plaque was defined according to the Mannheim consensus¹⁵ as a carotid wall thickness of >1500 μm.

In cases in which only 1 carotid artery was pathologic, the normal side (46 carotid arteries) was excluded from analysis, leaving 200 arteries with an atherosclerotic plaque for analysis.

Quantification of the degree of stenosis and plaque analysis was performed using CTA according to previously published criteria.^16,17 Carotid sonography is used as a screening tool to identify carotid stenosis, and CTA was performed under the following circumstances: 1) Carotid sonography showed a pathologic stenosis (>50% measured with the NASCET criteria¹⁸) or features related to plaque vulnerability (ulcerations, irregular surface); 2) sonography could not adequately assess the degree of stenosis and plaque characteristics because of anatomic conditions; 3) diabetes screening; and 4) presurgery analysis. Moreover, all subjects with cerebrovascular events underwent CTA of the carotid arteries. The neurologic status at the time of CT was classified as symptomatic or asymptomatic according to the neurologic assessment documented in the clinical chart review using the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria.^19,20 The maximum timing between events and imaging to consider a subject as symptomatic was 1 week. In the case of >1 week between ischemic symptoms and CTA of carotid arteries, the patient was excluded. We defined as symptomatic those patients with TIA or stroke, considering TIA as a brief (<24-hour) episode of neurologic dysfunction such as dysarthria, dysphasia, hemiparesis, or hemiparesthesia and monocular blindness. If the episodes of neurologic dysfunction lasted >24 hours, the patient was considered to have a stroke. In case of doubt with other pathologies (eg, hypoglycemia, migraine, postparoxysmal neurologic dysfunction), we excluded patients from the analysis. Asymptomatic patients had no history of either remote or recent symptoms at the time of the examination. Clinical classification into symptomatic and asymptomatic was based on the assessment of the clinician evaluating the patient and ordering the diagnostic study and was extracted from the chart. We considered symptomatic patients those who had plaque in the carotid artery ipsilateral to the cerebrovascular event.

Moreover, we excluded patients with the following conditions: 1) concomitant intracranial pathology such as brain tumor, abscess, and encephalitis; and 2) the presence of a cardioembolic source documented by a cardiologist.

CTA Technique

Patients were studied using a 16–detector row CT system (Brilliance; Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands). CT images were obtained with coverage from the aortic arch to the carotid siphon in a caudocranial direction, and examinations were performed before and after the administration of contrast material. An angiographic phase was obtained with the administration of 80 mL of prewarmed contrast medium, Ultravist 370 (iopromide; Bayer HealthCare, Berlin, Germany) into a cubital vein using a power injector at a flow rate of 4–5 mL/s and a 16-ga intravenous catheter followed by 30 mL of saline flush. CT technical parameters included the following: section thickness = 0.6 mm, section interval = 0.3 mm, matrix size = 512 × 512 pixels, FOV = 14–19 cm. A C-filter algorithm of reconstruction was applied.

IPH and Plaque Volume Component Analysis Quantification

Two radiologists (L.S. and A.B. with 11 and 8 years of experience in CTA, respectively) blinded to clinical information regarding symptomatic status performed all measurements of Hounsfield units using as window/level settings, W = 850:L = 300.²¹ Volume analysis was performed with dedicated software (Elucid Bioimaging, Wenham, Massachusetts) to semi-automatically quantify the subcomponent volume.^22,23 With this software, it is possible to identify attenuation values of all the voxels within a volume, and by means of applying some thresholds, it is possible to classify the tissues according to the attenuation values (Fig 1). For this analysis, we considered 5 classes: 3, as suggested by de Weert et al²⁴ in which voxels identifying lipid tissues were <60 HU, fibrous tissue between 60 and 130 HU, and calcium tissue >130 HU.^10,24 Two additional classes (4 and 5) were added by splitting the lipid: the fourth class was the IPH for values <25 HU according to the findings by Saba et al,¹⁰ whereas the fifth class was the lipid-IPH, which included all the voxels with Hounsfield unit values between 26 and 59 HU.

Fig 1.

The first case is a 69-year-old male patient with right stroke who underwent CTA that showed a large IPH component of 107 mm³ (A–C). A, The coronal view of the carotid CTA is given with the segmentation of the software (white open arrow). B, A coronal cut of the postprocessed carotid arteries is shown (white arrowhead). C, The white arrow indicates the internal carotid artery in the axial selected section. The legend of the chromatic scale is the following: red = IPH; yellow = lipid-IPH component; blue = mixed component; green = calcified component. The second case is a 73-year-old male patient with left MCA stroke with an IPH/lipid ratio of 0.93 (D–F). D–F, Three axial slices from the bifurcation upward were selected showing the presence of a large IPH and the small amount of lipid-IPH (white arrowheads).

