1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => OpenAccess
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)


  
    


















































































































































    Diagnostic Value of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction Combined with a Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm during CT of the Oral Cavity | American Journal of Neuroradiology  
    



















    































    
  
  




    
    

  

      


    

      

  
  
  

    

  

    

  

                
    

      

  

    

  
      
  
  

    


Advertisement



  



  


  
  



  



    

  


  


  


  
  
  
  
  
  

  	      


    
      

    
  
    
        
    

  

    
                        

  

                
    

      

	  

		
		

			

			  

  
      
  
  

    

  
  
      
Research ArticleHead & Neck

  
      
Open Access

  
      
Diagnostic Value of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction Combined with a Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm during CT of the Oral Cavity
  
    	
Y. Kubo, K. Ito, M. Sone, H. Nagasawa, Y. Onishi, N. Umakoshi, T. Hasegawa, T. Akimoto and M. Kusumoto

  
    	
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2020,  41 (11) 2132-2138; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6767 

  
  
  



  


  
  



			

		

	
	
 	
	  
  

		
		

			

			  

  
      
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

  

    

  
      
  
  

    
References
  1. 1.↵
    1. Goerres  GW, 
    2. Hany  TF, 
    3. Kamel  E, et al
    . Head and neck imaging with PET and PET/CT: artefacts from dental metallic implants. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002;29:367–70 doi:10.1007/s00259-001-0721-1 pmid:12002712
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Barrett  JF, 
    2. Keat  N
    . Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics 2004;24:1679–91 doi:10.1148/rg.246045065 pmid:15537976
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Ravishankar  S, 
    2. Ye  JC, 
    3. Fessler  JA
    . Image reconstruction: from sparsity to data-adaptive methods and machine learning. Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng 2020;108:86–109 doi:10.1109/JPROC.2019.2936204 pmid:32095024
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Willemink  MJ, 
    2. Noel  PB
    . The evolution of image reconstruction for CT: from filtered back projection to artificial intelligence. Eur Radiol 2019;29:2185–95 doi:10.1007/s00330-018-5810-7 pmid:30377791
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Herman  GT
    . Fundamentals of computerized tomography: image reconstruction from projections. Springer-Verlag: London, 2009 doi:10.1007/978-1-84628-723-7
  6. 6.↵
    1. Singh  S, 
    2. Kalra  MK, 
    3. Hsieh  J, et al
    . Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Radiology 2010;257:373–83 doi:10.1148/radiol.10092212 pmid:20829535
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Gervaise  A, 
    2. Osemont  B, 
    3. Lecocq  S, et al
    . CT image quality improvement using adaptive iterative dose reduction with wide-volume acquisition on 320-detector CT. Eur Radiol 2012;22:295–301 doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2271-7 pmid:21927791
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Martinsen  ACT, 
    2. Sæther  HK, 
    3. Hol  PK, et al
    . Iterative reconstruction reduces abdominal CT dose. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:1483–87 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.021 pmid:21543174
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Yu  Z, 
    2. Thibault  JB, 
    3. Bouman  CA, et al
    . Fast model-based X-ray CT reconstruction using spatially nonhomogeneous ICD optimization. IEEE Trans Image Process 2011;20:161–75 doi:10.1109/TIP.2010.2058811 pmid:20643609
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Fleischmann  D, 
    2. Boas  FE
    . Computed tomograph: old ideas and new technology. Eur Radiol 2011;21:510–17 doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2056-z pmid:21249371
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Chang  W, 
    2. Lee  JM, 
    3. Lee  K, et al
    . Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2013;48:598–606 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182899104 pmid:23511193
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Goodenberger  MH, 
    2. Wagner-Bartak  NA, 
    3. Gupta  S, et al
    . Computed tomography image quality evaluation of a new iterative reconstruction algorithm in the abdomen (adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V): a comparison with model-based iterative reconstruction, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and filtered back projection reconstructions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2018;42:184–90 doi:10.1097/RCT.0000000000000666 pmid:28806318
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Noda  Y, 
    2. Goshima  S, 
    3. Koyasu  H, et al
    . Renovascular CT: comparison between adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction. Clin Radiol 2017;72:901.e913–19 doi:10.1016/j.crad.2017.06.002 pmid:28673448
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Smith  EA, 
    2. Dillman  JR, 
    3. Goodsitt  MM, et al
    . Model-based iterative reconstruction: effect on patient radiation dose and image quality in pediatric body CT. Radiology 2014;270:526–34 doi:10.1148/radiol.13130362 pmid:24091359
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Taguchi  N, 
    2. Oda  S, 
    3. Imuta  M, et al