We also calculated the percentages of these components, and finally, a ratio was introduced as the ratio of IPH/lipid volume (with values between 0, if no IPH was present, and 1, if all the lipid plaque component was due to IPH).

IPH Volume Dichotomization

After the volume calculation of the IPH, 5 thresholds were selected to obtain a dichotomization and subsequently test the effect of the presence/absence of IPH versus symptoms using a 6-hypothesis scenario. We considered the following 6 thresholds of IPH volume: 10, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 mm³.

Statistical Analysis

In this study, continuous data were described as the mean ± SD. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed between volume and volume subcomponents (lipid, mixed, calcified, IPH, lipid-IPH tissue), percentage of variable of the subcomponents, ratio of IPH/lipid, and the presence of cerebrovascular events. The normality of each continuous group was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z-test, and different values in groups with and without cerebrovascular symptoms were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. The dichotomized IPH values according to the thresholds were tested versus the presence/absence of cerebrovascular events using a χ² test. A P value < .05 indicated a statistically significance association, and all values were calculated using a 2-tailed significance level. Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS 13.0 Statistical Package (IBM, Armonk, New York). Graphics were plotted with MedCalc 15.0 software (MedCalc Software, Mariakerke, Belgium).

Results

General Results

No patients were excluded due to suboptimal image quality. Of the 123 patients, 46 were symptomatic (15 strokes, 31 transient ischemic attacks) and 77 were asymptomatic. General plaque characteristics and their subcomponent volume and percentages are summarized in Table 1. No statistically significant difference was found for the common cerebrovascular risk factors between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. However, there were statistically significant differences in the lipid volume (P = .002), IPH volume (P = .001), percentage of lipid (P = .002), percentage calcium (P = .001), percentage of IPH (P = .0001), percentage of lipid-IPH (P = .0001), and the IPH/lipid ratio (P = .001). Boxplots are given in Fig 2.

Fig 2.

Boxplot of the volume components of the carotid artery plaque according to the presence or absence of cerebral symptoms (A) and boxplot of the percentages of the components according to the presence or absence of cerebrovascular symptoms (B).

View this table:

Table 1:

Demographic and plaque characteristic summary table

ROC Curve Analysis

The ROC curve analysis for the total plaque component and subcomponent volume versus the presence of cerebrovascular symptoms is given in Fig 3A. Table 2 summarizes general ROC results from the volume analysis. The best ROC AUC was obtained with the IPH volume, with a value of 0.793 (P = .001).

Fig 3.

ROC curve analysis of the volume components of the carotid artery plaque according to the presence or absence of cerebral symptoms (A) and ROC curve analysis of the percentages of the components according to the presence or absence of cerebral symptoms (B).

View this table:

Table 2:

ROC curve analysis between symptoms and volume/percentage of plaque tissues

The ROC curve analysis was also performed for the percentage of plaque components versus the presence of cerebrovascular symptoms, and the ROC plot is shown in Fig 3B. Table 2 also summarizes the general ROC results from volume analysis. The best performance was obtained by the percentage of IPH with an AUC of 0.812; P = .001). Also, the IPH/lipid ratio showed a very good AUC, with a value of 0.811 (P = .001).

IPH Volume Dichotomization

In Table 3, the χ² results for the different threshold volumes of IPH and cerebrovascular symptoms are summarized. The best association was found by considering a threshold of 50 mm³ (P = .001, χ² = 43.913, contingency coefficient = 0.424).

View this table:

Table 3:

χ² test between symptoms and different volume thresholds of IPH

Discussion

Several studies have recently shown that carotid artery plaque characteristics are associated with a risk of rupture and subsequent distal embolization.^2,3,5,24 In this study, we assessed the relationship between volume and percentage of IPH and other plaque components in the carotid artery detected with CT and their association with symptomatic status. We observed a significant association between the presence of ipsilateral cerebrovascular events and the absolute volume of IPH as well as plaque lipid content. Moreover, the ratio of IPH/lipid volume was strongly associated with cerebrovascular events.

Among factors involved with plaque rupture, IPH is one of the most dangerous, and its noninvasive identification is an important step for correct risk stratification.^5⇓⇓–8 MR imaging is considered the best technique for the detection of IPH, while the value of CT is debated. However, a recent study¹⁰ suggests that a threshold of ≤25 HU is strongly associated with the presence of IPH on CT.

One of the main limitations of carotid plaque analysis was the fact that various imaging techniques do not account for the heterogeneous composition of the atherosclerotic tissue where several components can coexist in the same plaque.^25,26 In the carotid artery plaque, coexistence of several components is frequent with changes across time. Volumetric analysis of the plaque could offer important insights because it allows us to quantify different plaque components and provides a more complete analysis.^13,14,27,28 The introduction of a new CT criterion (≤25 HU of attenuation) for the detection of IPH applied to the use of volumetric quantification analysis systems could allow one to extrapolate the real impact of the IPH component. Recently published articles in 2019^29,30 have demonstrated that the volumetric analysis of the carotid artery plaques obtained by CT data is a reliable technique and that small changes in plaque composition can also be detected.³⁰

In past years, the classic division of the carotid artery plaque type according to the attenuation values was based on the seminal study by de Weert et al,²⁴ in which 3 classes were identified: lipid (<60 HU), mixed (between 60 and 130 HU), and calcified (>130 HU). With the demonstration that attenuation values of <25 HU are due to IPH,¹⁰ we tried to test the effect of the volumes for this component; therefore, the lipid class was divided into IPH (<25 HU) and lipid-IPH (from 26 to 59 HU). By comparing symptomatic with asymptomatic subjects, we found a statistically significant difference in volume for the lipid (P = .002), and in particular for the IPH volume (P = .001). These findings confirm that IPH volume is higher in plaques causing cerebrovascular events.^{2,3,5,6,31,32} Of interest, there was no difference in lipid-IPH volume tissue, whereas the total lipid volume showed a statistically significant difference. This finding can be explained because in the old classification the lipid volume class included all the voxels <60 HU (and therefore also the IPH component); these results suggest that tissues with an attenuation between 26 to 59 HU, namely fatty components, are not associated with the presence of cerebrovascular events.

Further information can be gathered from the difference in the relative percentages of various tissue components. It is not only the volume threshold that can trigger plaque rupture but also the relative percentage, suggesting that the biomechanical structure of plaque is fundamental. In particular, in subjects with cerebrovascular symptoms, there is an increased percentage of IPH components and lipid (also including the IPH class). Conversely, in subjects without cerebrovascular symptoms, an increased percentage of calcium and lipid-IPH was found. The protective effect of the calcium was already demonstrated by Nandalur et al,³³ whereas the finding that the lipid-IPH percentage is lower in symptomatic subjects could support the histopathologic observation that lipid tissue within plaques is not active and not related to the risk of rupture.³⁴ The ROC curve analysis confirms these results by showing the highest area under the curve with the IPH volume (AUC of 0.793, P = .001) and percentage of IPH (AUC of 0.812, P = .001). To assess the effect of some volumetric thresholds, we created 6 different models by considering the following thresholds: 10, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 mm³, and the best association was found by considering a threshold of 50 mm³ (P = .001, χ² = 43.913, contingency coefficient = 0.424).

Our study has some limitations. It is a retrospective analysis, and we did not explore the association between the presence of IPH (and its volume or percentage) and the risk of new/recurrent cerebrovascular events. Instead, IPH was assessed in patients who already had cerebrovascular events, and this may have introduced a bias because some plaques may have theoretically changed in structure and composition in the interval between symptom onset and the time of CTA detection. However, we think that the limited time between the symptomatic event and the CTA reduces this potential effect. Our findings are based on a relatively small cohort, and these data will need to be validated in a larger and preferentially prospective cohort. Nevertheless, these data provide a valuable framework on which further confirmatory cohorts can be based.

Conclusions

The results of this study confirm that the value of <25 HU has a statistically significant association with the presence of cerebrovascular events and that the ratio between IPH and lipid volume represents a strong parameter for the association of cerebrovascular events.

Footnotes

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy of the Department of Army/Navy/Air Force, Department of Defense, or US Government.
The identification of specific products or scientific instrumentation does not constitute endorsement or implied endorsement on the part of the author, Department of Defense, or any component agency.
Disclosures: Jasjit S. Suri—UNRELATED: Other: member of AtheroPoint LLC (owner). James Kevin DeMarco—UNRELATED: Grants/Grants Pending: Department of Defense*; Payment for Lectures Including Service on Speakers Bureaus: Baptist Neurological Institute, Jacksonville, Florida; Payment for Development of Educational Presentations: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.* Waleed Brinjikji—UNRELATED: Consultancy: Superior Medical Editing (<$5000); Grants/Grants Pending: National Institutes of Health, Comments: Johnson and Johnson*; Patents (Planned, Pending or Issued): Marblehead Medical, Comments: patents pending for stroke intervention devices*; Stock/Stock Options: Marblehead Medical, Comments: cofounder of the company. *Money paid to the Institution.