    . Model-based iterative reconstruction in low-radiation-dose computed tomography colonography: preoperative assessment in patients with colorectal cancer. Acad Radiol 2018;25:415–22 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2017.10.008 pmid:29191684
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Yasaka  K, 
    2. Katsura  M, 
    3. Akahane  M, et al
    . Model-based iterative reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: dose-reduced CT for detecting pancreatic calcification. Acta Radiol Open 2016;5:205846011662834 doi:10.1177/2058460116628340 pmid:27110389
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Yuki  H, 
    2. Oda  S, 
    3. Utsunomiya  D, et al
    . Clinical impact of model-based type iterative reconstruction with fast reconstruction time on image quality of low-dose screening chest CT. Acta Radiol 2016;57:295–302 doi:10.1177/0284185115575537 pmid:25817455
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. De Crop  A, 
    2. Casselman  J, 
    3. Van Hoof  T, et al
    . Analysis of metal artifact reduction tools for dental hardware in CT scans of the oral cavity: kVp, iterative reconstruction, dual-energy CT, metal artifact reduction software—does it make a difference? Neuroradiology 2015;57:841–49 doi:10.1007/s00234-015-1537-1 pmid:25929982
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Boudabbous  S, 
    2. Arditi  D, 
    3. Paulin  E, et al
    . Model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) for the reduction of metal artifacts on CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;205:380–85 doi:10.2214/AJR.14.13334 pmid:26204291
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Kuya  K, 
    2. Shinohara  Y, 
    3. Kato  A, et al
    . Reduction of metal artifacts due to dental hardware in computed tomography angiography: assessment of the utility of model-based iterative reconstruction. Neuroradiology 2017;59:231–35 doi:10.1007/s00234-017-1811-5 pmid:28255903
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Yasaka  K, 
    2. Kamiya  K, 
    3. Irie  R, et al
    . Metal artefact reduction for patients with metallic dental fillings in helical neck computed tomography: comparison of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D), forward-projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution (FIRST) and AIDR 3D with single-energy metal artefact reduction (SEMAR). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016;45:20160114 doi:10.1259/dmfr.20160114 pmid:27268082
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Li  H, 
    2. Noel  C, 
    3. Chen  H, et al
    . Clinical evaluation of a commercial orthopedic metal artifact reduction tool for CT simulations in radiation therapy. Med Phys 2012;39:7507–17 doi:10.1118/1.4762814 pmid:23231300
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Brook  OR, 
    2. Gourtsoyianni  S, 
    3. Brook  A, et al
    . Spectral CT with metal artifacts reduction software for improvement of tumor visibility in the vicinity of gold fiducial markers. Radiology 2012;263:696–705 doi:10.1148/radiol.12111170 pmid:22416251
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Lell  MM, 
    2. Meyer  E, 
    3. Kuefner  MA, et al
    . Normalized metal artifact reduction in head and neck computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2012;47:415–21 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182532f17 pmid:22659592
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Kidoh  M, 
    2. Nakaura  T, 
    3. Nakamura  S, et al
    . Reduction of dental metallic artefacts in CT: value of a newly developed algorithm for metal artefact reduction (O-MAR). Clin Radiol 2014;69:e11–16 doi:10.1016/j.crad.2013.08.008 pmid:24156796
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Diehn  FE, 
    2. Michalak  GJ, 
    3. DeLone  DR, et al
    . CT dental artifact: comparison of an iterative metal artifact reduction technique with weighted filtered back-projection. Acta Radiol Open 2017;6:205846011774327 doi:10.1177/2058460117743279 pmid:29225924
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Hakim  A, 
    2. Slotboom  J, 
    3. Lieger  O, et al
    . Clinical evaluation of the iterative metal artefact reduction algorithm for post-operative CT examination after maxillofacial surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2017;46:20160355 doi:10.1259/dmfr.20160355 pmid:28112538
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Weiß  J, 
    2. Schabel  C, 
    3. Bongers  M, et al
    . Impact of iterative metal artifact reduction on diagnostic image quality in patients with dental hardware. Acta Radiol 2017;58:279–85 doi:10.1177/0284185116646144 pmid:27166346
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Niehues  SM, 
    2. Vahldiek  JL, 
    3. Tröltzsch  D, et al
    . Impact of single-energy metal artifact reduction on CT image quality in patients with dental hardware. Comput Biol Med 2018;103:161–66 doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.10.023 pmid:30384174
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Lubner  MG, 
    2. Pickhardt  PJ, 
    3. Tang  J, et al
    . Reduced image noise at low-dose multidetector CT of the abdomen with prior image constrained compressed sensing algorithm. Radiology 2011;260:248–56 doi:10.1148/radiol.11101380 pmid:21436086
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Lin  XZ, 
    2. Miao  F, 
    3. Li  JY, et al
    . High-definition CT Gemstone spectral imaging of the brain: initial results of selecting optimal monochromatic image for beam-hardening artifacts and image noise reduction. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2011;35:294–97 doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e3182058d5c
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Wang  Y, 