References

1.↵
2. Saba L,
3. Yuan C,
4. Hatsukami TS, et al
. Carotid artery wall imaging: perspective and guidelines from the ASNR Vessel Wall Imaging Study Group and Expert Consensus Recommendations of the American Society of Neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:E9–31 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5488 pmid:29326139
Abstract/FREE Full Text
2.↵
2. Lu M,
3. Peng P,
4. Cui Y, et al
. Association of progression of carotid artery wall volume and recurrent transient ischemic attack or stroke: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke 2018;49:614–20 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019422 pmid:29382804
Abstract/FREE Full Text
3.↵
2. Saba L,
3. Saam T,
4. Jäger HR, et al
. Imaging biomarkers of vulnerable carotid plaques for stroke risk prediction and their potential clinical implications. Lancet Neurol 2019;18:559–72 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30035-3 pmid:30954372
CrossRef PubMed
4.↵
2. Hellings WE,
3. Peeters W,
4. Moll FL, et al
. Composition of carotid atherosclerotic plaque is associated with cardiovascular outcome: a prognostic study. Circulation 2010;121:1941–50 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.887497 pmid:20404256
Abstract/FREE Full Text
5.↵
2. Altaf N,
3. MacSweeney ST,
4. Gladman J, et al
. Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage predicts recurrent symptoms in patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. Stroke 2007;38:1633 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.473066
Abstract/FREE Full Text
6.↵
2. Turc G,
3. Oppenheim C,
4. Naggara O
, HIRISC study investigators, , et al. Relationships between recent intraplaque hemorrhage and stroke risk factors in patients with carotid stenosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2012;32:492–99 doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.239335 pmid:22075251
Abstract/FREE Full Text
7.↵
2. Parmar JP,
3. Rogers WJ,
4. Mugler JP 3rd., et al
. Magnetic resonance imaging of carotid atherosclerotic plaque in clinically suspected acute transient ischemic attack and acute ischemic stroke. Circulation 2010;122:2031–38 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.866053 pmid:21041694
Abstract/FREE Full Text
8.↵
2. Demarco JK,
3. Ota H,
4. Underhill HR, et al
. MR carotid plaque imaging and contrast-enhanced MR angiography identifies lesions associated with recent ipsilateral thromboembolic symptoms: an in vivo study at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1395–402 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2213 pmid:20651015
Abstract/FREE Full Text
9.↵
2. Horie N,
3. Morikawa M,
4. Ishizaka S, et al
. Assessment of carotid plaque stability based on the dynamic enhancement pattern in plaque components with multidetector CT angiography. Stroke 2012;43:393-98 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.635953 pmid:22096033
Abstract/FREE Full Text
10.↵
2. Saba L,
3. Francone M,
4. Bassareo PP, et al
. CT attenuation analysis of carotid intraplaque hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:131–37 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5461 pmid:29191874
Abstract/FREE Full Text
11.↵
2. Cheng J,
3. Chen Y,
4. Yu Y, et al
. Carotid plaque segmentation from three-dimensional ultrasound images by direct three-dimensional sparse field level-set optimization. Comput Biol Med 2018;94:27–40 doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.01.002 pmid:29407996
CrossRef PubMed
12.↵
2. Ball S,
3. Rogers S,
4. Kanesalingam K, et al
. Carotid plaque volume in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Br J Surg 2018;105:262–69 doi:10.1002/bjs.10670 pmid:29315509
CrossRef PubMed
13.↵
2. Spence JD
. Approaching automated 3-dimensional measurement of atherosclerotic plaque volume. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:314–17 doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.036 pmid:28705311
FREE Full Text
14.↵
2. Saba L,
3. Raz E,
4. Anzidei M, et al
. Differences in plaque morphology and correlation of stenosis at the carotid artery bifurcation and the carotid siphon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:1108–14 doi:10.2214/AJR.12.10213 pmid:24147484
CrossRef PubMed
15.↵
2. Touboul PJ,
3. Hennerici MG,
4. Meairs S, et al
. Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness and plaque consensus (2004-2006-2011): an update on behalf of the advisory board of the 3rd, 4th and 5th watching the risk symposia, at the 13th, 15th and 20th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim, Germany, 2004, Brussels, Belgium, 2006, and Hamburg, Germany, 2011. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004;34:290–96 pmid:23128470
PubMed
16.↵
2. Saba L,
3. Sanfilippo R,
4. Montisci R, et al
. Agreement between multidetector-row CT angiography and ultrasound echo-color Doppler in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008;26:525–32 doi:10.1159/000160209 pmid:18836263
CrossRef PubMed
17.↵
2. Saba L,
3. Sanfilippo R,
4. Pascalis L, et al
. Carotid artery wall thickness and ischemic symptoms: evaluation using multi-detector-row CT angiography. Eur Radiology 2008;18:1962–71 doi:10.1007/s00330-008-0962-5 pmid:18404269
CrossRef PubMed
18.↵
2. Alexandrov AV,
3. Bladin CF,
4. Maggisano R, et al
. Measuring carotid stenosis: time for a reappraisal. Stroke 1993;24:1292–96 doi:10.1161/01.STR.24.9.1292 pmid:8362420
Abstract/FREE Full Text
19.↵
2. de Paiva Bezerra R,
3. de Miranda Alves MA,
4. Conforto AB, et al
. Etiological classification of stroke in patients with Chagas Disease using TOAST, Causative Classification System TOAST, and ASCOD phenotyping. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2017;26:2864–69 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.07.007 pmid:28844546
CrossRef PubMed
20.↵
2. Xin XY,
3. Cheng L,
4. Yang Z, et al
. Comparison study of ASCO and TOAST classification system in Chinese minor stroke patients. Cerebrovasc Dis 2019;47:95–100 doi:10.1159/000497478 pmid:30921793
CrossRef PubMed
21.↵
2. Saba L,
3. Mallarin G
. Window settings for the study of calcified carotid plaques with multidetector CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1445–50 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1509 pmid:19299487
Abstract/FREE Full Text
22.↵
2. Rozie S,
3. de Weert TT,
4. de Monyé C, et al
. Atherosclerotic plaque volume and composition in symptomatic carotid arteries assessed with multidetector CT angiography; relationship with severity of stenosis and cardiovascular risk factors. Eur Radiology 2009;19:2294–301 doi:10.1007/s00330-009-1394-6 pmid:19384548
CrossRef PubMed
23.↵
2. Sheahan M,
3. Ma X,
4. Paik D, et al
. Atherosclerotic plaque tissue: noninvasive quantitative assessment of characteristics with software-aided measurements from conventional CT angiography. Radiology 2018;286:622–31 doi:10.1148/radiol.2017170127 pmid:28858564
CrossRef PubMed
24.↵
2. de Weert TT,
3. de Monyé C,
4. Meijering E, et al
. Assessment of atherosclerotic carotid plaque volume with multidetector computed tomography angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;24:751–59 doi:10.1007/s10554-008-9309-1 pmid:18373211
CrossRef PubMed
25.↵
2. Baroncini LA,
3. Filho AP,
4. Ramos SG, et al
. Histological composition and progression of carotid plaque. Thromb J 2007;5:4 doi:10.1186/1477-9560-5-4 pmid:17324272
CrossRef PubMed
26.↵
2. Carr S,
3. Farb A,
4. Pearce WH, et al
. Atherosclerotic plaque rupture in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg 1996;23:755–65 doi:10.1016/S0741-5214(96)70237-9 pmid:8667496
CrossRef PubMed
27.↵
2. Miralles M,
3. Arrébola M,
4. Bruguer S, et al
. Volumetric assessment of the carotid bifurcation: an alternative concept to stenosis grading. Ann Vasc Surg 2015;29:411–18 doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2014.11.005 pmid:25591486
CrossRef PubMed
28.↵
2. Saba L,
3. Raz E,
4. di Martino M, et al
. Is there an association between asymmetry of carotid artery wall thickness (ACAWT) and cerebrovascular symptoms? Int J Neurosci 2015;125:456–63 doi:10.3109/00207454.2014.948116 pmid:25057761
CrossRef PubMed
29.↵
2. Zhu G,
3. Li Y,
4. Ding V, et al
. Semiautomated characterization of carotid artery plaque features from computed tomography angiography to predict atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2019 May 6 [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1097/RCT.0000000000000862 pmid:31082978
CrossRef PubMed
30.↵
2. Chrencik MT,
3. Khan AA,
4. Luther L, et al
. Quantitative assessment of carotid plaque morphology (geometry and tissue composition) using computed tomography angiography. J Vasc Surg 2019 Mar 5. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2018.11.050 pmid:30850296
CrossRef PubMed
31.↵
2. Ajduk M,
3. Pavić L,
4. Bulimbasić S, et al
. Multidetector-row computed tomography in evaluation of atherosclerotic carotid plaques complicated with intraplaque hemorrhage. Ann Vasc Surg 2009;23:186–93 doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2008.05.008 pmid:18657388
CrossRef PubMed
32.↵
2. Liu Y,
3. Wang M,
4. Zhang B, et al
. Size of carotid artery intraplaque hemorrhage and acute ischemic stroke: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance Chinese atherosclerosis risk evaluation study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2019;21:36
33.↵
2. Nandalur KR,
3. Baskurt E,
4. Hagspiel KD, et al
. Calcified carotid atherosclerotic plaque is associated less with ischemic symptoms than is noncalcified plaque on MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:295–28 doi:10.2214/ajr.184.1.01840295 pmid:15615991
CrossRef PubMed
34.↵
2. Bentzon JF,
3. Otsuka F,
4. Virmani R, et al
. Mechanisms of plaque formation and rupture. Circ Res 2014;114:1852–66 doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302721 pmid:24902970
Abstract/FREE Full Text

Received April 7, 2019.
Accepted after revision July 15, 2019.