    2. Qian  B, 
    3. Li  B, et al
    . Metal artifacts reduction using monochromatic images from spectral CT: evaluation of pedicle screws in patients with scoliosis. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:e360–66 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.02.024 pmid:23518146
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Lydiatt  WM, 
    2. Patel  SG, 
    3. O’Sullivan  B, et al
    . Head and neck cancers: major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Cancer Staging Manual. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:122–37 doi:10.3322/caac.21389 pmid:28128848
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Svanholm  H, 
    2. Starklint  H, 
    3. Gundersen  HJ, et al
    . Reproducibility of histomorphologic diagnoses with special reference to the kappa statistic. APMIS 1989;97:689–98 doi:10.1111/j.1699-0463.1989.tb00464.x pmid:2669853
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Blatt  S, 
    2. Ziebart  T, 
    3. Krüger  M, et al
    . Diagnosing oral squamous cell carcinoma: How much imaging do we really need? A review of the current literature. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016;44:538–49 doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2016.02.003 pmid:26976698
    CrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Cha  J, 
    2. Kim  HJ, 
    3. Kim  ST, et al
    . Dual-energy CT with virtual monochromatic images and metal artifact reduction software for reducing metallic dental artifacts. Acta Radiol 2017;58:1312–19 doi:10.1177/0284185117692174 pmid:28273739
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Laukamp  KR, 
    2. Zopfs  D, 
    3. Lennartz  S, et al
    . Metal artifacts in patients with large dental implants and bridges: combination of metal artifact reduction algorithms and virtual monoenergetic images provides an approach to handle even strongest artifacts. Eur Radiol 2019;29:4228–38 doi:10.1007/s00330-018-5928-7 pmid:30649598
    CrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Toso  S, 
    2. Laurent  M, 
    3. Lozeron  ED, et al
    . Iterative algorithms for metal artifact reduction in children with orthopedic prostheses: preliminary results. Pediatr Radiol 2018;48:1884–90 doi:10.1007/s00247-018-4217-6 pmid:30056564
    CrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Wellenberg  RH, 
    2. Boomsma  MF, 
    3. van Osch  JA, et al
    . Computed tomography imaging of a hip prosthesis using iterative model-based reconstruction and orthopaedic metal artefact reduction: a quantitative analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2016;40:971–78 doi:10.1097/RCT.0000000000000449 pmid:27331924
    CrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Neroladaki  A, 
    2. Martin  SP, 
    3. Bagetakos  I, et al
    . Metallic artifact reduction by evaluation of the additional value of iterative reconstruction algorithms in hip prosthesis computed tomography imaging. Medicine 2019;98:e14341 doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000014341 pmid:30732160
    CrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Tsuchida  Y, 
    2. Takahashi  H, 
    3. Watanabe  H, et al
    . Effects of number of metal restorations and mandibular position during computed tomography imaging on accuracy of maxillofacial models. J Prosthodont Res 2019;63:239–44 doi:10.1016/j.jpor.2018.12.006 pmid:30658907
    CrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Motoyama  S, 
    2. Ito  H, 
    3. Sarai  M, et al
    . Ultra-high-resolution computed tomography angiography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis. Circ J 2018;82:1844–51 doi:10.1253/circj.CJ-17-1281 pmid:29743388
    CrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Faber  J, 
    2. Fonseca  LM
    . How sample size influences research outcomes. Dental Press J Orthod 2014;19:27–29 doi:10.1590/2176-9451.19.4.027-029.ebo pmid:25279518
    CrossRefPubMed
  


  
  



  




  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

     Back to top  


  
  



			

		

		
		

			

			  

  
        
In this issue

    
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

  

    

  
      
  
  

    


Advertisement



  



  


  
  



  



  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

	  
  

		

          

            

  
      
  
  

     Print  


  
  



  
      
  
  

     Download PDF  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
 Email Article
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
 Citation Tools
  


  
  



          

        

        
        

          

            



  
      
  
  

    

  

    

  
      
  
  

    

  
  
  
  
      
Diagnostic Value of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction Combined with a Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm during CT of the Oral Cavity
  
    	
Y. Kubo, K. Ito, M. Sone, H. Nagasawa, Y. Onishi, N. Umakoshi, T. Hasegawa, T. Akimoto, M. Kusumoto

  
    	
 American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2020, 41 (11) 2132-2138; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6767 

  
  
  



  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    

  
    
  
  
    
  
  
    
  


  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  


  
  



  



  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
  


  
  



          

        

	
 	
	
	


  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
              Purchase  


  
  



  
        
Jump to section

    
  
  

    
  


  
  



  
      
  
  

    
  


  
  



			

		

	
	
 	
	
	


    

  



  

                
    

      

  

    

  
      
  
  

    


Advertisement