View Abstract

In this issue

Download PDF

Email Article

Citation Tools

Purchase

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Show more EXTRACRANIAL VASCULAR

[1] 1.↵

Saba L,
Yuan C,
Hatsukami TS, et al
. Carotid artery wall imaging: perspective and guidelines from the ASNR Vessel Wall Imaging Study Group and Expert Consensus Recommendations of the American Society of Neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:E9–31 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5488 pmid:29326139
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[3] Saba L,

[4] Yuan C,

[5] Hatsukami TS, et al

[6] 2.↵

Lu M,
Peng P,
Cui Y, et al
. Association of progression of carotid artery wall volume and recurrent transient ischemic attack or stroke: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke 2018;49:614–20 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019422 pmid:29382804
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[8] Lu M,

[9] Peng P,

[10] Cui Y, et al

[11] 3.↵

Saba L,
Saam T,
Jäger HR, et al
. Imaging biomarkers of vulnerable carotid plaques for stroke risk prediction and their potential clinical implications. Lancet Neurol 2019;18:559–72 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30035-3 pmid:30954372
CrossRef PubMed

[13] Saba L,

[14] Saam T,

[15] Jäger HR, et al

[16] 4.↵

Hellings WE,
Peeters W,
Moll FL, et al
. Composition of carotid atherosclerotic plaque is associated with cardiovascular outcome: a prognostic study. Circulation 2010;121:1941–50 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.887497 pmid:20404256
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[18] Hellings WE,

[19] Peeters W,

[20] Moll FL, et al

[21] 5.↵

Altaf N,
MacSweeney ST,
Gladman J, et al
. Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage predicts recurrent symptoms in patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. Stroke 2007;38:1633 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.473066
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[23] Altaf N,

[24] MacSweeney ST,

[25] Gladman J, et al

[26] 6.↵

Turc G,
Oppenheim C,
Naggara O
, HIRISC study investigators, , et al. Relationships between recent intraplaque hemorrhage and stroke risk factors in patients with carotid stenosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2012;32:492–99 doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.239335 pmid:22075251
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[28] Turc G,

[29] Oppenheim C,

[30] Naggara O

[31] 7.↵

Parmar JP,
Rogers WJ,
Mugler JP 3rd., et al
. Magnetic resonance imaging of carotid atherosclerotic plaque in clinically suspected acute transient ischemic attack and acute ischemic stroke. Circulation 2010;122:2031–38 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.866053 pmid:21041694
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[33] Parmar JP,

[34] Rogers WJ,

[35] Mugler JP 3rd., et al

[36] 8.↵

Demarco JK,
Ota H,
Underhill HR, et al
. MR carotid plaque imaging and contrast-enhanced MR angiography identifies lesions associated with recent ipsilateral thromboembolic symptoms: an in vivo study at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1395–402 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2213 pmid:20651015
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[38] Demarco JK,

[39] Ota H,

[40] Underhill HR, et al

[41] 9.↵

Horie N,
Morikawa M,
Ishizaka S, et al
. Assessment of carotid plaque stability based on the dynamic enhancement pattern in plaque components with multidetector CT angiography. Stroke 2012;43:393-98 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.635953 pmid:22096033
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[43] Horie N,

[44] Morikawa M,

[45] Ishizaka S, et al

[46] 10.↵

Saba L,
Francone M,
Bassareo PP, et al
. CT attenuation analysis of carotid intraplaque hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:131–37 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5461 pmid:29191874
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[48] Saba L,

[49] Francone M,

[50] Bassareo PP, et al

[51] 11.↵

Cheng J,
Chen Y,
Yu Y, et al
. Carotid plaque segmentation from three-dimensional ultrasound images by direct three-dimensional sparse field level-set optimization. Comput Biol Med 2018;94:27–40 doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.01.002 pmid:29407996
CrossRef PubMed

[53] Cheng J,

[54] Chen Y,

[55] Yu Y, et al

[56] 12.↵

Ball S,
Rogers S,
Kanesalingam K, et al
. Carotid plaque volume in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Br J Surg 2018;105:262–69 doi:10.1002/bjs.10670 pmid:29315509
CrossRef PubMed

[58] Ball S,

[59] Rogers S,

[60] Kanesalingam K, et al

[61] 13.↵

Spence JD
. Approaching automated 3-dimensional measurement of atherosclerotic plaque volume. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:314–17 doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.036 pmid:28705311
FREE Full Text

[63] Spence JD

[64] 14.↵

Saba L,
Raz E,
Anzidei M, et al
. Differences in plaque morphology and correlation of stenosis at the carotid artery bifurcation and the carotid siphon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:1108–14 doi:10.2214/AJR.12.10213 pmid:24147484
CrossRef PubMed

[66] Saba L,

[67] Raz E,

[68] Anzidei M, et al

[69] 15.↵

Touboul PJ,
Hennerici MG,
Meairs S, et al
. Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness and plaque consensus (2004-2006-2011): an update on behalf of the advisory board of the 3rd, 4th and 5th watching the risk symposia, at the 13th, 15th and 20th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim, Germany, 2004, Brussels, Belgium, 2006, and Hamburg, Germany, 2011. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004;34:290–96 pmid:23128470
PubMed

[71] Touboul PJ,

[72] Hennerici MG,

[73] Meairs S, et al

[74] 16.↵

Saba L,
Sanfilippo R,
Montisci R, et al
. Agreement between multidetector-row CT angiography and ultrasound echo-color Doppler in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008;26:525–32 doi:10.1159/000160209 pmid:18836263
CrossRef PubMed

[76] Saba L,

[77] Sanfilippo R,

[78] Montisci R, et al

[79] 17.↵

Saba L,
Sanfilippo R,
Pascalis L, et al
. Carotid artery wall thickness and ischemic symptoms: evaluation using multi-detector-row CT angiography. Eur Radiology 2008;18:1962–71 doi:10.1007/s00330-008-0962-5 pmid:18404269
CrossRef PubMed

[81] Saba L,

[82] Sanfilippo R,

[83] Pascalis L, et al

[84] 18.↵

Alexandrov AV,
Bladin CF,
Maggisano R, et al
. Measuring carotid stenosis: time for a reappraisal. Stroke 1993;24:1292–96 doi:10.1161/01.STR.24.9.1292 pmid:8362420
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[86] Alexandrov AV,

[87] Bladin CF,

[88] Maggisano R, et al

[89] 19.↵

de Paiva Bezerra R,
de Miranda Alves MA,
Conforto AB, et al
. Etiological classification of stroke in patients with Chagas Disease using TOAST, Causative Classification System TOAST, and ASCOD phenotyping. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2017;26:2864–69 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.07.007 pmid:28844546
CrossRef PubMed

[91] de Paiva Bezerra R,

[92] de Miranda Alves MA,

[93] Conforto AB, et al

[94] 20.↵

Xin XY,
Cheng L,
Yang Z, et al
. Comparison study of ASCO and TOAST classification system in Chinese minor stroke patients. Cerebrovasc Dis 2019;47:95–100 doi:10.1159/000497478 pmid:30921793
CrossRef PubMed

[96] Xin XY,

[97] Cheng L,

[98] Yang Z, et al

[99] 21.↵

Saba L,
Mallarin G
. Window settings for the study of calcified carotid plaques with multidetector CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1445–50 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1509 pmid:19299487
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[101] Saba L,

[102] Mallarin G

[103] 22.↵

Rozie S,
de Weert TT,
de Monyé C, et al
. Atherosclerotic plaque volume and composition in symptomatic carotid arteries assessed with multidetector CT angiography; relationship with severity of stenosis and cardiovascular risk factors. Eur Radiology 2009;19:2294–301 doi:10.1007/s00330-009-1394-6 pmid:19384548
CrossRef PubMed

[105] Rozie S,

[106] de Weert TT,

[107] de Monyé C, et al

[108] 23.↵

Sheahan M,
Ma X,
Paik D, et al
. Atherosclerotic plaque tissue: noninvasive quantitative assessment of characteristics with software-aided measurements from conventional CT angiography. Radiology 2018;286:622–31 doi:10.1148/radiol.2017170127 pmid:28858564
CrossRef PubMed

[110] Sheahan M,

[111] Ma X,

[112] Paik D, et al

[113] 24.↵

de Weert TT,
de Monyé C,
Meijering E, et al
. Assessment of atherosclerotic carotid plaque volume with multidetector computed tomography angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;24:751–59 doi:10.1007/s10554-008-9309-1 pmid:18373211
CrossRef PubMed

[115] de Weert TT,

[116] de Monyé C,

[117] Meijering E, et al

[118] 25.↵

Baroncini LA,
Filho AP,
Ramos SG, et al
. Histological composition and progression of carotid plaque. Thromb J 2007;5:4 doi:10.1186/1477-9560-5-4 pmid:17324272
CrossRef PubMed

[120] Baroncini LA,

[121] Filho AP,

[122] Ramos SG, et al

[123] 26.↵

Carr S,
Farb A,
Pearce WH, et al
. Atherosclerotic plaque rupture in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg 1996;23:755–65 doi:10.1016/S0741-5214(96)70237-9 pmid:8667496
CrossRef PubMed

[125] Carr S,

[126] Farb A,

[127] Pearce WH, et al

[128] 27.↵

Miralles M,
Arrébola M,
Bruguer S, et al
. Volumetric assessment of the carotid bifurcation: an alternative concept to stenosis grading. Ann Vasc Surg 2015;29:411–18 doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2014.11.005 pmid:25591486
CrossRef PubMed

[130] Miralles M,

[131] Arrébola M,

[132] Bruguer S, et al

[133] 28.↵

Saba L,
Raz E,
di Martino M, et al
. Is there an association between asymmetry of carotid artery wall thickness (ACAWT) and cerebrovascular symptoms? Int J Neurosci 2015;125:456–63 doi:10.3109/00207454.2014.948116 pmid:25057761
CrossRef PubMed

[135] Saba L,

[136] Raz E,

[137] di Martino M, et al

[138] 29.↵

Zhu G,
Li Y,
Ding V, et al
. Semiautomated characterization of carotid artery plaque features from computed tomography angiography to predict atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2019 May 6 [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1097/RCT.0000000000000862 pmid:31082978
CrossRef PubMed

[140] Zhu G,

[141] Li Y,

[142] Ding V, et al

[143] 30.↵

Chrencik MT,
Khan AA,
Luther L, et al
. Quantitative assessment of carotid plaque morphology (geometry and tissue composition) using computed tomography angiography. J Vasc Surg 2019 Mar 5. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2018.11.050 pmid:30850296
CrossRef PubMed

[145] Chrencik MT,

[146] Khan AA,

[147] Luther L, et al

[148] 31.↵

Ajduk M,
Pavić L,
Bulimbasić S, et al
. Multidetector-row computed tomography in evaluation of atherosclerotic carotid plaques complicated with intraplaque hemorrhage. Ann Vasc Surg 2009;23:186–93 doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2008.05.008 pmid:18657388
CrossRef PubMed

[150] Ajduk M,

[151] Pavić L,

[152] Bulimbasić S, et al

[153] 32.↵

Liu Y,
Wang M,
Zhang B, et al
. Size of carotid artery intraplaque hemorrhage and acute ischemic stroke: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance Chinese atherosclerosis risk evaluation study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2019;21:36

[155] Liu Y,

[156] Wang M,

[157] Zhang B, et al

[158] 33.↵

Nandalur KR,
Baskurt E,
Hagspiel KD, et al
. Calcified carotid atherosclerotic plaque is associated less with ischemic symptoms than is noncalcified plaque on MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:295–28 doi:10.2214/ajr.184.1.01840295 pmid:15615991
CrossRef PubMed

[160] Nandalur KR,

[161] Baskurt E,

[162] Hagspiel KD, et al

[163] 34.↵

Bentzon JF,
Otsuka F,
Virmani R, et al
. Mechanisms of plaque formation and rupture. Circ Res 2014;114:1852–66 doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302721 pmid:24902970
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[165] Bentzon JF,

[166] Otsuka F,

[167] Virmani R, et al

Main menu

User menu

Search

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Carotid Intraplaque-Hemorrhage Volume and Its Association with Cerebrovascular Events

Abstract

ABBREVIATIONS:

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Patient Population

CTA Technique

IPH and Plaque Volume Component Analysis Quantification

IPH Volume Dichotomization

Statistical Analysis

Results

General Results

ROC Curve Analysis

IPH Volume Dichotomization

Discussion

Conclusions

Footnotes

References

In this issue

Citation Manager Formats

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Similar Articles

News and Updates

Resources

Opportunities

American Society of Neuroradiology

Main menu

User menu

Search

Carotid Intraplaque-Hemorrhage Volume and Its Association with Cerebrovascular Events

Abstract

ABBREVIATIONS:

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Patient Population

CTA Technique

IPH and Plaque Volume Component Analysis Quantification

IPH Volume Dichotomization

Statistical Analysis

Results

General Results

ROC Curve Analysis

IPH Volume Dichotomization

Discussion

Conclusions

Footnotes

References

In this issue

Citation Manager Formats

Jump to section

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Similar Articles

News and Updates

Resources

Opportunities

American Society of Neuroradiology